Would you pay money to see a 20 year old movie starring Britney Spears?

[exitseven]

The movie "Crossroads" starring Britney Spears will be released in theaters in October.

[lightbulb27]

no, not seeing the value. I'd rather watch 9/11 survivor videos, I learned a few things from that.

But who knows, maybe Britney lets up some of her secrets to success?

A girl I knew in HS was just like her, I saw her live... back then.

[Likes2drive]

Not likely, it’s 20 years old, probably stream it for free anyway if I even want to see it

[Daniela1982]

She must really need money since she has never worked a day in her life. 🤮

[exitseven]

This poor kid has been on a hamster wheel since she could walk. I don't think she had an easy life.

[Radiate143]

She hasn't worked a day in her life? What do you do?

[Daniela1982]

@Radiate143 I work for a living. She doesn't. She was on top of the world at one time until she fell on her arse.

[MrOracle]

Britney has plenty you could criticize her for, but not being hard-working ISN'T one of them. You could argue that what she DID with all that work wasn't valuable, and I could hear that argument, but she worked 16 hours a day for most of 2 decades, including a 5-year daily show in Vegas, where she had to dance, sing, do costume changes, etc. If you think that isn't work, I would think you haven't done much work.

Make no mistake: Britney's parents used her and made a fortune from her, and she paid a very heavy price for all that money.

[Daniela1982]

@MrOracle Well that is something I never heard before, that she was a Vegas Show Girl.

[MrOracle]

She headlined her own show for 5 years - and was under conservatorship the whole time, so it was her father who arranged it and controlled her and all the money. She was working 6 days a week. I believe she was under conservatorship for 13 years, and couldn't even go to the grocery store without supervision. She only just got out of that a year ago - her dad had controlled everything she did, more or less since she was a young child working for Disney (who has a horrible reputation for exploiting kids themselves). She was her parents' cash cow.

[Daniela1982]

@MrOracle She was a big girl. She could have gone out on her own instead of marrying Kevin Federline, and some dumb ass on an apparent whim for a grand total of 55 hours. Then she married Sam Asghari who was 29 to Britney's 41. Now they are getting divorced. To make money she sells photos on eBay for $2,000. This woman? is a total loser, although I'm sure she has her admirers. https://youtu.be/ElXi7yDHyWo?si=xXwZg6DBYQgV35Nd

[MrOracle]

You claimed she didn't work a day in her life, but she's worked full time - and often far beyond that - since she was 8 years old. Her childhood was stolen from her by her parents and Disney, along with her mental health. And for 13 years, she barely had pocket money because her dad controlled everything, and paid himself exceedingly well for doing so.

Is she a mess? Absolutely. But to say she didn't work is completely ignorant. Her childhood and the majority of her adult life was run by her father who kept her working to enrich himself.

[Daniela1982]

@MrOracle First of all, there are child labor laws so if she worked at 8 years old for Disney, it wasn't full time. So what jobs did she have since you seem to be in her fan club?

[MrOracle]

I'm not now and have never been a Britney fan, thank you, but I grew up with musicians who had national careers, so I know something of what that takes.

And, yes, there are child labor laws, but they limit hours worked based on the age of the child, and by the time they hit 11, they can work 8 hours a day (with breaks). That was around when Britney was on the Mickey Mouse Club. She was 16 when her first big solo single was released, and that means she was working on that for somewhere around a year prior to its release - many hours in the studio and in promotion, followed by promotion and touring (with a full show of choreographed dancing, as is common for pop singers), and rinse/repeat for roughly 8 years before her "meltdown". She had to perform because she was contractually required to do so and because she had 200+ people on the payroll who would all lose their jobs if she didn't work. Imagine dealing with all that pressure in your teens and early 20s. She had a couple of years off when she had her kids, and then her 5-year Vegas residency sandwiched in between world tours. You characterized her as never working a day in her life. Really?

[Daniela1982]

@MrOracle I stand corrected. Thanks for the info.

[ShesRad80]

i didn't pay to see it the first time, so no

[Jaximus-Lion]

Britney Spears!!!

No hard feelings

[DizzyDesii]

😂😂

[BoopBoopBeep]

I'd have to get the standard hourly rate for my services plus expenses (free concessions) to sit through that garbage.

[Drewtate]

I'd pay money not to see it. There's only one reason for a guy to watch a chick flick.

[exitseven]

hahahahhaa too funny.

[jennifer_bloom]

The movie ad does not look appealing to me so I would probably not view the movie. I don't like country style type of movies, I like movies that take place in cities or on islands or in population dense continents.

[OlderAndWiser]

Probably not, unless my fiancée wanted to see it.

[exitseven]

You must be in love

[OlderAndWiser]

Indeed!

[exitseven]

Or whipped.

[Chayce]

^^ lol

[normalice]

I'd need a plot summary. But I don't have time for movies or entertainments in general, so unless it's something truly extraordinary, no.

[Dinklex3]

No, lol.

I’ve seen that movie like 5 times.

[Mangospacho]

Of course. I would not pay more than $0.99 though. It is basically a cheap knock off of Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants…. but without the pants.

[Lliam]

Hahahahaha!

[sheikalana]

No LOL. You can watch if for free on any dodgy website.

[inhua]

the movie is gonna be about how she's not that innocent

[Anonymous]

I seen the movie when it came out years ago. It was okay but not the best either. However, You can legit find sites where you can watch this for free online. So no I wouldn't pay

[Nikki1989]

I wouldn't waste a dime on anything she has done in her career.

[DizzyDesii]

That movie was honestly bad but i rewatch it every 5 years or so

[Koneko911]

I mean I've seen this movie a decent amount of times lmao. So I'm not paying to go see something I've seen a lot

[RedInnocent68]

Strangely, yes. It would be oddly satisfying, plus Britney is hot.

[Daniela1982]

USED to be hot. 🙄🙄

[RedInnocent68]

Young Britney belting out ‘I love Rock’n’Roll’ is very hot. Things have changed, but even today Britney is not un-hot. Still, I’d rather do it with Madonna 😂

[Daniela1982]

NOT!

[Anonymous]

No. Its basically a TV movie for 13 year olds. Much like the hanna Montana movie

[EmmaMary]

In a single word NO.

[Anonymous]

of course i love britney/
and my loneliness is killing me
something or other still believe,
STILL BELIEVE.
hit me baby one more time

[TrueConfection]

It doesn't look like a movie I'd go see.

[FunkyMonkee]

Not even if it was a porno and she was being ravaged by a bus load of midgets!

[Luopio27]

I saw it and was bored the entire film.
Im just not a BS fan.

[zagor]

No, but more likely so than to pay to see a movie with present-day Britney Spears.

[Jennz6]

No, don’t think so

[Hispanic-Cool-Guy]

Yep. I like Britney Spears.

[havingfun2023]

Yes for sure 😄😊

[AngryCarl2]

I didn't pay to see it when it was new.

[AviatorTom]

Nope

[Fireguy17]

No, not even a new movie with her in it.

[Sparkie460]

No ill pass big time

[smilelots]

no i would not sorry