Really? Of all the things to be concerned about this election and you are throwing a fit because of locker room banter between two old white guys whom everyone knows are dicks?
Living in Northern California my entire life, I have witnessed more than my fair share of liberal feminist stupidity. From extrapolating "rape culture" out of the swimsuit issue to condemning skyscrapers as phallic symbols of oppression, I have seen it all. Needless to say, I am not easily surprised at the new and innovative ways social liberals find to completely destroy Western civilization as we know it in the name of "tolerance" and "progress." The Bay Area is always one step ahead of the proverbial loop, so what conservatives in other states are only now beginning to experience, we have been dealing with for at least the past decade. Think of us as Ground Zero.
But this one takes the freaking cake...
You mean to tell me that the same "progressive" little Robespierre turds, sons of Alfred Kinsey, and daughters of Margaret Sanger who have effectively destroyed the traditional family unit, sanctioned the systematic slaughter of the unborn in the name of 'choice,' and blackmailed society into accepting the metaphysical absurdity known as same-sex 'marriage' are taking offense? The same social liberals whose entire platform is built upon crossing lines in the sand and promoting a culture of promiscuity are actually complaining about vulgarity and sexually explicit language?
Because if there is one thing I never thought I would see in my lifetime, it would have been liberal feminists taking offense at sexual deviancy. This is something that has blown even me away.
Because women never speak the same way...
And all those evenings after class I heard women laughing about how they were going to "rape" their boyfriends when they got home never happened, and my eyes were mistaken all those times I read words like 'cock,' 'pussy,' and 'dick' in women's magazines, as well as non-consensual language like 'make him your slave' and 'dominate him in bed.'
Yeah right. I call total bullshit on that just as I do the notion of liberal feminists finding anything vulgar or offensive, much less sexual deviancy which carries nigh Sacramental importance within their ideology. You cannot promote promiscuity as a form of 'empowerment' and then be shocked when women are regarded as mere sexual objects. You cannot create a culture of sexual deviancy only to condemn it once a man does it. You cannot act like sluts and then expect for there to NOT be men like Donald Trump. Frankly if you act like sluts, then men are going to treat you as such.
Men like Donald Trump are only engaging in the culture of sexual deviancy that liberal feminists created. For every woman who considers promiscuity a form of 'empowerment,' there is a man like Trump who views them as sexual objects to be conquered.
Maybe if you had not burned your bras in the 1960s and threw yourselves pussy-first like a bunch of prostitutes at losers like Donald Trump, Floyd Mayweather, and the rapper types because you wanted the money, fortune, and fame, none of this would be happening. Is it not ironic that the men who are the most successful with women are in fact those who hold the least respect for them?
Because that is on you, and not men.
Conservatives -- and I mean real conservatives opposed to these emasculated, fuckboy American types -- have long affirmed the importance of the traditional family unit and inevitable dangers of when it is compromised through promiscuity, sexual deviancy, and moral relativism.
You cannot promote an 'anything-goes' culture and then expect for certain things not to go. You cannot build your entire platform upon crossing lines in the sand only to suddenly draw your own at 'consent' and then expect for it to not get crossed.
This is precisely what conservatism warned about. Everything that conservatives like myself cautioned would happen has in fact happened, and you liberal feminists have nobody to blame but yourselves. You chose to burn your bras. You chose the Sexual Revolution. You chose to become sluts and dismiss the timeless wisdom of the past. You traded Aristotle, Aquinas, and God for sexually deviant eugenists like Margaret Sanger and Alfred Kinsey. You revived paganism, and as they say in Arabic, "As you are, so you are ruled." Only a return to Christianity can reverse the rapid downfall that "progressivism" has wrought in the West. But I digress, you liberal feminists are about the most hypocritical and self-righteous bunch of whiners on the face of planet Earth.
Why is it acceptable for women to engage in locker room banter as evident above yet so horrendously wrong when a man does it like Donald Trump? Why is it acceptable for women but not for men? Why is it that when women use sexually explicit language, it is good and 'empowering,' but when men do the same, there is a moral outrage? Why is it that when you want to use the classroom to forcibly indoctrinate my children with your propaganda, I must keep an "open" mind, but when Trump says something that hurts your feelings, it is toxic "hate speech" that further perpetuates the rape culture and must be silenced at all costs? Why is it that when you want to use my tax dollars to fund your promiscuity via birth control and abortion, I must oblige, but when men want to use their own money to fund their promiscuity via prostitution and pornography, it is socially unacceptable?
I will bite....
Because liberal feminists were never truly offended by Trump's sexually explicit language to begin with. Rather, they were offended at the fact that he is a heterosexual male because "progressivism" by its very nature is opposed to everything and anything even remotely normal, since normalcy bears witness to its Creator whom they hate.
It is the same twisted and downright hypocritical ideology that praises a grown ass man like Bruce Jenner for chopping off his penis and wearing a dress because he feels "trapped" in the wrong body yet condemns Tim Tebow for saving his virginity until marriage because they hate the Light itself. It is cultural Marxism, the idea that everything in the world is malleable. That there is no authority or Truth beyond arbitrary human opinion, not even logic, science, and nature itself. That is a criticism against the scientific community as well.
The same bastards who regard themselves as objective pillars of truth were also the first ones to forfeit all credibility for the sake of political correctness the moment the (re)definition of gender, feminism, and homosexuality came along. The scientists should be the ones reminding the world of chromosomes and basic biology, the fact that men and women are sexually dimorphic, that homosexuality is a perversion that serves no Darwinian purpose. But instead they sold out, and lost all academic integrity in my eyes.
Within cultural Marxism, men will always be vilified as the enemy because existence itself is interpreted as a 'struggle' against the perceived authority. The idea that women could do wrong is a metaphysical impossibility within such a narrative. Hence why the hypocrisy of this fiasco flies over the liberal feminist's head.
In other words, it is simply a way for feminists among other social liberals to try and justify their outright hypocrisy and belief that two wrongs make a right. This is why they claim to oppose racism and yet want to hold White people accountable for the past. This is why they refuse to admit that Black people can also be racist. This is why they condemn locker room banter on the part of men like Donald Trump but otherwise turn a blind eye whenever women do it.
Take the Orlando Shooting for example. More evidence that social liberalism is eating its own tail. An adherent of the religion peace slaughters fifty LGBT people and liberals still blame it on white Christian men. Why? Because cultural Marxism admits no basis for Muslims or LGBTs to be in the wrong since political correctness has deemed them an 'oppressed' class of citizens. Rather than admit that forcing LGBTs together with adherents of a religion that is ontologically opposed to their very existence through the sludge of State-enforced conformity was a powder keg waiting to go off, they resort to their favorite scapegoat: the white Christian male.
That is, the only class of citizens that cultural Marxism allows to be deemed wrong. Frankly, this is why academia has done more harm in this country than it has done good, but I digress. As a rule of thumb, any major that begins with "Socio" and/or ends with "Studies" ought to be dismissed and thrown into the trash bin. All it has done is give social liberals a pseudo-intellectual language by which to try and make their utter insanity sound at least somewhat reasonable, like the (re)definition of gender.
Some Final Thoughts...
The very fact alone that of all the real things to be concerned about this #Election2016 you would get all worked up about something as petty and irrelevant as locker room banter is batshit insane. That you would have the audacity to extrapolate rape culture out of it when Hillary literally waged a campaign of victim shaming against the women who accused her husband of rape is beyond preposterous. How about the fact that justice Scalia is dead and the fate of the Supreme Court as we know it rests upon whoever wins this election? Or that the situation in the Middle East has gotten progressively worse and thanks to Syria, we are on the verge of another Cold War with Russia?
Frankly, if the women of this country are stupid enough to elect Hillary Clinton just because Trump said something that hurt their feelings, then I offer no apology on the part of misogyny and sexism in this country. You will have effectively proven that your sex is incapable of logical discourse and should not be allowed to vote to begin with.
So with everything said and done,
Most Helpful Opinions