Hi. It’s me. You know the drill. I’m making fun of stupid shit on G@G.
There’s an influx of dudes on here who adamantly believe that because a woman is unwilling to have sex with a man (or want to have sex with a man) upon immediately meeting him, it implies we have no attraction towards males.
You heard me correctly. If you won’t fuck a guy the second you meet him, you’re not actually attracted to men. You have to be in the fullest state of sexual arousal, panties wet and stifling moans to make these guys believe it lol.
News flash: attraction isn’t strictly limited to wanting to fuck. There’s many forms of attraction, and not all of them leave your pussy tingling with the need to hop on a guy’s cock.
Sorry to burst thine bubble, poor, sheltered anonymous.
First things first
If you regard studies based on DATING SITE STATISTICS … you’re an IDIOT.
I used statistics and the subsequent math related to it to add validity to stories all the time. What people don’t understand is that just because a study says something, doesn’t mean it is wholly and universally true.
1) Look at the core group. If it’s women on tinder, that’s not an accurate representation of what women in social setting actually feel. People online blow up their egos because they get messages from hundreds of men and have more options than they would if they had to rely on actually meeting someone online.
2) How many people are actually involved? If it’s a small study of 50 to even 100 people, that’s too small of a group to say their findings are definite. That’s basic logic.
3) Studies are not inherently concrete facts. If you have ever read a study, you’ll noticed most of them say…
“This study SUGGESTS…”
Do you know why they say that? Because saying the study PROVES all women feel x, y, or z, would be FALSE. Isolated groups of women can’t represent all women with different experiences and cultures. So, no, your tinder study doesn’t make you correct.
Secondly
You can find someone sexually attractive … without wanting to the fuck them.
Yep, it’s true. For example: I find Kenta Sakurai EXTREMELY sexually attractive. I could even get off fantasizing about him.
But if you plopped him right in front of me, even if I was single, I STILL wouldn’t fuck him.
Why? Because I, like many women, were raised with a sexual moral code that tells us it’s not appropriate. We have to be selective, choose a strong and ideal partner in all areas than physical, and avoid being sexually immoral. Because that would make us “easy sluts” who aren’t “girlfriend or wife material.”
We also don’t randomly hop on dick because we can’t trust everyone we meet regardless of how hot they are. Whether women want to admit it or not; we are the physically weaker sex. If we retract consent, men could overpower and hurt us. Sorry if that kills the mood a little.
Lastly!
Women aren’t men. You can’t demand a woman be aroused by people the same way a man does, because she’s not a fucking man. Just because we feel visual arousal doesn’t mean we don’t also crave mental arousal. It’s true, men are more visual than us, but it doesn’t imply we are incapable of visual stimulation. Many of us just require MORE than that to have our arousal peaked to it’s maximum capacity.
If that offends you, start fucking men. It isn’t anyone’s fault that you’re so insecure that you have to come up with convoluted ideas that women aren’t attracted to men just because you can’t get a girl to sleep with you.
Get over yourself.
That is all.
~ Love Jane.
Most Helpful Opinions