I personally think women in their 30s and 40s are just hitting their peak of sexiness and beauty. I would love to date or have a sexual relationship with a woman in that age range. Anyone thinking women in their 39s are not attractive or worthy, they are stupid.
the vast majority of them hit the wall by this time and loose their sex market value. just continue to get worst from there on now. of course nowadays so many young women drink, smoke and fuck out of control that they hit that wall by the age of 27 or eve before.
@NicoletteXO it doesn't matter if I copied and pasted from an ad in a Disney movie. that reality is right in front of us all and that is why you're so butthurt about up. YAWN
If you think Disney movies are a good source of information, pretty sure you ain't got the right to weigh in on what constitutes 'reality', buddy 😂 Seriously, stop overdosing on the incel / MGTOW material - it's addled your brain. And God knows you don't have too many braincells left to mess around with.
@NicoletteXO again you dont need any source of information when the reality is right in front of you, therefore you pretty argue like a true butthurt child who "don't have too many braincells left to mess around with."
also we mgtow and incels are not the same buddy. so come back and revisit this argument when you learn how to face reality and now rely on wishful thinking.
I bet that pink downvote was obviously from you. YAWN.
Newsflash: your (bitter, jaded) opinion is not reality. The fact that you think it is just serves to bolster what I mentioned about your low braincell count. In fact, your meagre brain is so inoperational, that you couldn't even come up with a counterargument, so copied and pasted my words. Yup, clearly the sign of a genius 😂
@NicoletteXO oh I just saw your profile and realized you're 35, otfrl!
no wonder why my opinion got your attention and you're so triggered by it, talk about being "bitter." and yeah if my opinion is not reality then please upload me a picture of yourself now and how you looked at 25 if you're brave enough and lets see if me and everyone here will agree you won't look a hell of a difference.
Dude. You're 34 - practically the same age. And yet you've clearly got nothing to show for it other than a noggin full of delusion. Tragic, really. And you are bitter. Extremely bitter.
@NicoletteXO lmao you're invaded my opinion that had nothing to do and now you been rumbling about it for hours and TRYING to throw shades at me for it yet I'm the "bitter" one?
and yeah we are practically the same age alright but I'm not a woman like you
You literally can't even string a coherent sentence together, dude 😂 Losing your marbles at 34, hate to see what you'll be like at 40, Grandpa.
You might also want to get your eyesight checked. You are comparing two pictures of a woman - the one on the left with a full face of makeup, and the one on the right with no makeup. And newsflash - the dude looks older on the right too! LMFAO. Your pictures prove nothing but the confirmation of your own ineptitude.
@NicoletteXO and now you grammar, lmao thanks for proving my point.
seriously dude and your vision isn't any better. we men are not fooled by makeup as much as you women assume therefore that comparison will fly either way for the fact that even if the woman on the right was wearing makeup we will still see the age marks and the significant amount of fat she gain throughout the years thank to the double chin.
and no shit the guy still looks older, but old or not he still looks a lot hotter than in he did in his early youth and women themselves even proof it as they still drool over him. his name is Gerard Butler by the way, he is the main protagonist of the movie 300
You literally just said "and now you grammar" 😂 😂 😂 Which is about as grammatically incorrect a sentence as one could possibly muster! Well done, you've just doubled down to re-emphasize my point that you are an illiterate imbecile.
Not to mention, you are an imbecile who seems to think cobbling together random pictures of people which happens to suit your narrative proves something. It doesn't prove anything other than how hard you're trying. Yet, you still fail 😂 Also, the guy is not as hot as you think. Maybe you're gay.
@NicoletteXO or maybe my computer is slow and lags when I type, not that I give a fuck what you think. but yeah, 2 hours later and you're still butthurt about the opinion this " illiterate imbecile" made on the internet 🤣 🤣 🤣
till then yeah you WISH my evidence do not proof my point that you been desperately trying to deny in your own pool of misery and projection. and yeah he might not be hot to you, but that's ok you have your preferences, but he is still considered a sex symbol by many females across the world for a reason
Again, copying and pasting idiotic memes from a red pill sites is not "proof". You obviously failed science and logic in school. Go and look at Jessica Simpson's social media today. She's lost the extra weight she put on due to childbirth (which you clearly have no respect for, since you are a misogynistic asshole). She's looking fiiiiiiiine for 41. I'm just gonna put it out there and say you would NEVER be able to pull a hottie like that.
Google guys like John Favreau to see a pic of a dude who got fat as he aged. Newsflash: it happens all the time. Anyone can get fat. Self-serving memes with plenty of counterexamples everywhere online proves zilch regarding your idiotic assertions concerning women. You fail. Go suck a dick, since you hate women so much.
@Kvynhanma and you are an immature little boy, who probably has sexual dysfunction. No real man has your mentality. Go home to your crusty wank sock, little one.
@Kvynhanma that's what they tell you because you have to pay them for it 😂😂 After saving up real hard from your job at Dunkin' Donuts. Go get 'em, tiger. LMFAO.
@Kvynhanma selling low-quality weed doesn't count as self-employment darling. But I'm glad you spend your extra time blowing what little cash you can scrounge up on meaningless sex which you have to pay for. Since obviously no-one will give it to you for free 😂 Sounds like a rock-solid way to evolve into a real man one day 😂😂
@NicoletteXO again they’re strippers not prostitutes I don’t pay them sometimes they try to cook for me just to stay at my spot longer and selling weed really? I’m not in middle school anymore 😂😂 your just jealous come on tell the truth and shame the devil
@Kvynhanma I guess the reason you can only afford the Tank Engine is you are clearly breaking the golden rule: "don't get high on your own supply". There ain't no stripper on earth who is going to cook for some random man-child for free 😂😂 You're straight up trippin', dude.
@Kvynhanma Revisit your demeanour in this interchange. It's aggressive, immature, unconsidered, unintelligent and sloppy. A real man would show up in the exact opposite way to you.
@Kvynhanma Oh God, not YOU again! It's "you're" (a contraction of "you are"), not "your"! Yes, Nicolette is 35. So what? The "wall" is something believed in only by those silly and immature males who spend far too much time on the internet because they have nothing else to do. No hobbies, no job, no girlfriend or wife. In other words, LOSERS!
@Kvynhanma "I’m just really good at sex" Not only is your grammar and punctuation completely off, but you're thoroughly deluded as well. Boys who like to brag that they're "really good at sex" are just the opposite, in the opinion of just about every female on the planet who has ever had sex with them.
@Kvynhanma "I have an iq of 115" Are we supposed to be impressed by that? The last time I did one of those tests I got a score of 143. In any case, IQ tests are over-rated, and nowhere near as useful as many people apparently believe they are.
@Rachelspiks I got a similar score to you, which doesn't surprise me. However, I avoided mentioning that since it's kind of like when people say "I'm intelligent" on a bio. Like, if you have to say it, you definitely aren't 😂 Though in this context, he is the one who raised the topic, so I have no problem with you educating him on what actually counts as even remotely impressive in the realm of IQ scores.
@NicoletteXO Yes, you're right. When people (usually insecure males, I've noticed) mention their IQ, it usually comes across as being extremely cringey, and often downright embarrassing.
@NicoletteXO Actually, he probably tries to hide his wank socks from his mother in his messy bedroom somewhere, and he's now got a whole pile of them and they're starting to stink the place out.
@Kvynhanma Hey, what does your bedroom really stink like? Do you have one of those blow-up sex dolls in your closet? Is the closet also where you hide the goat you have when your mother knocks on your door?
@Kvynhanma Of course you don't "f*** unattractive hoes", because even they don't want you. You would have to pay them, and even then they'd be reluctant.
@Kvnnhanmaa lol - yeah, she'll need to douse herself in something (anything!) simply to mask the stench of your dirty dried up man-child jizz socks. Even your goat is disgusted with you and yearning to escape.
Jesus it hasn't even been 24 since I logged out and already I got 47 notices in just this post. wtf did you do @NicoletteXO? on wow lmao and why am I not surprised you are friends with @Rachelspiks?
CasaNorba - You no doubt already know that neither I nor Nicolette will ever back down from an argument if we happen to know that we're right, and especially if the one we're arguing with is clearly a misogynist, as "Kvynhanma" clearly is.
I don't classify myself as a feminist - so, we'll put your little mistake aside. But since you've clearly never won an award in your life, I'll throw you a bone. You win the Most Butt-fucked Man-Child Award for 2021. Congratulations. Sorry about your anus. I know it hurts, but you take it like a champ.
I'm not a feminist either. I guess every woman who actually stands up for what she believes in is a "feminist" according to most insecure men who like to think of themselves as "going their own way", or some other such crap.
@NicoletteXO " You win the Most Butt-fucked Man-Child Award for 2021. Congratulations. Sorry about your anus."
says the butthurt 35 year old granny that's been attacking my post for almost 24 hours. I guess you won yet another award that its "the most projecting person of 2021." till you my friend are no different than an actual feminists
@Rachelspiks damn its almost a month and you're still butthurt over mgtow. till then yeah is not odd to think you're a feminists since after all feminists are the people the hate and stalks us the most everywhere we go
@Rachelspiks these morons have such limited capacity to actually engage in a relevant and nuanced discussion, I sometimes think they just reach into a big ol' hat filled with the words "feminist", "Karen", "triggered", "ho" and "slut", then do a lucky dip to decide what they're going to type next. So fucking boring and puerile.
@NicoletteXO Yes, and I've been called all those things at one point in time or another here at GAG. When their insults fail to have any effect upon me, they then resort to the ultimate admission of defeat - they block me.
CasaNorba - No, I'm not obsessed with MGTOW, I just want you people to finally GO! Stop your constant whining about how awful women apparently are, and just live your life as you promised you would. Is that too hard to do?
@Rachelspiks "You call Nicolette a "granny" for being 35? You're 34 grandpa!" - you took the words right out of my mouth. Unbelievably deluded, isn't he? Probably early-onset dementia 😂 😂
"well buddy if you sound and behave like those then you can't get mad if people call you those things. simple as that".
Firstly, I'm not your buddy.
Secondly, if you believe a "slut" or a "ho" "sounds like" a person who is able to astutely and hilariously rebut vitriolic and inane comments from men like you who can hardly string a sentence together... well, then, you must hold sluts in eminently high regard.
Either that, or your comment is logically incoherent. I'll put my wager on the latter.
"Attacking your post"? No honey. This started with another little man-baby making an unsolicited attack on me. And I put him in his little place for it. As he well deserved.
Lol. You mean the part where I mentioned your ridiculous, shallow and vitriolic comment on women seemed to be copied and pasted from a red-pill website? That's not an attack, that's a reflection of obvious truth. Interesting that you are so aggressively unstable that you seem to think you can instigate vitriol and attack upon women, yet you are concurrently so weak and overly sensitive that you perceive a mere reflection on this as an attack.
@NicoletteXO "You mean the part where I mentioned your ridiculous, shallow and vitriolic comment on women seemed to be copied and pasted from a red-pill website? That's not an attack,"
oh it is buddy, you shouldn't be talking about "aggressively unstable" since that's exactly what you sounded like when you posted that nonsense; just because you know it was true and your 35 year old ass couldnt handle it
" yet you are concurrently so weak and overly sensitive that you perceive a mere reflection on this as an attack."
if you were any stronger yourself you would of ignored my opinion and walked away specially if it didn't pertain to you. so yeah buddy you got any more PROJECTIONS you would like to make?
Hahahaha your lack of ability to use logic is hilarious and astounding.
I literally said "Copied and pasted from a red pill site I presume. YAWN." - if you think that sounds unstably aggressive, you're even less stable and more unhinged than I thought. Someone yawning is aggressive? I'd hate to see you in a physical brawl then. You'd be on your ass in a nano-second, pathetically crying for Mummy and sucking your thumb.
As to your comment: "if you were any stronger yourself you would of ignored my opinion and walked away specially if it didn't pertain to you. so yeah buddy you got any more PROJECTIONS you would like to make?"
My strength is revealed by my capacity to express myself as and when I see fit. If you want to throw a man-tanty and make unwarranted comments about women, you'd best be prepared to be called out for your BS by both strong men and women.
And this whole thread is about women in my age bracket. So... um... the whole topic pertains to me, numbskull.
And you seem not to understand the meaning of the word 'projections'. Writing in capitals only serves to draw attention to your incorrect use of this term. And also makes you look like more of a man-baby.
