
Should guys get a vasectomy in their 20's and get it reversed down the road if they decide they want kids?

Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 
Seriously considering it. I don’t want kids and definitely don’t see that changing so no need to reverse it either
Yeah, I know I didn't want to reproduce and when I found out my girlfriend also didn't want to I got one. It took a while to convince my dad to let me (his house, his rules) get one, but since I told him decided to not reproduce >10 years before I had a girlfriend he eventually caved. My mom helped wear him down.
Yes! It helps them to avoid paternity lawsuits and child support.
Opinion
22Opinion
Hell no, that's just dumb. Getting vasectomy costs money, getting a reversal costs money. Rent an apartment with cash and use a fake name, that's free with very little change to your lifestyle.
If you find that you've gone raw while drunk with the wrong women and don't want to take responsibility... then don't, just move to another place under another fake name. It's also patriotic and supporting feminism. Feminism says women can do things as well as men or better, our taxes and economy depends on more children. Giving them the wonderful choice to be single mothers, how can that not be in support of both?
Some heroes don't wear masks.
You give men a bad name
Lololol 🤣🤣🤣
@Apple1996 Not much actually, more so when I was playing the field I'd rent out places with cash in college towns and furnish them from goodwill. It had so much less to do with worrying about knocking a girl up than drama.
Condoms or no condoms, if you're sleeping with one or more women a week some are going to be at their place, some at yours, and a fair number just won't let it go at casual. Even though, you know, you met at a party, slept together and haven't talked much since then besides maybe sleeping together more.
It's easier to pick up and become someone else in a new town, or simply across town, there is birth control, and just buying plan B to keep in your place. I did that and going to the clinic twice a month when I was playing around. There is one here that is free, gives out free condoms, and started giving me free plan B after they started making me see a counselor there.
Your reply doesn’t even make sense. Renting an apartment with cash isn’t free, you’re still paying money.. And love how you encourage men to become dead beat dads and blame it on feminism. Even though men trying to skip out of their parental responsibilities is nothing new and was happening way before feminism. But isn’t that what some guys do these days, blame everything on feminism or use that as an excuse to treat women like shit and then blame them. 🙄
@Brainsbeforebeauty Renting is never free, it's not like it's a secondary place. It's not an encouragement to be a dead-beat dad, but to treat NSA relationships precisely as that.
I wasn't forcing women to be slutty when they slept with me, it was their choice, as it was my choice to cover my ass while sleeping with a lot of women.
How can anyone be a dead beat dad while cycling multiple relationships that don't last more than a month a piece? At most that would be an absent sperm donor. It isn't like they thought the names I gave them was my real name to begin with unless they were incredibly dumb.
Oh so women you slept with were slutty but not yourself? And no strings attached doesn’t mean have unprotected sex and bail if you knock someone up… Wouldn’t it just be easier and more ethical to just buy some damn condoms🤷♀️ So your advice to young men is to lie to women, and it’s not their responsibility if they impregnate someone? Wow okay smh
@Brainsbeforebeauty You're expecting me to feel, what, shame? I didn't want to settle down with any of them, so I covered my ass. Simple and easy. I did and do want to take responsibility with the family I have. There's seriously no issue I see there, any woman willing to have unprotected sex with who is essentially a stranger must be on some form of birth control. Either way I make it a "not me" problem.
Is it an issue because I found a simple solution to cover myself and make it not my problem? Like they say in the lion king, you've got to put your past behind you.
I guess you were too busy watching Lion king and missed sex ed.. ANYONE having sex with a random stranger should protect THEMSELVES by using protection.. but hey so easy for some men to put all the blame on the women or the responsibility… Seeing you apparently don’t get it, sex takes two people, so does getting pregnant so both parties should protect themselves or both souls face the consequences… And shame, you’re literally bragging about giving fake names to women and you what, think that makes you some tough guy? Yeah sure okay🙄
@razelove Your strategy seems clumsy and expensive but I guess it has worked for you so far. The thing is you only have to get caught once and you have a disaster on your hands, and it would not be difficult to find you if someone really wanted to. Did you have license plates on the car you drove? Was it registered to you? Did the owner of the apartment you rented have your real name?
I and go on and on but you get the idea. A vasectomy is cheaper and more reliable than all of this.
@msc545 I agree that it isn't a long term solution. That was when I was younger, and looking to be completely unattached with like-minded individuals who also didn't want attachments.
