Let's say to you she is the hottest, smartest, funniest, kindest woman. She loves you and respects you. She is healthy, std free, child free, single, knows the language you speak. And she is not a sex worker.
So you will reject her
IF
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News Let's say to you she is the hottest, smartest, funniest, kindest woman. She loves you and respects you. She is healthy, std free, child free, single, knows the language you speak. And she is not a sex worker.
So you will reject her
IF
I don’t think I would. Based on your game here and in the spirit of playing along I suppose there are reasons a woman this ideal would be rejected but it would be petty and ridiculous. For me, maybe tattoos, or face piercings, or just somebody who’s not my type.
To be fair this question is kind of unrealistic. It’s like saying “If you could be a billionaire but could ONLY have the cash in the currency of a different country than you live in, would you reject it?” Yeah. You give any man a woman who meets the criteria you propose, they are taking her unless they are mental.
I don't care if she is a virgin or has a high body count.
Being rich is a plus.
Monogamous and 100% heterosexual are mandatory.
The only thing that might be a deterrent for me is wanting kids. I never had any interest in that responsibility, headache or heartache. But I might be willing to compromise if she was as amazing as you described.
The only thing that would make me reject her for sure (and wasn't on the list) is if she was saving her virginity for marriage or wasn't much into sex. I want a woman who loves and craves sex.
Maybe a guy might reject her because they're just not suited for each other, they don't click in terms of their personalities or they're not compatible?
You could be everything on paper and still not be right for a specific guy, and he will probably reject you. Same with vice versa. I've rejected guys who were amazing on paper and I should like them theoretically but for some reason we just didn't click. We weren't meant to be.
It depends on whose opinion she is smart, hot, etc. If it's her own, the man's opinion may differ. If it's him, there could be a personality trait or something he can't digest on daily basis
Opinion
42Opinion
If she's as good as you see, there would be no reason to reject her. But if I were forced to choose one of the poll options, it would be "unemployed". I prefer independent women, able to take care of themselves.
I would reject her because I am engaged and 100% faithful to my fiancée.
I just wasn't feeling it.😆
I think it's funny that you listed among the choices body count. Because it wouldn't even be possible for a woman to be all those good things and have a high body count. This is WHY men avoid high body count women because it's synonymous with damaged.
Men chose women for two reasons only 1. Attraction (and that can come in many forms) and 2. She's a good person. If she gives him reason to question the 2. He will reject her. Younger men will overlook it. But that's just youth and inexperience.
"Because it wouldn't even be possible for a woman to be all those good things and have a high body count"
EXACTLY
100%
That's what I thought too.
Well don't stress the women with high body counts getting more men. Because I PROMISE you she is not keeping him. He does NOT respect her. You cannot respect somebody that does not even respect themselves.
there are many. the bodycount one is a possibility but so are things like her money and choices (examples of choices being monogamous and wanting kids, or the opposites of those too) one big choice that is an auto nope is if she has or had any sort of onlyfans type of thing ever (which saddly these days seems to be well over half of women, especially in the under 30 age bracket) . if she has a dominant personality type (tries to boss me around) , then its a nope/ she's just somebody i used to know. as others have mentioned, it varies per person as well. somethings i am an immediate no on is a positive to others.
None of the above but the high body count comes closest. She can be all of those things and still not be compatible with me for unexpected reasons. Like perhaps she is all of those things and I reject her because she smokes and hasn't quit (yet).
Why would you include this hypothetical woman being rich as a dealbreaker? That's a bonus to almost any person lol.
Anyway, if a woman was the hottest, smartest, funniest, kindest, and most loyal woman on earth, I can't think of any reason to reject her at all.
I would say because she has a body count. The reason is that I´m a sexual not active guy so her having a high body count I would assume having sex often is important to her. That´s something I´m not interested in due to personal reasons and it seems like an obstacle for a relationship.
If her number of prior sexual partners is high enough for her to refer to it as a "body count" or even if it's not high but she uses the term. I detest it. It shows a lack of respect for both the previous partners and yourself.
That's a red flag. Not the number (although the lower the better) but the term itself.
The assumption is that I'd know or at least suspect that she is all those things, right? Assuming I'm also single at the time, I don't imagine I would reject her for any of those reasons.
It's too bad you didn't include a poll option to see the results, because I'd be curious to know what they are.
" sorry... but I already am with the hottestest, smartestest, funniestest, kindestest and the most loyalest woman "
aside from the body count all the others are awesome qualities maybe straight part too since i would like a fbisexual girl harem me as the only guy.
i also reject because i don't want a relationship.
Insecure men will come up with the weakest of excuses for rejecting a woman. It says more about them than the woman they are rejecting.
So when a man rejects a woman he is insecure? Lol
High body count is the antithesis of the other characteristics you described.
Exactly
I checked body count.
Also, tattoos. Bad boundaries. Piercings.
I don't know. If she is married to my brother? —maaaaaaybe? (I don’t have a brother. So, it’s hard to say.) Why would I reject this woman? I don’t understand.
Sadly, religious differences are an immediate deal-breaker. You won't understand if you are not religious. Other reasons could be: different ambitions or life goals, different views in marriage and married life and children, and low humility and co-operation levels
If she has a high body count, but then she is most likely not loyal and std free.
Let's be realistic first. Who wants to reject a lady like you told? I never reject a lady like this, sorry.
I would reject her for a high body count because it means sexual access to her is very easy and she doesn't keep herself for the most compatible people. My body count is also low (3), so I would expect the same.
High bodycount directly contradicts loyalty, so that would be a deal breaker for me. All the other options are fine, some are even desirable.
@marish01 none of these reason fit me to reject a person
Unemployed Could Be a Big Factor with Guys. xxoo
She wants pets, she doesn't want kids, she smokes or does drugs.
Only the body count. I don't consider the rest as flaws, on the contrary.
None of those reasons. It would likely be because our personalities or interests didn't align.
Maybe if she has different long term goals than him that could be a reason to not be together.
If she was straight and monogamous, I'd turn her down
Well if she was straight I'd be turned down first 🤔
Ok. This question was for men.
Maybe wanting kids since I already did that and the high body count is all I can really say that would deter me
A lot of porn stars/onlyfans or Instagram models fit into that. I am sure not every guy will wanna date that. It depends on the guy she's trying to attract.
A lot of porn stars/onlyfans are the smartest, kindest, hottest women? Lol
Many of the onlyfans creators/escorts are doctors, nurses, or paying student loans. A lot of former sex workers find redemption as they age and try to get an education. Sometimes they grow kinder too. But the past can catch up to anyone.
Because we have another disagreement that is so fundamental it would undercut all the postives
If she is unemployed, uneducated, or has a really high body count - then BYE.
Uh-oh. Why do they lock women in Harems?
My pub pals and I used to have an unofficial rule regarding body counts. Whatever a man says his is, divide it in half. Whatever a woman says hers is, double it.
@LaFemmeFatale_1 To keep them from having access to intact men. Eunuchs were the only men allowed to have contact with these women.
I am not saying this was humane or a good idea!
That’s right. What does that say about men though?
The fact that only Eunuchs were allowed anywhere close to females?
You think it’s women in Harem who were forcefully there exploiting the intact male visitors?
Or the other way around? You sound like women are to be blamed for something that was obviously perpetrated by men.
I'm really not blaming anybody for this except you make a good point about men in this instance. Men in many ways are at the mercy of their biochemistry relative to sexual behavior. Unless you've experienced it yourself, you have no idea how compelling a high level of testosterone can really be. It is literally being under the influence of drug with the only difference being it's a drug you've made yourself internally.
Sounds like a torture,
With all this provided information, It would make far better sense to lock you guys instead of women.
Probably that’s why men start wars, not knowing where to take this energy.
Now imagine, being a woman and half of the population is as insane as you describe.
Being a man shouldn’t be an excuse…
Additionally, considering the number of women with personality disorders that cause them to essentially victimize men, the situation is not much better and so You could also argue that half the population of women need to be locked up as well. Again, I hope that intelligence and a lack of alcohol are mitigating factors although my personal experience suggests otherwise.
Is intelligence a mediating factor, though?
I think, the more intelligent the person is, the better equipped she/he is to mold the situations to make them meet her/his needs.
My guess would be that intelligence might not always be correlated to inhibitory abilities and instead might equip a person with better strategies to maneuver to please oneself.