@NicoletteXO again aggressive or not it caught your 35 year old ass your attention for a reason and the fact that your EGO prevented you from ignoring my opinion speaks loud enough buddy.
"My strength is revealed by my capacity to express myself as and when I see fit. If you want to throw a man-tanty and make unwarranted comments about women, you'd best be prepared to be called out for your BS by both strong men and women."
yea ok Wonder Woman, just dont trip over your own Magic Lasso like you been doing for the past 24 hours.
"And this whole thread is about women in my age bracket. So... um... the whole topic pertains to me, numbskull."
yeah "ME, ME and ME" because "I'm so butthurt that I can't stand people talking negative about anything that relates to me!"
and yes I do know what PROJECTION is Miss English Teacher, it is what you also been doing for the past 24 hours. accusing others of sounding like a "man-baby" when this is exactly what you been doing
1) "again aggressive or not it caught your 35 year old ass your attention for a reason and the fact that your EGO prevented you from ignoring my opinion speaks loud enough buddy."
Hahahaha - love how you just quietly admit defeat here, then immediately try to deflect from that by calling me 35 as if it's an insult - while you are 34 yourself.
Let me educate you in what a projection is. It's exactly what you yourself have done here. You post a vitriolic and unbearably egocentrically inflated comment about women, then you try to pretend someone who calls you out on this is being driven by ego. LMFAO. THAT'S what a projection is, honey. Projecting what you yourself are onto someone else.
2) "yea ok Wonder Woman, just dont trip over your own Magic Lasso like you been doing for the past 24 hours." If anyone's been tripping, it's you. You haven't managed to support a single one of your absurd comments here. Because they are full of logical fallacies and incoherence.
"And this whole thread is about women in my age bracket. So... um... the whole topic pertains to me, numbskull."
yeah "ME, ME and ME" because "I'm so butthurt that I can't stand people talking negative about anything that relates to me!"
Let me educate you in something else. DEFLECTION. There, some capitals for you, since you seem to love them so much. What you just tried (and failed) to do above is the (lame and shallow) strategy of deflection.
You suggested I shouldn't speak about things that don't pertain to me. I pointed out that they absolutely do pertain to me. In fact, this whole topic is literally about my demographic, so they couldn't pertain more to me. Instead of admitting that you are clearly and obviously wrong, you shift up to a red herring - the accusation that I am talking about "me, me, me". Well, that would be unnecessary if you did not make a stupid and clearly inaccurate assertion about me. What you are attempting to create is DEFLECTION from the fact that you are simply wrong.
You are also clearly butthurt about the fact you are wrong. Which is why instead of being able to admit this and apologise like a decent human, you then use PROJECTION to pretend I am butthurt about something which you fail to be able to articulate.
3) and yes I do know what PROJECTION is Miss English Teacher.
No, you don't. If you did, you'd realize projection is a topic from the subject of psychology, not English. Though the fact that you have no idea when, where and how to use capital letters does indicate you need to work on your understanding of both these fields.
@NicoletteXO "Hahahaha - love how you just quietly admit defeat here, then immediately try to deflect from that by calling me 35 as if it's an insult - while you are 34 yourself."
actually no buddy, its the other way around because as I already proven 24 hours ago we men age way better than you women do, which explains why men in their 30 and over have a higher value in the sex market while you women become the lowest fruits in the tree at after their 30s. so no, just because you keep deflecting and denying this at heart does not mean it defies reality. sorry buddy but facts dont give a fuck about your feelings.
" You post a vitriolic and unbearably egocentrically inflated comment about women, then you try to pretend someone who calls you out on this is being driven by ego. LMFAO. "
as vitriolic and unbearably egocentrically inflated as it sounded to you it still the truth sweety and you did not call anybody out. all you did was storm in and WHINE about how I got it from a red pill forum like if that automatically validates your views. if anything all you did and STILL DOING (24 hours later) is showing how butthurt you are by the truth.
"You suggested I shouldn't speak about things that don't pertain to me. I pointed out that they absolutely do pertain to me. In fact, this whole topic is literally about my demographic, so they couldn't pertain more to me."
ok thank you buddy, now YOU"RE THE ONE ADMITTING YOUR OWN DEFEAT.
"Instead of admitting that you are clearly and obviously wrong, you shift up to a red herring - the accusation that I am talking about "me, me, me"
actually I am not wrong at all and I even brought evidence to the table, just because you dismissed them for being from a red pill forum does not mean YOUR RIGHT and reality has to change to accommodate your feelings.
"You are also clearly butthurt about the fact you are wrong. Which is why instead of being able to admit this and apologies like a decent human, you then use PROJECTION to pretend I am butthurt about something which you fail to be able to articulate."
again just because you think something is wrong does not mean you're right and reality has to change for you. seriously a lot of women in their 30s and over even admitted themselves that they no longer stand a chance in the dating world, hence why they become so easy and even lower their standards.
"No, you don't. If you did, you'd realize projection is a topic from the subject of psychology, not English. "
who said anything about English and psychology buddy? I'm not the one picking grammar here to further proof how butthurt and self defeated you feel miss I CAN RUB MY OPINION ON ANYONE'S FACE BECAUSE I'M ALWAYS RIGHT AND EVERYONE WHO DISAGREE WITH ME MUST BE WRONG!
talk about psychology buddy go see a therapist and get your Kanye West Syndrome checked out
@CasaNorba I just LOVE how you managed to trigger the G@G snowflakes here. I know this website is full of degenerates who can't stand the truth, but Jesus Christ! Let them think that a 35 year old is just as "wanted" as a 20 year old 😂😂😂
@TruthBringer Fucking YAWN. If you cared to read this dialogue properly - which I doubt you did, because you're clearly as moronic and illiterate as CasaDouchebag here, you would have seen that we already predicted your utterly unoriginal comment of accusing us of being "triggered" above, in this comment:
"these morons have such limited capacity to actually engage in a relevant and nuanced discussion, I sometimes think they just reach into a big ol' hat filled with the words "feminist", "Karen", "triggered", "ho" and "slut", then do a lucky dip to decide what they're going to type next. So fucking boring and puerile."
Seriously, you're like a little sponge for misogynist ideology, with nary an original thought in your tiny brain. Honestly, I don'y know why you're siding with Señor Asswipe here, it's not an alliance that's going to do you any favours.
@NicoletteXO And the irony of "expecting" comments form someone else when you're using the very same outdated misandrist shaming tactics. Yawn indeed lmfao
'CasaNorba', 'Kvynhanmer' and the ironically named 'TruthBringer', just give up. You may as well, because you can't win when you don't have the truth on your side and you're up against Nicolette. Like me, she never loses an argument. :) Besides, there are more important things in life to discuss, and I'm pretty sure that the physical attractiveness of women over 30 is pretty low on the list (or at least it should be). What about the fact that right around the globe, various governments are introducing new rules and depriving citizens of their basic rights and freedoms under the guise of "fighting a deadly virus"? The entire thing is a scam, a 'scamdemic' as it's being called, and yet here you are getting all hot and bothered over something that doesn't even matter.
@Rachelpiks whatsup with you people and "winning". I'm literally taking a piss here and enjoying how people like Nicolette managed to get triggered over a post over the fucking internet. And now she is projecting her own flaws onto someone else as an attempt to mask her own insecurities. Also, you blocked me while I frankly don't even remember ever arguing with you, and yet I manage to have you read my comments lmfao
I said: "Hahahaha - love how you just quietly admit defeat here, then immediately try to deflect from that by calling me 35 as if it's an insult - while you are 34 yourself."
You said: "actually no buddy, its the other way around because as I already proven 24 hours ago we men age way better than you women do, which explains why men in their 30 and over have a higher value in the sex market while you women become the lowest fruits in the tree at after their 30s. so no, just because you keep deflecting and denying this at heart does not mean it defies reality. sorry buddy but facts dont give a fuck about your feelings."
Here's where I'm going to annihilate you: LMFAO!!! You actually believe you 'proved' something by posting some self-serving memes? 😂😂😂 Why don't you actually do a degree in epistemology like I have and learn what proof actually entails. Let's just say it's not that. PMSL 😂😂 Also, even if we stooped to your bottom-feeding level of 'what counts as evidence' (random self-serving images), which I don't condone... but even then, I already gave counter-examples which you have ignored. So on every possible measure, you fail.
I said: " You post a vitriolic and unbearably egocentrically inflated comment about women, then you try to pretend someone who calls you out on this is being driven by ego. LMFAO. "
You said "as vitriolic and unbearably egocentrically inflated as it sounded to you it still the truth sweety and you did not call anybody out. all you did was storm in and WHINE about how I got it from a red pill forum like if that automatically validates your views. if anything all you did and STILL DOING (24 hours later) is showing how butthurt you are by the truth."
My response - So, you admit here that your own words were vitriolic and unbearably stoically inflated. Now you are fucking deflecting again from the original point - which is that you accused me of being egoic, and I countered that by pointing out the irony of someone who began a thread in an egoic manner pointing this out. Now you admit I was right. However, you are attempting to mask this with more of your red-herring BS by changing the subject again. You admit I was right. The end. And I was. The other points are superfluous and not relevant to the original point. Cool. You lose again.
Next.
I said: "You suggested I shouldn't speak about things that don't pertain to me. I pointed out that they absolutely do pertain to me. In fact, this whole topic is literally about my demographic, so they couldn't pertain more to me."
You said: "ok thank you buddy, now YOU"RE THE ONE ADMITTING YOUR OWN DEFEAT."
My response: Again, you appear to have cognitive processing impairments. This is not an example of me admitting defeat. This is an extremely clear example of you being undeniably wrong. You stated I shouldn't speak because something didn't pertain to me. I pointed out that the whole topic pertains to me, since it is focussed on my demographic specifically. This is proof you were wrong. Plain and simple. AGAIN.
Yes, I know that it's your opinion, but it's wrong. It might be time to change it. That's what intelligent people do; they come to the realisation they were not correct and adjust their beliefs accordingly. You should try it some time.
@rachelspiks It sounds like you don’t know how old this site works either otherwise he will realize that you can’t change opinions.
Till then just because someone else’s opinion does not comfort your views or you think is wrong does not mean it automatically is.
SMARTER people in the other hand respect and mind their own business and walk away when they come across an opinion they disagreed on. Cause In the end everyone is entitled to have their own views nobody has to see the world from YOUR point of view
I said: "Instead of admitting that you are clearly and obviously wrong, you shift up to a red herring - the accusation that I am talking about "me, me, me"
You said: "actually I am not wrong at all and I even brought evidence to the table, just because you dismissed them for being from a red pill forum does not mean YOUR RIGHT and reality has to change to accommodate your feelings."
My response: Again, refer to my point about epistemology above. Moronic self-serving memes showing pictures of two random actors doesn't constitute proof. Though the fact that you believe it does demonstrates what a low-calibre mind you have. Seriously, get some higher education. Also, it's *you're 🙄 Oh, and if you want to study what constitutes 'reality' - how about studying for years in ontology, as I have, rather than assuming your puny little perspectives are 'reality' just because you stamp your fat little Man-toddler foot, throw a tantrum and try to demand them to be.
I said: "You are also clearly butthurt about the fact you are wrong. Which is why instead of being able to admit this and apologies like a decent human, you then use PROJECTION to pretend I am butthurt about something which you fail to be able to articulate."
You said: "again just because you think something is wrong does not mean you're right and reality has to change for you. seriously a lot of women in their 30s and over even admitted themselves that they no longer stand a chance in the dating world, hence why they become so easy and even lower their standards."
My response: I absolutely agree with you, that 'reality' doesn't have to change because of my opinion. However, I never claimed it did. I'm simply stating your claims to not hold. The onus of proof here is on you, since you are the one who has fronted up here with a position which - you literally admit above - was formulated in a vitriolic and egoically inflated manner. The burden of proof is on the one who initiates the claim - and that is you. And you've failed to support your point. And "a lot of women have claimed?" - your random anecdote isn't proof, buddy. I could equally say a huge proportion of older men I see are fat and ugly, and don't stand a chance with any well-kept woman in her 30s. However, as we've both agreed, me simply chucking around anecdotes (even if they are true in my own experience) isn't any watertight proof of the nature of things. And therefore, neither is your chucking around of random anecdotes proof of the nature of things. So, FAIL AGAIN.
NEXT.
I said: "No, you don't. If you did, you'd realize projection is a topic from the subject of psychology, not English. "
You said: "who said anything about English and psychology buddy?"
