Girl's Behavior 
Guy's Behavior 
Flirting 
Dating 
Relationships 
Fashion & Beauty 
Health & Fitness 
Marriage & Weddings 
Shopping & Gifts 
Technology & Internet 
Break Up & Divorce 
Education & Career 
Entertainment & Arts 
Family & Friends 
Food & Beverage 
Hobbies & Leisure 
Other 
Religion & Spirituality 
Society & Politics 
Sports 
Travel 
Trending & News 
So like why? What makes 30 so unattractive for her?
Why is a woman degraded for being 30 and over? What makes 30 so unattractive for her?
Anonymous
(30-35) 
What is your opinion?
Add Opinion
Superb Opinion
Her looks drop, most good men (and women) are married by then, and she's down to her last few eggs. I mean, think about it. 100-200 years ago, most people basically died by age 40. I prefer women 23 to 30, but would date a SENSIBLE women that was 31 to 35. But there's just something about me that cringes at a woman that's 35 and older. Basically, the best way I can describe it is, a woman's 35 is like a man's 55. A woman who's 40 is like a male 60. I just think, "Okay, so your kids are now in the 8th grade or so, right? Maybe just started high school?"
Not to mention, men in their 20s are usually still immature and don't, as women put it, "have their sh*t together" yet. I didn't even have a half-decent paying job myself until three years ago and I'm 34 and have a Masters. I'm not even going to get into the whole thottery women often do, to where by the time they mature and stop being hoes around age 29 to 30, they've "hit the wall."
To me, a woman 35 and older just feels old as f*ck. Especially white women. Salma Hayek is a vampire woman. But most women don't have her genetics. Not to mention, many, MANY women nowadays are just bitter cunt. Not saying you have to be happy in this Clown World we're living in. But I'm talking about Feminists and Karens. And by 30, they look like absolute sh*t. Frowning all the time and constantly being angry with a telephone pole up your ass will age you like that. Brie Larson is three years younger than me and she looks like she's in her 40s. She, as a white woman, looks like a black or Hispanic woman's mid 40s, like 43 or 44. While Salma Hayek looks like she's 40. Brie probably has more money than Hayek, too.
So yeah. Women's beauty peaks at 23, and mentally, they're at their best by age 29. Men tend to peak at 35 to 40, at least, and are mentally at their best at that age. Thus, older women are less attractive, and younger men are less attractive.
Salma Hayek looks like she's 40 at age 55. Definitely MILF of the Century. 
Brie Larson looks like she's 43 at age 31. Being a bitter cunt will do that to your looks. 
This is 30, ladies. 321 Reply- +1 y
Women don't lose all there eggs by 30, if they did I wouldn't be having such a hard time finding a sterile woman (I don't want kids).
Women in their 40s and 50s have kids all the time.
Also aging is largely do to bad habits, poisons, pollutants, injuries, and diseases, very few people age from genetics alone. - +1 y
@TheSpaceGnome
I know. It's an exaggeration. But most women DO lose their eggs by their early to mid 40s, though. Hence, why people make the exaggeration to begin with. - +1 y
I wish it wasn't, If they lost them at 30 I'd be a happy man lol
- +1 y
The whole dead by 40's thing is a myth, life expectancy was lower because of high infant mortality, but if somebody lived to be five, they would probably live to their fifties or sixties. Anyway the whole entitled Karen thing is really just liberals trying to distract the world from the things that really matter. Anyway in the old days most women were married before they were 18 would you say that their looks drop before then? It is all just us men trying to convince ourselves that we are the fairer sex.
- +1 y
@TheSpaceGnome exactly. The absurd cultural narratives around this are ridiculously sexist. The average age of women running out of eggs is 52 years old. Interestingly, sperm count and quality decreases rapidly for men in ways they seem not to realize. It will take around five times longer for a 45 year old man to get a woman pregnant, than it will take a 25 year old man to get the same woman pregnant - because his potency declines.
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO I would say it's not sexist.
People usually think it's age 30 because thats what they were told, and people typically don't bring up sperm quality because in general offspring quality in not talked about much in society.
When talking about running out of eggs, people typically are refering to whether or not the person is now sterile/infertile. Usually this is brought up because of not wanting kids, or wanting to have kids before no eggs are left. For example I want a sterile wife, and my friend needed an egg donor to have her kid.
Men's sperm quality can and does decline yes, but they will still fertilize an egg, and only 1 of of the approx 75 million sperm he squirts out each time has to be of good quality, because the highest quality one is going to reach the egg first.
In contrast, the number of eggs released during ovulation is usually 1 or 2 (the majority is dumped during periods) and when it goes up higher, the chances each embryo will survive next to it's siblings goes down, so mass competition to ensure quality control isn't a thing for eggs.
- +1 y
@TheSpaceGnome no, it's totally sexist. And actually, only one egg is released during ovulation in a healthy woman per month. Very occasionally, there may be more than one egg released, which is a biological fluke that has nothing to do with fertility. Women don't run out of eggs until menopause - the average age of menopause is 52. And I'm not sure why you seek to downplay the fact that a man who is 25 is going to be five times as likely in any given occasion to impregnate the same woman, as a man who is 45 trying to impregnate the same woman. That is due to his declining potency with age.
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO
"no, it's totally sexist."
No, it isn't, sexism is prejudice against a gender based on perceived inferiority, and this topic has nothing to do with either of those things.
"And actually, only one egg is released during ovulation in a healthy woman per month. Very occasionally, there may be more than one egg released, which is a biological fluke that has nothing to do with fertility"
1. thats effectively what I just said:
"In contrast, the number of eggs released during ovulation is usually 1 or 2 (the majority is dumped during periods) and when it goes up higher, the chances each embryo will survive next to it's siblings goes down, so mass competition to ensure quality control isn't a thing for eggs"
See? No where in that does it contradict your statement.
2. technically speaking, fertility, evolution, and life in general, are a series of flukes.
I'm aware about the average menopause age.
Also I'm not downplaying anything, most men rack their brains on how to avoid unplanned pregnacy without resorting to surgery. Her not having eggs allows avoiding pregnancy, having less sperm or mostly lower quality sperm does not.
Lower quality sperm still eventually reach the egg unless the tail is deformed or missing, which is rare, and higher quality sperm beat them to it.
Also soerm do not uniformally degrade, each individual sperm has it's own individual quality, every single ejactukation, from first ever, to last, has low quality and high quality sperm.
Also a man's health can improve that quality, but men over 100 can still get someone pregnant.
- +1 y
@TheSpaceGnome Dude. The sexist part is the assertion that somehow women's fertility is suddenly declining after 30, while pretending men's fertility is also not declining. It is. They both are. However, a healthy person will remain fertile for a long time, whether male or female. Women only become truly incapable of having children after menopause. As you acknowledge.
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO No, it's not sexist.
Also andropause in men does not cease sperm production, menopause in women does cease egg production. Pointing out biological differences between genders is not sexist. - +1 y
Sexism is descriminating against people based on their gender in a way that asserts one is superior to the other, asserting facts about reproductive capability has nothing to do with superiority.
- +1 y
@TheSpaceGnome Good job putting her in her place. People like her can't tell the difference between sexism and just pointing cold harsh facts. I bet it's not sexism when the roles are reversed
- +1 y
@TheSpaceGnome Again, as I said: The sexist part is the assertion that somehow women's fertility is suddenly declining after 30, while pretending men's fertility is also not declining. It is. They both are.
I don't have a problem pointing out actual biological differences between men and women. But pointing out fallacious ones is problematic. - +1 y
@TruthBringer he didn't put me in my place. He made an incorrect assertion that avoided my point. My point is correct and remains.
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO I just stated facts, just because you ignore them doesn't make them incorrect.
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO Sure sweetie, whatever floats your boat.
@TheSpaceGnome Keep spreading that ugly truth, mate! - +1 y
@TheSpaceGnome But they're not facts. Your assertion that somehow women's fertility is suddenly declining after 30, while pretending men's fertility is also not declining is simply incorrect. It's not a fact. The end.
- +1 y
@TruthBringer but it's not truth. It's false. What's interesting is that you seem to need to make stuff up and ignore scientific reality. You must need your ego stroked through nursing a fantasy.
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO Oh the irony of that coming from you lmfao
- +1 y
@TruthBringer Only irony (which has also been pointed out by users other than myself) is that you call yourself "TruthBringer" when you are committed to falsehood.
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO Funny coming from someone who has been recked by others with proper arguments. Stick to your logical fallacies, missy.
Most Helpful Opinions
+1 yI dont get guys here. Many of them hate modern women and say women in past are better but also dont want to date older women. Biologically men in their 20s are in their prime. I am done how old men act like they are the prize. Young women like young men, not old men. Hollywood does not represent the reality. You are biologically trash if you are old as a man. An old man can't hunt, can't have healthy kids due to bad sperm quality and so you have no worth for the population according to evolution. But an old woman still can cook, look after grandchildren etc.
Yes we live in a civilized society but i just mention this for the people who mention biolgy etc. b
Here a copy and paste of my old posts about this topic:
The sperm quality is decreasing the older the men get which means their kids are more likely to have genetic abnormalities.
"Evolutionary Psychology studies suggest that women prefer slightly older or similarly aged partners... Several recent studies have shown changes in male reproductive parameters as a result of increased age. In the current review of medical literature, we found evidence that much older men are more likely to be infertile, women with much older partners are more likely to experience problems during pregnancy, and children of much older men are more likely to have genetic abnormalities. Based on these findings, we suggest that reproducing with much older men does not represent the best reproductive option for women, which would explain the female preference for only slightly older or similarly-aged mates. sexual selection;mate choice reproductive behavior; ..."-
I also think old men who date much younger women probably date these women for shallow reasons since the maturity level ain't the same due to brain development that affect the personality and maturity level of the young girls. So it is not a healthy relationship and there may be a power imbalance since young girls also dont have much adult life experience which make them naive/inexperience and because of brain development which make them make irrational decisions.
This is why divorce rate is higher the bigger the age gap is.
Then men may be attracted to women in their early 20s, but women in their early 20s are not attracted to majority of men since young men aka men their age are minority since women prefere someone their age. Therefore majority women marry men at their age.
So dear incels keep being delusional. Young girls would not even want you if you are over 30s. You may not want women over 30s but why do you think women in their 20s would want you? 🙃
445 Reply- +1 y
I mention scientific facts before any idiot dare to write bs as a reply
- +1 y
Men in their 30s already tend to get health problems, become bald, fat, wrinkly and get beer bellies aka are biologically unworthy.
- +1 y
It is important for men to be healthy, strong etc to protect the family. This is why he is biological not good. But as i said we live in a civilized society. So age, fertig, health etc dont determine our worth. So dear guys dont think your unworthy. You are still important and worthy for your family etc. I did not mean offended men. I realize i was too harsh and offensive
- +1 y
So i am sorry. For me good men/women no matter the age are quality worthy men
- +1 y
... But as i said we live in a civilized society. So age, fertility, health etc dont determine our worth. So dear guys dont think you're unworthy. You are still important and worthy for your family etc. I did not mean offended men. I realize i was too harsh and offensive. So i am very sorry.****
.. Good men/women no matter the age are quality men/women.
Sorry being offensive again
- +1 y
Nah, it's mostly the money and career that makes a really older guy attractive
- +1 y
Yes but do you really want women who are only interested in yout money?
- +1 y
Most don't care. A healthy guy in his 30s or 40s can attract younger women.
Beyond that, we want a pussy, they want some money. It's another adjustment - +1 y
Women turn 25+ everyday too? And the population of younger generation is fewer than older generations in many western countries
- +1 y
Do you think these 18 years old people will stay forever like this? Whatever it is disgusting to wait for minors to become legal
- +1 y
They dont become fully adults when they suddenly turn 18.
- +1 y
Some do, some don't.
You don't need to be an adult to have sex, all you need is to be ready, physically and emotionally - +1 y
You have to consider brain development and adult life experience which have a huge influence on your maturity and personality. None of them have both. If by law 13 years would be an adult, would you date a 13 years old?
- +1 y
I'm not sexually attracted to a 13 yr old. But I won't interfere with anyone else who's dating one.
Plus for many people, sex is sex, from what I know, we don't need full brain development to have sex for pleasure.
Would you have hooked up with anyone when you were 18?
Some will. A lot of people won't - +1 y
Good point but i would be fully against people who have sex with minors since we dont know this minor is mature enough to know what she wants when it comes to sex. The risk is power imbalance. Some of them may get taken advantaged and so they end up doing sexual acts in which they are not interested. For example if he/she does not want anal but do it for the other one but regret it and get even traumatized by it
- +1 y
Definitely, but I also don't like generalizing the idea that even 18 yr olds are naive.
Actually I had sexual fantasies on my teachers from a very young age, long before I even turned 10 and I didn't knew anything about it back then.
But had I had a chance with them during that time, I would have gone for it.
Even after all these years, I still wish that I had that chance - +1 y
Most underage girls have sex with someone at their age not 25+ years old guys
- +1 y
Not most girls, and even with consent, sexual affairs between students and teachers is a serious matter.
There's power imbalance - +1 y
This is disgusting. I fully agree with you
- +1 y
Minors who are nearly 18 is a grey area, but from strict interpretation of law, it's a crime.
Why don't the senior guys wait till they turn 18?
