Is being a man risky to ‘catch a case’?

[Anonymous]

Jay z, Russel brand, Conor mcgregor, Andrew tate etc….
They’ve all had their names destroyed with no chance of clearing their name. How much of it is even true? It’s all speculative and when you look deeper often it doesn’t even seem plausible.

As a man you can just go about life and who knows you could have people that want to tarnish your name and destroy your life.
It is always men that have it all that are painted as the bad people of the world when they have more access to women than any man 🤔

It’s too risky being a man in 2025

No it’s not

Those men are guilty

[SueShe]

I don't know any of those people you mention. Are they even real people or are they AI generated characters?

If they are real, then there must be proof that they have done something bad or inappropriate such as theft, murder, rape or anything illegal.

If there is proof of their "crimes", then they deserve the reputation they got and they are the only ones to be blamed for it.

It is certainly not riskier to be a man in 2024 than a woman. A woman is more likely to be a victim of those people than the other way round.

[Nikki1989]

Up to your neck in clear evidence is not speculative. Are you triggered because your misogynistic heroes are taking a dive?

[strateguy632]

The me too is a disguise for cruelty.