My reponse: Um... you did - in this sentence right here: "and yes I do know what PROJECTION is Miss English Teacher". LOL.
You said: "I'm not the one picking grammar here to further proof how butthurt and self defeated you feel miss I CAN RUB MY OPINION ON ANYONE'S FACE BECAUSE I'M ALWAYS RIGHT AND EVERYONE WHO DISAGREE WITH ME MUST BE WRONG!"
My response: *prove *rub my opinion IN, not on *disagrees
Also, the only one butthurt is you, Mr Illiterate. The fact that you start yelling in caps because you are embarrassed about being revealed as such is fairly clear to anyone with half a brain. Not that you'll be able to relate.
I don't believe I am always right at all. If you fronted with an intelligent argument I'd be happy to engage with it. However, you didn't. That's on you, buddy.
@NicoletteXO are you gonna be a parrot and repeat everything I said to further proved how triggered you been for the past 48 hours?
seriously dude @TruthBringer and I already lifted up your skirt and called you out on your projection habits. all you're doing at the moment is continue to convince me and yourself that you got the ego of a 10 year old, getting triggered for 48 hours over a subject that its true just to further imply that it EMPLIES TO YOU after all
@TruthBringer to your point - "And the irony of "expecting" comments form someone else when you're using the very same outdated misandrist shaming tactics. Yawn indeed lmfao"
Look, I understand where you are coming from here. What I will say is this. It is not my preference to remain at this fairly low level of name-slanging. However, if someone leads with it, as these men have, I will give it straight back to them and more. I will never start that game. But I will finish it.
The moment any one of these men apologizes or admits they are (or even might be) wrong, or the moment they start speaking to me in a respectful and reasonable manner, I will immediately return them that courtesy.
This is not misandry. I LOVE, adore and respect good men, intelligent men and respectful men. I know plenty of them, and they receive a soft and beautiful side of me which imbecilic and disrespectful men won't see because their behaviour precludes them from seeing it.
Rather than misandry - what this is, is putting imbecilic men back in their place when they initiate unwarranted vitriol against women.
To be clear, I am more than happy to do the same for imbecilic women. It's not a gendered thing.
@NicoletteXO You've not done a good job representing yourself in a respectable manner from the start. So it's best to either do so from the very beginning in order to open a healthy discussion/debate, or refrain from engaging into arguments over the internet if what someone says affects you this much. No I didn't read your entire rants and neither am I planning on doing so. I'm simply stating that you're unironically showing your sensitivity over a topic that is directed at your age group. And you didn't do a good job behaving in a respectable way that would allow you to be taken seriously. Especially if you're going to throw typical toxic feminist shaming tactics around. And no, this is not me attacking you. This is just me pointing out the hypocrisy in your bahvior. Because you're doing a similar thing as the men you're criticizing of doing.
Also, since you have a soft spot for the red pill community, I provided some links that aren't coming from the red pill.
"@rachelspiks It sounds like you don’t know how old this site works either otherwise he will realize that you can’t change opinions. Till then just because someone else’s opinion does not comfort your views or you think is wrong does not mean it automatically is.
SMARTER people in the other hand respect and mind their own business and walk away when they come across an opinion they disagreed on. Cause In the end everyone is entitled to have their own views nobody has to see the world from YOUR point of view"
Response:
Nobody is suggesting that "just because someone else’s opinion does not comfort your views or you think is wrong does not mean it automatically is". Nobody said your views are "automatically wrong", Casa. What is being asserted is that you have failed to demonstrates that your views hold weight. They are not 'automatically' wrong - though they are unproven because you haven't proven them.
And if "SMARTER" people (God, the fucking caps) "respect and mind their own business and walk away when they come across an opinion they disagreed on", then what are you waiting for?
If you think that is the definition of a smart person, walk away. See ya later.
Otherwise according to your own definition, you're not that smart.
@NicoletteXO "If you think that is the definition of a smart person, walk away. See ya later.
Otherwise according to your own definition, you're not that smart."
again this is my opinion and you and @rachelspiks are the one who invaded it trying showing how butthurt that two of you were for the past 48 hours so no, you actually proof my point for the fact that you invaded my opinion first trying to change my views and showing how triggered and oversensitive you are and can't even walk away 48 hours later
@TruthBringer oh seriously, go suck a dick. You're going to moralise here? What a joke.
You said: "@NicoletteXO You've not done a good job representing yourself in a respectable manner from the start. So it's best to either do so from the very beginning in order to open a healthy discussion/debate, or refrain from engaging into arguments over the internet if what someone says affects you this much. No I didn't read your entire rants and neither am I planning on doing so. I'm simply stating that you're unironically showing your sensitivity over a topic that is directed at your age group. And you didn't do a good job behaving in a respectable way that would allow you to be taken seriously. Especially if you're going to throw typical toxic feminist shaming tactics around. And no, this is not me attacking you. This is just me pointing out the hypocrisy in your bahvior. Because you're doing a similar thing as the men you're criticizing of doing."
You haven't read the debate. You chime in now moralizing. You fail to observe that the one who began this was Casa with his initial comment, which he himself admits (finally - because I relentlessly called him out on it) was "vitriolic and egoically inflated". Why not moralize against Casa, since he initiated this?
I said, I won't start a debate in this way. But I will finish it. Casa started by playing dirty, so until he cleans it up, that's where we are.
I think it is completely 'unrespectable' that you chime in in this way with no skin in the game. It shows that you stand for unprovoked vitriol against women. And it shows you are the kind of "man" who will shame others unless they roll over and take unwarranted abuse. Yeah, super respectable.
You said: "@NicoletteXO are you gonna be a parrot and repeat everything I said to further proved how triggered you been for the past 48 hours? seriously dude @TruthBringer and I already lifted up your skirt and called you out on your projection habits. all you're doing at the moment is continue to convince me and yourself that you got the ego of a 10 year old, getting triggered for 48 hours over a subject that its true just to further imply that it EMPLIES TO YOU after all"
Response: EMPLIES? 😂😂😂 And I truly thought you couldn't get more illiterate. Here, I admit I was wrong hahahahaha.
I'm going to hold you to account until you give up. That's what's going down. Suck it up.
You haven't proven a goddamn thing, except that you're very good at losing arguments and you don't like it when people have the acuity to tear yours apart. Not that your half-baked points really classify as "arguments", but anyway...
I said: @NicoletteXO "If you think that is the definition of a smart person, walk away. See ya later. Otherwise according to your own definition, you're not that smart."
You said: "again this is my opinion and you and @rachelspiks are the one who invaded it trying showing how butthurt that two of you were for the past 48 hours so no, you actually proof my point for the fact that you invaded my opinion first trying to change my views and showing how triggered and oversensitive you are and can't even walk away 48 hours later
but I'm the "butthurt" one ey?"
I don't concur with your definition of a smart person. What I am suggesting is that if YOU think walking away constitutes what a smart person does, then go ahead and do it. Go on, shoo!
@NicoletteXO "And I truly thought you couldn't get more illiterate. Here, I admit I was wrong hahahahaha."
you must of been wrong if you were able to argue 48 HOURS with this illiterate then it means you clearly understood everything I said. and once again you're picking grammar as a way to further imply that you lost the argument
" Not that your half-baked points really classify as "arguments", but anyway..."
is not classified as argument to you yet you been arguing and projecting for the past 48 hours here... the IRONY
@NicoletteXO NO SHIT, I said "smarter people dont go around invading other peoples opinion trying to change other people's views. they instead mind their own business and walk away"
which is something that two of you butthurt losers have been failing to do for the past 48 HOURS.
Dude. The fact that I don't capitulate to your bullshit is not indication of the quality of your "arguments" LMAO.
The fact that you clearly are illiterate, and also too arrogant to admit it - although it is objectively the case - is simply the delightful icing on the cake here.
This is what an illiterate moron does - attempt to deflect from his repeated failures, instead of admitting them and doing better.
@Rachelspiks to your point - " 'CasaNorba', 'Kvynhanmer' and the ironically named 'TruthBringer', just give up. You may as well, because you can't win when you don't have the truth on your side and you're up against Nicolette. Like me, she never loses an argument. Besides, there are more important things in life to discuss, and I'm pretty sure that the physical attractiveness of women over 30 is pretty low on the list (or at least it should be). What about the fact that right around the globe, various governments are introducing new rules and depriving citizens of their basic rights and freedoms under the guise of "fighting a deadly virus"? The entire thing is a scam, a 'scamdemic' as it's being called, and yet here you are getting all hot and bothered over something that doesn't even matter."
@NicoletteXO as I said I don’t need to change my views for you whether you think they’re right or not.
And trust me I’m happy being illiterate and arrogant over being a whiny self righteous troll with the ego of a 10 year old.
The fact that you keep deflecting, and spamming the same horseshit for 48 hours makes it safe to assume that you’re no longer arguing, you’re just trolling your useless life away here, does this MEANS IS NOW A GOOD IDEA FOR ME TO BLOCK YOU?
You said: "@NicoletteXO NO SHIT, I said "smarter people dont go around invading other peoples opinion trying to change other people's views. they instead mind their own business and walk away" which is something that two of you butthurt losers have been failing to do for the past 48 HOURS."
Nuh-uh. Again the deflection. Nice try, but no. You said this AFTER I whooped your ass. You don't get to change your original position, which was simply that smart people walk away from arguments, just because I tied you in a pretzel with it and noted that if that is what you think a smart person does, you should do it.
I don't personally think that is the definition of a smart person. I don't think having a dialogue and rebutting points for a long time is a problem per se, nor an indication for or against intelligence.
But you do. So if you want to remain consistent, you're gonna need to get going pronto. Othewise by your own lights, you have admitted that you are the opposite of a smart person. Essentially, if you don't leave now, you admit you are a dolt.
@NicoletteXO again I retard I said "smart people dont go around trying to change other people's views they instead respect other people's opinion and walk away."
none of that implies to me because this is my opinion and YOUR THE ONE WHO'S HERE INVADING IT trying to change my views when all you been doing is showing how butthurt you been for the past 48 hours.
till then now you're definitely the one who's gonna walk away cause I'm sick of arguing with a 10 year old. seriously dude, go troll away your useless meaningless life somewhere else
Nicolette wanted to leave one final message, but couldn't because she told me you blocked her. So, as a favour, here it is :)
"A final message to Casa-Ungghh-Unnnggh-I-Can't-Take-Being-Intellectually-Buttfucked-Anymore...
You said: "NicoletteXO trust me I’m happy being illiterate and arrogant over being a whiny self righteous troll with the ego of a 10 year old. The fact that you keep deflecting, and spamming the same horseshit for 48 hours makes it safe to assume that you’re no longer arguing, you’re just trolling your useless life away here, does this MEANS IS NOW A GOOD IDEA FOR ME TO BLOCK YOU?"
Response: You getting your ass kicked with astute and pertinent points, blow by blow, ain't spam or deflection, buddy. That's you getting floored. I'm glad you've finally admitted you are illiterate and arrogant - I will give you a cookie. That is your consolation prize after you made the ultimate admission of defeat - blocking me. Whatever you may think of women your age, one thing this shows is they can wipe the floor with you."
@Rachelspiks dude I dont give a fuck, the fact that she needs a personal messenger to evade the block pretty much explains how butthurt she is.
and where the hell am I getting defeated at? this is a damn internet post, not a boxing match. so why dont you and her go fuck off, find someone else to bother.
Lmao "illiterate this, illiterate that" I guess correcting grammar is the only way she will ever feel victorious. not my fault that English is not my primary language, just like her being 35 and already looking like a granny
@NicoletteXO Thanks for once again proving you're an immature individual who can't take any criticism and decides to attack people because you can't deal with your emotional tantrum. Your first response was more than enough to dictate that you decided to come with bad energy, to get go. Funny enough that you lecture me about morality while you yourself have not been a Jesus Christ yourself. You obviously lack self-awareness. Not to forget to mention that you getting triggered over internet comments says a lot about your self-image and level of self-esteem (which your ad hominems are a testament to them not being quite so high). And that for someoneof your age.. wow... Sure I don't condone Casa's way of talking to you, but I still side with him on this one because I agree with his initial comment. But you decided to discard anything he said by just pointing to them coming from red pill sources, which on it's own is an ad hominem attack to the source rather than the message. This is clearly shown in your lack of valid arguments to debunk anything he said. Not to forget to mention your misandrist shaming tactics. So you attacking men and their comments simply for stating the obvious, and yet you're sitting here lecturing others about "unprovoked virtriol against women".
