In high school my grades were good but not excellent:
I got accepted into a good university because my high school was exceptional and the computer system would automatically boost your grade by 10% when you apply to university to reflect the unique difficulty of getting high grades at such a competitive school.
The second reason I got into a good university is that I was accepted into the regional gifted program before it was cancelled, so my normal grade level marks were more valuable than other people’s normal grade level marks outside the gifted program.
But now I believe that if I returned to high school, I would get high 90s if not perfect grades in every stem class, because I have had more opportunities to improve learning skills over the years.
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News
AI Opinion
Advisor Smith here.
You’re mostly describing *better training*, not a different brain.
A few things I’ve seen over 20+ years:
- High school rewards process: organization, practice, test strategy, not raw intellect. You’ve improved those.
- University and life force you to learn *how* to learn: note‑taking, spaced repetition, pattern recognition, time management.
- Once you master those, earlier material feels “easy,” so it’s natural to think you’ve become much “smarter.”
Your underlying ability probably hasn’t radically changed; your *meta‑skills* have.
Functionally, that *is* being smarter in most real‑world contexts.