Will pussies start to bite at 18? 😂 - +1 y
No, is it difficult to wait for them? otherwise they should not complain for getting arrested. You can't make laws that satisfy everyone.
- +1 y
@Tstrbrainer because it’s legal
- +1 y
And age of consent is in many countries 17. So it would be legal (?)
- +1 y
I also dont understand why many boys-not men-act like they dont age.
- +1 y
According to the statistics women are interested in someone their age and divorce rate is higher the bigger the age gap is.
- +1 y
Actually men generally feel in their prime after 25 , I guess.
Usually the 30s. - +1 y
What do you mean? Omg i should put the statistics how women rate men and vica versa. Maybe you know it
- +1 y
@Kvnhanma
- +1 y
But most of men in their early 30s habe girlfriend/wifes who are max 5 years younger.
- +1 y
I don't know how women feel, but I think us men generally look better as we age, till a certain limit
- +1 y
No, i dont think. Young people in general look better. I know many guys who become bald, fatter and unhealthy etc. The older you get, the more it is difficult to maintain a healthy weight aka loose weight
- +1 y
Depends, I think my dad looked way better during his forties than he looked in his late twenties and early thirtes
- +1 y
@Tstrbrainer
most men do not look better in 40s than 30s / 20s. keep dreaming. - +1 y
They can, if men put enough effort, they can look better.
At least compared to women of their same age
+1 yWe live in a society where women are judged purely based on attractiveness. The primary position with some men is that women somehow stop being attractive at age 30, which I strongly disagree with. Thus, such women are then degraded for being "unattractive." Many men are often attracted to women younger than 30 because they typically have a more youthful appearance and naive personality, which makes them easier to take advantage of. Such behavior could be harboring pedophilia too. Men that are only attracted to women below 30 could potentially be attracted to underage girls as well, as no real limits could exist to how much "younger" such men prefer. If any man I meet says that he doesn't find women attractive when they're 30+, I definitely wouldn't trust him around children. These are men that are more likely to find your teenage daughter attractive more than you.
However, many women 30+ can still be attractive, even more so than women that are younger. Simply because a woman is young doesn't automatically mean that she's attractive, as young women can still have characteristics that men find unattractive. For example, young women could be overweight, disheveled because of drug use, or possess features that many would consider unattractive. Unless a woman isn't taking care of herself, no reason exists for her looks to fade at age 30. Plenty of women that are 30 and over are attractive. I'm 30 and, when I'm out, guys in their late teens and early 20s often hit on me because they mistake me for being around their age. They're usually shocked when I tell them I'm 30. In fact, many women exist that men pay attention to, such as those in the mall or any public place often frequented by women, that could appear younger, but are actually over 30, and they wouldn't know unless they actually approached her.43 Reply- +1 y
In my experience, people tend to look pretty much the same in their 30s as they did in their 20s.
- +1 y
@TheSpaceGnome: I agree. The only time they really look different is when they become drug addicts or something like that.
- +1 y
yup.
333 opinions shared on Girl's Behavior topic. If a man doesn't have kids and wants to find a mate to have kids with/create a family, anything over 30 is too old. The reason why is after 35 her chances of getting pregnant drop to 15% to 20% and the chances of it being healthy without learning disabilities decrease substantially too. Regardless of people's opinions or wishful thinking, biology still matters.
Think of it this way, if two people meet and start dating, then one year later they start living together if everything was working out well, and a year after that they decide to start a family. If they are extremely lucky and she gets pregnant within a couple months, they will have been together for 3 years at least by the time they could have their first kid. After having it, she should take a year off trying in order for her body to fully recover. If they want another kid, and somehow defy the odds by a lot and she is again pregnant within a few months, By the time she has the second kid they have been together for 5 years. If they want a third kid there would be another year off, and another year of trying and pregnancy.
So if someone wants 3 kids, it would take a minimum of 7 years after meeting someone to have them and that is assuming lots of luck with getting pregnant so quick each time they try. If she was 30 when they met, she would be 37 when having the third kid. It is unlikely for her to even get pregnant by then, and if she does it is about a 37% chance of it having a learning disability. And that is assuming she led a healthy life and didn't do drugs in her past or drink heavy.
That is the main reason why if a man wants kids he doesn't want someone past 30.
As far as women choosing a man to create a family with, she should avoid men past 55 for the same reasons. And if he has a past of drug use or heavy drinking it can increase the chances of it having a learning disability too just like it does with women.
The main difference in biology affecting women more is because they already have their eggs. So if they did drugs in their teens and stopped in their early 20s, then choose to have a kid in her late 20s, the chance is still there for the problems. People's past choices matter and have permanent consequences.
Women past 30 are still physically attractive, but biologically they aren't a good choice for a man that wants kids. A single father shouldn't have a problem dating them though since that wouldn't be a concern of his.
I hope that explains it.512 Reply- +1 y
You're not telling the truth. Your speaking biases as every woman is different. I am a virgin, and never would I date a man who claims my value is unless I have his kids but he doesn't treat me right. No way. Any man who sees women like this simply doesn't need kids. many of you can barely take care of your own, or else you would have had WIVES already. Some of you are already divorced. You can't tell people at what age they should go for or not. Your choices matter to us too. You are still single at 40. Please stop.
- +1 y
@btbc92 I divorced someone for being a liar and hypocrite.
Plus biology doesn't care about your ignorance. You are just mad because you are about to reach your expiration date and lose your value.
Yes, my choices matter. i have always been a good person so I won't accept someone that is trash like the women that did hook ups, had kids with others, did drugs, etc. Those people are worthless trash to me. - +1 y
You married that "hypocrite". If a man like you ever talk like that about me I went and they're married you in the first place. Plus you're a divorcee who can't even keep a wife. I think this is a lot about your so-called value. I have more respect for divorcing that respect women than a man who treats women like garbage. If you think that people are trash for whatever, let's look at you. Cuz none of the 10 times you did some of those things that you calling others trash. There are plenty healthy men who don't have an issue with that and don't believe in all that mess you want to spew about women. You forgetting that God is in control. I ain't mad about me reaching anything because at the end of the day, guys like you are the number one reason why I never bother in the first place. Because you treat women like garbage. And I don't want a man who treats women like garbage. And any woman who's stupid enough to marry you is the fool.
- +1 y
Problematic health of offspring only increases with age if they live unhealthy lives or have unhealthy genes. humans have indeterminate lifespans, there is no cap on how long good health can be perpetuated.
Because of this, there is no way to predict when or if a woman will reach the stage of "too old to breed safely". I mean you could go by odds and say pretty much every 80 year old, but if we are talking 20s-50s, the number in which menopause and egg loss/degredation sets in is highly variable.
Many women though have healthy kids in their 40s and 50s, so 30 is definitely not a set cut off point, and menopause at 30 is quite uncommon.
- Asker+1 y
Well I don't wants kids that's for sure.
- +1 y
I don't either, but oddly enough fertility level still matters because at that point, guys (myself included), are looking for a woman who is sterile.
- +1 y
@btbc92 You are ignorant. you deny biology and statistical facts. Come back on here when you are 50 and miserable. Your only value will be to hook up kind of people and users. You are exactly the type that have been brainwashed by the modern feminism movement and will later on in life be miserable, but by the time you realize your mistakes it will be too late for you and you will never have a good happy life.
- +1 y
I don't have to be miserable because I listen to God and not man. I never hook up and I won
to hook up, so you can keep those miserable curses to yourself. What mistakes have I made? I am a virgin. I never dated. I never had a boyfriend or been with a man. What mistakes am I making? So all those curses you think you're putting on me, are actually what you're doing to yourself. God knows what is best for me or not. So stop. Your 40. You need to think about that. Biology or not. God is in CONTROL. And that is the part you hate because you made those decisions. - +1 y
Your answer is hilarious. You're telling me that I should have kids with a man who is 55 years old? I'm planning on having kids in my 30s. Even if I were 33, I would never ever have kids with a man over 40. Sperm quality deteriorates with age too. why on earth would you think that i would want to have kids with a 50 yr old man? do you really think most young women are attracted to old guys in their 40s-50s? you're just dreaming. Maybe its only true on GAG , but not the real world.
- +1 y
Ask to an AI Persona
Laura
Have questions about GirlsAskGuys? I'm here to help!
Gamer Bella
With my passion and experience in hobbies and leisure activities, I'm here to offer personalized...
Cinematic Lily
With my rich background and passion for the arts, I share insights on films, TV shows, and...
Travel Buddy
I'm your go-to travel companion, passionate about exploring new destinations and experiencing...
Love Doctor Brad
Welcome to the heart of understanding and transformation. I am your guide on this journey to...
Athletic Chloe
Whether you need tips on improving your game, insights on fitness and nutrition, or just want to...
Fashionista Amy
I'm here to inspire and guide you with a touch of latest trends or advice on personal style.💅👒
Advisor Smith
With years of experience guiding individuals in their education and career paths, I'm here to...
James The Foodie
From savoring Italian classics to discovering the bold flavors of Japanese cuisine, I explore...
What Girls & Guys Said
19
Opinion
108Opinion
I don't think anyone degrades them and 30 is not unattractive. Just that it is a known fact that men prefer younger women. A 30 years old would be seen as perfect by men who are older, especially if she dresses classy and is healthy.
Like with a lot of things in life, being consistent in your good habits is important. For example, accumulated exercise and healthy eating can affect how one can look and feel at an older age. It can happen that one can have a more toned body and even feel more energetic as a result of accumulated exercise during the years.
She can also be more efficient in managing herself, know herself better with age and have more money to pay for beauty treatments and attractive clothes.
I'm at the moment 28 and I honestly feel better every year. I can even achieve higher standards in my exercise compared to my younger self (till now).
But despite this it is true that women have a disadvantage in terms of aging compared to men. But on the other hand young women are valued for their beauty, then they slowly lose it, but men were never valued for their beauty.30 Reply
+1 yWhen people have a birthday with a zero at the end, people often start to reflect on their life. What have they accomplished, are they married, do they have a family. Increasingly women are delaying marriage and having a family. At the same time, the number of eligible men seem to have decreased because men tend marry younger women. A woman's late teens and twenties should be focused on finding a lifetime partner, while the selection is abundant. However, most women blow this golden opportunity by dating a bunch of jerks.
https://www.youtube.com/embed/vhhgI4tSMwc
At age 35, the chances of certain birth defects doubles with every additional year of age. At age 35, the demographics change and the supply of unmarried men equalizes for the first time in a woman's life. Although the change has been gradual, suddenly the women notice the shortage. Prior to this, the women enjoyed a 10-18% surplus of unmarried men to unmarried women ratio in same age range.
36 Reply- +1 y
NEXT:
You said: Sure I don't condone Casa's way of talking to you, but I still side with him on this one because I agree with his initial comment. But you decided to discard anything he said by just pointing to them coming from red pill sources, which on it's own is an ad hominem attack to the source rather than the message. This is clearly shown in your lack of valid arguments to debunk anything he said. Not to forget to mention your misandrist shaming tactics. So you attacking men and their comments simply for stating the obvious, and yet you're sitting here lecturing others about "unprovoked virtriol against women".
- +1 y
@TruthBringer big brother g@g deleted both of our comments here and none of them were offensive. 😂😂😂
- +1 y
@CasaNorba I love how they got removed for "membercalling" when at least I didn't even mention a single name. Didn't expect anything from this website really 😂😂
- +1 y
@TruthBringer the only person I tagged was you and we are following each other
https://imgur.com/a/BWi3QRv
never once did I mentioned that other person's name. I guess there is at least one 35 year old woman in the administrator team - +1 y
My response: So - hold up - according to you... Casa can have an opinion that is "totally obvious" according to you. He is not required to provide any justification or valid arguments WHATSOEVER, and on top of this he can just swing out of the park with rudeness and vitriol against women. That's totally cool, according to you. But apparently I am supposed to act like a sweet, demure little thing and be super lovely, and to carefully craft arguments - even though he never did that? The onus of proof is on the one making the assertion. HE made a vitriolic assertion, with no valid proof, and I spent a great deal of time painstakingly dismantling every single one of his awful and imbecilic attempts to deflect from the fact that he has no proof. I kicked his ass with it, because his claims were utterly incoherent. He actually tried to claim that a couple of random internet memes with pictures of actors constituted proof. His lack of understanding of epistemology is unbelievable - and so is yours if you side with this. If you think what he said was so obvious, then why don't you show the proof? Real proof - not internet memes, not unreferenced graphs with no source (as above). Actual, referenced proof, and lots of it. Because what you are trying to prove is unbelievably problematic and pernicious. It's actually inhuman. And you lecture about "Jesus Christ". Just wow.
- +1 y
@CasaNorba Tell me about it hahaha
No one degrades over 30, or any age. The concept of degradation with time is applicable only to "sexual mean value" (SMV) than yes as a woman gets older anatomically, she shows signs of aging and physiologically the quality of the eggs deteriorate. Women do have a biological clock. Medically the age of 35 is considered as "high risk pregnancy" but really fertility (the chance of getting pregnant within one year) starts to decrease considerably post 30.
So from a biological and sexual economics point of view a woman is most attractive and at her prime at ages 21-25. And this was known almost universally among different cultures.