@NicoletteXO And now you're butthurt so you start to use your own private owl named @Rachelspiks to send some messages. Be on your way. I think you have far more important things to be concerned of like making sure you don't end up alone. Your sexual market value has already taken a dive as it is. And that of Casa funny enough has increased compared to his 20s (as multiple non-red pill sources have shown). I suggest you try to learn to swallow that harsh fact because it will remain nothing but a fact. And another proof of evidence are the cultures (such as in the middle-east) where women are urged to get married as they are still young and fertile with (preferably) someone who is older as the older man usually has his shit together. But that's another discussion you're clearly not ready for. As well as you're not ready to hold an intellectual debate but instantly jump into defensive mode as well as logical fallacies. I've seen enough for a 35 year old now. Ciao ciao
@Rachelspiks Nobody asked you to butt in from the beginning, either. But then here you are. And now your little mate has been blocked (for being an annoying creature who clearly lacks real life attention), you start to back away ha. The fact you decided to be a mail dog is a laugh all in itself. Go sit on each other's face somewhere else. Preferably a safe space where facts like these aren't being discussed.
@CasaNorba This is them having to deal with men throwing harsh truth about women:
Jesus 35 years old and this much toxicity. Imagine living under the same roof. Women like these two make me appreciate my girlfriend more and more
I prefer older men at 33 and don’t want to date anyone younger than me. I still look youthful how I was in my 20s and still healthy. These guys don’t realize those women in their 20s have to get older too !
I love the hypocrisy... ugly women can say seriously that they demand a hot guy and that looks shouldn't matter (as long it's the woman's looks)
All women hate heavy men... be 20 pounds or more overweight and you're disgusting... but THIS is a supermodel... If ANY man with close to her BMI tried to tell a woman about inner beauty she'd laugh in his face!!!
So why are those men degraded? or is it only bad if it is a woman?
I've heard mostly women do the "degrading" and i always find some amusement listening because the venom being spouted, i always learn something new, mostly how specific they can drill down on a single thing like maybe hair... I witnessed a women describe anothers hair for about 15 minutes. A male couldn't hang with that.
Women lose their attractive / beauty/ body / the youthfulness.
I slept with a 40 fit girl And a 18 fit girl.
And the 18 year girl took me a long time to get tired of her. She kept walking around in nude and her body was incredible. Everything is firm the skin is amazing , very tight, the bodies aren’t saggy. And etc etc..
Newsflash; 18 year old dude's bodies are also tighter, and they often have better erections, than men your age. However, the mark of an intelligent person is to realize that everyone ages. It happens to all of us eventually. So while keeping fit is important for everyone, you'd better start appreciating the beauty that also lives beneath the surface of people - character, confidence, creativity and so on - otherwise you will ended up a very sad wrinkly old dude.
Your "coaching practice" is a fucking joke dude. You are a fucking joke. You tried to solicit me and many other women here, and then in other threads you spread inane misogynistic BS which reveals you are the one who needs coaching - or better yet, meds and a psych ward.
You seem awfully angry from life what do you care what others do? Because you don’t work on yourself. The whole time you’ve been chasing me. why don’t you go and contact me and have a debate with me instead of hiding behind the keyboard and talking bullshit? Yeah coaching practice is bullshit to those who refuse to do anything with the lives that’s why the whole time you’re chasing me and talking bullshit one day someone is gonna mike Tyson you because of your mouth. Karen! Now fuk off. Keyboard warrior.
You spew insults and vitriol, then accuse me of being angry? Nice try, dude. And let's not forget you are the one who invited me (amongst so many others) to check out your website. You frequently do this here on GAG in a manner which is almost always entirely tone-deaf, since it is never asked for and rarely relevant to the topic. So, before I clicked on the site, I already suspected it would be as bad as it is. It's quite amusing that you talk about things like "lack of listening skills in the 21st century", when I don't think I could find a more fabulous example of someone with poor listening skills and utterly terrible communication skills than you. An example of your recent 'wordsmithery' above: "You don’t know FK all you don’t understand nothing But biology and you keep yapping. I bet you’re a fat ass" - yeah, that sure sounds like someone I'd be asking advice from LMFAO.
You literally know nothing about me and spew insults and BS.
I didn't say coaching practices are bullshit. I said YOURS is bullshit. Because there is a complete disjunct between who you pretend to be on your website and who you are here. YOU are the one who needs coaching - from someone actually capable and skilled in those arts. Better yet, a psychotherapist. Coaching won't be enough to untangle the mess in your head and heart.
And gee, you make physically threatening comments to women and then wonder why they don't 'contact you to have a debate'? Gee, I wonder why?
Correction *I don't think I could find a more fabulous example of someone with poorer listening skills and more utterly terrible communication skills than you.
Isn't this question being just a BIT dramatic? I don't think women are "degraded" for being 30 and over. Making the observation that the vast, vast, VAST majority of women achieve their height of physical beauty in their mid-twenties or earlier is hardly "degrading" women in their 30s.
I don’t think that’s true. My moms 30+ and has never teen demeaned for her age, I’m pretty sure the age thing is unique to guys on this site that think a woman over 30 is in menopause already or some bullshit 🤷🏽♀️
That’s looking at it from a males biology POV. Men don’t necessarily find a women unattractive just because she is 30. Some women are still highly beautiful way beyond 30. There are men who will like you for you regardless of anything.
It usually a cultural thing people think older women isn't as attractive compared to younger female because in everyone mind the younger the girl, the hotter she is. But I wouldn't let non of those assholes bother you there are actually some of us guys who do prefer mature women.
" I think 30 is around the time a lot of women stop being insecure and naive people-pleasers,"
obviously, since their looks deteriorate after 30 then they have no choice but to lower their ego and standards. no man is willing to chance any of you by this stage in life
@CasaNorba " I think 30 is around the time a lot of women stop being insecure and naive people-pleasers,"
obviously, since their looks deteriorate after 30 then they have no choice but to lower their ego and standards. no man is willing to chance any of you by this stage in life"
I'm genuinely starting to wonder if you have a mental impairment or intellectual disability. I'm suggesting literally the opposite. That as a woman matures she raises her standards, because unlike a naive and insecure young woman who will try to please everyone around her despite being treated like an afterthought, a mature woman won't accept that.
You know what's really pernicious about men like you? Your type is the kind who pay out women for having a "high body count" (even that phrase is so nauseating, just dripping with misogyny)... but you know who has a high body count in a way that doesn't serve them? Young, naieve, people pleasing women with low standards. Of course, not all young women are this way, and more power to those who know their value. However, the more mature a woman gets, the better she learns not to accept lowball offers, imagining and hoping the man will magically change. She learns to judge a man by his character and actions, rather than believing promises of hot air that turn out later to be false, as young women often do.
The fact that you even need to have this explained to you because your comprehension skills are so poor shows us just what kind of a man you are. Let's just say, not the sharpest tool in the shed.
not you just confirmed you're the one who's mentally ill or perhaps retarded. women dont raise their standard in their 30s. this is when they have no choice but to lower it because like I said their looks are deteriorating and no men of high quality pay mind to her. seriously women in their 30s who are single or haven't been married always tremble with fear because they think "they're gonna be alone forever"
"your type is the kind who pay out women for having a "high body count"
no shit buddy, would you want to be in a relationship with a man who's slept with 50+ women? do you not mind taking the risk of being a cuckqueen? or are you already one?
and no just because a women become less mature and give it up less easier as they age still does not mean they can automatically scape their pass. your pass will always determine your future whether you like it or not.
"The fact that you even need to have this explained to you because your comprehension skills are so poor shows us just what kind of a man you are. Let's just say, not the sharpest tool in the shed."
just because I dont bow down to all your horseshit believes does not mean my comprehension skills are poor miss English teacher
You said: "not you just confirmed you're the one who's mentally ill or perhaps retarded."
My response: How so? I just demonstrated you misunderstood an extraordinarily simple position statement. In fact, you misunderstood it so profoundly that you thought it meant literally the opposite of what it actually meant. If you think that accurately pointing out your lack of basic comprehension skills constitutes being "retarded", well then, you're in a worse position than I feared.
You said: "women dont raise their standard in their 30s. this is when they have no choice but to lower it because like I said their looks are deteriorating and no men of high quality pay mind to her. seriously women in their 30s who are single or haven't been married always tremble with fear because they think "they're gonna be alone forever"
My reponse: just because you assert this, doesn't prove jack shit. This is not my experience, nor the experience of almost every woman I've ever encountered. I accept that my anecdotal evidence is not the final say on this. But yours certainly isn't either. And if you're going to fling around absurd vitriol about women, you're going to need to have more up your sleeve that "it is that way because I say so". Furthermore, we've already demonstrated above that you have the comprehension capacity of a cane toad. So, while I don't think anybody's anecdotal evidence is sufficient to prove anything here, if I had to choose a perspective which is more likely to be clear and cogent, it wouldn't be the perspective of a man with the IQ of a cockroach.
You said: "your type is the kind who pay out women for having a "high body count" no shit buddy, would you want to be in a relationship with a man who's slept with 50+ women? do you not mind taking the risk of being a cuckqueen? or are you already one?"
My response: I don't give a damn about how many women my man has slept with. What I care about is whether or not he is a man of character who is in integrity with himself. There are virgins and incels who have slept with no women at all - this is not a virtue. And there are men who have slept with many women because they are shallow and superficial - also not a virtue. There are other men who have slept with a large sum of women, who have acted in joy and integrity while doing so - I celebrate those men, and their healthy sexuality. I'm sure you can't relate at all, because your sexuality (as your intellect) is obviously warped and twisted beyond repair. I doubt very much that you've ever had a loving, healthy sexual encounter in your life, let alone a decent relationship.
NEXT:
You said: "and no just because a women become less mature and give it up less easier as they age still does not mean they can automatically scape their pass. your pass will always determine your future whether you like it or not."
My response: This sentence is literally incoherent and completely undermines your previous position. Earlier you claim that women of your age bracket DON'T in fact make the choice to raise their standards and "give it up less easily" - but now you admit they do (as I said originally, and you stupidly disputed). But at the same time, now you are saying it is "less mature" of a woman to "give it up less easily". Riiight.
As mentioned, I have no problem with people having sexual experience - male or female. In fact, I think it is healthy. Why are you so repressed and judgmental about sexuality? Is it because you can't get none? I suspect so.
I said: "The fact that you even need to have this explained to you because your comprehension skills are so poor shows us just what kind of a man you are. Let's just say, not the sharpest tool in the shed."
You said: "just because I dont bow down to all your horseshit believes does not mean my comprehension skills are poor miss English teacher"
My response: I didn't assert your comprehension skills are poor because you are "not bowing down". I asserted - correctly - that they are poor because you miscomprehended an extremely basic position statement. And you miscomprehended it so poorly, you actually thought it meant literally the opposite of what it in fact meant. Also, as anyone who has had the misfortune of encountering your uncouth babbling here will already know - your comprehension and literacy skills are astoundingly sub-par for someone with such temerity. In fact, you yourself even admit to your own illiteracy and arrogance elsewhere here, in a conversation we had a couple of hours ago. So, yeah - I assert that your comprehension skills are poor, because your comprehension skills are demonstrably, and unequivocally, poor.
It's a societal trend that women should be young and beautiful, so the younger the better. Women, especially in fields such as entertainment after a certain age no longer hold value. This ass backwards philosophy leaks into everyday life.
I personally think that type of thinking is childish. I feel like you shouldn't be worried about the opinion or someone who thinks like that. He's probably realizing he's getting old and projecting. And that's putting it nicely.
Anyone who thinks so isn't worth your time or energy. Seriously isn't that some creepy shit anyway? EVERYONE will be over 30 unless they die. So what happens to the guy who is married then his wife turns 30? Yeah, he's just a piece of shit human now.
Well I don't think a women being over 30 should be degraded they are still fairly young and sexy in my opnion. Some women feel they are part there prime when they reach there 30's and there looks mind of fade away a little and maybe had some kids and feel what guy would want that. I think women are too hard on themselves as they get older if you asked me they are more attractive as they get older because they more mature and experienced.
Clueless, but speaking for myself I find 30 year old or older much sexier than 20 something year olds. Something about the maturity level. Plus I actually will have something in common with them.
