Should the US sign the Treaty of Rome and then be subject to the International Criminal Court?

[Anonymous]

Supporting the ICC would reinforce the U. S.'s commitment to international law and human rights - if that commitment actually exists, of course.

It may not.

[AI Opinion]

It's a complex issue. Joining the ICC by ratifying the Treaty of Rome could strengthen U. S. support for international law and human rights. However, there are concerns about sovereignty and jurisdiction, which have been pivotal in the U. S.'s hesitation. It's essential to weigh the potential benefits of international cooperation against the desire for maintaining judicial independence and control over national security matters. Such a decision should align with broader national interests and values, considering both diplomatic and legal perspectives.

[exitseven]

No, the last thing we need is to have foreigners sticking their noses into our business.

[Asker]

I see. Well of course we would not want to be held to account for all the war crimes our government commits would we?

[exitseven]

Damn straight

[Asker]

So you think it's perfectly okay for American presidents to be war criminals as long as they don't get caught right?

[exitseven]

its a good thing we do not have anything like that.

[Asker]

Of course we do. Are you blind?

[exitseven]

What has President Trump done that is a war crime?

[Asker]

Bombed a sovereign country (which is an act of war) without congressional approval or oversight.

[exitseven]

Iran cannot be allowed to ha e a nuclear weapon. Trump is the only one with the stones to blow it to hell

[Asker]

Really nobody should have a nuclear weapon because all it will take to destroy the world is someone setting off just one of these things. Because of that happens Everyone else who has one will follow suit.

[exitseven]

I agree but the world's largest terrorist country should understand no circumstances be allowed to hav e one.

[Asker]

The world's largest terrorist country is the United States.

[exitseven]

When was the last time Americans hijacked a plane and flew it into a skyscraper full of civilians?

[Asker]

We don't need to do that ince we spend literally a trillion $ per year of taxpayer money on machines designed to kill people. Trump attacked Iran less than a month ago with such machines. That was an act of terrorism and a war crime.

Your problem is that you only see terrorism when others do it, not when the US does it. The rest of the world does not agree with you at all.

[exitseven]

Iran cannot be allowed to have a nuclear weapon. President Trump acted to protect his country and the whole middle east. Nobody else had the guts to get it done.
Imagine if Iran made a nuke and the network of Iranian terrorists that snuck into the country when Biden opened to border are able to have it blow up the Suoerbowl.

[Asker]

The Iranians HAVE nuclear weapons now. They will not use them unless the US or, more likely, Israel does - your "cannot allow" routine notwithstanding. The Iranians do not follow the orders of the US or Trump.

[exitseven]

That is true, however , if Iran had a nuke they would have used it by now, Their nuclear facility has been destroyed and it will be a few years before they get another one built.

[Asker]

No, their nuclear capability they are not crazy enough to use it yet has not been destroyed. Even the US admits that. If they actually had a nuclear weapon which they do, they are not crazy enough to use it. The Israelis are.

[DonaldDarko]

No, in fact the ICC and other globalist institutions should be disbanded in favor or national sovereignty.

[Asker]

Part of the reason that people do things like crashing airplanes into our buildings and attacking us in various ways has to do with the fact that people like you think war crimes are perfectly fine.

[DonaldDarko]

Most of the reason that happens is those people are in our country to begin with.

[Asker]

No, they were not. Try to remember where the airplanes came from. This just gets

[Asker]

Stupid and tiresome.

[DonaldDarko]

They weren't flown by Americans and the plot originated elsewhere. Unless you want to talk about Lucky Larry and go down that rabbit hole.

[Asker]

So yeah I did originate elsewhere and they were not operated by Americans. You were right about both things. That kind of makes my point doesn't it? Why do you suppose foreigners were so pissed off at the US you think it might have had something to do with all the war crimes we committed with them as the victims?

[Asker]

This stupid system changed it sound like I said

[Asker]

I originated elsewhere. I didn't. I'm from California. I'm a US citizen. I didn't fly those planes obviously or have anything to do with this.

[DonaldDarko]

Exactly, globalist regime change wars started by the global banks that gave us the federal reserve. We need to take our country back and kick these people out.

[Asker]

Oh great! We're back to the global Bank conspiracy stuff.

[DonaldDarko]

Why remain ignorant? Is your ignorance willful? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KyxskH5T-54

[Asker]

No, it's just my aversion to unsupported wild allegations.

[DonaldDarko]

So, naturally you won't even bother to investigate. If it's not the big banking families then who is responsible for these wars?

[Asker]

In the US, it seems to be the "defense" contractors, otherwise called the war industry. Our government pays these people $1 trillion $ of taxpayer money yearly to make war machines that occasionally work and often do not.

[DonaldDarko]

The military industrial complex. They make the weapons , train the soldiers then start a war to burn through all of the soldiers and weapons so they can start all over again. They are in the business of death. It's still all run through the global banks though.

[Asker]

Maybe - but the banks are not the problem.

[DonaldDarko]

Ultimately it's human nature that is the problem. We can detect a sociopath with an MRI machine. Maybe we should scan everyone as a child and keep records. Anyone displaying those characteristics can be barred from public office.

[Asker]

It is not possible to detect a "sociopath" (we actually no longer use that term - try "anti-social personality disorder for correct nomenclature) with an MRI machine. Sociopathy, or ASPD is a clinical diagnosis.

[DonaldDarko]

Yes it is. Of course at this point I'd tend to lean on eastern European standards like Russia rather than the west. We're calling crazy people "nurodivergent" and some want to call pedophiles "minor attracted persons". That's not to mention the normalization of homosexuality , "transgender" and a lot of other asinine play pretend ideas. Clearly our institutions have gone off the rails. We can detect anti social behavior in brain patterns with an MRI machine though. abcnews.go.com/.../story?id=69049419