Do You Think News Editors Should Limit The Coverage Of The Fall From Grace Of The Rich And Famous Because It's Not News Worthy?

[Sunrising]

It seems to me the media goes over the top about reporting court cases of the rich and famous.

Once reported that should be enough, not going on and on boring us to death about the case.

What is your opinion?

A. The news editors are right to give us unlimited coverage of the fall from grace of the rich and famous.

B. The news editors should limit the coverage on the news of the fall from grace of the rich and famous, because it's not news worthy.

C. Something else.

Updates

1 d

Does anyone watch the news on TV?

I just watch the headlines for a few minutes and that's plenty of news for me lol.

[OlderAndWiser]

News editors either pander to the audience, or they try to advance a specific sociopolitical agenda. In this case, most people want to hear about scandal among the elite, and it helps to advance the class warfare mentality of the left.

[NathanDavis]

most people prefer entertainment and gossip... to the news

that's why actual news are gone and replaced by this... people want it

[Paige2006]

It depends on who the perspn is and the details

[Pterodon]

I haven’t witnessed any such thing. You liberals think “that’s my money in your wallet don’t you?”