The age of 30 is nothing magical, there are no absolutes when it comes to biology, it's a science of probability distributions of populations. Depending on your genetics, nutrition, sorroundings, you can maintain status quo for longer, or lose it sooner, but 30 seems to be a an asthetically pleasing number. In India the age of 27 would illicit the same response, and in China around 28, and in Pakistan 26. I can't comment about the Arab nations.20 ReplyJust ignore toxic men. Those are the ones most women wouldn't want to marry and have their kids anyway. You are only being degraded because they felt rejected when they were younger and feel younger women are way better when they fail to see women are women, just like men are men. It's just their way of trying to get a come-up. Those types of men who claim that are NOT looking for wives or children. They just want sex with a much younger woman as they age and try to use money, status, etc to keep a woman interested. You have to avoid men with that toxic mindset. They are unhealthy and unhappy. And they use the excuse as if all of us had slept around. I'm a virgin. Most of these men are not. So the men who speak that are best to be avoided and best to teach your girls especially to not fall for it. They try to groom you young.
42 Reply- +1 y
Any man who wants to date a girl under 30 because she's under 30: get him his bib, his diapers, and his pacifier because that's probably what he wants to see on his woman.
Only men on GAG degrade women in their 30s. Walk out into the real world, and you won't see this misogyny crap. If you take a look around at all these men on GAG degrading women over 30, its the same men who are extremely bitter about being single and complaining about women having high standards. These guys can't even manage to get a 50 yr old woman to look in their direction. Shitting on women is just a way for them to feel better about themselves getting rejected
813 Reply- +1 y
@Ayanna240 you got 7 more years left but your probably already noticing your becoming less and less attractive already 😂
- +1 y
I agree. They complain about not finding women. Beggars can't be choosers
- +1 y
@Kvynhanma
Hun I don’t find guys in their late 30s-40s attractive either that’s why I don’t date them. I only date guys 5-6 years older , not 10-20 years older.
Yea keep saying that you will get more valuable with age, overwhelming majority of guys will never hit millionaire status ever In your lives - +1 y
@kvnhanma
To be frankly honest , I don’t even find most guys in their mid 30s to be physically attractive. This age is where they first showing noticeable signs of Aging such as balding , weight gain, white hairs , dull skin.
And you’re delusional if you think I’m gonna marry you just because you have a house and a car. I’m gonna be buying my own house and car in a few years. I don’t need your house and car - +1 y
you're gonna end up like this guy who wasted his youth years Not dating but working on becoming financially stable. Now he’s in his late 30s-40s and he realizes he still can’t get a woman because they call him Boring. He didn’t age well too. Not even 1 out of 300 women matched with him on a dating app
It's not that she's unattractive, most guys prefer Young women with parts of them that's still fresh off the refrigerator if you know what I mean. Apparently nobody older women anyone in between 30 and up, because they think parts of a woman that's older is the old things that come out of the refrigerator if you know what I mean and they don't want that. I don't really care what people say she's a beautiful and I find her attractive I don't really have a particular taste in women I just roll the dice see where my percentage score is and I go for it if it's a reasonable amount. Like if I roll of 5 and 4 on the dice, there's a 20% chance that she is willing to get to know me.
27 Reply- +1 y
@Ayanna240 well put.
- +1 y
@Ayanna240 You're right nobody is attracted to old. But there's one thing you forgot, most people in the world are very picky when it comes to certain people. Some people won't even accept the person regardless of their age their gender their raise hell they even their religion. I know I'm unattractive, I'm 296 lb handsome in the face but lack in the body Department. It also goes the same way with men and women. I really don't have a particular type in women or their age hell I even see people in real life with couples. Like there's a 21 year old guy in a relationship with a woman who's 69. I don't know about most of these guys in the world, but for me; I accept any woman as my girlfriend as long as she's willing to accept me even if she's an alien and a woman disguise.
- +1 y
@CuriousJC
no offense. Just trying to do you a favor. I highly suggest reducing your weight if you want to extend your life by 25-30 years. - +1 y
@Ayanna240 Don't worry about me, my apartment building has a gym in the basement and I go down there every day after I finish a meal stay on the treadmill for about an hour while watching Netflix. I'm always active, when I'm not at the gym in the basement I'm always on my video game Kinect playing exercise games with others. But the real question is, if there was an obese man who found you attractive are you going to be willing to get to know him and maybe possibly fall in love or try to find someone else?
- 1.4K opinions shared on Girl's Behavior topic.
+1 yIt's not that she's unattractive, it's just that she now has to compete with much younger women in the dating pool. Youth and beauty is a woman's greatest asset.
By forty they are starting to sag and wrinkle, and the prime guys are all snapped up and married off, leaving just the rejects, nerds, dweebs, and divorcees with kids in tow.
So if you're thirty, get busy and find a suitable prospect - several of them even, and find one worth keeping. Otherwise you're looking at the rest of your years as a crazy cat-lady.45 Reply- +1 y
I agree with you 100000000%
- +1 y
Lmfao look at the pink dislikes. Truth hits hard, doesn't it? 😂
- +1 y
@TruthBringer - yeah, the truth is hard. Except bonster, and she's probly a pink guy. LOL
What's worse is the young woman's thought train, or lack thereof, where she thinks she shouldn't settle for a really great guy, she should fuck them all. So after a decade fresh off the cock-carousel, she starts to realize the guys are going for the younger women in the dating pool. And she's used goods, having been fucked and fucked over so many times, she's jaded and well used, commands zero respect from any respectable guy, and she's already spurned so many really decent guys she should have taken up with.
So feeling the black cloud over her head, and the day of doom soon approaching - the magic FORTY where she won't ever be able to find a guy, she starts going through her little black book, re-upping with the best of those dingalings on the cock-carousel. Only now they've wised up and hooked up with a really great gal that really DOES want him, and the smarter girls have all picked up the best guys. So there she sits, wondering what the fuck she's gonna do now, what with all her 'standards' and that she's not gonna settle for anything less. Some of them just never do find a great guy and settle down, they just go from cock to cock. You see them, too much makeup, saggy tits, fat bellies, they smoke and drink, and the only guys that want them are the rejects.
Sad really. But that's a common female outlook. - +1 y
@Browneye57 Absolutely well spoken! Let me also add that they are easily to spot by their tattoos and piercings. I actually love it when a woman visually shows me that she is a walking red flag. So I know to avoid them at all cost
- +1 y
@TruthBringer - For some reason, especially with desperate women, there seems to be this belief that drilling holes in their body parts, or applying permanent ink, will somehow elevate them. I just shake my head. Such fools.
My oldest daughter was just sure she would like pierced nipples. That somehow that would make her cool or something. That lasted about 6 months. Dear lord.
+1 yHi Anonymous! This is simple biology. Guys are rating prospective mates (on a subconscious level) on their ability to produce healthy offspring. This starts to decline slightly by the age of 30 (although much less so than at 40) so on an instinctive level men are preferring girls who have a good 10-15 years of childbearing ahead of them. And this is true even of men who think they don't want any children. It's hardwired into our psyche.
Now personally I would think women over 30 can still be very attractive, and might be preferred by men of a similar age.30 Reply- Anonymous(36-45)+1 y
Because we live in a "man-girl" society. If you listen to music the women usually sing about having a man and men sing about having a girl. It stems from misogyny and being in a patriarchal society. And if I was to pin it back even further than that, I would say it has to do with women being more fertile in younger years and men having the desire to spread seeds. But that's more of a primordial take. In realist, most men in real life don't care. They are just regular guys. If they find you attractive, then they will approach you.
31 Reply Harsh truth?
Women over 30 don't look as good/young/cute etc as they did in their 20s and probably have had more partners.
Men are very visual so we tend to notice it. And all of it is fucked up in many ways and very logical in others, although that doesn't change who we are.
Obviously actually degrading someone for their age is not cool at all.
Feeling more attraction towards a younger/fresher etc woman (not a kid) is normal and looking down on it is an act of degrading men.13 Reply388 opinions shared on Girl's Behavior topic. To me you're just in your Prime you are the hot lovers that everybody's looking for as far as I'm concerned if you want to be degraded verbally I will do it but only during sex. Can you guys that degrade in 30 year old woman they are fools because women that are 30 and older are in their Prime and they know how to fuck and they love marathons
40 Reply
Anonymous(36-45)+1 yI don't degrade a young woman in her 30s, she hasn't even started her life yet. Sure, her youthful looks may have passed but that won't really be an issue if she maintains a good diet, exercises, cuts out the bad stuff and drinks tea and water regularly. Problem is, so many girls these days can't cope with problems so they are damaging their body by snorting cocaine, smoking weed, drinking tons of alcohol. I know someone will read this and think cocaine, weed and booze are all healthy benefits for the human body and apparently I'm a stupid goof? But this is GAG and I won't bow to stupidity just because it's been normalized by society.
30 Reply- Anonymous(30-35)+1 y
Women in their 30’s and 40’s are like men in their 20’s, lacking their primary value.
Women’s prime is 18-26. They are the most attractive and the most fertile. Which gives them a high sexual marketplace value. This devalues over time (30-40+)
Men in their 20’s are overwhelmingly lacking confidence, status and money. Which gives them their sexual marketplace value. That comes later in their 30’s and 40’s.
If a woman blows most of her value in her 20’s - her prime, then why should a man when he’s in his prime give her the time of day.24 Reply- +1 y
Lol. You definitely never passed sex ed. Someones "prime" is when their most likely to impregnate or get pregnant. For men its mid 20's. For women its late 30's.
As for "sexual marketplace value" dude you need help. Like the kind of a credit card provides, cause your personality sure ain't gonna get you anywhere when it comes to women - Opinion Owner+1 y
Both men and women are most fertile in their early 20’s. Late 30’s is really the tail end to avoid complications, I don’t know where you learned otherwise but things would be a lot different if that was the case.
Thanks for the free psychoanalysis Doc, but I’m just answering the OP’s question. - +1 y
I don't have the patience for argueing with an idiot on the internet tonight. Id recommend getting your info on fertility from your doctor, not random strangers in the internet, especially anonymous ones ;)
Goodnight random misinformed anon - Opinion Owner+1 y
Goodnight! 😘
- Anonymous(30-35)+1 y
It's just sort of an average age where women start to be less physically attractive and their sexual experience is too much, and then also often are bitter about not getting the same attention which makes them less attractive and even less likely to get that dream marriage. At that age the contrast really starts to show with the girl ~10 years younger to has had little to no sexual experience and who is more physically attractive with years of attractiveness ahead of her, not to mention child-bearing years.
211 Reply- +1 y
For the First Time Ever, Thirty-Something Women Are Having More Babies Than Their Twenty-Something Counterparts
slate.com/.../...than-women-in-their-twenties.html - Opinion Owner+1 y
@aliali8 Yeah, that's a bad thing. That's supporting what I'm say. Women aren't trying to settle until later and people are generally have less kids overall. It's bad for society. If you only look at the relative value of childbirths normalized for any given year, then it's going to look like women are given birth at older age. But firstly, that's not a good thing, and secondly it's more accurate to say younger women are having less kids. So yeah, that's compatible with everything I said originally.
- +1 y
@aliali8 And Autism rates are skyrocketing.
- +1 y
@KrakenAttackin
thats due to all the chemical birth control that women use for casual sex. - Opinion Owner+1 y
Yes, that's all entirely compatible with everything I'm saying. None of it in any way refutes anything I'm saying.
- +1 y
@Opinion owner,
having less kids is also not necessarily a bad thing. With less overpopulation, there will be jobs for people. And nowadays, cost of living has risen so sharply, taxes are so high all around america, its actually very important for parents to have sufficient income to raise their children. Hundred year old ideals such a stay home wives are no longer affordable or realistic. - Opinion Owner+1 y
@aliali8 Overpopulation is an oversimplified justification.
I don’t agree we’re overpopulated. Nor does it mean there’s magically more jobs for people if there’s less people, nor that it’s a good thing. It’s much more complicated than that. It involves an aging out population and family unit instability.
Taxes are high because you vote for them to be high, not any other reason. And the way taxes are handled out, again, with an aging population that will go up, not down.
Needing more income to support children doesn’t mean having kids later is good – if it was even true, because money isn’t the only problem. At best, having kids later is the lesser evil. But having kids younger remains the ideal way to do things. So again, that doesn’t nullify anything I’ve said. It’s just making excuses for a bad situation. What we should be caring about is resolving the problem, not looking for silver linings.
It’s similarly affordable and realistic. People just prefer more luxuries. But it’s also a self-fulling problem. If women didn’t work as much then men’s wages would go up. By significantly increasing the worker pool by introducing more women into the workforce, it drove down everyone’s wages.
Again, look for actual solutions, not silver linings. - +1 y
@Opinion owner
[If women didn’t work as much then men’s wages would go up. By significantly increasing the worker pool by introducing more women into the workforce, it drove down everyone’s wages.]
Women working have no effect on worker's wages. If a company is set to hire 100 people, they are not gonna increase their number of hires to 150 just to include female workers. Every company has a budget plans on how many people they can afford to hire for a particular year.
[Needing more income to support children doesn’t mean having kids later is good – if it was even true, because money isn’t the only problem. At best, having kids later is the lesser evil. But having kids younger remains the ideal way to do things. So again, that doesn’t nullify anything I’ve said. It’s just making excuses for a bad situation. What we should be caring about is resolving the problem, not looking for silver linings.]
do you know what a worse situation is? having more children than you can afford to raise. Not being able to let your child attend college because you couldn't afford to pay the tuition. Feeding your kids the cheapest, junk food because you couldn't afford better quality food.
