Guys who date multiple women at the same time are mostly called Womanizers, but what do you call women who also date and have sex with multiple men, a Manizer🤔 ?

[Kelly6]

[Finchie40]

Sluts or whores even though sluts and whores is mainly directed at a females , a man can be a slut and whore as well , It mainly stems down from someone that doesn’t have a heart when it comes to relationships , someone that is selfish that only thinks of themselves , someone that only thinks what is best for them , they do not know how to wear someone else’s shoes before wearing their own , they only see things their way , Most people in general are selfish people that only really think of themselves , when things don’t go their way they immediately latch onto someone else to give them validation for their own selfish actions instead of pointing fingers at themselves first and realizing it’s ok to be wrong. I became a man whore after my ex decided to cheat on me , that I was loyal and faithful to , I went through a period of only caring about myself , my heart was shattered and I felt so lost , I looked at all girls like they were all players , so I played with them as well , not giving myself completely to any of them because my trust for girls’ went out the window during that time to eventually realizing what I was doing was selfish and wrong as well , so the only way love grows between 2 people, is if both people know how to remove selfishness for each other , and learn how to prioritize each other over everyone else , if you can’t do that for your partner , they will not be able to do it for you, and your relationship will more than likely come to an end , and you will more than likely keep continuing having failed relationships if you do not learn how to remove selfishness. Cheating is a selfish act period , if someone can cheat on you , let them go , they do not value you like you value them period. They only value themselves, they do not know how to give the same way they want to receive , they only think what is best for them. I no longer commit to girls’ that do not know how to remove selfishness period it’s just waste of time , So many people cheat these days I blame a lot of it on social media by filling our heads with nonsense , Social media is nonsense

[Lliam]

It's interesting that there aren't pejoratives for "womanizers". Guys who are successful at womanizing are praised. "The dude is a stud."

But the list of pejoratives for women who do the same thing are endless. Sluts, hoes, strumpets, trollops, tarts, and one and on. All the words are associated with prostitution.
Or referring to them as bitches (in heat).
Or vamps? As if women are preying on men. But are men ever referred to as vamps?

Men are forgiven for "sowing their wild oats", but women who engage in a period of wild or irresponsible behavior while young, especially involving many casual sexual relationships are considered to be tainted, used goods, or the equivalent of whores.

There is that one, stupid, oft quoted "study" that says women who have sexual experience are less capable of bonding and more likely to divorce. Is there a study like that about men?

Why aren't women allowed to gain life experience while learning how to select their ideal mate, and have fun while doing so? Are women even obligated to get married and have babies at all, as some people claim? Are they someone else's property?

I'm not talking about the kind of self destructive promiscuity that results from low self esteem or low self respect. But I do think that it's normal and healthy for bright, confident women to enjoy sex and to engage the dating game as much as do men.

I believe in respecting women. What they want to do is their business. But I respect those who embrace their sexuality more than I do those who play by society's rules. They should have their own standards and play by their own rules. And if that means being very selective or preferring not to engage in sex, that's fine, too. It's their choice and they shouldn't be judged or shamed either way.

[Mewzinc]

Thank you for saying this.

[Lliam]

@Mewzinc. :-)

[Kaamraj]

The sexual interests of men and women are diffrent and at times adversarial. It is difficult for men to date multiple women, however the converse is very easy. Women value sucess in a man, and men value purity in a woman. This is true universially across time and cultures and the main reason for that was to ensure paternity.

[Lliam]

@Kaamraj. Not one of my girlfriends was a virgin. Neither was my wife. I think virginity is abnormal except in patriarchal cultures where the woman lives with her parents until she gets married off in her teens.
It is peculiar to certain cultures but the practice is and never has been universal.

[Kaamraj]

@lliam- You are correct in that I should not have used absolutist statement in saying universially across time and cultuers, I rephrase it to almost universially. Because it is only in the recent past that too in the west that female promiscuity has been somewhat accepted. But the world is not exclusively western. If you go to Asia, Africa, and S. America where majority of the population lives then purity is still valued becasue those places are more conservative and men and women are expected to fulfill their gender roles. Yes vast majorty of the world is patriarchial, there may be a few matriarchies (countable on one hand) scattered in isoalted places in the world. But patriarchies are the rule of thumb.

