What do you think about Briffault's Law?

[Anonymous]

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/machiavellians-gulling-the-rubes/201610/briffaults-law-women-rule

“the female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place.”

-Even though a woman has accrued past benefits from her relationship with a man, this is no guarantee of her continuing the relationship with him. (Translation: What have you done for me lately?)
-If a woman promises a man to continue her relationship with him in the future in exchange for a benefit received from him today, her promise becomes null and void as soon as the benefit is rendered. (“I will gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today.“)
-A man’s promise of a future benefit has limited ability to secure a continuing relationship with a woman, and his promise carries weight with her only to the extent that the woman’s wait for the benefit is short and to the extent that she trusts him to keep his promise.

I believe it

I don't believe it

[Anonymous]

stating that this is a 'law' gives it more credibility than it deserves. A good relationship between man and woman far transcends the quid pro quo transaction described above. A good relationship also involves trust and duty and honor. and committment. It even involves, dare I say, love.
My grandparents, who have been married for 62 years, would read this and just scratch their heads at how stupid some people can be when trying to explain the mystery of what happens between men and women.