[Taxes are high because you vote for them to be high, not any other reason. And the way taxes are handled out, again, with an aging population that will go up, not down.]
nobody wants to pay high taxes. so certainly i don't think anyone will vote to pay higher taxes.
[I don’t agree we’re overpopulated. Nor does it mean there’s magically more jobs for people if there’s less people, nor that it’s a good thing. It’s much more complicated than that. It involves an aging out population and family unit instability.]
Only problem is that elderly are living longer and longer lives due to advances in medical science. So no, people aren't aging out as quickly as they should. So taxes will be higher just to provide Medicare for these old peoples' medication.
- Opinion Owner+1 y
@aliali8 “If a company is set to hire 100 people, they are not gonna increase their number of hires to 150 just to include female workers.”
Yes, that’s why I’m right.
They will still hire 100 people but now there’s twice as many applicants to choose from. This drive competition between workers up and thus drives wages down.
“do you know what a worse situation is? having more children than you can afford to raise.”
And a good situation would be having kids when you’re younger and also being able to afford it. That’s the ideal and people can afford it, there reluctant to have kids is not a financial decision the downtick in birth-rate is because of culture and personal choice, not a lack of means relative to how people used to live. But again, more excuses. The ideal is obviously having a family when younger. Whatever work-arounds you think people are using which is resulting in todays second-rate scenario doesn’t change the ideal situation.
“Not being able to let your child attend college because you couldn't afford to pay the tuition”
I don’t think that’s a problem, fewer people should go to university. Encouraging everyone to go is a BAD thing.
“Feeding your kids the cheapest, junk food because you couldn't afford better quality food.”
People aren’t in that situation though. That’s obviously not representative of the population nor why people would be having kids later. The people who aren’t having kids are the university educated upper-middle class. And it has nothing to do with my original point about older women being generally less attractive. - Opinion Owner+1 y
“nobody wants to pay high taxes.”
They vote for them. So yeah, they kinda do. It may not look like higher taxes on the surface, but they keep supporting bigger government and more government programs. And rarely advocate for smaller government, so yeah, people’s voting habits relates to their tax rate.
“So no, people aren't aging out as quickly as they should.”
Aging out refers to the current population being larger than the future same age relative population. Historically, big reductions in birth rates don’t go well. There’s then more old people to take care of (in addition to the effect of modern medicine) and few young people to work jobs and pay taxes. Again, that translates to higher taxation.
“So taxes will be higher just to provide Medicare for these old peoples' medication.”
And that’s the kind of thing people vote for, hence yes, they are *choosing* to pay higher taxes.
- Anonymous(30-35)+1 y
it really pisses me off how some guys have no fucking clue how the female reproductive system works. no, 90% of our eggs aren't gone by our 30's... some women can even naturally (yes, naturally) have children at age 40 for fucks sake. stay in your lane. a woman's age does not equal her worth.
60 Reply 
+1 yThis is all about the long and storied history of SEXISM. Sixteen year old women are glorified because they're fresh and cute. But women with experience and a few lines on their faces aren't. Whereas MEN who are older are lionized! Men with the same lines, the same experience are considered attractive.
These things are changing slowly. Very slowly. All you can do is value yourself despite these annoying and unfair leanings in society.22 Reply- +1 y
@HighValue Not talking about a woman who can't produce offspring. Females from 12 to 50 can produce viable, healthy offspring, though 28 is supposed to be the optimal age for female birthing physically.
I'm solely discussing the factor of much older men seeking much younger women. My 59 year old grandfather married my 29 year old grandmother after his first wife died. However, it's true that a same aged woman marrying a same aged man wouldn't be able to have children.
But everyone doesn't want to have children and possibly they've had children from an earlier marriage.
The sexism is that women's intelligence and contributions other then as babymakers and arm candy are often overlooked. And men are primed to feel they need to produce their own biological offspring. Men are also rarely considered babymakers and arm candy. That's where the inherent sexism lies.
Most men are lustfully restricted to firm breast, shape and juvenile beauty and since sex is all they imagine a woman can provide, they assume that she gives her wildest at 18-30.
Most of these men are not enlightened or have no illumination.
A man should want his woman to look good but they have to understand that they both would grow old and their beauty fade as they approach the day, they'd meet their maker.30 Reply
+1 yDont listen to that nonsense... everyone gets older.. your only degraded if you allow yourself to be anyone that starts that non sense with me I say shut the fuck up.. then if they keep going I say I dont care shut the fuck up snd show them the door or excuse yourself... just keep repeating it like a child until they realize you have better things to do then listen to their bullshit.
a lot of opinions are bullshit10 Reply
+1 yBecause it’s a load of bollox, women over 30 look lovely, even over 40.
It’s just fuckwits saying stuff like that, low intelligence and zero life skills or experience.40 Reply
+1 yEveryone's gonna turn 30 some day or the other.
Anyone can be attractive/unattractive. It all comes down to how you take care of your body. If you take care of your body well, then you'd be attractive even if you're 40. But I think most men prefer women in mid 20s because of fertility. It is said that a woman's fertility reduces after she turns 30. I'm not sure. But hey, those people who say you're unattractive are maybe just jealous of you.00 Reply
+1 yI personally think women in their 30s and 40s are just hitting their peak of sexiness and beauty. I would love to date or have a sexual relationship with a woman in that age range. Anyone thinking women in their 39s are not attractive or worthy, they are stupid.
40 Replythe vast majority of them hit the wall by this time and loose their sex market value. just continue to get worst from there on now. of course nowadays so many young women drink, smoke and fuck out of control that they hit that wall by the age of 27 or eve before.
2132 Reply- +1 y
Copied and pasted from a red pill site I presume. YAWN.
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO it doesn't matter if I copied and pasted from an ad in a Disney movie. that reality is right in front of us all and that is why you're so butthurt about up. YAWN
- +1 y
If you think Disney movies are a good source of information, pretty sure you ain't got the right to weigh in on what constitutes 'reality', buddy 😂 Seriously, stop overdosing on the incel / MGTOW material - it's addled your brain. And God knows you don't have too many braincells left to mess around with.
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO again you dont need any source of information when the reality is right in front of you, therefore you pretty argue like a true butthurt child who "don't have too many braincells left to mess around with."
also we mgtow and incels are not the same buddy. so come back and revisit this argument when you learn how to face reality and now rely on wishful thinking.
I bet that pink downvote was obviously from you. YAWN. - +1 y
Newsflash: your (bitter, jaded) opinion is not reality. The fact that you think it is just serves to bolster what I mentioned about your low braincell count. In fact, your meagre brain is so inoperational, that you couldn't even come up with a counterargument, so copied and pasted my words. Yup, clearly the sign of a genius 😂
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO oh I just saw your profile and realized you're 35, otfrl!
no wonder why my opinion got your attention and you're so triggered by it, talk about being "bitter." and yeah if my opinion is not reality then please upload me a picture of yourself now and how you looked at 25 if you're brave enough and lets see if me and everyone here will agree you won't look a hell of a difference.
- +1 y
Dude. You're 34 - practically the same age. And yet you've clearly got nothing to show for it other than a noggin full of delusion. Tragic, really. And you are bitter. Extremely bitter.
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO lmao you're invaded my opinion that had nothing to do and now you been rumbling about it for hours and TRYING to throw shades at me for it yet I'm the "bitter" one?
and yeah we are practically the same age alright but I'm not a woman like you
- +1 y
You literally can't even string a coherent sentence together, dude 😂 Losing your marbles at 34, hate to see what you'll be like at 40, Grandpa.
You might also want to get your eyesight checked. You are comparing two pictures of a woman - the one on the left with a full face of makeup, and the one on the right with no makeup. And newsflash - the dude looks older on the right too! LMFAO. Your pictures prove nothing but the confirmation of your own ineptitude. - +1 y
@NicoletteXO and now you grammar, lmao thanks for proving my point.
seriously dude and your vision isn't any better. we men are not fooled by makeup as much as you women assume therefore that comparison will fly either way for the fact that even if the woman on the right was wearing makeup we will still see the age marks and the significant amount of fat she gain throughout the years thank to the double chin.
and no shit the guy still looks older, but old or not he still looks a lot hotter than in he did in his early youth and women themselves even proof it as they still drool over him. his name is Gerard Butler by the way, he is the main protagonist of the movie 300 - +1 y
You literally just said "and now you grammar" 😂 😂 😂 Which is about as grammatically incorrect a sentence as one could possibly muster! Well done, you've just doubled down to re-emphasize my point that you are an illiterate imbecile.
Not to mention, you are an imbecile who seems to think cobbling together random pictures of people which happens to suit your narrative proves something. It doesn't prove anything other than how hard you're trying. Yet, you still fail 😂 Also, the guy is not as hot as you think. Maybe you're gay. - +1 y
@NicoletteXO or maybe my computer is slow and lags when I type, not that I give a fuck what you think. but yeah, 2 hours later and you're still butthurt about the opinion this " illiterate imbecile" made on the internet 🤣 🤣 🤣
till then yeah you WISH my evidence do not proof my point that you been desperately trying to deny in your own pool of misery and projection. and yeah he might not be hot to you, but that's ok you have your preferences, but he is still considered a sex symbol by many females across the world for a reason
and here I got a better one for you 🤣🤣🤣
- +1 y
Again, copying and pasting idiotic memes from a red pill sites is not "proof". You obviously failed science and logic in school. Go and look at Jessica Simpson's social media today. She's lost the extra weight she put on due to childbirth (which you clearly have no respect for, since you are a misogynistic asshole). She's looking fiiiiiiiine for 41. I'm just gonna put it out there and say you would NEVER be able to pull a hottie like that.
Google guys like John Favreau to see a pic of a dude who got fat as he aged. Newsflash: it happens all the time. Anyone can get fat. Self-serving memes with plenty of counterexamples everywhere online proves zilch regarding your idiotic assertions concerning women. You fail. Go suck a dick, since you hate women so much. - +1 y
*red pill sites
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO your 35!🤮😓
- +1 y
@Kvynhanma and you are an immature little boy, who probably has sexual dysfunction. No real man has your mentality. Go home to your crusty wank sock, little one.
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO I’m not a real man because I don’t like old women?
- +1 y
@Kvynhanma You're not a real man because you have the mental capacity of a flea.
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO I have an iq of 115
- +1 y
@Kvynhanma You missed the decimal point - 1.15 😂😂
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO was that your idea of an insult? You sure showed me🙄
- +1 y
@Kvynhanma Indeed I did. Now run along, man-child. It's time for your daily ritual of crying and jerking off into a sock alone.
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO I have large boob stripper friends to do that for me but okay 😂
- +1 y
@Kvynhanma yeah. You definitely would need to pay - ain't nobody gonna provide your punk ass with any 'intimacy' for free 😂
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO they don’t need money their strippers
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO I’m just really good at sex
- +1 y
@Kvynhanma that's what they tell you because you have to pay them for it 😂😂 After saving up real hard from your job at Dunkin' Donuts. Go get 'em, tiger. LMFAO.
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO I’m self employed so I have tons of down time to have sex
- +1 y
@Kvynhanma selling low-quality weed doesn't count as self-employment darling. But I'm glad you spend your extra time blowing what little cash you can scrounge up on meaningless sex which you have to pay for. Since obviously no-one will give it to you for free 😂 Sounds like a rock-solid way to evolve into a real man one day 😂😂
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO again they’re strippers not prostitutes I don’t pay them sometimes they try to cook for me just to stay at my spot longer and selling weed really? I’m not in middle school anymore 😂😂 your just jealous come on tell the truth and shame the devil
- +1 y
@Kvynhanma *you're 😂😂
- +1 y
@Kvynhanma I guess the reason you can only afford the Tank Engine is you are clearly breaking the golden rule: "don't get high on your own supply". There ain't no stripper on earth who is going to cook for some random man-child for free 😂😂 You're straight up trippin', dude.
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO so tell me what is a real man? 🧐
- +1 y
@Kvynhanma Revisit your demeanour in this interchange. It's aggressive, immature, unconsidered, unintelligent and sloppy. A real man would show up in the exact opposite way to you.
- +1 y
@Kvynhanma Oh God, not YOU again! It's "you're" (a contraction of "you are"), not "your"!
Yes, Nicolette is 35. So what? The "wall" is something believed in only by those silly and immature males who spend far too much time on the internet because they have nothing else to do. No hobbies, no job, no girlfriend or wife. In other words, LOSERS! - +1 y
@Rachelspiks perfectly articulated, my darling! x
- +1 y
@Kvynhanma "I’m just really good at sex"
Not only is your grammar and punctuation completely off, but you're thoroughly deluded as well. Boys who like to brag that they're "really good at sex" are just the opposite, in the opinion of just about every female on the planet who has ever had sex with them. - +1 y
@Kvynhanma "I have an iq of 115"
Are we supposed to be impressed by that? The last time I did one of those tests I got a score of 143. In any case, IQ tests are over-rated, and nowhere near as useful as many people apparently believe they are. - +1 y
@Rachelspiks I got a similar score to you, which doesn't surprise me. However, I avoided mentioning that since it's kind of like when people say "I'm intelligent" on a bio. Like, if you have to say it, you definitely aren't 😂 Though in this context, he is the one who raised the topic, so I have no problem with you educating him on what actually counts as even remotely impressive in the realm of IQ scores.