Age means nothing. Women over 30 can be attractive af. I'm thinking that the only guys who don't think so are young and still attracted to high school and college-age girls.
I think there may be a few of those. But actually I think the ones who spout this are mainly incels. It gives their egos comfort to believe a narrative that suggests that at some point women will feel rejection - since underneath all their vitriol, they just feel rejected themselves. It's like a twisted way of extracting a sense of justice from the Universe in their minds.
There may also be idiots who think she must "used goods." I have a super low opinion of guys who think women who have had prior relationships are "used". Like women are only supposed to have sex with one man in their entire life. Ghaaah!
It's actually ridiculous. Like men, women flourish with good sex, and plenty of it. It's like watering a garden. There is nothing virtuous about being sex-starved.
It's not, I've seen atttractive 45 year old women before. seen unattractive ones too mind you, but the age itself typically is not the issue, as many women in their 30s and 40s look just as hot as when they were in their 20s.
3
0 Reply
Anonymous
(18-24)
+1 y
I don't know why but this is an explanation: it's not that 30 was an age just picked for people to start disliking women, it's that women tend to start losing youthful features around that age. It's probably a general rule, but some people revere it as if it always holds true, which it doesn't (of course this matter is subjective but I'm not going to go into details).
The only thing significant about the age 30 in this case is that it tends to correspond to loss of youthful features.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
110Opinion
I personally think women in their 30s and 40s are just hitting their peak of sexiness and beauty. I would love to date or have a sexual relationship with a woman in that age range. Anyone thinking women in their 39s are not attractive or worthy, they are stupid.
the vast majority of them hit the wall by this time and loose their sex market value. just continue to get worst from there on now. of course nowadays so many young women drink, smoke and fuck out of control that they hit that wall by the age of 27 or eve before.
Copied and pasted from a red pill site I presume. YAWN.
@NicoletteXO it doesn't matter if I copied and pasted from an ad in a Disney movie. that reality is right in front of us all and that is why you're so butthurt about up. YAWN
It**
If you think Disney movies are a good source of information, pretty sure you ain't got the right to weigh in on what constitutes 'reality', buddy 😂 Seriously, stop overdosing on the incel / MGTOW material - it's addled your brain. And God knows you don't have too many braincells left to mess around with.
@NicoletteXO again you dont need any source of information when the reality is right in front of you, therefore you pretty argue like a true butthurt child who "don't have too many braincells left to mess around with."
also we mgtow and incels are not the same buddy. so come back and revisit this argument when you learn how to face reality and now rely on wishful thinking.
I bet that pink downvote was obviously from you. YAWN.
Newsflash: your (bitter, jaded) opinion is not reality. The fact that you think it is just serves to bolster what I mentioned about your low braincell count. In fact, your meagre brain is so inoperational, that you couldn't even come up with a counterargument, so copied and pasted my words. Yup, clearly the sign of a genius 😂
@NicoletteXO oh I just saw your profile and realized you're 35, otfrl!
no wonder why my opinion got your attention and you're so triggered by it, talk about being "bitter." and yeah if my opinion is not reality then please upload me a picture of yourself now and how you looked at 25 if you're brave enough and lets see if me and everyone here will agree you won't look a hell of a difference.
Dude. You're 34 - practically the same age. And yet you've clearly got nothing to show for it other than a noggin full of delusion. Tragic, really. And you are bitter. Extremely bitter.
@NicoletteXO lmao you're invaded my opinion that had nothing to do and now you been rumbling about it for hours and TRYING to throw shades at me for it yet I'm the "bitter" one?
and yeah we are practically the same age alright but I'm not a woman like you
You literally can't even string a coherent sentence together, dude 😂 Losing your marbles at 34, hate to see what you'll be like at 40, Grandpa.
You might also want to get your eyesight checked. You are comparing two pictures of a woman - the one on the left with a full face of makeup, and the one on the right with no makeup. And newsflash - the dude looks older on the right too! LMFAO. Your pictures prove nothing but the confirmation of your own ineptitude.
@NicoletteXO and now you grammar, lmao thanks for proving my point.
seriously dude and your vision isn't any better. we men are not fooled by makeup as much as you women assume therefore that comparison will fly either way for the fact that even if the woman on the right was wearing makeup we will still see the age marks and the significant amount of fat she gain throughout the years thank to the double chin.
and no shit the guy still looks older, but old or not he still looks a lot hotter than in he did in his early youth and women themselves even proof it as they still drool over him. his name is Gerard Butler by the way, he is the main protagonist of the movie 300
You literally just said "and now you grammar" 😂 😂 😂 Which is about as grammatically incorrect a sentence as one could possibly muster! Well done, you've just doubled down to re-emphasize my point that you are an illiterate imbecile.
Not to mention, you are an imbecile who seems to think cobbling together random pictures of people which happens to suit your narrative proves something. It doesn't prove anything other than how hard you're trying. Yet, you still fail 😂 Also, the guy is not as hot as you think. Maybe you're gay.
@NicoletteXO or maybe my computer is slow and lags when I type, not that I give a fuck what you think. but yeah, 2 hours later and you're still butthurt about the opinion this " illiterate imbecile" made on the internet 🤣 🤣 🤣
till then yeah you WISH my evidence do not proof my point that you been desperately trying to deny in your own pool of misery and projection. and yeah he might not be hot to you, but that's ok you have your preferences, but he is still considered a sex symbol by many females across the world for a reason
and here I got a better one for you 🤣🤣🤣
Again, copying and pasting idiotic memes from a red pill sites is not "proof". You obviously failed science and logic in school. Go and look at Jessica Simpson's social media today. She's lost the extra weight she put on due to childbirth (which you clearly have no respect for, since you are a misogynistic asshole). She's looking fiiiiiiiine for 41. I'm just gonna put it out there and say you would NEVER be able to pull a hottie like that.
Google guys like John Favreau to see a pic of a dude who got fat as he aged. Newsflash: it happens all the time. Anyone can get fat. Self-serving memes with plenty of counterexamples everywhere online proves zilch regarding your idiotic assertions concerning women. You fail. Go suck a dick, since you hate women so much.
*red pill sites
@NicoletteXO your 35!🤮😓
@Kvynhanma and you are an immature little boy, who probably has sexual dysfunction. No real man has your mentality. Go home to your crusty wank sock, little one.
@NicoletteXO I’m not a real man because I don’t like old women?
@Kvynhanma You're not a real man because you have the mental capacity of a flea.
@NicoletteXO I have an iq of 115
@Kvynhanma You missed the decimal point - 1.15 😂😂
@NicoletteXO was that your idea of an insult? You sure showed me🙄
@Kvynhanma Indeed I did. Now run along, man-child. It's time for your daily ritual of crying and jerking off into a sock alone.
@NicoletteXO I have large boob stripper friends to do that for me but okay 😂
@Kvynhanma yeah. You definitely would need to pay - ain't nobody gonna provide your punk ass with any 'intimacy' for free 😂
@NicoletteXO they don’t need money their strippers
@NicoletteXO I’m just really good at sex
@Kvynhanma that's what they tell you because you have to pay them for it 😂😂 After saving up real hard from your job at Dunkin' Donuts. Go get 'em, tiger. LMFAO.
@NicoletteXO I’m self employed so I have tons of down time to have sex
@Kvynhanma selling low-quality weed doesn't count as self-employment darling. But I'm glad you spend your extra time blowing what little cash you can scrounge up on meaningless sex which you have to pay for. Since obviously no-one will give it to you for free 😂 Sounds like a rock-solid way to evolve into a real man one day 😂😂
@NicoletteXO again they’re strippers not prostitutes I don’t pay them sometimes they try to cook for me just to stay at my spot longer and selling weed really? I’m not in middle school anymore 😂😂 your just jealous come on tell the truth and shame the devil
@Kvynhanma *you're 😂😂
You’re *spellcheck*😓
@Kvynhanma I guess the reason you can only afford the Tank Engine is you are clearly breaking the golden rule: "don't get high on your own supply". There ain't no stripper on earth who is going to cook for some random man-child for free 😂😂 You're straight up trippin', dude.
@NicoletteXO so tell me what is a real man? 🧐
@Kvynhanma Revisit your demeanour in this interchange. It's aggressive, immature, unconsidered, unintelligent and sloppy. A real man would show up in the exact opposite way to you.
@Kvynhanma Oh God, not YOU again! It's "you're" (a contraction of "you are"), not "your"!
Yes, Nicolette is 35. So what? The "wall" is something believed in only by those silly and immature males who spend far too much time on the internet because they have nothing else to do. No hobbies, no job, no girlfriend or wife. In other words, LOSERS!
@Rachelspiks perfectly articulated, my darling! x
@Kvynhanma "I’m just really good at sex"
Not only is your grammar and punctuation completely off, but you're thoroughly deluded as well. Boys who like to brag that they're "really good at sex" are just the opposite, in the opinion of just about every female on the planet who has ever had sex with them.
@Kvynhanma "I have an iq of 115"
Are we supposed to be impressed by that? The last time I did one of those tests I got a score of 143. In any case, IQ tests are over-rated, and nowhere near as useful as many people apparently believe they are.
@Rachelspiks we have to stop meet like this😂🙄
@Rachelspiks me talk like good
@Rachelspiks I got a similar score to you, which doesn't surprise me. However, I avoided mentioning that since it's kind of like when people say "I'm intelligent" on a bio. Like, if you have to say it, you definitely aren't 😂 Though in this context, he is the one who raised the topic, so I have no problem with you educating him on what actually counts as even remotely impressive in the realm of IQ scores.
@NicoletteXO for a person you claim has only 2 brain cells that’s a pretty incredible score
@Kvynhanma yes, congratulations for achieving a score of 1.15 with your two little champions. You won the Addled Olympics. Good job, buddy. Good job.
@NicoletteXO "Crusty wank sock" - that was funny. He probably really does have one of those! :D
@Kvynhanma LMFAO. This kid has never seen a naked woman of any age with this kind of comment 😂😂😂
@Kvynhanma Oh wow, what an articulate and devastating comeback! I'm impressed. No really, this isn't sarcasm.
@Rachelspiks And his mother washes them in disgust 😂
@NicoletteXO Yes, you're right. When people (usually insecure males, I've noticed) mention their IQ, it usually comes across as being extremely cringey, and often downright embarrassing.
Wow ! Can I use these?
@Rachelspiks This time was no exception, either ;)
@Kvynhanma Yes you may, since you clearly don't have the extensive vocabulary required in order to come up with your own ripostes.
@NicoletteXO Actually, he probably tries to hide his wank socks from his mother in his messy bedroom somewhere, and he's now got a whole pile of them and they're starting to stink the place out.
@Rachelspiks hi sarcasm
@Rachelspiks Oh this is graphically accurate 😂😂 I can practically smell his slightly-stale-cheese-and-imbalanced-pheromone whiffs from here 🤢
@Kvynhanma Aw, are you starting to cry? :'(
Here, have a tissue.
@Rachelspiks yeah, he's running out of socks.
@Rachelspiks I mean your insults were pretty sad and pathetic but not worth crying over you did the best you could with your little female mind
@NicoletteXO I guess I'll never think of stale cheese the same way again, LOL :D I might end up becoming a vegan because of the association.
@Rachelspiks cringe worthy 😬
@Kvynhanma Hey, what does your bedroom really stink like? Do you have one of those blow-up sex dolls in your closet? Is the closet also where you hide the goat you have when your mother knocks on your door?
@Kvynhanma You are? I agree.
@Kvynhanma Do you have a box of 'Kleenex' by your bed? Please use those instead of your socks, if you do not mind.
@Kvynhanma Of course you don't "f*** unattractive hoes", because even they don't want you. You would have to pay them, and even then they'd be reluctant.
@Kvnnhanmaa lol - yeah, she'll need to douse herself in something (anything!) simply to mask the stench of your dirty dried up man-child jizz socks. Even your goat is disgusted with you and yearning to escape.
Jesus it hasn't even been 24 since I logged out and already I got 47 notices in just this post. wtf did you do @NicoletteXO? on wow lmao and why am I not surprised you are friends with @Rachelspiks?
CasaNorba - You no doubt already know that neither I nor Nicolette will ever back down from an argument if we happen to know that we're right, and especially if the one we're arguing with is clearly a misogynist, as "Kvynhanma" clearly is.