Alcohol and stupidity are truly exacerbating factors, I totally agree with that. But they are harming themselves more with both, because intelligent people still can do everything that stupid people do, but stupidity raises chances for the stupid to be punished.
So, intelligence is more of an equipment for self-preservation rather than equipment to protect others from your own self.
What I mean is that, I have often thought that men don’t act on their impulses not because they have morals and don’t want to or they wouldn’t act had there been no consequences of their actions, but because they are smart enough to not act on them.
Take the harem as an example, I don’t think the empathy to another human being would stop a man to not go there, instead his carefulness as to how it would end for him.
And thinking of this makes me feel sad sometimes, because it makes me think we are more like animals who have camouflaged themselves as civilized humans.
As for personality disorders, I imagine it’s not only women who might suffer from them, there are also significant numbers of men living with them.
And if the numbers are so high, then - those disorders might be helping these individuals to survive.
Because I wonder why would any of those traits persist to this day and as you say, be part of half of the female population if that doesn’t in some way contribute to the survival or the success of an individual?
So, personality disorders might actually have helped those people suffering with them to survive, however, it makes it a living hell to live with them, I seriously suspect my abusive aunt has APD and NPD. Her daughter, who’s just 19 and is also abusive, is the victim. But it’s hard to think of her as a victim when she is attacking everyone. My aunt thinks she loves her daughter a lot, but in truth, she uses her as a shield to herself and as a weapon to everyone else, I doubt her daughter will contribute anything positive to the society because her mother didn’t raise her in a healthy way.
So, I guess personality disorders might only contribute to the self-preservation of that individual and destruction of everyone else, including their own children.
I don’t think high testosterone is as bad as personality disorders, so I wouldn’t compare them with one another.
But it also has a potential to hurt the other people on the expense of one’s own pleasure.
I know I grew up listening to my brother and grandfathers telling lots of stories like that, they most likely wanted to protect us from those things ever happening to us, which I guess worked, but It also showed us the part of the men, that not many women should know.
That’s probably why my grandmother hid Casanova’s Memoirs from me when I took it out to read at the age of 14. She said, I’d never fall in love with a man, if I read that, she instead, gave it to my brother. 😂
@LaFemmeFatale_1 Not so much an excuse as an explanation... We are not ALL like this but enough of us are that its a problem. You are right that it is largely responsible for wars.
@LaFemmeFatale_1 You are right that intelligence can be a double-edged sword. However, intelligence often favors peace over violence even if it is just a matter of personal welfare.
Perfectly elucidated, thanks.
(I learned a new word)
I voted that a woman who wants kids someday, I'm not her guy
Come on, this was the easiest question ever for men, we don't want a girl who's been ploughed more than the ancient farmlands along the Nile.
Some guys also might believe she is too good to be true.
I'd never reject her for any of those things, some would be a bonus !!!
If she's loyal and loves me, that is sufficient to not reject.
I wouldn't reject her if she's my type of girl.
If she's not mean enough to me.
um personality... or my own issues.
Because he is a pussy
She has ugly fingers and toes
Slept with people I know & cool with
Kidlets. No kiddies for me.,
I wouldn't reject her
Maybe cause I am Happily Married?
None of the above
Risk
If she is risk?
If she’s all those things that means many men are going to pursue her. Thus naturally increasing the probability of her cheating, no, I’m not insecure. I’m just realistic. Every human being has moments where they have to resist the urge or temptation to do something they shouldn’t, men or women are not excused or immune to this.
That being said, yeah, she could be really loyal but what are the chances? Especially given the fact “there is always someone better than you” so what do you think would happen if a man that is better than her man approaches her…. Her loyalty will definitely be tested
If she has good morals she will be loyal
Correct, I agree. But it goes back to the concept of the chances…. Is she truly loyal or is she for a limited time only
If she values monogamy she will feel disgust for sex outside monogamous relationships. That disgust comes naturally.
I agree, and only that is the kind of woman I’d be willing to marry and start a family with
That will be smart of you.
If she has moral values she can't be tempted. She won't even cheat on you in her mind.
Sometimes though that’s very difficult to determine. My last ex said multiple times she would never cheat and also gave the impression I was everything to her and she dropped me like I was nothing when I made the sacrifice to go on a deployment so I could have enough money to afford an engagement ring for her
Atheist
he's taken
You can also add your opinion below!