Some would change their minds, mostly it was to avoid drama, and it isn't anymore expensive than simply renting.
Most places down here take cash and don't look into your rental history or background check anyway. The first place I rented that checked ID was in Vegas for work back in 2019. As far as plates that would be a place to start. It isn't worth it to switch plates to simply trick someone, rather that's something you do with a stolen car to put on a wing and a prayer.
They could, but then we can look at it from these two points.
1.) This could count as genital mutilation if we count circumcision.
2.) Although it is reversible, it isn't guaranteed to work, so you could be going unsee the knife again for nothing
If they want. But it’s best to just not have sex… that will keep the medical bills down and the chance of children down.
Some guys though going to bang
Well. That’s on them if they become a daddy. Sure some people make poor choices some people rob banks too
That doesn't have to be on them if they just get snipped thats the point lol
Well… as others have said sometimes it’s not reversible. It’s best to have morals…. Even being snipped can fail
Even if you're snipped you should still use some kind of birth control just to make sure.
Well. It’s best not to have sex if you’re not ready for kids. I’m not gonna give you the answer you wanna hear so give up
I don't care just having a convo here. Thanks for the comments.
Your welcome
Nah men should just be responsible and have kids in their 20s if they want them. Waiting till later on is not good idea especially if it involves getting a vasectomy reversed that could cause even more issues.
If you think you’d want kids later I would not recommend doing it because it not always reversible. My husband had it reversed and we are VERY lucky it worked.
No. Vasectomies are not easily reversible. Success rates go down with the years and the reversal procedures are expensive…
Don’t count on the reversal being successful. It’s like cutting off a leg and then getting it reattached when you decide to take up running.
I don’t think those are easily reversed, yet I’m still inclined to say yes. When I crunch the numbers of guys who ended up with unwanted children because they hate wearing condoms, and add to that the number of guys who fell for the: “but I’m on the pill line” I think it would be far better to risk never having children as opposed to having ones they aren’t ready for and don’t want now.
Good luck getting a Urologist to do the surgery. Surgically reversing one doesn’t always work.
Most Urologist won’t do it for moral reasons. The chances of one reversing itself are better than surgically.
I agree, in your 20’s you are running around sticking it into anything with 2 tits, a hole, and a heartbeat. You won’t have any sleepless nights wondering if you just got your ankle caught in her trap. Gnawing through your leg wouldn’t be much of an option.
Then if you had managed to find a doctor willing to do it, imagine the look on your pregnant girlfriend’s face when you present to a judge you were sterile long before she claimed you as her baby daddy.
That procedure isn’t meant to be reversed I learned the hard way that if you mess with nature
Nature will fuck you up
Care to elaborate?
@Guardian45 cut the trees down around my house and fucking wood peckers made a nest in my roof
HAHAHAHAHA!!!😳😂🤣🤪🤡
@Guardian45 that’s what happens when you mess with nature you pay 1100 in roof repairs
Nope, it's called having self control and using protection till your ready. You get a vasectomy when your done that period in your life and not interested in any little one's popping up outta nowhere.
It's a really personal decision and one answer doesn't fit all guys. Vasectomies aren't easily reversed. That said, I know at least one guy who has done just that and it worked for him.
Absolutely. There’s no others firm of male birth control
yeah can save on condoms and bs of getting anyone pregnant
Considering that they seem to base their entire life around getting laid, these PUA/RP types sure have a terrible understanding of how to make life choices that will make you attractive to women. Just no.
I think it’s personal choice. But having common sense when having sex is a must- protect your self physically. It’s a no brainer.
Nope. For one, to get a reversal is not covered by any insurance. You have to pay before the procedure. Depends on who you go to it can be $8k to $25k.
You pretty much have no chance of reproducing if the vascetomy lasts past 5 years, and that's if the vas deferens even can reconnect. Vasectomies should be seen as permanent.
You heard this from Rollo, didn't you?
Don't remember where I saw it... could be him.
Or they could use condoms. Vasectomies don't help prevent disease.
No, that makes no sense at all. Things happen…. and can’t always be reversible.
Sounds like a good plan to me. No surprise baby
Vasectomies are meant to be permanent sterilization. The reversals are iffy at best.
No. Condoms are a lot less painful
I understand it's very quick and not that bad
A friend of mine had it and he said it was painful but it didn't take long
Yes, if that's what they want.
Sounds like a good plan for some men.
No, no guy should get a vasectomy
Why not?
Hella dumb
Bad idea
no wtf
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions