Take it from me - at least 3 of the 4 chicks on picture C are taking a non-androgenic anabolic steroid called Anavar (or Oxandrolone).
The girls on picture D are quite small as compared to the girls on picture C (at least in muscle size and definition).
E and F are obvious steroid users.
I am fine with any fit chick, as long as she doesn't take steroids. Not because I don't find her attractive - I find the girls on picture C attractive regardless of their steroid use -, but because I am not comfortable living with a person who uses chemicals to become superhuman. People don't understand how much of a boost a drug like Anavar gives you - it doesn't give you bulging muscles, but the density of muscle fibers, the composition of their whole body changes significantly. Anavar is a dedicated strength steroid without the typical steroid look.
As a man I am used to being the stronger one in a relationship. Additionally I take pride in my achievements in the gym. Dating a woman who is sacrificing her own health to become inhumanly strong, possibly stronger than me, just isn't something I would like to do. It's like fucking the TX from Terminator 3 - I would feel uncomfortable knowing that despite her dainty looks, she is insanely strong, and I would have to take drugs too, to keep up with her. And I am NOT wilking to take drugs.
I like very fit, very athletic women so I voted E.
I think the only scary one is F - and I also find men who use steroids to the stage they become bipedal gorillas rather frightening. I mean, I like War of the Planet of the Apes as much as the next guy, but seeing humans achieve those proportions is rather scary.
I don't see a huge difference between A to D, they all just look like skinny/fit insta models with similar builds.
I have a friend who looks like E, and while I wouldn't say it's the ideal for most women, she pulls it off. She does gymnastics and is just a generally badass girl but still very cute and innocent looking at the same time.
I have abs like the girl in D, a good butt and otherwise not particularly defined muscles. If I wear a shirt I don't look defined at all, which is funny because I can beat some guys in arm wrestling and such. I like being stronger than I look and surprising people with that.
"Some of you are easy to manipulate"... how boring is your life that you get enjoyment out of people mistaking two muscular body types as the same on a forum? Damn
Opinion
101Opinion
aside from F I don't consider the others "muscle mass" at all, they just look ripped and toned to me. F till then is borderline too much, but what I really can't see myself living with is these...
Or even theses
I used to not have abs but have the “ab crack” so I didn’t have a proper 6 pack or 8 pack or any sort of “pack” but you could tell I was fit. I liked this because the slight show of abs looked nice with my skin tone (sun kissed) but I lost that when I took a break from boxing to focus on work and become just a flat stomach which I hated because I have kinds big boobs which I hated too so I just hated my body. I’ve now started doing boxing again and got that tone back so I’m really happy. So I’d have to say I like abs but I feel like if I had too much it wouldn’t suit me which I know sounds weird. Other Girls can do what they want I’m just saying on me.
A and B are what you call little? I don't find this poll fair enough because many women would still kill to have as much muscle as the woman in A does. Yeah she looks more lean and toned but that's still not as much muscle as many women have.
Unless you are only talking about fitness models or whatever, that is.
Lol at all the anguish about poll pictures - c'mon people!
I voted E, because I'm attracted to a high level of muscle and strength on a woman. If she could look like F without the steroids, I'd probably vote F. I just don't like when they go extreme and slowly turn their feminine features into male ones: face/voice etc. In contrast, making your muscles bigger is NOT turning your female features into male ones, it's just getting fit and strong. Muscles are gender neutral in my opinion.
D and E are my favorites. The girl I like right now is E, but I know athletes that are D and it is fucking attractive, mostly because of the discipline it takes to get there. It helps that I also am really into exercise, so I'm not threatened by a girl that is muscular too. A, B, and C are fine too though.
I mean I'm going to be honest- right now I fall between a B and C (they both look the same!), but am working to get a body that is D (Some definition and strength) because I like the defined, toned look and how good I feel having a muscular, yet still feminine body.
Yeah I know, it's a turnoff for most guys for females to have muscle but it's my body, not theirs; I'm not trying to impress anyone but myself, haha.
F is out of question.
E, don't think it would be that much of a problem, but the two examples seem to not attract me.
anything below E, I'm ok with it. Even skinny girls. without any kind of muscle, but with healthy looking bodies.
There's this one that is the definition of skinny, but that's her natural body, she's not starving herself, by contrary and let me tell you, she has something.
Wouldn't mind dating or more :)
Your options are not balanced. "A little" is actually very defined on the girl with abs.
I was with a woman who spent more time on her body/futness that being present with family. That is a MAJOR turnoff and she had muscle but not even your "a little" category
From B to D, E can look sexy too. As long as they're not too defined and have enough body fat % to still look feminine. Too much arm muscles, shoulders, thighs etc are masculine so definitely not fan. Love toned abs but not too defined six pack.
I like and prefer fit girls. So somewhere C is just fine.
It's unnecessary for a woman in the US to use steroids and become incredibly strong because our women are not really allowed to work heavy labor. During a joint interview I was in the employer openly discriminated the girl I was with. She's a larger girl. Tall with a sturdy frame.
C and D are the hottest for both their face and body sculpture. C wins by a little, but I don't think there is a big difference between a, b, c and d in terms of body. E looks like a girl on a man's body and F looks like a fullout man with a transexual face. I definitely don't swing that way.
Max. these are kinda my dream bodies
This one thing popped in my head😂😂.
I can't get any of those hotties unless I become filthy rich 😂and if I do become filthy rich I still would look for personality more.😊
You can find anybody attractive. There is no fixed defination for 'beauty'.
It all depends on the eyes of the beholder.😊
I 'd rather talk about minimal level of muscle size and definition.
The thing is that a girl I'm dating doesn't have any muscle definition at all. She has a great body, would be 10/10, except it's completely flabby. Flabby butt, flabby thighs, flabby belly, flabby upper arms.
When I see her naked i just want our next date to be at the gym. Work out, girl!
No and yes is my opinion.
Personally, when she a six-pack, I feel it's a little too much.
Though some girls can still look feminine and have a six-pack, so it probably just depends on the girl.
I believe a bit of muscle is healthy for everyone. Men have a wide variety of tastes as noticed in this pole. My guy likes a toned woman. I am a D upperbody E lower body Just as he like his women :)
not really into the thick ass muscular thighs for anybody. I like A, B, and D in terms of pictures. But A-D for definition. E is only too , but she's gonna be no fun to live with. Always eating healthy, working out like 1 hour a day.
I don't really care as long as she has wide hips, small waist, big ass, thick thighs, and abs with no more definition than, well... A, B, or C (they're all pretty much the same).
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions