Isn’t adoption cucking as a man?

[Anonymous]

A man did his thing and left. Now here you adopting a child looking after and giving the best to another man’s genetic legacy.
Pathetic. I understand it’s hard for the child like he or she has been born in unfortunate circumstances.

I agree

I disagree

A total of 23 votes were cast: 10 girls and 13 guys. See detailed results

[Siri137]

Well, I guess some people don't really care about non-issues like "genetic legacies", because they actually care enough about others to do what they believe to be the right thing to do under certain circumstances. So no, that isn't at all "pathetic"; it's actually an example of positive masculinity, and we need more of it.

[Flatmanlewis]

This is the most pathetic opinion I’ve ever heard of. Adoption may be the only thing which allows a small child to even come close to the dream of a loving home and parents who care for them. To spin that unbelievably loving and selfless act into some twisted, insecure, “some man’s penis went someplace I didn’t” mindset is among the most depraved and pathetic things I have ever even heard.

[OtterMan68]

this has to be on the dumbest things ever. Of course not. It's giving a child a chance. It's not like the wife is refusing to have a biological child with her husband but had a baby with another man and forced her husband to adopt it!

[Nikki1989]

Nope.

You sound cold and heartless.

[itsclearlynicholas]

Probs - the same sex couples adopt and there's always a distinction I observer without conclusions of those same sex who adopt couples versus the same sex 0 offspring couples

[itsclearlynicholas]

Or they go the non-adoption way, aka sperm donor / egg donor or carrier ♀️

[Anonymous]

Only if you're weak enough to view cucking as a problem

[Anonymous]

This is confusing the way you put this

[Redstang88]

Nope