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO for a person you claim has only 2 brain cells that’s a pretty incredible score
- +1 y
@Kvynhanma yes, congratulations for achieving a score of 1.15 with your two little champions. You won the Addled Olympics. Good job, buddy. Good job.
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO "Crusty wank sock" - that was funny. He probably really does have one of those! :D
- +1 y
@Kvynhanma LMFAO. This kid has never seen a naked woman of any age with this kind of comment 😂😂😂
- +1 y
@Kvynhanma Oh wow, what an articulate and devastating comeback! I'm impressed. No really, this isn't sarcasm.
- +1 y
@Rachelspiks And his mother washes them in disgust 😂
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO Yes, you're right. When people (usually insecure males, I've noticed) mention their IQ, it usually comes across as being extremely cringey, and often downright embarrassing.
- +1 y
@Rachelspiks This time was no exception, either ;)
- +1 y
@Kvynhanma Yes you may, since you clearly don't have the extensive vocabulary required in order to come up with your own ripostes.
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO Actually, he probably tries to hide his wank socks from his mother in his messy bedroom somewhere, and he's now got a whole pile of them and they're starting to stink the place out.
- +1 y
@Rachelspiks Oh this is graphically accurate 😂😂 I can practically smell his slightly-stale-cheese-and-imbalanced-pheromone whiffs from here 🤢
- +1 y
@Kvynhanma Aw, are you starting to cry? :'(
Here, have a tissue. - +1 y
@Rachelspiks yeah, he's running out of socks.
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO I guess I'll never think of stale cheese the same way again, LOL :D I might end up becoming a vegan because of the association.
- +1 y
@Kvynhanma Hey, what does your bedroom really stink like? Do you have one of those blow-up sex dolls in your closet? Is the closet also where you hide the goat you have when your mother knocks on your door?
- +1 y
@Kvynhanma You are? I agree.
- +1 y
@Kvynhanma Do you have a box of 'Kleenex' by your bed? Please use those instead of your socks, if you do not mind.
- +1 y
@Kvynhanma Of course you don't "f*** unattractive hoes", because even they don't want you. You would have to pay them, and even then they'd be reluctant.
- +1 y
@Kvnnhanmaa lol - yeah, she'll need to douse herself in something (anything!) simply to mask the stench of your dirty dried up man-child jizz socks. Even your goat is disgusted with you and yearning to escape.
- +1 y
Jesus it hasn't even been 24 since I logged out and already I got 47 notices in just this post. wtf did you do @NicoletteXO? on wow lmao and why am I not surprised you are friends with @Rachelspiks?
- +1 y
CasaNorba - You no doubt already know that neither I nor Nicolette will ever back down from an argument if we happen to know that we're right, and especially if the one we're arguing with is clearly a misogynist, as "Kvynhanma" clearly is.
- +1 y
I don't classify myself as a feminist - so, we'll put your little mistake aside. But since you've clearly never won an award in your life, I'll throw you a bone. You win the Most Butt-fucked Man-Child Award for 2021. Congratulations. Sorry about your anus. I know it hurts, but you take it like a champ.
- +1 y
I'm not a feminist either. I guess every woman who actually stands up for what she believes in is a "feminist" according to most insecure men who like to think of themselves as "going their own way", or some other such crap.
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO " You win the Most Butt-fucked Man-Child Award for 2021. Congratulations. Sorry about your anus."
says the butthurt 35 year old granny that's been attacking my post for almost 24 hours. I guess you won yet another award that its "the most projecting person of 2021." till you my friend are no different than an actual feminists - +1 y
You call Nicolette a "granny" for being 35? You're 34 grandpa!
- +1 y
@Rachelspiks these morons have such limited capacity to actually engage in a relevant and nuanced discussion, I sometimes think they just reach into a big ol' hat filled with the words "feminist", "Karen", "triggered", "ho" and "slut", then do a lucky dip to decide what they're going to type next. So fucking boring and puerile.
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO Yes, and I've been called all those things at one point in time or another here at GAG. When their insults fail to have any effect upon me, they then resort to the ultimate admission of defeat - they block me.
- +1 y
CasaNorba - No, I'm not obsessed with MGTOW, I just want you people to finally GO! Stop your constant whining about how awful women apparently are, and just live your life as you promised you would. Is that too hard to do?
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO well buddy if you sound and behave like those then you can't get mad if people call you those things. simple as that
- +1 y
@Rachelspiks "You call Nicolette a "granny" for being 35? You're 34 grandpa!" - you took the words right out of my mouth. Unbelievably deluded, isn't he? Probably early-onset dementia 😂 😂
- +1 y
"well buddy if you sound and behave like those then you can't get mad if people call you those things. simple as that".
Firstly, I'm not your buddy.
Secondly, if you believe a "slut" or a "ho" "sounds like" a person who is able to astutely and hilariously rebut vitriolic and inane comments from men like you who can hardly string a sentence together... well, then, you must hold sluts in eminently high regard.
Either that, or your comment is logically incoherent. I'll put my wager on the latter.
- +1 y
"Attacking your post"? No honey. This started with another little man-baby making an unsolicited attack on me. And I put him in his little place for it. As he well deserved.
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO dude you literally attacked my post hours before you and @Kvynhanma had your childish brawl.
- +1 y
Lol. You mean the part where I mentioned your ridiculous, shallow and vitriolic comment on women seemed to be copied and pasted from a red-pill website? That's not an attack, that's a reflection of obvious truth. Interesting that you are so aggressively unstable that you seem to think you can instigate vitriol and attack upon women, yet you are concurrently so weak and overly sensitive that you perceive a mere reflection on this as an attack.
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO "You mean the part where I mentioned your ridiculous, shallow and vitriolic comment on women seemed to be copied and pasted from a red-pill website? That's not an attack,"
oh it is buddy, you shouldn't be talking about "aggressively unstable" since that's exactly what you sounded like when you posted that nonsense; just because you know it was true and your 35 year old ass couldnt handle it
" yet you are concurrently so weak and overly sensitive that you perceive a mere reflection on this as an attack."
if you were any stronger yourself you would of ignored my opinion and walked away specially if it didn't pertain to you. so yeah buddy you got any more PROJECTIONS you would like to make? - +1 y
Hahahaha your lack of ability to use logic is hilarious and astounding.
I literally said "Copied and pasted from a red pill site I presume. YAWN." - if you think that sounds unstably aggressive, you're even less stable and more unhinged than I thought. Someone yawning is aggressive? I'd hate to see you in a physical brawl then. You'd be on your ass in a nano-second, pathetically crying for Mummy and sucking your thumb.
As to your comment: "if you were any stronger yourself you would of ignored my opinion and walked away specially if it didn't pertain to you. so yeah buddy you got any more PROJECTIONS you would like to make?"
My strength is revealed by my capacity to express myself as and when I see fit. If you want to throw a man-tanty and make unwarranted comments about women, you'd best be prepared to be called out for your BS by both strong men and women.
And this whole thread is about women in my age bracket. So... um... the whole topic pertains to me, numbskull.
And you seem not to understand the meaning of the word 'projections'. Writing in capitals only serves to draw attention to your incorrect use of this term. And also makes you look like more of a man-baby. - +1 y
@NicoletteXO again aggressive or not it caught your 35 year old ass your attention for a reason and the fact that your EGO prevented you from ignoring my opinion speaks loud enough buddy.
"My strength is revealed by my capacity to express myself as and when I see fit. If you want to throw a man-tanty and make unwarranted comments about women, you'd best be prepared to be called out for your BS by both strong men and women."
yea ok Wonder Woman, just dont trip over your own Magic Lasso like you been doing for the past 24 hours.
"And this whole thread is about women in my age bracket. So... um... the whole topic pertains to me, numbskull."
yeah "ME, ME and ME" because "I'm so butthurt that I can't stand people talking negative about anything that relates to me!"
and yes I do know what PROJECTION is Miss English Teacher, it is what you also been doing for the past 24 hours. accusing others of sounding like a "man-baby" when this is exactly what you been doing - +1 y
1) "again aggressive or not it caught your 35 year old ass your attention for a reason and the fact that your EGO prevented you from ignoring my opinion speaks loud enough buddy."
Hahahaha - love how you just quietly admit defeat here, then immediately try to deflect from that by calling me 35 as if it's an insult - while you are 34 yourself.
Let me educate you in what a projection is. It's exactly what you yourself have done here. You post a vitriolic and unbearably egocentrically inflated comment about women, then you try to pretend someone who calls you out on this is being driven by ego. LMFAO. THAT'S what a projection is, honey. Projecting what you yourself are onto someone else.
- +1 y
2) "yea ok Wonder Woman, just dont trip over your own Magic Lasso like you been doing for the past 24 hours." If anyone's been tripping, it's you. You haven't managed to support a single one of your absurd comments here. Because they are full of logical fallacies and incoherence.
"And this whole thread is about women in my age bracket. So... um... the whole topic pertains to me, numbskull."
yeah "ME, ME and ME" because "I'm so butthurt that I can't stand people talking negative about anything that relates to me!"
Let me educate you in something else. DEFLECTION. There, some capitals for you, since you seem to love them so much. What you just tried (and failed) to do above is the (lame and shallow) strategy of deflection.
You suggested I shouldn't speak about things that don't pertain to me. I pointed out that they absolutely do pertain to me. In fact, this whole topic is literally about my demographic, so they couldn't pertain more to me. Instead of admitting that you are clearly and obviously wrong, you shift up to a red herring - the accusation that I am talking about "me, me, me". Well, that would be unnecessary if you did not make a stupid and clearly inaccurate assertion about me. What you are attempting to create is DEFLECTION from the fact that you are simply wrong.
You are also clearly butthurt about the fact you are wrong. Which is why instead of being able to admit this and apologise like a decent human, you then use PROJECTION to pretend I am butthurt about something which you fail to be able to articulate.
3) and yes I do know what PROJECTION is Miss English Teacher.
No, you don't. If you did, you'd realize projection is a topic from the subject of psychology, not English. Though the fact that you have no idea when, where and how to use capital letters does indicate you need to work on your understanding of both these fields. - +1 y
@NicoletteXO "Hahahaha - love how you just quietly admit defeat here, then immediately try to deflect from that by calling me 35 as if it's an insult - while you are 34 yourself."
actually no buddy, its the other way around because as I already proven 24 hours ago we men age way better than you women do, which explains why men in their 30 and over have a higher value in the sex market while you women become the lowest fruits in the tree at after their 30s. so no, just because you keep deflecting and denying this at heart does not mean it defies reality. sorry buddy but facts dont give a fuck about your feelings.
" You post a vitriolic and unbearably egocentrically inflated comment about women, then you try to pretend someone who calls you out on this is being driven by ego. LMFAO. "
as vitriolic and unbearably egocentrically inflated as it sounded to you it still the truth sweety and you did not call anybody out. all you did was storm in and WHINE about how I got it from a red pill forum like if that automatically validates your views. if anything all you did and STILL DOING (24 hours later) is showing how butthurt you are by the truth.
"You suggested I shouldn't speak about things that don't pertain to me. I pointed out that they absolutely do pertain to me. In fact, this whole topic is literally about my demographic, so they couldn't pertain more to me."
ok thank you buddy, now YOU"RE THE ONE ADMITTING YOUR OWN DEFEAT.
- +1 y
"Instead of admitting that you are clearly and obviously wrong, you shift up to a red herring - the accusation that I am talking about "me, me, me"
actually I am not wrong at all and I even brought evidence to the table, just because you dismissed them for being from a red pill forum does not mean YOUR RIGHT and reality has to change to accommodate your feelings.
"You are also clearly butthurt about the fact you are wrong. Which is why instead of being able to admit this and apologies like a decent human, you then use PROJECTION to pretend I am butthurt about something which you fail to be able to articulate."
again just because you think something is wrong does not mean you're right and reality has to change for you. seriously a lot of women in their 30s and over even admitted themselves that they no longer stand a chance in the dating world, hence why they become so easy and even lower their standards.
"No, you don't. If you did, you'd realize projection is a topic from the subject of psychology, not English. "
who said anything about English and psychology buddy? I'm not the one picking grammar here to further proof how butthurt and self defeated you feel miss I CAN RUB MY OPINION ON ANYONE'S FACE BECAUSE I'M ALWAYS RIGHT AND EVERYONE WHO DISAGREE WITH ME MUST BE WRONG!
talk about psychology buddy go see a therapist and get your Kanye West Syndrome checked out - +1 y
@CasaNorba I just LOVE how you managed to trigger the G@G snowflakes here. I know this website is full of degenerates who can't stand the truth, but Jesus Christ! Let them think that a 35 year old is just as "wanted" as a 20 year old 😂😂😂
- +1 y
Also don't mind me, just throwing some none red pill sources here:
metro.co.uk/.../
www.marketwatch.com/.../women-online-daters-peak-at-age-18-men-peak-at-50-2018-08-17
www.thesun.co.uk/.../
www.theatlantic.com/.../ - +1 y
@TruthBringer Fucking YAWN. If you cared to read this dialogue properly - which I doubt you did, because you're clearly as moronic and illiterate as CasaDouchebag here, you would have seen that we already predicted your utterly unoriginal comment of accusing us of being "triggered" above, in this comment:
"these morons have such limited capacity to actually engage in a relevant and nuanced discussion, I sometimes think they just reach into a big ol' hat filled with the words "feminist", "Karen", "triggered", "ho" and "slut", then do a lucky dip to decide what they're going to type next. So fucking boring and puerile."
Seriously, you're like a little sponge for misogynist ideology, with nary an original thought in your tiny brain. Honestly, I don'y know why you're siding with Señor Asswipe here, it's not an alliance that's going to do you any favours. - +1 y
@NicoletteXO And the irony of "expecting" comments form someone else when you're using the very same outdated misandrist shaming tactics. Yawn indeed lmfao
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO This argument is STILL going on? They don't give up easily, but they should, because they're not going to "win" here, that's for sure. :D
- +1 y
'CasaNorba', 'Kvynhanmer' and the ironically named 'TruthBringer', just give up. You may as well, because you can't win when you don't have the truth on your side and you're up against Nicolette. Like me, she never loses an argument. :)
Besides, there are more important things in life to discuss, and I'm pretty sure that the physical attractiveness of women over 30 is pretty low on the list (or at least it should be). What about the fact that right around the globe, various governments are introducing new rules and depriving citizens of their basic rights and freedoms under the guise of "fighting a deadly virus"? The entire thing is a scam, a 'scamdemic' as it's being called, and yet here you are getting all hot and bothered over something that doesn't even matter. - +1 y
@Rachelpiks whatsup with you people and "winning". I'm literally taking a piss here and enjoying how people like Nicolette managed to get triggered over a post over the fucking internet. And now she is projecting her own flaws onto someone else as an attempt to mask her own insecurities. Also, you blocked me while I frankly don't even remember ever arguing with you, and yet I manage to have you read my comments lmfao
- +1 y
Ok Casa - let's straighten you out:
I said: "Hahahaha - love how you just quietly admit defeat here, then immediately try to deflect from that by calling me 35 as if it's an insult - while you are 34 yourself."
You said: "actually no buddy, its the other way around because as I already proven 24 hours ago we men age way better than you women do, which explains why men in their 30 and over have a higher value in the sex market while you women become the lowest fruits in the tree at after their 30s. so no, just because you keep deflecting and denying this at heart does not mean it defies reality. sorry buddy but facts dont give a fuck about your feelings."
Here's where I'm going to annihilate you: LMFAO!!! You actually believe you 'proved' something by posting some self-serving memes? 😂😂😂 Why don't you actually do a degree in epistemology like I have and learn what proof actually entails. Let's just say it's not that. PMSL 😂😂 Also, even if we stooped to your bottom-feeding level of 'what counts as evidence' (random self-serving images), which I don't condone... but even then, I already gave counter-examples which you have ignored. So on every possible measure, you fail.
- +1 y
Ok, next.
I said: " You post a vitriolic and unbearably egocentrically inflated comment about women, then you try to pretend someone who calls you out on this is being driven by ego. LMFAO. "
You said "as vitriolic and unbearably egocentrically inflated as it sounded to you it still the truth sweety and you did not call anybody out. all you did was storm in and WHINE about how I got it from a red pill forum like if that automatically validates your views. if anything all you did and STILL DOING (24 hours later) is showing how butthurt you are by the truth."
My response - So, you admit here that your own words were vitriolic and unbearably stoically inflated. Now you are fucking deflecting again from the original point - which is that you accused me of being egoic, and I countered that by pointing out the irony of someone who began a thread in an egoic manner pointing this out. Now you admit I was right. However, you are attempting to mask this with more of your red-herring BS by changing the subject again. You admit I was right. The end. And I was. The other points are superfluous and not relevant to the original point. Cool. You lose again.
Next.
I said: "You suggested I shouldn't speak about things that don't pertain to me. I pointed out that they absolutely do pertain to me. In fact, this whole topic is literally about my demographic, so they couldn't pertain more to me."
You said: "ok thank you buddy, now YOU"RE THE ONE ADMITTING YOUR OWN DEFEAT."
My response: Again, you appear to have cognitive processing impairments. This is not an example of me admitting defeat. This is an extremely clear example of you being undeniably wrong. You stated I shouldn't speak because something didn't pertain to me. I pointed out that the whole topic pertains to me, since it is focussed on my demographic specifically. This is proof you were wrong. Plain and simple. AGAIN.
- +1 y
Yes, I know that it's your opinion, but it's wrong. It might be time to change it. That's what intelligent people do; they come to the realisation they were not correct and adjust their beliefs accordingly. You should try it some time.
- +1 y
*egoically, not stoically (silly autocorrect)
- +1 y
@rachelspiks
It sounds like you don’t know how old this site works either otherwise he will realize that you can’t change opinions.
Till then just because someone else’s opinion does not comfort your views or you think is wrong does not mean it automatically is.
SMARTER people in the other hand respect and mind their own business and walk away when they come across an opinion they disagreed on. Cause In the end everyone is entitled to have their own views nobody has to see the world from YOUR point of view - +1 y
Onto your next round of doltishness:
I said: "Instead of admitting that you are clearly and obviously wrong, you shift up to a red herring - the accusation that I am talking about "me, me, me"
You said: "actually I am not wrong at all and I even brought evidence to the table, just because you dismissed them for being from a red pill forum does not mean YOUR RIGHT and reality has to change to accommodate your feelings."
My response: Again, refer to my point about epistemology above. Moronic self-serving memes showing pictures of two random actors doesn't constitute proof. Though the fact that you believe it does demonstrates what a low-calibre mind you have. Seriously, get some higher education. Also, it's *you're 🙄 Oh, and if you want to study what constitutes 'reality' - how about studying for years in ontology, as I have, rather than assuming your puny little perspectives are 'reality' just because you stamp your fat little Man-toddler foot, throw a tantrum and try to demand them to be.
- +1 y
NEXT:
I said: "You are also clearly butthurt about the fact you are wrong. Which is why instead of being able to admit this and apologies like a decent human, you then use PROJECTION to pretend I am butthurt about something which you fail to be able to articulate."
You said: "again just because you think something is wrong does not mean you're right and reality has to change for you. seriously a lot of women in their 30s and over even admitted themselves that they no longer stand a chance in the dating world, hence why they become so easy and even lower their standards."
My response: I absolutely agree with you, that 'reality' doesn't have to change because of my opinion. However, I never claimed it did. I'm simply stating your claims to not hold. The onus of proof here is on you, since you are the one who has fronted up here with a position which - you literally admit above - was formulated in a vitriolic and egoically inflated manner. The burden of proof is on the one who initiates the claim - and that is you. And you've failed to support your point. And "a lot of women have claimed?" - your random anecdote isn't proof, buddy. I could equally say a huge proportion of older men I see are fat and ugly, and don't stand a chance with any well-kept woman in her 30s. However, as we've both agreed, me simply chucking around anecdotes (even if they are true in my own experience) isn't any watertight proof of the nature of things. And therefore, neither is your chucking around of random anecdotes proof of the nature of things. So, FAIL AGAIN.
NEXT.
I said: "No, you don't. If you did, you'd realize projection is a topic from the subject of psychology, not English. "
You said: "who said anything about English and psychology buddy?"
My reponse: Um... you did - in this sentence right here: "and yes I do know what PROJECTION is Miss English Teacher". LOL. - +1 y
NEXT.
You said: "I'm not the one picking grammar here to further proof how butthurt and self defeated you feel miss I CAN RUB MY OPINION ON ANYONE'S FACE BECAUSE I'M ALWAYS RIGHT AND EVERYONE WHO DISAGREE WITH ME MUST BE WRONG!"
My response:
*prove
*rub my opinion IN, not on
*disagrees
Also, the only one butthurt is you, Mr Illiterate. The fact that you start yelling in caps because you are embarrassed about being revealed as such is fairly clear to anyone with half a brain. Not that you'll be able to relate.
I don't believe I am always right at all. If you fronted with an intelligent argument I'd be happy to engage with it. However, you didn't. That's on you, buddy. - +1 y
@NicoletteXO are you gonna be a parrot and repeat everything I said to further proved how triggered you been for the past 48 hours?
seriously dude @TruthBringer and I already lifted up your skirt and called you out on your projection habits. all you're doing at the moment is continue to convince me and yourself that you got the ego of a 10 year old, getting triggered for 48 hours over a subject that its true just to further imply that it EMPLIES TO YOU after all - +1 y
@TruthBringer to your point - "And the irony of "expecting" comments form someone else when you're using the very same outdated misandrist shaming tactics. Yawn indeed lmfao"
Look, I understand where you are coming from here. What I will say is this. It is not my preference to remain at this fairly low level of name-slanging. However, if someone leads with it, as these men have, I will give it straight back to them and more. I will never start that game. But I will finish it.
The moment any one of these men apologizes or admits they are (or even might be) wrong, or the moment they start speaking to me in a respectful and reasonable manner, I will immediately return them that courtesy.
This is not misandry. I LOVE, adore and respect good men, intelligent men and respectful men. I know plenty of them, and they receive a soft and beautiful side of me which imbecilic and disrespectful men won't see because their behaviour precludes them from seeing it.
Rather than misandry - what this is, is putting imbecilic men back in their place when they initiate unwarranted vitriol against women.
To be clear, I am more than happy to do the same for imbecilic women. It's not a gendered thing. - +1 y
@NicoletteXO You've not done a good job representing yourself in a respectable manner from the start. So it's best to either do so from the very beginning in order to open a healthy discussion/debate, or refrain from engaging into arguments over the internet if what someone says affects you this much. No I didn't read your entire rants and neither am I planning on doing so. I'm simply stating that you're unironically showing your sensitivity over a topic that is directed at your age group. And you didn't do a good job behaving in a respectable way that would allow you to be taken seriously. Especially if you're going to throw typical toxic feminist shaming tactics around. And no, this is not me attacking you. This is just me pointing out the hypocrisy in your bahvior. Because you're doing a similar thing as the men you're criticizing of doing.
Also, since you have a soft spot for the red pill community, I provided some links that aren't coming from the red pill. - +1 y
To CasaButthurt's point:
"@rachelspiks
It sounds like you don’t know how old this site works either otherwise he will realize that you can’t change opinions. Till then just because someone else’s opinion does not comfort your views or you think is wrong does not mean it automatically is.
SMARTER people in the other hand respect and mind their own business and walk away when they come across an opinion they disagreed on. Cause In the end everyone is entitled to have their own views nobody has to see the world from YOUR point of view"
Response:
Nobody is suggesting that "just because someone else’s opinion does not comfort your views or you think is wrong does not mean it automatically is". Nobody said your views are "automatically wrong", Casa. What is being asserted is that you have failed to demonstrates that your views hold weight. They are not 'automatically' wrong - though they are unproven because you haven't proven them.
And if "SMARTER" people (God, the fucking caps) "respect and mind their own business and walk away when they come across an opinion they disagreed on", then what are you waiting for?
If you think that is the definition of a smart person, walk away. See ya later.
Otherwise according to your own definition, you're not that smart.
- +1 y
*demonstrate
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO "If you think that is the definition of a smart person, walk away. See ya later.
Otherwise according to your own definition, you're not that smart."
again this is my opinion and you and @rachelspiks are the one who invaded it trying showing how butthurt that two of you were for the past 48 hours so no, you actually proof my point for the fact that you invaded my opinion first trying to change my views and showing how triggered and oversensitive you are and can't even walk away 48 hours later
but I'm the "butthurt" one ey? - +1 y
@TruthBringer oh seriously, go suck a dick. You're going to moralise here? What a joke.
You said: "@NicoletteXO You've not done a good job representing yourself in a respectable manner from the start. So it's best to either do so from the very beginning in order to open a healthy discussion/debate, or refrain from engaging into arguments over the internet if what someone says affects you this much. No I didn't read your entire rants and neither am I planning on doing so. I'm simply stating that you're unironically showing your sensitivity over a topic that is directed at your age group. And you didn't do a good job behaving in a respectable way that would allow you to be taken seriously. Especially if you're going to throw typical toxic feminist shaming tactics around. And no, this is not me attacking you. This is just me pointing out the hypocrisy in your bahvior. Because you're doing a similar thing as the men you're criticizing of doing."
You haven't read the debate. You chime in now moralizing. You fail to observe that the one who began this was Casa with his initial comment, which he himself admits (finally - because I relentlessly called him out on it) was "vitriolic and egoically inflated". Why not moralize against Casa, since he initiated this?
I said, I won't start a debate in this way. But I will finish it. Casa started by playing dirty, so until he cleans it up, that's where we are.
I think it is completely 'unrespectable' that you chime in in this way with no skin in the game. It shows that you stand for unprovoked vitriol against women. And it shows you are the kind of "man" who will shame others unless they roll over and take unwarranted abuse. Yeah, super respectable.
- +1 y
Casa:
You said: "@NicoletteXO are you gonna be a parrot and repeat everything I said to further proved how triggered you been for the past 48 hours? seriously dude @TruthBringer and I already lifted up your skirt and called you out on your projection habits. all you're doing at the moment is continue to convince me and yourself that you got the ego of a 10 year old, getting triggered for 48 hours over a subject that its true just to further imply that it EMPLIES TO YOU after all"
Response: EMPLIES? 😂😂😂 And I truly thought you couldn't get more illiterate. Here, I admit I was wrong hahahahaha.
I'm going to hold you to account until you give up. That's what's going down. Suck it up.
You haven't proven a goddamn thing, except that you're very good at losing arguments and you don't like it when people have the acuity to tear yours apart. Not that your half-baked points really classify as "arguments", but anyway...
