Would you be willing to basically sacrifice your privacy if it means you're super super-rich?

[Anonymous]

For example, let's say you're an extremely famous celebrity, and you are required by your management to do live streams, and post pictures and videos on social media every single day. People follow you everywhere you go and you can't publicly date (it's in your contract). The upside is you're worth millions of dollars. Would you accept this highly publicized restrictive lifestyle for the money?

[HighlyVolatile]

No, I even worked in Hollywood with celebrities for a while (merely as a lowly VFX TD). I don't envy that lifestyle at all. I'm also ill-suited for it as a type extreme on the openness side of the spectrum.

I've been in trouble with a former company in the post for simply being too friendly with customers on my Facebook page (which was private but they found me through my name) just chatting about my personal life (nothing related to work), and I'm far from a celebrity.

I wouldn't know how to contain myself if I was constantly in the spotlight; I'd be a PR agent's worst nightmare just being all friendly and chatty sharing personal details that smarter people more concerned with reputations shouldn't.

[HighlyVolatile]

* in the past

[HighlyVolatile]

I also never had dreams of becoming rich. I like my lifestyle now which isn't rich but I don't have to worry about affording the bills. That's perfectly fine with me. I don't have any entrepreneurial ambitions and wouldn't really find all that much to do productively with all that money.

[abc3643]

If you are an extremely famous celebrity, then you should be able to have enough money to that for a short time and then instantly retire and disappear.

There are a considerable number of celebrities who have done just that.

THIS:
"you are required by your management "

No, I am not required. I would fire them. THEY WORK FOR ___ME___.

[Aerissa_Jade]

Your basically talking about what happens to most celebrities. They have little to no privacy, I literally get and understand why some guys beat the tar out of the paparazzi's people who get in their face.

Your question reminds me of the Truman show... imagine that being your life, and even if your having sex or whatever it is all live streamed.

I can't say I'd do it, but then again I might, simply because I spend soo much of my time off the grid, no cell service no nothing. It might be a bit hard to live stream in the deep mountains or desert. Thus I'd be like, not my problem... that's your problem, lol.

[whereismyjohnny]

No. I really like my privacy (and I’m private person in general). I never found celebrity life appealing tbh

[IMuser]

You might like this

https://www.youtube.com/embed/3f9U_a94HQs

[BCA6010]

You couldn't pay me enough money to live under a spotlight. It doesn't appeal to me at all.

[Sour-rose]

Naw, that's hell. I don't need mofos be taking pictures of my feet while I'm in the bathroom stall.

[exitseven]

I am thinking that I might do this for the short term then retire with a bundle.

[BeMuse]

Nope.

[Anonymous]

do what makes you happy in life

[Opinion Owner]

I had a question for you.. is this a social media influencer or a famous singer or famous actor/actress? I wasn't sure which famous type you were referring to. also too check with a lawyer and see if you can have your contract renegotiated in some way

[Opinion Owner]

tbh if you have millions the best thing you can do is to invest it for the future when you become old and can't work anymore that way you'll have the income to fall back on. invest it in real estate, 30 year bonds, series ee bonds, series I bonds, 5 year CD's, gold, silver, platinum, stuff that will provide you with an income in the future. just avoid stocks and mutual funds efts options annuities things like that just avoid. and avoid bitcoin Ethereum and cryptocurrencies

[itsalyssaagain]

No..

[clampfan101]

No way.

[Anonymous]

Nope