Do you think sexualization of fictional characters is acceptable as long as the character is of adult age?

Question

Citizenkirk · Accepted Answer

Sexualization by whom? The creator of a fictional character has ABSOLUTE and COMPLETE Godhood, Ownership, Entitlement,

Do you think sexualization of fictional characters is acceptable as long as the character is of adult age?

Decisionmaking Athoritarian Rule, Administrative Determination, Proprietary Ownership, and Final Sayso, on any copyright or parents protected intelectual property, provided that any such determination of said proprietary decision making processes, don't infringe upon the protected copyrights and patent holders rights of other intellectual property, legal contract, or living citizen's constitutionally protected civil rights, and by extension, human beings right too exist, under the conditions of thier established Godhood or national sovereign authority.
I am banned from one website for sexual child abuse, because I refused to change the age of the 15 year old memory of myself, in a forum where it was considered appropriate to share our childhood experiences of swimming naked in school gym classes and being examined bare by female classmates in home economics and female health classes where forced male nudity was appropriate educational policy at the time. The educational authority that required these policies be respected and unquestioned by students who's teachers and school administrators chose to implement them in thier educational curriculum, were not threatened or criticized for using good sound judgment by the standards of the time these memories are from, for being offensively abusive and degrading sexual abusive of minors by today's social conventions and legislative reactionary Dogma. I was, for remembering my age correctly, and not lying about it by changing my age and the circumstances of that memory, to legally compliant specifications of current legal restrictions and social convention. Supposedly, the only thing keeping me out of jail at times was the lack of visual imagery of such events that supposedly violated the established illegalization of sexually inspired visual imagery of minus the age of 18 years of age for which I accommodated that legal no no, by drawing a picture of myself in one of these situations without a shred of clothing at 15 years of age, instructed to assume a most undignified posture, with a smiling female classmate pushing two fingers into my prostate, via my rectal opening, with my genitals dangling a couple inches front of her eyes, submitting a picture taken by a mother of a couple of the students, with instructions on how to find the one with my 15 year old face not pixilated out by my photo imaging software on the internet along thousands of other grandfathered - public domain protected images of kid's, in the same situation.
I dared law enforcement to risk kissy 💋 kissy with my Louisville Slugger and patent attorney's wicked fountain 🖋️ pen justice, to get in my face digitally, or physically, for thier misenterpretation of legal president iether here, in the real world, cool world,

or in the back of thier sick, twisted little minds, where I

will collar them for gross, reality impaired stupidity.💫
I am not the Godking of my childhood memories, merely the custodian of thier truth. If I'm known to put some hurt on living, breathing, law enforcement unprofessionals (Indeed, I am) dumb enough to follow the lead of internet predators of alleged sexual predators or communist, this guy,

and myself, WILL HAVE THE LAST WORD✊⚠️

TheorionMage · Accepted Answer

As an active Graphic Artist, I do NOT believe prevailing hypocritical Society has ANY right to place its limits and strictures upon another human's imaginative fantasy portrayals
Its the 'adult' version of playing with paper dolls... the simplest form is to 'photoshop' One's preferred fantasy companion's visage replacing that of One's fantasy scenario's operant REGARDLESS of fantasized age.

SO LONG AS SAID FANTASY REMAINS ONLY TWO-DIMENSIONAL COSPLAY, no harm is done. Should the imagery be discretely shared as found in the archives of DEVIANTART. COM among consenting adults... it is NOBODY ELSE'S damned business!

NO ONE is 'divinely authorized' to dictate ANY OTHER'S INTERNAL FANTASIES, so long as they REMAIN internalized and NOT acted upon.

Former President Jimmy Carter, himself a 90 yr old Habitat For Humanity Humanitarian and Sunday School Teacher has been publicly quoted as having said:
"I have 'lusted' in mah heart..."
As long as it STAYS there, its NOBODY'S pervue but One's own and One's Deity
to pass judgement upon. PERIOD!

