Polls: Society & Politics

Myself included.

I don't like to discuss politics, but i do like the controversy that come with it. Seeing people go at each other throats and shit lol comedy to me 😂😂😂

The poll of over 13,600 people was conducted across Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom from January 1st to March 31st 2018, and reveals continued support in each of the four countries, and individual regions, for reciprocal free movement of citizens.

CANZUK is an idea involving freedom of movement between the above four countries, not for convicted criminals or dole bludgers, but for entrepreneurs, professionals, retirees, students etc. They would be able to live and work in each other's countries, without the requirement to apply for a visa, in effect restoring the rights lost when the UK joined the EU.

There would not be a common government, a common currency or common taxation. What is proposed relates to the rights of citizens only. They might, for example, benefit from the local tuition fees, rather than those charged to third party nationals, and would be entitled to healthcare, if resident in another of the involved countries. Qualifications issued by one country would be recognised as equivalent in the others, without the need to retake basic level professional licences etc.

Would you be in support of this or not?

25 years since this advert first aired, we now live in a different society. It was quite the advert when growing up, but how does it sit in our modern world?

To any one who isn't aware, it was a hugely popular advert in the 90s where at 11.30 the window cleaner who was shirtless would drink a diet coke and all the women in the office would oogle him

pictures are taken from the internet
Ken Herrman's photographic portraits of Bokh wrestling culture inner Mongolia.
https://tacticalbabygear.com/

She might be the first female president and much better than the orange clown

I stopped saying "bless you" when people sneeze because I'm an Atheist and I've had too many people be a dick about it, when I say "bless you" they turn to me and say stupid bullshit like "AH HA!! I caught you!! you do believe in God and only seeking attention and trying to be "edgy""

But I tend to feel a bit of guilt for not saying it, not the depressing type of guilt, it the type of guilt you feel when you don't say please and thank you.

The way I see it, everyone perhaps deserves basic civility but not respect.

Cyprus Gang Rape Scandal

Trump for Life..

Wipe your hands when your done...


https://congress.debateus.org/2019/06/06/a-bill-to-repeal-the-22nd-amendment/

A Bill to Repeal the 22nd Amendment
admin
June 6, 2019

This bill calls for repealing the 22nd amendment in order to let Presidents serve more than two teams, something that has been suggested by Donald Trump. Since this limit is now established in an amendment, such a change would require amending the constitution.

There were not, however, always Presidential term limits.

How the 22nd Amendment came into existence (2019)

In 2009, Thomas Neale from the Congressional Research Service detailed the long debate about presidential term limits at the 1787 Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia. The delegates considered a fixed term for the chief executive among several options. Initial ideas included a three-year or seven-year term of office, limited to one term. When the delegates could not agree on a solution, the question was referred to the Committee on Postponed Matters, which included Gouverneur Morris and James Madison. The Committee devised the Electoral College and a four-year term for the President with no term limits, among other important innovations. Neale says during the state ratification process, doubts from the anti-Federalists were offset by “the near certainty that George Washington would serve as first President under the Constitution.”

These doubts about unlimited presidential terms of office did not fade away after President Washington set the unofficial two-term precedent in 1796. Scholar Stephen W. Stathis explains in a 1990 paper that Congress considered early versions of presidential term limit amendments in 1803 and 1808, and the Senate approved term-limit resolutions in 1824 and 1826, only to be rejected by the House.