@Rachelspiks you dont have to tell me twice, you two have already one G@G 2021 Award for "most butthurt feminists"
won*
I don't classify myself as a feminist - so, we'll put your little mistake aside. But since you've clearly never won an award in your life, I'll throw you a bone. You win the Most Butt-fucked Man-Child Award for 2021. Congratulations. Sorry about your anus. I know it hurts, but you take it like a champ.
I'm not a feminist either. I guess every woman who actually stands up for what she believes in is a "feminist" according to most insecure men who like to think of themselves as "going their own way", or some other such crap.
@NicoletteXO " You win the Most Butt-fucked Man-Child Award for 2021. Congratulations. Sorry about your anus."
says the butthurt 35 year old granny that's been attacking my post for almost 24 hours. I guess you won yet another award that its "the most projecting person of 2021." till you my friend are no different than an actual feminists
You call Nicolette a "granny" for being 35? You're 34 grandpa!
@Rachelspiks damn its almost a month and you're still butthurt over mgtow. till then yeah is not odd to think you're a feminists since after all feminists are the people the hate and stalks us the most everywhere we go
@Rachelspiks these morons have such limited capacity to actually engage in a relevant and nuanced discussion, I sometimes think they just reach into a big ol' hat filled with the words "feminist", "Karen", "triggered", "ho" and "slut", then do a lucky dip to decide what they're going to type next. So fucking boring and puerile.
@NicoletteXO Yes, and I've been called all those things at one point in time or another here at GAG. When their insults fail to have any effect upon me, they then resort to the ultimate admission of defeat - they block me.
CasaNorba - No, I'm not obsessed with MGTOW, I just want you people to finally GO! Stop your constant whining about how awful women apparently are, and just live your life as you promised you would. Is that too hard to do?
@NicoletteXO well buddy if you sound and behave like those then you can't get mad if people call you those things. simple as that
@Rachelspiks you're not obsess with us yet you talk about us and hound us 24/7. action speaks louder than words buddy
@Rachelspiks "You call Nicolette a "granny" for being 35? You're 34 grandpa!" - you took the words right out of my mouth. Unbelievably deluded, isn't he? Probably early-onset dementia 😂 😂
"well buddy if you sound and behave like those then you can't get mad if people call you those things. simple as that".
Firstly, I'm not your buddy.
Secondly, if you believe a "slut" or a "ho" "sounds like" a person who is able to astutely and hilariously rebut vitriolic and inane comments from men like you who can hardly string a sentence together... well, then, you must hold sluts in eminently high regard.
Either that, or your comment is logically incoherent. I'll put my wager on the latter.
"Attacking your post"? No honey. This started with another little man-baby making an unsolicited attack on me. And I put him in his little place for it. As he well deserved.
@NicoletteXO dude you literally attacked my post hours before you and @Kvynhanma had your childish brawl.
Lol. You mean the part where I mentioned your ridiculous, shallow and vitriolic comment on women seemed to be copied and pasted from a red-pill website? That's not an attack, that's a reflection of obvious truth. Interesting that you are so aggressively unstable that you seem to think you can instigate vitriol and attack upon women, yet you are concurrently so weak and overly sensitive that you perceive a mere reflection on this as an attack.
@NicoletteXO "You mean the part where I mentioned your ridiculous, shallow and vitriolic comment on women seemed to be copied and pasted from a red-pill website? That's not an attack,"
oh it is buddy, you shouldn't be talking about "aggressively unstable" since that's exactly what you sounded like when you posted that nonsense; just because you know it was true and your 35 year old ass couldnt handle it
" yet you are concurrently so weak and overly sensitive that you perceive a mere reflection on this as an attack."
if you were any stronger yourself you would of ignored my opinion and walked away specially if it didn't pertain to you. so yeah buddy you got any more PROJECTIONS you would like to make?
Hahahaha your lack of ability to use logic is hilarious and astounding.
I literally said "Copied and pasted from a red pill site I presume. YAWN." - if you think that sounds unstably aggressive, you're even less stable and more unhinged than I thought. Someone yawning is aggressive? I'd hate to see you in a physical brawl then. You'd be on your ass in a nano-second, pathetically crying for Mummy and sucking your thumb.
As to your comment: "if you were any stronger yourself you would of ignored my opinion and walked away specially if it didn't pertain to you. so yeah buddy you got any more PROJECTIONS you would like to make?"
My strength is revealed by my capacity to express myself as and when I see fit. If you want to throw a man-tanty and make unwarranted comments about women, you'd best be prepared to be called out for your BS by both strong men and women.
And this whole thread is about women in my age bracket. So... um... the whole topic pertains to me, numbskull.
And you seem not to understand the meaning of the word 'projections'. Writing in capitals only serves to draw attention to your incorrect use of this term. And also makes you look like more of a man-baby.
@NicoletteXO again aggressive or not it caught your 35 year old ass your attention for a reason and the fact that your EGO prevented you from ignoring my opinion speaks loud enough buddy.
"My strength is revealed by my capacity to express myself as and when I see fit. If you want to throw a man-tanty and make unwarranted comments about women, you'd best be prepared to be called out for your BS by both strong men and women."
yea ok Wonder Woman, just dont trip over your own Magic Lasso like you been doing for the past 24 hours.
"And this whole thread is about women in my age bracket. So... um... the whole topic pertains to me, numbskull."
yeah "ME, ME and ME" because "I'm so butthurt that I can't stand people talking negative about anything that relates to me!"
and yes I do know what PROJECTION is Miss English Teacher, it is what you also been doing for the past 24 hours. accusing others of sounding like a "man-baby" when this is exactly what you been doing
1) "again aggressive or not it caught your 35 year old ass your attention for a reason and the fact that your EGO prevented you from ignoring my opinion speaks loud enough buddy."
Hahahaha - love how you just quietly admit defeat here, then immediately try to deflect from that by calling me 35 as if it's an insult - while you are 34 yourself.
Let me educate you in what a projection is. It's exactly what you yourself have done here. You post a vitriolic and unbearably egocentrically inflated comment about women, then you try to pretend someone who calls you out on this is being driven by ego. LMFAO. THAT'S what a projection is, honey. Projecting what you yourself are onto someone else.
2) "yea ok Wonder Woman, just dont trip over your own Magic Lasso like you been doing for the past 24 hours." If anyone's been tripping, it's you. You haven't managed to support a single one of your absurd comments here. Because they are full of logical fallacies and incoherence.
"And this whole thread is about women in my age bracket. So... um... the whole topic pertains to me, numbskull."
yeah "ME, ME and ME" because "I'm so butthurt that I can't stand people talking negative about anything that relates to me!"
Let me educate you in something else. DEFLECTION. There, some capitals for you, since you seem to love them so much. What you just tried (and failed) to do above is the (lame and shallow) strategy of deflection.
You suggested I shouldn't speak about things that don't pertain to me. I pointed out that they absolutely do pertain to me. In fact, this whole topic is literally about my demographic, so they couldn't pertain more to me. Instead of admitting that you are clearly and obviously wrong, you shift up to a red herring - the accusation that I am talking about "me, me, me". Well, that would be unnecessary if you did not make a stupid and clearly inaccurate assertion about me. What you are attempting to create is DEFLECTION from the fact that you are simply wrong.
You are also clearly butthurt about the fact you are wrong. Which is why instead of being able to admit this and apologise like a decent human, you then use PROJECTION to pretend I am butthurt about something which you fail to be able to articulate.
3) and yes I do know what PROJECTION is Miss English Teacher.
No, you don't. If you did, you'd realize projection is a topic from the subject of psychology, not English. Though the fact that you have no idea when, where and how to use capital letters does indicate you need to work on your understanding of both these fields.
@NicoletteXO "Hahahaha - love how you just quietly admit defeat here, then immediately try to deflect from that by calling me 35 as if it's an insult - while you are 34 yourself."
actually no buddy, its the other way around because as I already proven 24 hours ago we men age way better than you women do, which explains why men in their 30 and over have a higher value in the sex market while you women become the lowest fruits in the tree at after their 30s. so no, just because you keep deflecting and denying this at heart does not mean it defies reality. sorry buddy but facts dont give a fuck about your feelings.
" You post a vitriolic and unbearably egocentrically inflated comment about women, then you try to pretend someone who calls you out on this is being driven by ego. LMFAO. "
as vitriolic and unbearably egocentrically inflated as it sounded to you it still the truth sweety and you did not call anybody out. all you did was storm in and WHINE about how I got it from a red pill forum like if that automatically validates your views. if anything all you did and STILL DOING (24 hours later) is showing how butthurt you are by the truth.
"You suggested I shouldn't speak about things that don't pertain to me. I pointed out that they absolutely do pertain to me. In fact, this whole topic is literally about my demographic, so they couldn't pertain more to me."
ok thank you buddy, now YOU"RE THE ONE ADMITTING YOUR OWN DEFEAT.
"Instead of admitting that you are clearly and obviously wrong, you shift up to a red herring - the accusation that I am talking about "me, me, me"
actually I am not wrong at all and I even brought evidence to the table, just because you dismissed them for being from a red pill forum does not mean YOUR RIGHT and reality has to change to accommodate your feelings.
"You are also clearly butthurt about the fact you are wrong. Which is why instead of being able to admit this and apologies like a decent human, you then use PROJECTION to pretend I am butthurt about something which you fail to be able to articulate."
again just because you think something is wrong does not mean you're right and reality has to change for you. seriously a lot of women in their 30s and over even admitted themselves that they no longer stand a chance in the dating world, hence why they become so easy and even lower their standards.
"No, you don't. If you did, you'd realize projection is a topic from the subject of psychology, not English. "
who said anything about English and psychology buddy? I'm not the one picking grammar here to further proof how butthurt and self defeated you feel miss I CAN RUB MY OPINION ON ANYONE'S FACE BECAUSE I'M ALWAYS RIGHT AND EVERYONE WHO DISAGREE WITH ME MUST BE WRONG!
talk about psychology buddy go see a therapist and get your Kanye West Syndrome checked out
@CasaNorba I just LOVE how you managed to trigger the G@G snowflakes here. I know this website is full of degenerates who can't stand the truth, but Jesus Christ! Let them think that a 35 year old is just as "wanted" as a 20 year old 😂😂😂
Also don't mind me, just throwing some none red pill sources here:
metro.co.uk/.../
www.marketwatch.com/.../women-online-daters-peak-at-age-18-men-peak-at-50-2018-08-17
www.thesun.co.uk/.../
www.theatlantic.com/.../
@TruthBringer Fucking YAWN. If you cared to read this dialogue properly - which I doubt you did, because you're clearly as moronic and illiterate as CasaDouchebag here, you would have seen that we already predicted your utterly unoriginal comment of accusing us of being "triggered" above, in this comment:
"these morons have such limited capacity to actually engage in a relevant and nuanced discussion, I sometimes think they just reach into a big ol' hat filled with the words "feminist", "Karen", "triggered", "ho" and "slut", then do a lucky dip to decide what they're going to type next. So fucking boring and puerile."
Seriously, you're like a little sponge for misogynist ideology, with nary an original thought in your tiny brain. Honestly, I don'y know why you're siding with Señor Asswipe here, it's not an alliance that's going to do you any favours.
@NicoletteXO And the irony of "expecting" comments form someone else when you're using the very same outdated misandrist shaming tactics. Yawn indeed lmfao
@NicoletteXO This argument is STILL going on? They don't give up easily, but they should, because they're not going to "win" here, that's for sure. :D
'CasaNorba', 'Kvynhanmer' and the ironically named 'TruthBringer', just give up. You may as well, because you can't win when you don't have the truth on your side and you're up against Nicolette. Like me, she never loses an argument. :)
Besides, there are more important things in life to discuss, and I'm pretty sure that the physical attractiveness of women over 30 is pretty low on the list (or at least it should be). What about the fact that right around the globe, various governments are introducing new rules and depriving citizens of their basic rights and freedoms under the guise of "fighting a deadly virus"? The entire thing is a scam, a 'scamdemic' as it's being called, and yet here you are getting all hot and bothered over something that doesn't even matter.
@Rachelpiks whatsup with you people and "winning". I'm literally taking a piss here and enjoying how people like Nicolette managed to get triggered over a post over the fucking internet. And now she is projecting her own flaws onto someone else as an attempt to mask her own insecurities. Also, you blocked me while I frankly don't even remember ever arguing with you, and yet I manage to have you read my comments lmfao
@rachelspiks in case you have a mental disease and haven’t realized this is my opinion, I give up when I feel like it.