[Lliam]

@Kaamraj.
1) I don't think purity has any value. I celebrate women's liberation.
2) Since when It is difficult for men to date multiple women?
3) Who cares about the barbaric social customs of some cultures when other cultures in the distant past and some who still survive today had more elegant and egalitarian ways of dealing with relationships and sexuality?

Patriarchy - the ownership of women - is nothing to celebrate. And religion is no excuse.

.

[Vegasrunner]

@Lliam Your answer validates the original question. She's literally saying there are negative terms for men who bang multiple women. They are called womanizer. I agree w/ you that women have labels for this behavior as well however there is an obvious reason for this. Besides the fact that the risk is higher for permiscuios women, it way easier for a women to have sex. I would argue men are celebrated for sowing their wild oates because very few men can actually do this. Women can definitely "gain life experience by getting ran through, however that comes w/ the consequences of not being selected by a HV man. I never understand why this is so complicated but look at it like this. If u had a son and his friend bragged about "sowing his wild oates" no matter how much he wanted to there's no guarantee your son can do the same. If you had a daughter who's friend bragged about "gaining sexual experience" your daughter could gain the same experience w/ little to know effort. Do you believe Society rewards things that are difficult or easy?

[Lliam]

@Vegasrunner. You're entitled to your opinions. But they are just opinions. You can rationalize all you want.
Virgin chasers and men who judge women crack me up.

[Vegasrunner]

@Lliam Always easy to rationalize common sense. The virgin part was added by you because subconscious u understand your POV doesn't make sense so you've created an extreme to justify your position.

[Lliam]

@Vegasrunner. "Common sense." LOL That's a good one. Creationists think they are using common sense, too, when they try to rationalize their beliefs.

I've known too many wonderful women to buy into double standards.

I'll stand by my original comment. If you don't get it, I don't care.

[Kaamraj]

1) I don't think purity has any value. I celebrate women's liberation.

You might not think that but most of the world does think that it has a very high value. That is why women outside the west are far more careful to guard their reputation because they know that it's what men are looking for, and not only men, but their families as well.

2) Since when It is difficult for men to date multiple women?

Yes it's very difficult for men to date multiple women, there was a recent survey out lately that a third of men are virgins or have not had sex in a year. Due to social media and dating apps women have become far more selective about whom they date. Dating app data clearly shows that a lion's share of right swipes are being cornered by most women and a tiny fraction of men. So most men are left out of the dating game.

3) Who cares about the barbaric social customs of some cultures when other cultures in the distant past and some who still survive today had more elegant and egalitarian ways of dealing with relationships and sexuality?

I would like to add not some cultures but most cultures, espicially out side the west. Vast majority of Asia and Africa think like this. Does it make them barbaric to certain extent, I dont know, we cannot judge other's cultures. There is nothing egaliterian about sexuality, it's a zero sum game, men and women's sexual strategies are diameterically different and cannot co-exist (marriage) without compromise from both sides, where one side compromises much mroe.

Patriarchy - the ownership of women - is nothing to celebrate. And religion is no excuse.

Nearly all socities across time and geography have been patriarchies, it is what works. Might be there were few obscure matriarchies here and there in isolated tribes but they got conqured and assimilated fast. It is the order of nature, there is nothing that can be done about it.

[Lliam]

@Kaamraj. You're arguing that if most cultures practice slavery and have done so for millennia, then it's human nature and should be accepted.

[Kaamraj]

I was thinking that you would bring that up. The answer is that in terms of slavery the population can be divided into slaves and their sympathesizers, neutral people, and slave owners and their sympathisers. Both parties have absolutely opposite interests. Nature is amoral (not having any morals of its own) both parties will fight politically and if need be kinetally (as the American Civil War) and the party who is superior will get to impose its idealogy. Slavery is for from gone, there are more slaves today then there ever was in human history. My position is that I am uninvolved in any issue until it affects me directly.

[Vegasrunner]

@Gotcha so you're saying we should make things like ladies night and abortion illegal throught the country?

[Lliam]

@Vegasrunner. All I'm saying is that it's normal for girls to want a boyfriend after they pass puberty. And they can have been in several relationships in their life before they get married.

As for abortion, I fully support the option for early term, chemical abortion up to 10 or 11 weeks after the beginning of their last period. Sometimes mistakes happen. There are other circumstances when abortion can make sense, too. But abortion is a whole other issue.

[Mewzinc]

@Lliam @Kaamraj I've been reading what you guys have been talking about. I wanted to say, as a woman, I agree with Lliam more. Kaamraj you can argue all you want about what is culturally accepted, however I'll tell you right now a majority of women from around the world would disagree with you. A lot of women will pass on the kind of guy you are describing and go for a more accepting man with the ideologies like Lliam has. At the end of the day we just want to be treated human.

[Kaamraj]

@ Mewzinc- Have you heard about arranged marriages? They're the default way to get married in most of the world. What is the criterion there for men and women? Sucess and purity respectively for men and women.

Most of the world is very barbaric where men and women are both viewed as commodities. I may not like it but I don't make the rules and nor are they going to change in our lifetimes

[Lliam]

@Kaamraj. Yet there are three kinds of people.
1. Conservative/traditional types who are in favor of the cultural/religious traditions.
2. Those who are afraid to break the rules for fear of severe consequences imposed by family, society or laws.
3. Free thinkers who use their brains to imagine what is best for them and for society, and who say fuck tradition.

I'm the third type. I believe in positive change. That's how society progresses and evolves.
I question authority. I don't care about consensus or tradition.

[Vegasrunner]

@Lliam TY for sharing this but not sure what it has to do w/ the conversation. You said you were against double standards. So I presented 2
1) Ladies Night
2) Abortion
If you are against double standards then that means you don't believe women should receive free entry into public establishments and you believe men should have a say in deciding if a child should be born or not. If you don't you're being dishonest which invalidates your original opinion.

[Lliam]

@Vegasrunner. You can assume whatever you want about me. Golly, you're so clever.
You can also assume that I loathe your medieval values. Now go troll somewhere else.

[Vegasrunner]

@Lliam TY for sharing this but again it seems like we are having separate conversations. Please LMK where I made any assumptions about anything much less you. Seems like a pretty straightforward question, odd that someone who claims to "not buy into double standards" can't answer a question regarding double standards.

[Lliam]

@Vegasrunner. I don't care what assumptions you want to make about my thoughts on lady's nights and abortions. This is a stupid discussion. I choose not to engage with you further.

I think it's hilarious that you were so offended by my original comment that you would spend so much time trying to argue about it. You are sounding like the conservative equivalent of an angry liberal.

Hang tight to your chauvinistic ideology, but spare me attempts to convert me. I think more and more women are wising up, too. That's why guys of your mindset feel increasingly threatened.

[Vegasrunner]

@Lliam If I'm asking your opinion than I'm not making an assumption. However seems like we both understand answering that question would highlight your hypocrisy.
Not sure what you believe I would want to "convert" you to. If anything it's better for me for you to remain as you are, as the more guys like u there are the better it is for the 10% men like myself. You're correct woman are "wising" up that's why they are fighting over men like me while you're still struggling to hold on to one bitch. I've slept w w/ almost 300 woman in my life, how many have you?

[Lliam]

@Vegasrunner. In your very first comment, you said "Women can definitely "gain life experience by getting ran through, however that comes w/ the consequences of not being selected by a HV man."

I assumed that you imagined yourself a HV man. 🤣

Now you brag about sleeping with 300 women as if that's something to brag about. You call women bitches.

I WILL remain as I am. I think the 10% of sluts like you who have no sense of honor are the lowest form of human beings. And you lecture ME about what makes a high value woman. ROFL You make me sick.

