Should a Woman Settle for Whatever Man Shows Interest, Yes or No?

[BrownSugar00]

[Anonymous]

No, I don't ever think a woman should settle but I think women and girls these days have inflated egos and thats mostly because of feminism. I know some females will read this and roll their eyes and say, ohh look another angry simp. First of all ladies, I'm a guy in my 30s who's still a virgin and I had opportunities to have sex with different young women throughout the years but I prevented myself from doing so. There were girls in my life who came from broken homes and vulnerable, I talked to them and never took advantage of them. Women and even guys on this website are quick to judge with their insults without truly knowing who the over person is behind the screen/keyboard. But I feel like women always think the grass is greener on the other side and that's not always the case where then women have to feel regret, remorse, hurt, stupid for how many guys she's rejected in her life. I'm not saying a girl who's a doctor and beautiful should settle for a fat guy who's jobless. But women and girls say the want loyalty, someone who takes care of himself, someone who's loyal and authentic. A guy or man can possess all those things but she's still "unsure". Women think based on emotions and it doesn't matter how rich, successful or handsome you are it won't change anything besides her fantasies and that's it, that's not real love ladies, that's fake love so stop fooling yourselves and grow up. I'm tired of women and girls saying guys are immature, women these days as well.

[Saramad_Hill]

Heck no. No one, men, women, or anyone in between should have to 'settle' unless they just want to.
Personally I'd like to see men step back a little on the constant flirting and let the dating market balance itself out. Anyway. Everyone deserves to be satisfied when they enter a relationship. I know that's just a pipe dream, but still. If someone's hitting on you and you're "not feeling it," find a way to safely disengage and continue your search. Some guys are overly zealous in their courting, and it's a shame. Feeling safe and happy are important when it comes to potential mates.

[CubsterShura]

No one should settle for someone less than what they want regardless of gender. It is unfair to both sides. You're being unfair to yourself, and your partner because they also deserve someone who isn't settling by being with them.

Of course, that does not mean that you never open yourself to dating people you never thought you could give a chance if you like them enough, but it should not happen to the extent that you're unhappy with them.

[Monalisa77]

Technically, it may be impossible to find someone who gets your heart racing and for them to like you back just as much. Its unrealistic to expect that to happen, so if you find someone you like a lot but even if you dont have that reaction you should nt refuse to give them a chance just because you might think your settling

[Billlewis]

That's why I've always believed that a woman should keep at least two guys in her life at any given time, to make sure she receives the kind of attention and monetary support she deserves.

[OlderAndWiser]

I think the answer depends on how old she is and how desperate she feels.

[Robocod]

I think we all can agree that a large number of women live under the principle of "first come, first served". Maybe they're in love with a man but, if he doesn't make a move , instead of asking him out they will switch to option B (and C, D, E etc..) because he shown her some interest before option A.

I don't think it's a good method for women, but it's so common that basically it's how life goes.

So my answer is no, they should abandon the "I'm the prize, win me" mentality and choose actively who they want.

[Lionman95]

No but she should be realistic in her expectations that a hot super attractive guy might not be interested in her. I don´t think she should drop off all her expectations in a guy just to be in a relationship but I would say that physical beauty shouldn´t be the reason to date or not date a guy since there are more important criteria.

[TenderFantasy]

But don't looks get you in at least?

[monorprise]

Ultimately yes, you have to accept what you can get.

Unfortunately in the age of social media with all the world's cat-callers able to cat-call upon all women. Women find themselfs believing their own value vastly superior to what it actually is in face of soo many frankly unavailable to them men cheap attention.

This combined with the west's war on men of the last 30+ years in education has led to a dramatic devaluing of men in the eyes of many if not most women.

[Billlewis]

No. If anything, she should have two guys in her life -- one for regular sex and physical intimacy, and the other strictly as a non sexual sugar daddy or pay pig who is only allowed to pay for her dates, keep her home clean and spotless, masturbate at her feet and if he's lucky, possibly lick her clean after she's had sex with her dominant guy.

[sage2021]

No but hell no!
My nextdoor neighbor I had in my apartment building was some creepy old man. He would knock on my door 9:30 at night and tell me he is interested in me. Well, when my boyfriend, my protector moved in with me and the old man tried that, he got a big surprise when a man answered the door and told him to not come here anymore. Now I am here without my protector and I feel afraid fir the first time in my life. I was always told not to let the Boogeyman in.

[Static_In_The_Attic]

In life you should never settle unless you are in a courtroom & when it comes to a relationship or the start of one you should never settle for anything less then the best. On the other side of things if someone is interested in you & you are not already in a relationship giving someone a chance is a wonderful thing.

[IslaTheWitch]

No. She should settle for a guy she likes, and he ticks all the right boxes, and the feeling is mutual. And only if she wants to settle at all.

[caitycat21]

Absolutely not, I’d rather be a single old lady chilling with my cats than settle for a bum 🤷🏽‍♀️

[Nikki1989]

Never do that. There is always a better man around the corner.

[BigDog1989]

No, she shouldn't "settle", if that's what you mean BUT

Don't rub our noses in it when you think you've found someone to "settle" with. It's not cool to do that, when you know full well that, you SETTLED

[Anonymous]

No but I think you have to be realistic as well and pick the best possible partner.

[lanabug]

Nope. Just because he likes you it doesn't mean he's right for you.

[molonski2]

Obviously a big NO , she should never just settle because he makes an advance , but also within reason , and it depends a great deal on who " he " is..

[HiveBee]

She should settle for a good and righteous man. But that is not what women are attracted to and that is why men are angry with women for their preferences.

[Angelo75]

No, but I definitely think that a woman should think also about what she will bring to the table before setting her standards.

And just saying "I bring my charms and beauty" isn't gonna cut it.

[Unit1]

We're still doing this ya know

[blueonblack22]

Ah women rarely settle unless they have very limited options (which is rare). There is usually a much bigger barrier to entry for them.

[HighlyQuestionable]

No, but they should seriously consider any man who makes a real effort. If I am correct, in most cultures people value effort, perhaps not in the U. S. of A.

[smashleyy]

no. better to say “im single” than “im with a loser”