Ok Casa - let's straighten you out:
I said: "Hahahaha - love how you just quietly admit defeat here, then immediately try to deflect from that by calling me 35 as if it's an insult - while you are 34 yourself."
You said: "actually no buddy, its the other way around because as I already proven 24 hours ago we men age way better than you women do, which explains why men in their 30 and over have a higher value in the sex market while you women become the lowest fruits in the tree at after their 30s. so no, just because you keep deflecting and denying this at heart does not mean it defies reality. sorry buddy but facts dont give a fuck about your feelings."
Here's where I'm going to annihilate you: LMFAO!!! You actually believe you 'proved' something by posting some self-serving memes? 😂😂😂 Why don't you actually do a degree in epistemology like I have and learn what proof actually entails. Let's just say it's not that. PMSL 😂😂 Also, even if we stooped to your bottom-feeding level of 'what counts as evidence' (random self-serving images), which I don't condone... but even then, I already gave counter-examples which you have ignored. So on every possible measure, you fail.
Ok, next.
I said: " You post a vitriolic and unbearably egocentrically inflated comment about women, then you try to pretend someone who calls you out on this is being driven by ego. LMFAO. "
You said "as vitriolic and unbearably egocentrically inflated as it sounded to you it still the truth sweety and you did not call anybody out. all you did was storm in and WHINE about how I got it from a red pill forum like if that automatically validates your views. if anything all you did and STILL DOING (24 hours later) is showing how butthurt you are by the truth."
My response - So, you admit here that your own words were vitriolic and unbearably stoically inflated. Now you are fucking deflecting again from the original point - which is that you accused me of being egoic, and I countered that by pointing out the irony of someone who began a thread in an egoic manner pointing this out. Now you admit I was right. However, you are attempting to mask this with more of your red-herring BS by changing the subject again. You admit I was right. The end. And I was. The other points are superfluous and not relevant to the original point. Cool. You lose again.
Next.
I said: "You suggested I shouldn't speak about things that don't pertain to me. I pointed out that they absolutely do pertain to me. In fact, this whole topic is literally about my demographic, so they couldn't pertain more to me."
You said: "ok thank you buddy, now YOU"RE THE ONE ADMITTING YOUR OWN DEFEAT."
My response: Again, you appear to have cognitive processing impairments. This is not an example of me admitting defeat. This is an extremely clear example of you being undeniably wrong. You stated I shouldn't speak because something didn't pertain to me. I pointed out that the whole topic pertains to me, since it is focussed on my demographic specifically. This is proof you were wrong. Plain and simple. AGAIN.
Yes, I know that it's your opinion, but it's wrong. It might be time to change it. That's what intelligent people do; they come to the realisation they were not correct and adjust their beliefs accordingly. You should try it some time.
*egoically, not stoically (silly autocorrect)
@rachelspiks
It sounds like you don’t know how old this site works either otherwise he will realize that you can’t change opinions.
Till then just because someone else’s opinion does not comfort your views or you think is wrong does not mean it automatically is.
SMARTER people in the other hand respect and mind their own business and walk away when they come across an opinion they disagreed on. Cause In the end everyone is entitled to have their own views nobody has to see the world from YOUR point of view
Onto your next round of doltishness:
I said: "Instead of admitting that you are clearly and obviously wrong, you shift up to a red herring - the accusation that I am talking about "me, me, me"
You said: "actually I am not wrong at all and I even brought evidence to the table, just because you dismissed them for being from a red pill forum does not mean YOUR RIGHT and reality has to change to accommodate your feelings."
My response: Again, refer to my point about epistemology above. Moronic self-serving memes showing pictures of two random actors doesn't constitute proof. Though the fact that you believe it does demonstrates what a low-calibre mind you have. Seriously, get some higher education. Also, it's *you're 🙄 Oh, and if you want to study what constitutes 'reality' - how about studying for years in ontology, as I have, rather than assuming your puny little perspectives are 'reality' just because you stamp your fat little Man-toddler foot, throw a tantrum and try to demand them to be.
NEXT:
I said: "You are also clearly butthurt about the fact you are wrong. Which is why instead of being able to admit this and apologies like a decent human, you then use PROJECTION to pretend I am butthurt about something which you fail to be able to articulate."
You said: "again just because you think something is wrong does not mean you're right and reality has to change for you. seriously a lot of women in their 30s and over even admitted themselves that they no longer stand a chance in the dating world, hence why they become so easy and even lower their standards."
My response: I absolutely agree with you, that 'reality' doesn't have to change because of my opinion. However, I never claimed it did. I'm simply stating your claims to not hold. The onus of proof here is on you, since you are the one who has fronted up here with a position which - you literally admit above - was formulated in a vitriolic and egoically inflated manner. The burden of proof is on the one who initiates the claim - and that is you. And you've failed to support your point. And "a lot of women have claimed?" - your random anecdote isn't proof, buddy. I could equally say a huge proportion of older men I see are fat and ugly, and don't stand a chance with any well-kept woman in her 30s. However, as we've both agreed, me simply chucking around anecdotes (even if they are true in my own experience) isn't any watertight proof of the nature of things. And therefore, neither is your chucking around of random anecdotes proof of the nature of things. So, FAIL AGAIN.
NEXT.
I said: "No, you don't. If you did, you'd realize projection is a topic from the subject of psychology, not English. "
You said: "who said anything about English and psychology buddy?"
My reponse: Um... you did - in this sentence right here: "and yes I do know what PROJECTION is Miss English Teacher". LOL.
NEXT.
You said: "I'm not the one picking grammar here to further proof how butthurt and self defeated you feel miss I CAN RUB MY OPINION ON ANYONE'S FACE BECAUSE I'M ALWAYS RIGHT AND EVERYONE WHO DISAGREE WITH ME MUST BE WRONG!"
My response:
*prove
*rub my opinion IN, not on
*disagrees
Also, the only one butthurt is you, Mr Illiterate. The fact that you start yelling in caps because you are embarrassed about being revealed as such is fairly clear to anyone with half a brain. Not that you'll be able to relate.
I don't believe I am always right at all. If you fronted with an intelligent argument I'd be happy to engage with it. However, you didn't. That's on you, buddy.
@NicoletteXO are you gonna be a parrot and repeat everything I said to further proved how triggered you been for the past 48 hours?
seriously dude @TruthBringer and I already lifted up your skirt and called you out on your projection habits. all you're doing at the moment is continue to convince me and yourself that you got the ego of a 10 year old, getting triggered for 48 hours over a subject that its true just to further imply that it EMPLIES TO YOU after all
@TruthBringer to your point - "And the irony of "expecting" comments form someone else when you're using the very same outdated misandrist shaming tactics. Yawn indeed lmfao"
Look, I understand where you are coming from here. What I will say is this. It is not my preference to remain at this fairly low level of name-slanging. However, if someone leads with it, as these men have, I will give it straight back to them and more. I will never start that game. But I will finish it.
The moment any one of these men apologizes or admits they are (or even might be) wrong, or the moment they start speaking to me in a respectful and reasonable manner, I will immediately return them that courtesy.
This is not misandry. I LOVE, adore and respect good men, intelligent men and respectful men. I know plenty of them, and they receive a soft and beautiful side of me which imbecilic and disrespectful men won't see because their behaviour precludes them from seeing it.
Rather than misandry - what this is, is putting imbecilic men back in their place when they initiate unwarranted vitriol against women.
To be clear, I am more than happy to do the same for imbecilic women. It's not a gendered thing.
@NicoletteXO You've not done a good job representing yourself in a respectable manner from the start. So it's best to either do so from the very beginning in order to open a healthy discussion/debate, or refrain from engaging into arguments over the internet if what someone says affects you this much. No I didn't read your entire rants and neither am I planning on doing so. I'm simply stating that you're unironically showing your sensitivity over a topic that is directed at your age group. And you didn't do a good job behaving in a respectable way that would allow you to be taken seriously. Especially if you're going to throw typical toxic feminist shaming tactics around. And no, this is not me attacking you. This is just me pointing out the hypocrisy in your bahvior. Because you're doing a similar thing as the men you're criticizing of doing.
Also, since you have a soft spot for the red pill community, I provided some links that aren't coming from the red pill.
To CasaButthurt's point:
"@rachelspiks
It sounds like you don’t know how old this site works either otherwise he will realize that you can’t change opinions. Till then just because someone else’s opinion does not comfort your views or you think is wrong does not mean it automatically is.
SMARTER people in the other hand respect and mind their own business and walk away when they come across an opinion they disagreed on. Cause In the end everyone is entitled to have their own views nobody has to see the world from YOUR point of view"
Response:
Nobody is suggesting that "just because someone else’s opinion does not comfort your views or you think is wrong does not mean it automatically is". Nobody said your views are "automatically wrong", Casa. What is being asserted is that you have failed to demonstrates that your views hold weight. They are not 'automatically' wrong - though they are unproven because you haven't proven them.
And if "SMARTER" people (God, the fucking caps) "respect and mind their own business and walk away when they come across an opinion they disagreed on", then what are you waiting for?
If you think that is the definition of a smart person, walk away. See ya later.
Otherwise according to your own definition, you're not that smart.
*demonstrate
@NicoletteXO "If you think that is the definition of a smart person, walk away. See ya later.
Otherwise according to your own definition, you're not that smart."
again this is my opinion and you and @rachelspiks are the one who invaded it trying showing how butthurt that two of you were for the past 48 hours so no, you actually proof my point for the fact that you invaded my opinion first trying to change my views and showing how triggered and oversensitive you are and can't even walk away 48 hours later
but I'm the "butthurt" one ey?
@TruthBringer oh seriously, go suck a dick. You're going to moralise here? What a joke.
You said: "@NicoletteXO You've not done a good job representing yourself in a respectable manner from the start. So it's best to either do so from the very beginning in order to open a healthy discussion/debate, or refrain from engaging into arguments over the internet if what someone says affects you this much. No I didn't read your entire rants and neither am I planning on doing so. I'm simply stating that you're unironically showing your sensitivity over a topic that is directed at your age group. And you didn't do a good job behaving in a respectable way that would allow you to be taken seriously. Especially if you're going to throw typical toxic feminist shaming tactics around. And no, this is not me attacking you. This is just me pointing out the hypocrisy in your bahvior. Because you're doing a similar thing as the men you're criticizing of doing."
You haven't read the debate. You chime in now moralizing. You fail to observe that the one who began this was Casa with his initial comment, which he himself admits (finally - because I relentlessly called him out on it) was "vitriolic and egoically inflated". Why not moralize against Casa, since he initiated this?
I said, I won't start a debate in this way. But I will finish it. Casa started by playing dirty, so until he cleans it up, that's where we are.
I think it is completely 'unrespectable' that you chime in in this way with no skin in the game. It shows that you stand for unprovoked vitriol against women. And it shows you are the kind of "man" who will shame others unless they roll over and take unwarranted abuse. Yeah, super respectable.
Casa:
You said: "@NicoletteXO are you gonna be a parrot and repeat everything I said to further proved how triggered you been for the past 48 hours? seriously dude @TruthBringer and I already lifted up your skirt and called you out on your projection habits. all you're doing at the moment is continue to convince me and yourself that you got the ego of a 10 year old, getting triggered for 48 hours over a subject that its true just to further imply that it EMPLIES TO YOU after all"
Response: EMPLIES? 😂😂😂 And I truly thought you couldn't get more illiterate. Here, I admit I was wrong hahahahaha.
I'm going to hold you to account until you give up. That's what's going down. Suck it up.
You haven't proven a goddamn thing, except that you're very good at losing arguments and you don't like it when people have the acuity to tear yours apart. Not that your half-baked points really classify as "arguments", but anyway...
CasaMcOuchyButt:
I said: @NicoletteXO "If you think that is the definition of a smart person, walk away. See ya later.
Otherwise according to your own definition, you're not that smart."
You said: "again this is my opinion and you and @rachelspiks are the one who invaded it trying showing how butthurt that two of you were for the past 48 hours so no, you actually proof my point for the fact that you invaded my opinion first trying to change my views and showing how triggered and oversensitive you are and can't even walk away 48 hours later
but I'm the "butthurt" one ey?"
I don't concur with your definition of a smart person. What I am suggesting is that if YOU think walking away constitutes what a smart person does, then go ahead and do it. Go on, shoo!