- +1 y
CasaMcOuchyButt:
I said: @NicoletteXO "If you think that is the definition of a smart person, walk away. See ya later.
Otherwise according to your own definition, you're not that smart."
You said: "again this is my opinion and you and @rachelspiks are the one who invaded it trying showing how butthurt that two of you were for the past 48 hours so no, you actually proof my point for the fact that you invaded my opinion first trying to change my views and showing how triggered and oversensitive you are and can't even walk away 48 hours later
but I'm the "butthurt" one ey?"
I don't concur with your definition of a smart person. What I am suggesting is that if YOU think walking away constitutes what a smart person does, then go ahead and do it. Go on, shoo! - +1 y
@NicoletteXO "And I truly thought you couldn't get more illiterate. Here, I admit I was wrong hahahahaha."
you must of been wrong if you were able to argue 48 HOURS with this illiterate then it means you clearly understood everything I said. and once again you're picking grammar as a way to further imply that you lost the argument
" Not that your half-baked points really classify as "arguments", but anyway..."
is not classified as argument to you yet you been arguing and projecting for the past 48 hours here... the IRONY
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO NO SHIT, I said "smarter people dont go around invading other peoples opinion trying to change other people's views. they instead mind their own business and walk away"
which is something that two of you butthurt losers have been failing to do for the past 48 HOURS. - +1 y
Dude. The fact that I don't capitulate to your bullshit is not indication of the quality of your "arguments" LMAO.
The fact that you clearly are illiterate, and also too arrogant to admit it - although it is objectively the case - is simply the delightful icing on the cake here.
This is what an illiterate moron does - attempt to deflect from his repeated failures, instead of admitting them and doing better. - +1 y
@Rachelspiks to your point - " 'CasaNorba', 'Kvynhanmer' and the ironically named 'TruthBringer', just give up. You may as well, because you can't win when you don't have the truth on your side and you're up against Nicolette. Like me, she never loses an argument.
Besides, there are more important things in life to discuss, and I'm pretty sure that the physical attractiveness of women over 30 is pretty low on the list (or at least it should be). What about the fact that right around the globe, various governments are introducing new rules and depriving citizens of their basic rights and freedoms under the guise of "fighting a deadly virus"? The entire thing is a scam, a 'scamdemic' as it's being called, and yet here you are getting all hot and bothered over something that doesn't even matter."
EXACTLY!
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO as I said I don’t need to change my views for you whether you think they’re right or not.
And trust me I’m happy being illiterate and arrogant over being a whiny self righteous troll with the ego of a 10 year old.
The fact that you keep deflecting, and spamming the same horseshit for 48 hours makes it safe to assume that you’re no longer arguing, you’re just trolling your useless life away here, does this MEANS IS NOW A GOOD IDEA FOR ME TO BLOCK YOU? - +1 y
Casa-I-Like-Getting-Pegged-By-Women-With-Higher-IQs-Than-Me:
You said: "@NicoletteXO NO SHIT, I said "smarter people dont go around invading other peoples opinion trying to change other people's views. they instead mind their own business and walk away"
which is something that two of you butthurt losers have been failing to do for the past 48 HOURS."
Nuh-uh. Again the deflection. Nice try, but no. You said this AFTER I whooped your ass. You don't get to change your original position, which was simply that smart people walk away from arguments, just because I tied you in a pretzel with it and noted that if that is what you think a smart person does, you should do it.
I don't personally think that is the definition of a smart person. I don't think having a dialogue and rebutting points for a long time is a problem per se, nor an indication for or against intelligence.
But you do. So if you want to remain consistent, you're gonna need to get going pronto. Othewise by your own lights, you have admitted that you are the opposite of a smart person. Essentially, if you don't leave now, you admit you are a dolt.
So go on, be "smart". Git.
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO again I retard I said "smart people dont go around trying to change other people's views they instead respect other people's opinion and walk away."
none of that implies to me because this is my opinion and YOUR THE ONE WHO'S HERE INVADING IT trying to change my views when all you been doing is showing how butthurt you been for the past 48 hours.
till then now you're definitely the one who's gonna walk away cause I'm sick of arguing with a 10 year old. seriously dude, go troll away your useless meaningless life somewhere else - +1 y
Nicolette wanted to leave one final message, but couldn't because she told me you blocked her. So, as a favour, here it is :)
"A final message to Casa-Ungghh-Unnnggh-I-Can't-Take-Being-Intellectually-Buttfucked-Anymore...
You said: "NicoletteXO trust me I’m happy being illiterate and arrogant over being a whiny self righteous troll with the ego of a 10 year old. The fact that you keep deflecting, and spamming the same horseshit for 48 hours makes it safe to assume that you’re no longer arguing, you’re just trolling your useless life away here, does this MEANS IS NOW A GOOD IDEA FOR ME TO BLOCK YOU?"
Response: You getting your ass kicked with astute and pertinent points, blow by blow, ain't spam or deflection, buddy. That's you getting floored. I'm glad you've finally admitted you are illiterate and arrogant - I will give you a cookie. That is your consolation prize after you made the ultimate admission of defeat - blocking me. Whatever you may think of women your age, one thing this shows is they can wipe the floor with you."
- +1 y
@Rachelspiks dude I dont give a fuck, the fact that she needs a personal messenger to evade the block pretty much explains how butthurt she is.
and where the hell am I getting defeated at? this is a damn internet post, not a boxing match. so why dont you and her go fuck off, find someone else to bother.
Lmao "illiterate this, illiterate that" I guess correcting grammar is the only way she will ever feel victorious. not my fault that English is not my primary language, just like her being 35 and already looking like a granny - +1 y
Hey, don't you dare use foul language like that with me mister! I was just passing on a message, and don't call me "dude" either!
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO Thanks for once again proving you're an immature individual who can't take any criticism and decides to attack people because you can't deal with your emotional tantrum. Your first response was more than enough to dictate that you decided to come with bad energy, to get go. Funny enough that you lecture me about morality while you yourself have not been a Jesus Christ yourself. You obviously lack self-awareness. Not to forget to mention that you getting triggered over internet comments says a lot about your self-image and level of self-esteem (which your ad hominems are a testament to them not being quite so high). And that for someoneof your age.. wow... Sure I don't condone Casa's way of talking to you, but I still side with him on this one because I agree with his initial comment. But you decided to discard anything he said by just pointing to them coming from red pill sources, which on it's own is an ad hominem attack to the source rather than the message. This is clearly shown in your lack of valid arguments to debunk anything he said. Not to forget to mention your misandrist shaming tactics. So you attacking men and their comments simply for stating the obvious, and yet you're sitting here lecturing others about "unprovoked virtriol against women".
- +1 y
@NicoletteXO And now you're butthurt so you start to use your own private owl named @Rachelspiks to send some messages. Be on your way. I think you have far more important things to be concerned of like making sure you don't end up alone. Your sexual market value has already taken a dive as it is. And that of Casa funny enough has increased compared to his 20s (as multiple non-red pill sources have shown). I suggest you try to learn to swallow that harsh fact because it will remain nothing but a fact. And another proof of evidence are the cultures (such as in the middle-east) where women are urged to get married as they are still young and fertile with (preferably) someone who is older as the older man usually has his shit together. But that's another discussion you're clearly not ready for. As well as you're not ready to hold an intellectual debate but instantly jump into defensive mode as well as logical fallacies. I've seen enough for a 35 year old now. Ciao ciao
- +1 y
@Rachelspiks Nobody asked you to butt in from the beginning, either. But then here you are. And now your little mate has been blocked (for being an annoying creature who clearly lacks real life attention), you start to back away ha. The fact you decided to be a mail dog is a laugh all in itself. Go sit on each other's face somewhere else. Preferably a safe space where facts like these aren't being discussed.
@CasaNorba This is them having to deal with men throwing harsh truth about women:
Jesus 35 years old and this much toxicity. Imagine living under the same roof. Women like these two make me appreciate my girlfriend more and more - +1 y
@TruthBringer otfrl! I know right? I mean NicoletteXO is Australian so she is obviosly from the west so I can't be surprised with her.
@rachelspiks in the other hand is from Russia but still acts like a butt hurt vindictive feminists for some odd reason
Women lose their attractive / beauty/ body / the youthfulness.
I slept with a 40 fit girl
And a 18 fit girl.
And the 18 year girl took me a long time to get tired of her.
She kept walking around in nude and her body was incredible.
Everything is firm the skin is amazing , very tight, the bodies aren’t saggy. And etc etc..37 Reply- +1 y
Newsflash; 18 year old dude's bodies are also tighter, and they often have better erections, than men your age. However, the mark of an intelligent person is to realize that everyone ages. It happens to all of us eventually. So while keeping fit is important for everyone, you'd better start appreciating the beauty that also lives beneath the surface of people - character, confidence, creativity and so on - otherwise you will ended up a very sad wrinkly old dude.
- +1 y
Your "coaching practice" is a fucking joke dude. You are a fucking joke. You tried to solicit me and many other women here, and then in other threads you spread inane misogynistic BS which reveals you are the one who needs coaching - or better yet, meds and a psych ward.
- +1 y
You seem awfully angry from life what do you care what others do? Because you don’t work on yourself. The whole time you’ve been chasing me. why don’t you go and contact me and have a debate with me instead of hiding behind the keyboard and talking bullshit? Yeah coaching practice is bullshit to those who refuse to do anything with the lives that’s why the whole time you’re chasing me and talking bullshit one day someone is gonna mike Tyson you because of your mouth. Karen! Now fuk off. Keyboard warrior.
- +1 y
You spew insults and vitriol, then accuse me of being angry? Nice try, dude. And let's not forget you are the one who invited me (amongst so many others) to check out your website. You frequently do this here on GAG in a manner which is almost always entirely tone-deaf, since it is never asked for and rarely relevant to the topic. So, before I clicked on the site, I already suspected it would be as bad as it is. It's quite amusing that you talk about things like "lack of listening skills in the 21st century", when I don't think I could find a more fabulous example of someone with poor listening skills and utterly terrible communication skills than you. An example of your recent 'wordsmithery' above: "You don’t know FK all you don’t understand nothing But biology and you keep yapping. I bet you’re a fat ass" - yeah, that sure sounds like someone I'd be asking advice from LMFAO.
You literally know nothing about me and spew insults and BS.
I didn't say coaching practices are bullshit. I said YOURS is bullshit. Because there is a complete disjunct between who you pretend to be on your website and who you are here. YOU are the one who needs coaching - from someone actually capable and skilled in those arts. Better yet, a psychotherapist. Coaching won't be enough to untangle the mess in your head and heart.
And gee, you make physically threatening comments to women and then wonder why they don't 'contact you to have a debate'? Gee, I wonder why? - +1 y
Correction *I don't think I could find a more fabulous example of someone with poorer listening skills and more utterly terrible communication skills than you.
I prefer older men at 33 and don’t want to date anyone younger than me. I still look youthful how I was in my 20s and still healthy. These guys don’t realize those women in their 20s have to get older too !
47 Reply- Anonymous(45 Plus)+1 y
I love the hypocrisy... ugly women can say seriously that they demand a hot guy and that looks shouldn't matter (as long it's the woman's looks)
All women hate heavy men... be 20 pounds or more overweight and you're disgusting... but THIS is a supermodel... If ANY man with close to her BMI tried to tell a woman about inner beauty she'd laugh in his face!!!
Include a caption for your image… So why are those men degraded? or is it only bad if it is a woman?
00 Reply 
+1 yI've heard mostly women do the "degrading" and i always find some amusement listening because the venom being spouted, i always learn something new, mostly how specific they can drill down on a single thing like maybe hair...
I witnessed a women describe anothers hair for about 15 minutes. A male couldn't hang with that.00 Reply- Anonymous(36-45)+1 y
Isn't this question being just a BIT dramatic? I don't think women are "degraded" for being 30 and over. Making the observation that the vast, vast, VAST majority of women achieve their height of physical beauty in their mid-twenties or earlier is hardly "degrading" women in their 30s.
40 Reply I don’t think that’s true. My moms 30+ and has never teen demeaned for her age, I’m pretty sure the age thing is unique to guys on this site that think a woman over 30 is in menopause already or some bullshit 🤷🏽♀️
30 Reply
+1 yThat’s looking at it from a males biology POV. Men don’t necessarily find a women unattractive just because she is 30. Some women are still highly beautiful way beyond 30. There are men who will like you for you regardless of anything.
30 Reply
+1 yIt usually a cultural thing people think older women isn't as attractive compared to younger female because in everyone mind the younger the girl, the hotter she is. But I wouldn't let non of those assholes bother you there are actually some of us guys who do prefer mature women.
00 Reply
+1 yHonestly, I think 30 is around the time a lot of women stop being insecure and naive people-pleasers, and stop taking shit. People don't like that.
I'm way sexier - and cooler! - at 35 than I was at 25. All women who live in integrity are.212 Reply- +1 y
@Kvynhanma You're nasty.
- +1 y
@Kvynhanma You're nasty. Not to mention immature, stupid, retarded, socially inept and lacking in basic decency, manners and empathy.
- +1 y
@Kvynhanma No, me Jane, you dickhead.
- +1 y
@Rachelspiks burn 😂😂😂 Nailed it.