[Vegasrunner]

@Lliam Odd how willing u are to spew fallacies yet when asked a simple question you're unable to articulate an answer.
Please explain why a man that has options would settle for a woman that's been ran through. How many partners did your wife have b4 you? You may call it a brag, I simply call it my life. Part of the validation of my point is that no matter how hard you tried you could never accomplish that. (You're going to say you don't want to, however even if you tried you would fail)
Men can't be slots they are shut makers and you are correct only about 10% of men are able to do that which is why the top 10% of men receive attention from about 80% of woman while the other 90% of men like you are left to fight over the leftovers. I never lectured you at all about a HV woman because there is no such thing. A woman's value is tied to the level or man she can retain.

[Lliam]

@Vegasrunner. You just made me feel filthy for ever engaging with you.
You are a soulless creature. Scum on the surface of a cesspool. Bottom 1% of humanity. Sociopath.

[Vegasrunner]

@Lliam I can't control how you feel, that's something you'll have to work on your own best of luck to you.

[Kaamraj]

@Lliam
You are correct in that there are three types of people. Everyone guards their own interests. I am a self made man, I was studying and working when most of my contemporaries were having fun, so I have made a good position for myself in my country (India) and I will not relinquesh the perks that come with it, simply because I have earned it.

Secondly and more importantly, you are an intelligent man. Tell me this, purely concerning sexual dynamics, do you think that men and women can come together while both maximising their strategies or there must be a compromise (more so from one end). And if there is a compromise then would you like to make it?

[VIVANT]

I think it’s actually probably healthier. If people see multiple people at puts less pressure on everyone. Like I always get stuck trying to make sure someone is orient interested bc I don’t want to hurt them by seeing other people. But if I was already ok seeing multiple people then I would not need an answer. They could just take their time. Likewise, for me. I like to take things real slow. If I’m not the only person someone is seeing, it takes the urgency away for them. Course I don’t mean sex. That’s kinda gross to be having sex with multiple at once. I wouldn’t want to date people who have sex that casually.

[Ckckaka]

Yeah, right, so how's that possibly going to work? You date multiple people, sleep only with one of them and you possibly become emotionally-invested in that one, so the rest is basically treated subpar? Or those people take turns in your bed without knowing it? Like this week it's person A, the next week is person B? And is everyone involved fine with that arrangement? I seriously doubt it...

[VIVANT]

@Ckckaka

Hmm yeah I see your concern but that isn’t really a problem from what I can see based on how I’d approach it.

For myself I would not have sex unless I’m in a committed relationship. & if I am casually seeing a few ooo and notice I find I’m @faviring@ someone, I would not want to lead others on so I’d ask that person if they want to be exclusive, if not, I stop seeing them.

When I say dating, I’m really talking about the ‘getting to know you’ stage. Not relationship stage. I’d be upfront about it. To me dating is casual unused you both decide it is not.

I don’t want to get emotionally invested in someone who doesn’t want anything real with me nor, do I want someone invested in me when we barely know each other.

But I wouldn’t be seeing multiple people if I feel seriously about one. And I don’t have sex for a LONG time after seeing someone exclusively, so I’d never be in a position where I’m like having sex with one but not “the rest” lol I do see guys worrying about this & I find it odd they assume that just bc she’s not having sex with you she must be with someone else, what if she’s waiting in general 🤷🏻‍♀️

I’d be seeing one person for a long time before we have sex.

I don’t think there’s anything wrong if people want sex fast, it’s just not for me.

[VIVANT]

Ohhhh I missed the sex part of the question so I was na wrong based on dating nit having sex. No wonder you asked me about that 😂 😊

[Ckckaka]

Hahah OK :) Actually, I totally agree with your approach. Dating is the "getting to know each other" phase. No strong attachment, no sex at this stage. And no leading on, if someone turns out to be more interesting than others, then the exclusitivity talk follows and the rest as you described. I also have the same approach, I don't like to rush things, but I also try to be respectful to others and not string them along just for my entertainment (validity, attention etc.) I expect the same from others, but this is when things get complicated. So many people try to have their cake and eat it :(

[VIVANT]

@Ckckaka

absolutely agree 💯 and yeah people can really suck. But at least it makes it much easier to see the good ones ☺️

[CubsterShura]

I always liked the word maneater lol.

Dating multiple people isn't a bad thing when you're doing it casually especially when you're at the stage of life where you're willing to see the kind of men out there and how you feel about them, what you like etc. I'm happy that I did that myself for everything I learned from it, and I'm happily in a relationship now.

