Do you agree for the most part generally speaking looks being subjective has always been a myth?

[Ryan210000]

I say for the most part because most people always agreed with what people they find attractive. Most people always found megan fox, Marilyn monroe, etc good looking.

[normalice]

Fourth years ago when everyone's diets resulted in basically the same fit body shape, no. Suble differences in bone structure and skin tones were the only real differences and those were entirely subjective. But with high fructose corn syrup in everything body shapes have occupied a wide breadth of possibilities that were once beyond imagining along with a million ways people are sold to mitigate it. However, that same fit look is still the most desirable, overall, so a lot of the subjectivity has been removed.

[Ryan210000]

Am I a hypocrite for not wanting to romantically get involved with a woman under the 3 looks scale and super fat cause kissing her on the lips and having sex with her would disgust me?

[normalice]

If you are also "under a 3," yes. That would fit the definition of a hypocrite.

[Anonymous]

It tends to be subjective across race or culturally. What an Italian likes isn't necessarily what and American likes or what an African likes. They've done studies on this and compiled the best looking digital person as compiled by this country or that country and some of it is very different. I think we all agree on things like, someone having a face with like genetic abnormalities or the unfortunate affects of being in a fire, are things we don't tend to find attractive, and some would even be killed for having in some areas, but no, no such thing as universal beauty.

[Anonymous]

No, I believe it’s subjective. There are some features which are commonly thought of as attractive (clear skin, white teeth and symmetrical features) and unattractive (acne, pores, black head, cellulite) but I still think it’s subjective. I have never understood what people found pretty about Bella Hadid. I never found her pretty for example both before and after plastic surgery.
Some women who better fit my personal taste in looks would be somebody like Monica Bellucci, Ana De Armas, Abbey Lee Kershaw or Alyssa Milano.

[V_Injector]

Looks matter.

People play it down because they're virtue signaling... especially women.

But a woman makes rules for the below par, and breaks rules for the above par. They say such and such don't matter, but their actions don't match their words. Virtue signaling - "Look at me, I'm so virtuous."

They did a study on it in the military because of our eval system for advancement. Looks gets you advanced faster... fact.

[Siri137]

No, that's not the case at all. Would anyone say that the 'Elephant Man' was attractive? Would anyone disagree with the proposition that a face that is symmetrical, has clear healthy skin, and no other obvious physical aberrations is at least not ugly, if not pleasant to look at? Why do babies stare at attractive people (this has been demonstrated to be true via research)?

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn6355-babies-prefer-to-gaze-upon-beautiful-faces/

[Ryan210000]

I am saying what you are saying. Read again.

[DarkLegacy]

None of these science research are true or even real. I have know children to stare at someone out of curiosity, babies lack the ability to be attracted to someone because they have not reached puberty. That has to be one of the most ridiculous things I've come across. Trust a millennial woman to believe it.

[Siri137]

@DarkLegacy You're someone who obviously has comprehension issues, or maybe you just can't read.
You claim that babies lack the ability to be attracted to someone because they haven't reached puberty. Oh boy, you silly goose. I wasn't talking about SEXUAL attraction you know. There are OTHER forms of attraction, like being drawn to someone with a pleasant personality, or admiring the appearance of someone who knows how to look after him/herself, or thinking that scenery is lovely.
Trust a millennial man to not understand the complexities and nuances of attraction.

[DarkLegacy]

Trust a millennial woman to obsessed over physical appearance in men. Been brainwashed by crappy TV and the feminists.

[Siri137]

@DarkLegacy I'm not though. And I'm not a feminist either, and I don't watch much TV at all, but I am right about you though. I didn't mean sexual attraction, nor did I imply it, and that's pretty clear to anyone with even half a brain.

[DarkLegacy]

You are a millennial

[Siri137]

@DarkLegacy So are you. What's your point here? That all "millennials" are exactly the same? Is your mind really so one-dimensional?

[Smashingdoozy]

No... It's subjective. Collectively as a society we agree on what is and isn't attractive, yes absolutely. Most people can agree that Megan Fox is attractive. But it's quite different when you're talking about public figures/ famous people because they have that advantage. When you're talking about your average person it is completely subjective. I think it has something to do with potentially having a shot with that person.

[Ryan210000]

Your wrong because Danny Devito is ugly by general concepción regardless if he is famous or not. Or do you think most people think he is hot just because he is famous. Lmao

[Ryan210000]

I think he is average but I can tell most people think he is ugly.

[Smashingdoozy]

Attraction is both subjective and objective. It's like a scale, certain attributes and the level of them attract different people.

Simple attractions are things like being attracted to brown hair over red hair, or blue eyes over brown eyes. Those are subjective.

Face symmetry would be objective as humans in general are more attracted to symmetrical things

[Ryan210000]

Have you argued with anyone how an obvious ugly by general concepción person is ugly by the general concepción yet they think just because they think that person is hot or average they think most other people would agree or all other people would agree? It is like someone thinking Mike Tyson or Seal is hot and thats fine but if they are any age from 12 and above they should know most people don't agree.

[Smashingdoozy]

That's subjective...

[Ryan210000]

Generally speaking it isn't. If you think most people think Mike Tyson or Seal are good looking or average you are delusional. Some might but I like at said people should know by age 12 always what most people find attractive. Quit playing games.

[Smashingdoozy]

You've just explained subjective... Some people might find them attractive some might not. That's subjective.

[Ryan210000]

Yes but there has always been people that MOST people find good looking, ugly, or average. For example most people always never found 300 pound people to be sexy although some people do. If some people get surprised or most that others dont agree with them and they are 12 or above than that is silly. Do you agree and get me?

[Smashingdoozy]

Yes hence why I said it's both subjective and objective

[Ryan210000]

Am I a hypocrite for not wanting to get romantically involved with a woman that is under the 3 look scale due to kissing her on the lips would disgust me and having sex with her. Same with a woman that is really fat.

[Ryan210000]

? ? ?

[Smashingdoozy]

What?

[Ryan210000]

Read my message starting with if Im a hypocrite.

[Smashingdoozy]

Not seeing the correlation here

[Ryan210000]

What do you mean?

[Smashingdoozy]

Why are you asking that when it has nothing to do with the question you posted

[patois]

Every single race finds their own race most attractive, thus why interracial marriage is uncommon all around the world. Nobody agrees on what is attractive.

[patois]

People nit pick over every minor detail. One person like one thing and another person doesn't.

[4ngelic]

agree though there's still some level of subjectiveness. like culture by culture the ideal body type, lips shape, eye shape, skin color, etc differs. also some people have different preferences

[slatyb]

Yes, you although there are some differences in preferences, we mostly after on what is and is not attractive. Basically appearing healthy is attractive.

[sheikalana]

Looks are not subjective at all. Looks are as important as personality. Having a relationship with someone you're not attracted to has less chances to work.

[Miristheiss]

Do a degree. There is always nuance but overall most people agree on who is attractive and who isn't.

[nawtee_me]

Not at all, what looks good to one person may not look good to another. I prefer small boobs and others prefer larger ones. I prefer green eyes while others prefer blue or brown…. So yes beauty is in the eyes of the beholder…?

[Anonymous]

Lol. You're literally describing subjectivity. Unless every human on earth agrees on who is attractive and who isn't then it is subjective. It's that simple.

[Anonymous]

Most people?

I don't know about you, but I don't know “most people.”

[Anonymous]

I feel skarlit knight attractive... but couldn't find her these days... missing her?

[LiamJHayden]

2+2=4 is objective. Looks are subjective.

[jahaims]

Nope

[In_Trance]

Yeah