- +1 y
@CasaNorba " I think 30 is around the time a lot of women stop being insecure and naive people-pleasers,"
obviously, since their looks deteriorate after 30 then they have no choice but to lower their ego and standards. no man is willing to chance any of you by this stage in life"
I'm genuinely starting to wonder if you have a mental impairment or intellectual disability. I'm suggesting literally the opposite. That as a woman matures she raises her standards, because unlike a naive and insecure young woman who will try to please everyone around her despite being treated like an afterthought, a mature woman won't accept that.
You know what's really pernicious about men like you? Your type is the kind who pay out women for having a "high body count" (even that phrase is so nauseating, just dripping with misogyny)... but you know who has a high body count in a way that doesn't serve them? Young, naieve, people pleasing women with low standards. Of course, not all young women are this way, and more power to those who know their value. However, the more mature a woman gets, the better she learns not to accept lowball offers, imagining and hoping the man will magically change. She learns to judge a man by his character and actions, rather than believing promises of hot air that turn out later to be false, as young women often do.
The fact that you even need to have this explained to you because your comprehension skills are so poor shows us just what kind of a man you are. Let's just say, not the sharpest tool in the shed. - +1 y
not you just confirmed you're the one who's mentally ill or perhaps retarded. women dont raise their standard in their 30s. this is when they have no choice but to lower it because like I said their looks are deteriorating and no men of high quality pay mind to her. seriously women in their 30s who are single or haven't been married always tremble with fear because they think "they're gonna be alone forever"
"your type is the kind who pay out women for having a "high body count"
no shit buddy, would you want to be in a relationship with a man who's slept with 50+ women? do you not mind taking the risk of being a cuckqueen? or are you already one?
and no just because a women become less mature and give it up less easier as they age still does not mean they can automatically scape their pass. your pass will always determine your future whether you like it or not.
"The fact that you even need to have this explained to you because your comprehension skills are so poor shows us just what kind of a man you are. Let's just say, not the sharpest tool in the shed."
just because I dont bow down to all your horseshit believes does not mean my comprehension skills are poor miss English teacher - +1 y
@CasaNorba
You said: "not you just confirmed you're the one who's mentally ill or perhaps retarded."
My response: How so? I just demonstrated you misunderstood an extraordinarily simple position statement. In fact, you misunderstood it so profoundly that you thought it meant literally the opposite of what it actually meant. If you think that accurately pointing out your lack of basic comprehension skills constitutes being "retarded", well then, you're in a worse position than I feared.
- +1 y
NEXT.
You said: "women dont raise their standard in their 30s. this is when they have no choice but to lower it because like I said their looks are deteriorating and no men of high quality pay mind to her. seriously women in their 30s who are single or haven't been married always tremble with fear because they think "they're gonna be alone forever"
My reponse: just because you assert this, doesn't prove jack shit. This is not my experience, nor the experience of almost every woman I've ever encountered. I accept that my anecdotal evidence is not the final say on this. But yours certainly isn't either. And if you're going to fling around absurd vitriol about women, you're going to need to have more up your sleeve that "it is that way because I say so". Furthermore, we've already demonstrated above that you have the comprehension capacity of a cane toad. So, while I don't think anybody's anecdotal evidence is sufficient to prove anything here, if I had to choose a perspective which is more likely to be clear and cogent, it wouldn't be the perspective of a man with the IQ of a cockroach.
- +1 y
NEXT:
You said: "your type is the kind who pay out women for having a "high body count"
no shit buddy, would you want to be in a relationship with a man who's slept with 50+ women? do you not mind taking the risk of being a cuckqueen? or are you already one?"
My response: I don't give a damn about how many women my man has slept with. What I care about is whether or not he is a man of character who is in integrity with himself. There are virgins and incels who have slept with no women at all - this is not a virtue. And there are men who have slept with many women because they are shallow and superficial - also not a virtue. There are other men who have slept with a large sum of women, who have acted in joy and integrity while doing so - I celebrate those men, and their healthy sexuality. I'm sure you can't relate at all, because your sexuality (as your intellect) is obviously warped and twisted beyond repair. I doubt very much that you've ever had a loving, healthy sexual encounter in your life, let alone a decent relationship.
NEXT:
You said: "and no just because a women become less mature and give it up less easier as they age still does not mean they can automatically scape their pass. your pass will always determine your future whether you like it or not."
My response: This sentence is literally incoherent and completely undermines your previous position. Earlier you claim that women of your age bracket DON'T in fact make the choice to raise their standards and "give it up less easily" - but now you admit they do (as I said originally, and you stupidly disputed). But at the same time, now you are saying it is "less mature" of a woman to "give it up less easily". Riiight.
As mentioned, I have no problem with people having sexual experience - male or female. In fact, I think it is healthy. Why are you so repressed and judgmental about sexuality? Is it because you can't get none? I suspect so.
- +1 y
NEXT:
I said: "The fact that you even need to have this explained to you because your comprehension skills are so poor shows us just what kind of a man you are. Let's just say, not the sharpest tool in the shed."
You said: "just because I dont bow down to all your horseshit believes does not mean my comprehension skills are poor miss English teacher"
My response: I didn't assert your comprehension skills are poor because you are "not bowing down". I asserted - correctly - that they are poor because you miscomprehended an extremely basic position statement. And you miscomprehended it so poorly, you actually thought it meant literally the opposite of what it in fact meant. Also, as anyone who has had the misfortune of encountering your uncouth babbling here will already know - your comprehension and literacy skills are astoundingly sub-par for someone with such temerity. In fact, you yourself even admit to your own illiteracy and arrogance elsewhere here, in a conversation we had a couple of hours ago. So, yeah - I assert that your comprehension skills are poor, because your comprehension skills are demonstrably, and unequivocally, poor.
It's a societal trend that women should be young and beautiful, so the younger the better. Women, especially in fields such as entertainment after a certain age no longer hold value. This ass backwards philosophy leaks into everyday life.
31 Reply- +1 y
How the hell is it backwards?
I personally think that type of thinking is childish. I feel like you shouldn't be worried about the opinion or someone who thinks like that. He's probably realizing he's getting old and projecting. And that's putting it nicely.
42 Reply- +1 y
@aliali8 totally.
- 546 opinions shared on Girl's Behavior topic.
+1 yIt's not, I've seen atttractive 45 year old women before. seen unattractive ones too mind you, but the age itself typically is not the issue, as many women in their 30s and 40s look just as hot as when they were in their 20s.
30 Reply Anyone who thinks so isn't worth your time or energy. Seriously isn't that some creepy shit anyway? EVERYONE will be over 30 unless they die. So what happens to the guy who is married then his wife turns 30? Yeah, he's just a piece of shit human now.
50 Reply- 488 opinions shared on Girl's Behavior topic.
+1 yWell I don't think a women being over 30 should be degraded they are still fairly young and sexy in my opnion. Some women feel they are part there prime when they reach there 30's and there looks mind of fade away a little and maybe had some kids and feel what guy would want that. I think women are too hard on themselves as they get older if you asked me they are more attractive as they get older because they more mature and experienced.
00 Reply 4.3K opinions shared on Girl's Behavior topic. In real life, no. Only by online trolls. I found women in their 30s more attractive even when I was a young adult
50 Reply364 opinions shared on Girl's Behavior topic. Clueless, but speaking for myself I find 30 year old or older much sexier than 20 something year olds.
Something about the maturity level.
Plus I actually will have something in common with them.20 Reply697 opinions shared on Girl's Behavior topic. Age means nothing. Women over 30 can be attractive af. I'm thinking that the only guys who don't think so are young and still attracted to high school and college-age girls.
24 Reply- +1 y
I think there may be a few of those. But actually I think the ones who spout this are mainly incels. It gives their egos comfort to believe a narrative that suggests that at some point women will feel rejection - since underneath all their vitriol, they just feel rejected themselves. It's like a twisted way of extracting a sense of justice from the Universe in their minds.
- +1 y
It's actually ridiculous. Like men, women flourish with good sex, and plenty of it. It's like watering a garden. There is nothing virtuous about being sex-starved.
- Anonymous(25-29)+1 y
I don't know why but this is an explanation: it's not that 30 was an age just picked for people to start disliking women, it's that women tend to start losing youthful features around that age. It's probably a general rule, but some people revere it as if it always holds true, which it doesn't (of course this matter is subjective but I'm not going to go into details).
The only thing significant about the age 30 in this case is that it tends to correspond to loss of youthful features.00 Reply 
+1 yThere are tons of women over 30 and even much older that I find extremely attractive both that I know irl and like celebrities. I don't know where this idea comes fron that after 30 you're all of a sudden an old bag of bones lol
00 Reply- Anonymous(30-35)+1 y
I would say usually a woman over 30 is more mature, professional, has her own shit going for her already and a firm set of likes and dislikes in a partner. This can be intimidating to some men, so they brand her as being jaded and having a negative outlook on dating when really all she's done is set the bar higher for these dudes who are looking for an easy ride
00 Reply 
+1 yI don't think that, I actually prefer women in their 30's & 40's in terms of attractiveness, as they are usually more confident in themselves and its sexy.
10 Reply- 919 opinions shared on Girl's Behavior topic.
+1 ySome people think that’s beyond their prime years, and that all girls not in their prime are ugly.
Why? Because they’re selfish immature idiots. (and probably pervs, too)10 Reply I am 30, turning 31 soon and 80% of the men I have dated/in relationship with are younger than me (the youngest being 6 years younger). And I have less wrinkles, more hair and less fat than any of these younger guys I have dated. A lot of these young men I dated want to settle down and want a woman who wants marriage, kids, but also have their money and career together so they go after someone like me rather than a younger girl
00 Reply
+1 yI don’t understand this either I think there’s plenty of life in a woman in her forties and have always thought this I guess because most people think women should be done having kids by thirty and too many people that’s all they value women for
00 ReplyI don't think women become unattractive at 30, maybe there's some people that are that shallow but that all depends on the person I'm sure
10 Reply
+1 yA woman over 30 is atill attractive 😍
I dont see why someone would degrade her for being in her 30s60 Reply- Anonymous(30-35)+1 y
Those biology stuffs are bullshit. It’s about having options. Men are valued by women for their resources , looks. Men value beauty. Young girls have much more options , they generally date only rich or attractive women. If men can get enough resources they tend to take care of themselves too and start. Looking for more good looking women. Plus with more age attractive women come with huge baggage.
10 Reply Depends on the guy I guess based on the comments below. I find women to be most attractive in their mid 20's.
20 Reply
+1 y90% of your eggs are gone by then so go figure, you're 90% less of a sex object
311 Reply- +1 y
which some women would say is empowering so it comes down to your perspective on it
- +1 y
Thank you for recognizing my barbarity
- Asker+1 y
I don't care about the egg thing as I don't want kids. Nor I want to actually be married.
- +1 y
The ability to bear kids is what contributes to your total attractiveness
- Asker+1 y
Okay. Well I'm 30 and I like older men. anyways.
- +1 y
They like fertile women
- Asker+1 y
How about a guy who doesn't want kids?
- +1 y
Then you're talking about a long term relationship with very little long term purpose.
- Asker+1 y
But I have seen old couples married for a lifetime with no kids...
- +1 y
I have never seen old people together who never had kids.
996 opinions shared on Girl's Behavior topic. a woman who is over 30 literally has no value anymore. Even if she has kids, chances are she's just another horrible mother who uses her kids for emotional blackmail and attention. The game has changed and women over 30 belong to the streets.
02 Reply- Asker+1 y
I don't know what's up but that's sounds violent rather than degrading
- +1 y
You with your vagina haven't even been in a street fight. You have no idea what violence is. Shut it.
- 558 opinions shared on Girl's Behavior topic.
+1 yI think your premise is wrong. I don't think women are degraded for being their normal, healthy real age. There is nothing unattractive about that at all.
I'm sure there is more to the story.00 Reply - Anonymous(45 Plus)+1 y
She's not unattractive. She could be beautiful. One problem with lots of women and men too, is they sleep around when they are younger and then want to find someone when they get older, but it isn't easy like it is when you are younger. I'm older but look younger and am tall and strong, so younger women always try to approach me, and it could be the same for women, if they take care of themselves.
00 Reply - Anonymous(30-35)+1 y
Nothing. Reject it. Reject that thought. You don't have to accept it. Women in their 30s are not ugly. A lot of them look like they are in their 20s.
20 Reply I've never heard of women being degraded for being 30-years-old and over. I live in the USA. Maybe that's more of a third-world thing.
02 Reply- +1 y
The USA is the Third-World though.
- +1 y
@Rachelspiks totally 😂
+1 yThe same I feel when I turn 30 in a few short years: it's all fun and games and the body and mind are at their peak until the ripe age of 30 for both genders and especially 40 for men. 😕🤗
12 Reply- +1 y
I'm confused but uhh okay thanks for the commenter
+1 yShe's hitting the wall and losing her looks at that point, and there is a brand new group of early 20 something HOT b1tches about to take her place for the attention of males.
10 ReplyBecause women are just shitty to each other. Men go for women over 30 all the time.
30 ReplyU can actually look better as u get oder if u exercise lol
This stereotype exists because most women won't put in the work50 Reply- Show More (67)
Show More(122)
Click "Show More" for your mentions
Continue reading 
Why are women considered unattractive after 30?
Babygirl_S
Guru · Age 29 Home > Girl's Behavior > Questions > Why is a woman degraded for being 30 and over? What makes 30 so unattractive for her?
Add your reply For "{0}"
Most Helpful Opinion(mho) Rate.
Learn more
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