[Kelly6]

Thank you
I also agree that dating multiple is ok and shouldn’t be down graded.
I myself do this very often

[CubsterShura]

Exactly. If you aren't in an exclusive relationship it's no one's business how many people you're seeing. I actually think it's a good thing to see multiple people instead of dating one person casually to avoid catching feelings and getting too emotionally invested.

[Kelly6]

That’s very wise advice
I never thought that

[VIVANT]

Yup I agree 💯 @CubsterShura

[CubsterShura]

Ah what can I really say other than the fact that it really works

[Kelly6]

Strongly agree

[Mewzinc]

I remember dating more than one guy in my early twenties. I felt like a badass and it felt really good. I liked it a lot and it was fun. But when I say dating I mean like just getting to know each other, going on dates but we aren't labeled so he's free to do whatever he wants. Just enjoying each others company.

[CubsterShura]

@Mewzinc yup! It's all fair when you aren't in an exclusive relationship.

[Glyn54]

The whole thing is just a dumb argument. Labels are silly. If a man is dating many women (but not sleeping with them) then he is possibly still trying to work out whether any of them are "the one" for him.
if the man is dating multiple women and sleeping with some or all of them then the previous comment may still apply or he just likes having sex with multiple women. (I like having sex with multiple women - it's good for my self confidence and I like sex)
If a woman is doing any of the two cases above then EXACTLY the same thing applies to her as to him. It doesn't mean anything different.

If either the man or the woman are dating and having sex with multiple partners and all of the partners think that they are in an exclusve relationship with them then that person is using their partners and not being honest with them.

I had a lady who was my friends with benefits (friend with benefits) for many years. We went out maybe once a month or so, had dinner, went to a movie, then went home to my place to have sex. It was GOOD sex. We both KNEW that the other person was seeing other people from time to time (and presumably having sex with them) and we were both OK with it. As it turns out I bumped into her many years after it ended and we had a chat and it turns out that BOTH of us wanted to be in a relationship with the other person but neither of us ever brought it up because BOTH of us thought that the other person just wanted us for the sex (the GOOD sex).

Labels such as "womanizer" are a waste of time and don;t mean a thing.

[Mamaliv]

I do believe there is a difference between being in a relationship (committed to one person) vs dating (getting to know each other and seeing if you click) gonna have to slap a label on it and be clear about what you are looking for otherwise do what you want

[Lokiion]

Most definitely if you tell a women you seeing that you don’t wanna be exclusive she gonna respect you a lot more then if you didn’t make that clear cause at least she can trust you to tell the truth snd she can decided to either stay or leave

[VIVANT]

@Lokiion

Likewise can’t expect people to not see other people when you’re just hanging

[Lokiion]

@VIVANT of course why would you expect someone to be bound to you if you not bound to them it just makes sense

[VIVANT]

@Lokiion

Yup it’s surprising people get judged for common sense stuff lol ☺️

[Lokiion]

@VIVANT you’re an interesting person one of the few people I’ve actually had a decent logical conversation with on this site

[Mamaliv]

I’m in agreement with both of you! It’s very important to lay out what your looking for that way no one’s time is being wasted and no one gets hurt.

[Lokiion]

Exactly but a lot of men and women with a low self esteem try to manipulate and lie sadly this is just how must people are and they so afraid of “what if she/he leaves me” especially for the men that just aren’t good looking or good with talking to women or anybody in that matter it’s very sad to see how weak minded some people are nowadays (lmfao I’m saying this like I’m saying this like I’m an adult who has experience many things in life) anyway I feel like Ik what I’m talking about with this could be wrong that’s why friendly debates and opinion sharing are needed can’t grow or evolve if you only talk to people you agree with

[BigDog1989]

What word is the female equivalant of 'womanizer'? 'Man-eater' has already been mentioned. Others include 'seductress', 'femme-fatale', 'coquette', 'minx', 'wolfess', 'doxy' and 'vamp'. Depending on her age, she could also be a 'Delila', 'Jezebel', 'Cougar' or 'Lolita'.

Girls who wear red lipstick, are most often associated with the "jezebel" word.

[Kelly6]

All because they eat lot of dicks? 🤣🤣

[BigDog1989]

Yeah

[Kelly6]

Hmmm
I like yummy in my tummy 😋

[LaFemmeFatale_1]

For me sex and anything sexual is sacred for someone I love. It’s a part of the package in my mind, love and sex are inseparable. So is unimaginable to have sex and not love.

However, 6 months after break up, I dated 3 guys at the same time. Didn’t have anything sexual with any of them.

[Meropatrick]

Succubus, she will drain all these men emotionally and then leave for the next victim. People who r like that r awful both men and women. Human can't give time and energy and love for many at the same time. Someone is going to be left out of that fiasco

[stepyo99]

Um, excuse me, but womanizer is an oppressive term coined by the matriarchy to shame men who are expressing their sexuality and liberation. Perpetuating these backwards and outdated stereotypes of men in current year only shows how much work we have ahead of us. No (clap) womanizer (clap) shaming! (clap) Reclaim womanizer for the divine masculine. SLAY KING

[Kaamraj]

There are many names for a woman who dates multiple men, and most of them are derogatory. This is because men and women are not equal, their sexual strategies are diametrically different and at times in conflict with each other. Men are valued for their sucess and women, for their purity, this has been true universally across time and cultures. It is very difficult for a man to date a single woman, let alone multiple, and in life you are rewarded for what is difficult not easy.

[Jamie05rhs]

They're called womanizers because they use women. They consume women.
But if a woman does that, is she really using men? I don't think so. I think she's just allowing herself to be used. The men she has sex with couldn't care less. They're enjoying every minute of it.

[VIVANT]

Not necessarily. If he likes her and think she genuinely likes him it’s no different. If a woman has sex with a guy whose using her but she don’t I to him she won’t care either. What makes it users is when people are not upfront about their sims, it’s not the sex. Not very one wants to be used for sex and not everyone wants to be loved in sex. Really depends.

[Jamie05rhs]

@VIVANT I feel like if the guy likes her then he would know, though. Like, if I was in that position, I would be able to tell. For example, if she was trying to have sex with me in the first month. Don't you think that would throw up a big red flag? It would for me, anyway.

[Jamie05rhs]

"sims"?

[VIVANT]

Naaa 😂 not for guys who are ok with sleeping together fast. They can feel like it’s love. Then she can just move on snd he’ll be crushed. Really happens both ways.

[VIVANT]

It won’t happen to you bc you won’t have casual sex but for people who do it’s easy to lie to them on both sides. Or sometimes, the feelings feel real and change. Still ends up hurting. But that can be either gender.

[Jamie05rhs]

@VIVANT Lol then those guys are dumb.

[Jamie05rhs]

"It won’t happen to you bc you won’t have casual sex but for people who do it’s easy to lie to them on both sides."
Yeah, that's kind of the point. That's what I've been saying all along all these years. 🤷

[VIVANT]

Right. And I agree with you 😊 not what I was responding to. I was responding to whether guys can fall in love give up sex then have their heart broken and feel used. It doesn’t jean they didn’t like the sex, but it hurts more for most guys if they actually liked a girl, to have sex & he left, then if they were just dumped without sex.

Just saying the using can go both ways despite what gender roles demand.

[Jamie05rhs]

Oh, I totally agree with that. 100%.

"The using can go both ways." Yes, but the "manizers" are less likely to be successful. Because their reputation gets around, so dudes avoid them.
Whereas womanizers can have a reputation, and many women are actually fully aware of it but just conveniently look the other way.

[fonduegirl]

You can use people. It's not a gender thing.

From your viewpoint, men don't experience heartbreak either. That's very invalidating.

[Jamie05rhs]

@anon1903 I never said that men don't experience heartbreak.

[fonduegirl]

Explain:
"But if a woman does that, is she really using men? I don't think so. I think she's just allowing herself to be used. The men she has sex with couldn't care less. They're enjoying every minute of it"

[Jamie05rhs]

@anon1903 Exactly. Guys who f sluts do it for fun. It's casual entertainment.

[fonduegirl]

Guys are sexist pigs? Oh okay.

[Jamie05rhs]

Indeed they are. We have known this for decades. It's not news.

[fonduegirl]

Most certainly.

[EtherealWriter]

Contrary to what others might say, Dating is not a relationship. A lot of people seem to be confused about the difference. Relationship is when you're committed to the person you were dating. There's no boundaries on dating more than one person unless there is a line drawn from the beginning

[Nikki1989]

Typical how you are talking about men, but men on here turn it around to make it about women.

[Vegasrunner]

@Nikki1989 The question literally ask about women.

[magiusX26]

those are typically called many common names.

sluts
hoes
whores
only fans models
modern women
current fating pool
hussy
tramp
304s
thots
hooker
prostitute

and plenty more

[magiusX26]

*dating not fating

[Guardian45]

304s? What's that?

[Corina_J]

304s? Like "three o' fo'" (times a day?) LMAO 🤣 jk...

[magiusX26]

@guardian45 its slang for hoes think like a calculator turned upside down

[Guardian45]

@Corina_J. That's funny!🤣

[Guardian45]

Ah! 304. Got it!

[Corina_J]

I forgot about the calculator n pager "codes". 304 = hoe. Haaa!!! 🤣🤣

[fonduegirl]

That's not womanizer. That's a cheater, and a douche bag, unless those women know about each other, in which case he's rakish devil probably.

The female equivalent you're looking for is probably maneater.

[Guardian45]

Nope! I think the terminology in use are Cougars, sluts or nymphomaniacs, but in fact, the latter term is really rare. Most guys have NO IDEA what a true nympho is like! I survived one for only 3 months. She completely corrupted me to the Dark Side! God Bless Her!

[loveslongnails]

You made a distinction between men "dating multiple women", but no mention of having sex with multiple women, but the women are definitely having sex with the multiple men they're dating. Was that purposefully done?

[DermalPunch]

I think they call her a whore. Both are promiscuous but for a man this is something to aspire to for some reason. I think both are gross.

[saffoler]

Until you are in a committed relationship there is no expectation of exclusivity. So date as many people as you want. No judgment.

[slatyb]

Dating multiple people is a good strategy for finding a long-termb partner as long as you are not lying about it.

[Subflics]

Fuck no. I'm not paying for a date knowing that woman is going to fuck someone else

[VIVANT]

@Subflics

No Ned to pay for dates when both people just want to get to know each other. I do not understand why anyone wants to be paid for unless they just want to be paid for you know? If you both want to spend time together no one needs to be bought. It’s such an odd convention.

[Subflics]

Most Women have a lot of expectations of not spending anything on the first date. I've so much as have had my date be upset when I mentioned a split bill

[slatyb]

@Subflics Did I say fucking? I said dating.

[Subflics]

I'm usually fucking also

[abc3643]

"Jane, you ignorant slut!"

https://www.youtube.com/embed/x0hUQH53TFs

[abc3643]

Seriously,...
"Slut"

That's what a slut is.

=======
www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/.../slut

Definition of slut noun from the Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary

slut noun
/slʌt/
/slʌt/
(disapproving, offensive)
​an offensive word for a woman who is thought to have many sexual partners

[abc3643]

dictionary.cambridge.org/.../slut

Meaning of slut in English

slut
noun [ C ]
US /slʌt/ UK /slʌt/
slut noun [C] (SEXUALLY ACTIVE WOMAN)
Add to word list
slang disapproving
a woman who has sexual relationships with a lot of men without any emotional involvement

[Berethor]

A man is like a key, a woman is like a lock, men fuck, women get fucked, that how it is.

[CrimsonAngel09]

I thought women like that are simply called hoes.

[Kelly6]

No
Hoe is different that goes both ways

[Bogoboj]

Well it is a variation on men are studs and women are sluts.

Witch is good because men are the chasers and women are the choosers.

[VIVANT]

No one has to chase but everyone must choose.

[Bogoboj]

LoL men HAVE to chase and as he has already chosen to chase her that means he has already chosen!😁

[msc545]

no - they are "assessing their options".

[VIVANT]

👍🏼👍🏼

[hello123456789]

HOES! Or WHORES! You can decide which one.

Men can't be Hoes. Only Women. Listen to Andrew Tate and Kevin Samuels.

[inhua]

womanizers go for every woman he can get

manizers don't exist because women will only go for a select few men

[strateguy632]

womanizer is for many one nighters like barney in series how i met your mother. not for same time that is called "two timer"

[HippieVeganJewslim]

Maniser sounds like a good word. Better than sluts and whores, who don’t seem to date, but rather just have sex.

An even better word for it is polyamorist, except that one can be for any gender.

[RoseySarah]

Wish but often it is just us having a hard time and having our needs met 😔

[humanearth]

I call them fucking lucky.

Someone who can keep multiple partners straight and not fuck it up.

That takes some skill right there

[kuffs]

Unfortunately I think they would be called a whore, hoe, slut, tramp, etc.

[CuriousMufuxka]

Nah just opportunistic sluts. Go ahead and fuck your way to the top, won't earn my respect. Turns out most of the time those same sluts are side chicks.. Taking your man away, than squeezing every ounce of resource before leeching elsewhere.

[Yannishka]

Maybe a siren? That sounds cool and not bad like 'slut' and so on

[Lily_lilac]

Can also be haha… but yeah, as per someone mentioned, it is usually being called whores

[OfMiceandMen]

I like it! The problem is, can we get rid of the double-standard crap?

[XXblack88]

I would think that woman like that is called a slut. I'm not sure those

[MementoMori777]

No they are called a whore, it's mostly that sex part you mentioned

[FreakyBaby87]

Decent people would generally call her a tramp, trailer trash, prostitute, slut, whore.

Unfortunately in western society decent respectable behavior is dying & whores are been respected.

[Dkc123]

They're already called hoes... why give an extra name..😅

[Friendlybro79]

Man-eater like the song lol

[kylee2437]

Omg yes! I forgot about this song lol

[Kelly6]

@kylee2437 now I remember that too

[Friendlybro79]

Miss the 80s

[Friendlybro79]

@kylee2437 it's a great song right lol.

[Mansearching]

Maneater. But differences of opinions call them hoes or whores. I don't. Its called dating unless they getting their train pulled.

[AnusNdaPainus]

Skank

pole jockey

street walker

tramp

etc.

[jammcm]

Good question. We have a ex family member who seems to go after a new husband every 5 years. What would you call her?

[chadbdullah]

well I'd surely call them both men and women who does this sinners

[gothbxtch]

nope, normally women who do that are called much worse

[OddBeMe]

I think those labels have more intent to use women. There is a casual sex community who aren’t “using” anyone.

[Anonymous]

Slut seeing as she can get pregnant from anyone of them and not know who the father is.

[boobliker]

in my twenties I did 5 was the most for over 5 months

[DreamLife7]

It's called normal. Normal people date multiple people until they find the one.

[CubaPirate]

Frowned upon generally. But not by me because I tend not to judge

[Anonymous]

Men cheat worse than women. Watch this at 4 minutes

https://www.youtube.com/embed/AJd0YORYD0U

[MrOracle]

You mean CHADs cheat worse than women, which is true. But the vast majority of men are not Chads. A Chad is a guy who is in the top 5% of men as ranked by the vast majority of women. That mostly means looks, but could also be some combination of celebrity, charisma, or money instead.

There's a huge chasm between Chads and the rest of guys. Chads have girls throwing themselves at him constantly, everywhere they go. The majority of men are invisible to women.

[Kaiser84]

As a girl needs no effort to do that, I’d call her something different

[AmeerX]

I thought they are hotwives or succubus

[YesToLife]

Lol, sorry nope they are not called manizer

[Anonymous]

For the streeeeeeeets!

[summiter]

It sounds about right!

[ohsheeT]

No I think I'm going to call her my hero

[FunkyMonkee]

Those are usually called, whores or sluts.

[gorydetails]

they're sluts.

[Kelly6]

That’s general term used for both

[elizamichale1]

They call us sluts n hoes

[Alex-Snow]

I would love to find one!

[zebronics]

I think She is A Manager!!🌱