There is a famous quote of the Marquis D' Sade:

"How delightful the pleasures of the Imagination!
In those delectable moments, the whole world is ours;
not a single creature resists us.
The means to every crime is ours, and we employ them all"

Such portrayals harm no living being and may even provide the means
to sublimate and safely release inhibited frustrations says Contemporary Psychotherapy~

Chrissydamusicgirl · Accepted Answer

Sexualization is okay as long as it’s not dehumanizing, or objectifying, and the character can’t a child. The character also has to be three dimensional and not just exist for the sole purpose of being sexualized

Lanadelrey26 · Accepted Answer

Heck yes, why not? I have some big crushes on fictional characters lol I'm a simp for my Lady Dimitrescu

crispycookie · Answer

I can't say it's 100% okay to sexualize especially Disney princesses. In one way I wouldn't want a child to see something like that, on another way I feel like they are sexualizing a child's world. Maybe I'm thinking too much, but I just don't want a child to see something like that.

Belgie · Answer

I don't really care how old the fictional character is. It's fiction.

Are we going to have a branch of the police now, protecting the sexual rights of fictional minors? Does that seem like a sensible use of their limited time and resources?

HarleyQuinnWannabe · Answer

As long as kids can't find it it's fine but the risk of minors seeing porn of their favourite characters is too high. It needs to be password protected

Gustav1 · Answer

Well, the characters were made to look attractive by the studios before they became porn by the community. These characters were sexualized already in the making of them. We might as well question why the studios made them attractive instead of average looking like most people.

Miristheiss · Answer

I don't think it matters. It is fictional... it is a drawn graphic... a cartoon.
It goes to the bigger picture of is porn ok in your relationship or not.
Do girls mind if their guy has a little separate sex life on the side or do you want that just for you.
I'd say cartoons are preferable then live humans filming themselves with strangers for money.
I don't see how anyone can do that... how anyone is a sex worker.

RJJ33666 · Answer

Its fine to sexualize fictional characters, many men and women have a wild imagination and most people find them appealing as well. But it should be made sure that this sexualization of characters should be kept away from kids and shouldn't be made easy to bring attention to as it could badly traumatize those who still have a pure vision of these characters.

hahahmm · Answer

If the target audience is adults it's fine.

Head of a funny case where feminists complained about big breasted anime characters. Seems it's empowerment when a woman dresses like a hooker but if a man draws a 'woman' dressed like that it's bad.

Slartybartfast · Answer

Like Wilma Flintstone?  "I'd do Betty, but I'd be thinking of Wilma... "

Smashingdoozy · Answer

Sexualizing in fan art, whatever that's fine. But not in the actual movies or tv shows, that's plain weird and wrong.

SupremeWarlord · Answer

I believe sexualization of any fictional character of any age is acceptable.

Actually I'm even in favor of the creation of sex dolls resembling children, pedophiles are born that way and can't really force themselves to marry like normal people, in order to solve that I'm in favor of creating sex robots for them. They won't harm any children this way, and will stay sexually fulfilled.

Minamikun · Answer

Sexualization of characters are everywhere and they affect both women and men. You can't just avoid it because it's part from our Sexuality

However, if that character is an adult and he/she isn't from a kids show or whatever (Kids under 13), it's acceptable unless of course you are doing this a lot for something that it's not pornographic or it was made for be sexy or whatever

Saying it in a short answer: No, it isn't
But everything has limits

Pj1981 · Answer

I haven't gotten into it but I don't see why it would be unacceptable. I mean when you look at some of the freaky shit people are into that they find acceptable fictional Characters is quite mild

_SEBZER_ · Answer

Depending on what do you mean in sexualisation. If women character have tits is not sexualisation is reallity. But if you mean erotic dance in cartoon or something like that then i think this is bad.

Colman · Answer

We are all sexual beings. Fantasy is sexual. It makes no sense to asexualize fantasy characters. Sexualized fantasy characters, male as well as female, are 'entertaining'.

Subarugirl · Answer

Sure, its just fiction and animation. There is plenty of cartoon porn out there that is really popular.

Ninjazzed · Answer

Sure, it’s weird but as long as it isn’t pedophilic.

Nikki_02 · Answer

Sure detected for adults. Loony Tunes was never meant for children but the jokes went over their heads.

FinalFantasyBro · Answer

I honestly don't care for the idea of over sexualization but if the story is put on hold to add in sexualization or if they just add in something like fan service in a story that logically doesn't need it then I easily get put off with sexualization.

ToastyOats · Answer

Its a gateway to pedophilia for adults and way for those already pedophiles to groom children into sexual (usually homosexual) behaviour. I would ban it it entirely, you can shove your freedom of speech right up your ass!

iseekpinetrees · Answer

I could care less cartoon porn just makes me laugh not get turned on.

karaspara · Answer

Don't care just don't understand why anyone would want to

Sargentcaptain · Answer

I don't care either way. It's a drawing, they don't have rights.

AllThatSweetJazz · Answer

I don’t really see the problem with it for any character, regardless of “age”. It’s a bunch of rendered polygons. It doesn’t have an age.

Smegskull · Answer

They are fictional characters, I don't think age matters. People sexualise food and furniture too, what is the legal age for a sexualised guarden gnome?

rcljr · Answer

And does the fictional character have valid ID to prove age or is that a delusion too?

IncognitoBandito · Answer

If it's a fictional character I'm not that worried about sexualization or even the age within reason.

insignificant_person · Answer

I don't see there any problem even if the character is not adult.

K-I-S-S · Answer

I mean sure, but why do it? Is it a form of art or porn or etc?

Dchrls78104 · Answer

I think that this shows a desperation that humans have the capacity to rise above.

Yourfriend2021 · Answer

What are they teaching young girls with Monster High dolls?

EssenceOfLight · Answer

I don't judge about others, but I would do that I would ask myself some serious questions.

NightHawk99 · Answer

I just don't like when villains and evil things are sexualized. I find it stupid.

dragoblack · Answer

Its rule 34 adult fanfiction, yes as long as a made up character is made as an adult, it's fine

J9inva · Answer

Since they’re fictional and cartoons it doesn’t matter what age they are.

ChocoBat · Answer

I don't care, I'm in too deep

SooAlone · Answer

Yeah it is if it's in children's cartoons... If it's like a porn i don't mind

notserana · Answer

Sure, it’s still a bit strange though lol

TonyV · Answer

It's a fictional character who cares

LonewolfMeme · Answer

Depends who ends up seeing it.

RasberrySlushPuppy · Answer

It's what happens in real life so whatever

es20490446e · Answer

Who cares about fucking comics?

xb1345 · Answer

Hellllll yeah it's acceptable

dray995 · Answer

Does the name Jessica Rabbit ring a bell?

TallAnon · Answer

I think it's a drawing, so who cares.

Fuentes · Answer

It never bugged me as a kid lol

princeofromance · Answer

Yes!

jjj101010 · Answer

Think plenty of guy liked Jessica rabbit. Lol

Andres77 · Answer

I'm ok with it.

fr44c3iqqs · Answer

Absolutely not

Supernormal · Answer

Yes yes yes and yes

anylolone · Answer

Don't care.

Clarke498 · Answer

Sure

msc545 · Answer

Yes, it's harmless.

look44 · Answer

Yes of course.

Hulk30 · Answer

hell yea

Do you think sexualization of fictional characters is acceptable as long as the character is of adult age?

Most Helpful Opinions

What Girls & Guys Said

Is it wrong to sexualize a fictional character that is underage?

Do you think sexualization of fictional characters is acceptable as long as the character is of adult age?

Most Helpful Opinions

What Girls & Guys Said

Is it wrong to sexualize a fictional character that is underage?

We're glad to see you liked this post.