@NicoletteXO "And I truly thought you couldn't get more illiterate. Here, I admit I was wrong hahahahaha."
you must of been wrong if you were able to argue 48 HOURS with this illiterate then it means you clearly understood everything I said. and once again you're picking grammar as a way to further imply that you lost the argument
" Not that your half-baked points really classify as "arguments", but anyway..."
is not classified as argument to you yet you been arguing and projecting for the past 48 hours here... the IRONY
@NicoletteXO NO SHIT, I said "smarter people dont go around invading other peoples opinion trying to change other people's views. they instead mind their own business and walk away"
which is something that two of you butthurt losers have been failing to do for the past 48 HOURS.
Dude. The fact that I don't capitulate to your bullshit is not indication of the quality of your "arguments" LMAO.
The fact that you clearly are illiterate, and also too arrogant to admit it - although it is objectively the case - is simply the delightful icing on the cake here.
This is what an illiterate moron does - attempt to deflect from his repeated failures, instead of admitting them and doing better.
@Rachelspiks to your point - " 'CasaNorba', 'Kvynhanmer' and the ironically named 'TruthBringer', just give up. You may as well, because you can't win when you don't have the truth on your side and you're up against Nicolette. Like me, she never loses an argument.
Besides, there are more important things in life to discuss, and I'm pretty sure that the physical attractiveness of women over 30 is pretty low on the list (or at least it should be). What about the fact that right around the globe, various governments are introducing new rules and depriving citizens of their basic rights and freedoms under the guise of "fighting a deadly virus"? The entire thing is a scam, a 'scamdemic' as it's being called, and yet here you are getting all hot and bothered over something that doesn't even matter."
EXACTLY!
@NicoletteXO as I said I don’t need to change my views for you whether you think they’re right or not.
And trust me I’m happy being illiterate and arrogant over being a whiny self righteous troll with the ego of a 10 year old.
The fact that you keep deflecting, and spamming the same horseshit for 48 hours makes it safe to assume that you’re no longer arguing, you’re just trolling your useless life away here, does this MEANS IS NOW A GOOD IDEA FOR ME TO BLOCK YOU?
Casa-I-Like-Getting-Pegged-By-Women-With-Higher-IQs-Than-Me:
You said: "@NicoletteXO NO SHIT, I said "smarter people dont go around invading other peoples opinion trying to change other people's views. they instead mind their own business and walk away"
which is something that two of you butthurt losers have been failing to do for the past 48 HOURS."
Nuh-uh. Again the deflection. Nice try, but no. You said this AFTER I whooped your ass. You don't get to change your original position, which was simply that smart people walk away from arguments, just because I tied you in a pretzel with it and noted that if that is what you think a smart person does, you should do it.
I don't personally think that is the definition of a smart person. I don't think having a dialogue and rebutting points for a long time is a problem per se, nor an indication for or against intelligence.
But you do. So if you want to remain consistent, you're gonna need to get going pronto. Othewise by your own lights, you have admitted that you are the opposite of a smart person. Essentially, if you don't leave now, you admit you are a dolt.
So go on, be "smart". Git.
@NicoletteXO again I retard I said "smart people dont go around trying to change other people's views they instead respect other people's opinion and walk away."
none of that implies to me because this is my opinion and YOUR THE ONE WHO'S HERE INVADING IT trying to change my views when all you been doing is showing how butthurt you been for the past 48 hours.
till then now you're definitely the one who's gonna walk away cause I'm sick of arguing with a 10 year old. seriously dude, go troll away your useless meaningless life somewhere else
Nicolette wanted to leave one final message, but couldn't because she told me you blocked her. So, as a favour, here it is :)
"A final message to Casa-Ungghh-Unnnggh-I-Can't-Take-Being-Intellectually-Buttfucked-Anymore...
You said: "NicoletteXO trust me I’m happy being illiterate and arrogant over being a whiny self righteous troll with the ego of a 10 year old. The fact that you keep deflecting, and spamming the same horseshit for 48 hours makes it safe to assume that you’re no longer arguing, you’re just trolling your useless life away here, does this MEANS IS NOW A GOOD IDEA FOR ME TO BLOCK YOU?"
Response: You getting your ass kicked with astute and pertinent points, blow by blow, ain't spam or deflection, buddy. That's you getting floored. I'm glad you've finally admitted you are illiterate and arrogant - I will give you a cookie. That is your consolation prize after you made the ultimate admission of defeat - blocking me. Whatever you may think of women your age, one thing this shows is they can wipe the floor with you."
@Rachelspiks dude I dont give a fuck, the fact that she needs a personal messenger to evade the block pretty much explains how butthurt she is.
and where the hell am I getting defeated at? this is a damn internet post, not a boxing match. so why dont you and her go fuck off, find someone else to bother.
Lmao "illiterate this, illiterate that" I guess correcting grammar is the only way she will ever feel victorious. not my fault that English is not my primary language, just like her being 35 and already looking like a granny
Hey, don't you dare use foul language like that with me mister! I was just passing on a message, and don't call me "dude" either!
@Rachelspiks too bad DUDE! if you dont like verbal hostility then learn from your mistake and dont be anyone's personal messenger.
@NicoletteXO Thanks for once again proving you're an immature individual who can't take any criticism and decides to attack people because you can't deal with your emotional tantrum. Your first response was more than enough to dictate that you decided to come with bad energy, to get go. Funny enough that you lecture me about morality while you yourself have not been a Jesus Christ yourself. You obviously lack self-awareness. Not to forget to mention that you getting triggered over internet comments says a lot about your self-image and level of self-esteem (which your ad hominems are a testament to them not being quite so high). And that for someoneof your age.. wow... Sure I don't condone Casa's way of talking to you, but I still side with him on this one because I agree with his initial comment. But you decided to discard anything he said by just pointing to them coming from red pill sources, which on it's own is an ad hominem attack to the source rather than the message. This is clearly shown in your lack of valid arguments to debunk anything he said. Not to forget to mention your misandrist shaming tactics. So you attacking men and their comments simply for stating the obvious, and yet you're sitting here lecturing others about "unprovoked virtriol against women".
@NicoletteXO And now you're butthurt so you start to use your own private owl named @Rachelspiks to send some messages. Be on your way. I think you have far more important things to be concerned of like making sure you don't end up alone. Your sexual market value has already taken a dive as it is. And that of Casa funny enough has increased compared to his 20s (as multiple non-red pill sources have shown). I suggest you try to learn to swallow that harsh fact because it will remain nothing but a fact. And another proof of evidence are the cultures (such as in the middle-east) where women are urged to get married as they are still young and fertile with (preferably) someone who is older as the older man usually has his shit together. But that's another discussion you're clearly not ready for. As well as you're not ready to hold an intellectual debate but instantly jump into defensive mode as well as logical fallacies. I've seen enough for a 35 year old now. Ciao ciao
@Rachelspiks Nobody asked you to butt in from the beginning, either. But then here you are. And now your little mate has been blocked (for being an annoying creature who clearly lacks real life attention), you start to back away ha. The fact you decided to be a mail dog is a laugh all in itself. Go sit on each other's face somewhere else. Preferably a safe space where facts like these aren't being discussed.
@CasaNorba This is them having to deal with men throwing harsh truth about women:
Jesus 35 years old and this much toxicity. Imagine living under the same roof. Women like these two make me appreciate my girlfriend more and more
@TruthBringer otfrl! I know right? I mean NicoletteXO is Australian so she is obviosly from the west so I can't be surprised with her.
@rachelspiks in the other hand is from Russia but still acts like a butt hurt vindictive feminists for some odd reason
I prefer older men at 33 and don’t want to date anyone younger than me. I still look youthful how I was in my 20s and still healthy. These guys don’t realize those women in their 20s have to get older too !
My bracket is 33-38 to be exact
my age is 33—38. Hello
Hi 👋
Can proceed with romance process please?
Where are you from
Seeking friends but where are you from
Oh lol I was joking. But dm me and I'll tell you where I'm from. I'm down for friends!!
I love the hypocrisy... ugly women can say seriously that they demand a hot guy and that looks shouldn't matter (as long it's the woman's looks)
All women hate heavy men... be 20 pounds or more overweight and you're disgusting... but THIS is a supermodel... If ANY man with close to her BMI tried to tell a woman about inner beauty she'd laugh in his face!!!
So why are those men degraded? or is it only bad if it is a woman?
I've heard mostly women do the "degrading" and i always find some amusement listening because the venom being spouted, i always learn something new, mostly how specific they can drill down on a single thing like maybe hair...
I witnessed a women describe anothers hair for about 15 minutes. A male couldn't hang with that.
Women lose their attractive / beauty/ body / the youthfulness.
I slept with a 40 fit girl
And a 18 fit girl.
And the 18 year girl took me a long time to get tired of her.
She kept walking around in nude and her body was incredible.
Everything is firm the skin is amazing , very tight, the bodies aren’t saggy. And etc etc..
Newsflash; 18 year old dude's bodies are also tighter, and they often have better erections, than men your age. However, the mark of an intelligent person is to realize that everyone ages. It happens to all of us eventually. So while keeping fit is important for everyone, you'd better start appreciating the beauty that also lives beneath the surface of people - character, confidence, creativity and so on - otherwise you will ended up a very sad wrinkly old dude.
You again! You don’t know FK all you don’t understand nothing But biology and you keep yapping. I bet you’re a fat ass
About Biology*
Your "coaching practice" is a fucking joke dude. You are a fucking joke. You tried to solicit me and many other women here, and then in other threads you spread inane misogynistic BS which reveals you are the one who needs coaching - or better yet, meds and a psych ward.
You seem awfully angry from life what do you care what others do? Because you don’t work on yourself. The whole time you’ve been chasing me. why don’t you go and contact me and have a debate with me instead of hiding behind the keyboard and talking bullshit? Yeah coaching practice is bullshit to those who refuse to do anything with the lives that’s why the whole time you’re chasing me and talking bullshit one day someone is gonna mike Tyson you because of your mouth. Karen! Now fuk off. Keyboard warrior.
You spew insults and vitriol, then accuse me of being angry? Nice try, dude. And let's not forget you are the one who invited me (amongst so many others) to check out your website. You frequently do this here on GAG in a manner which is almost always entirely tone-deaf, since it is never asked for and rarely relevant to the topic. So, before I clicked on the site, I already suspected it would be as bad as it is. It's quite amusing that you talk about things like "lack of listening skills in the 21st century", when I don't think I could find a more fabulous example of someone with poor listening skills and utterly terrible communication skills than you. An example of your recent 'wordsmithery' above: "You don’t know FK all you don’t understand nothing But biology and you keep yapping. I bet you’re a fat ass" - yeah, that sure sounds like someone I'd be asking advice from LMFAO.
You literally know nothing about me and spew insults and BS.
I didn't say coaching practices are bullshit. I said YOURS is bullshit. Because there is a complete disjunct between who you pretend to be on your website and who you are here. YOU are the one who needs coaching - from someone actually capable and skilled in those arts. Better yet, a psychotherapist. Coaching won't be enough to untangle the mess in your head and heart.
And gee, you make physically threatening comments to women and then wonder why they don't 'contact you to have a debate'? Gee, I wonder why?
Correction *I don't think I could find a more fabulous example of someone with poorer listening skills and more utterly terrible communication skills than you.
Isn't this question being just a BIT dramatic? I don't think women are "degraded" for being 30 and over. Making the observation that the vast, vast, VAST majority of women achieve their height of physical beauty in their mid-twenties or earlier is hardly "degrading" women in their 30s.
I don’t think that’s true. My moms 30+ and has never teen demeaned for her age, I’m pretty sure the age thing is unique to guys on this site that think a woman over 30 is in menopause already or some bullshit 🤷🏽♀️
That’s looking at it from a males biology POV. Men don’t necessarily find a women unattractive just because she is 30. Some women are still highly beautiful way beyond 30. There are men who will like you for you regardless of anything.
It usually a cultural thing people think older women isn't as attractive compared to younger female because in everyone mind the younger the girl, the hotter she is. But I wouldn't let non of those assholes bother you there are actually some of us guys who do prefer mature women.
Honestly, I think 30 is around the time a lot of women stop being insecure and naive people-pleasers, and stop taking shit. People don't like that.
I'm way sexier - and cooler! - at 35 than I was at 25. All women who live in integrity are.
That’s nasty
@Kvynhanma You're nasty.
@Kvynhanma You're nasty. Not to mention immature, stupid, retarded, socially inept and lacking in basic decency, manners and empathy.
@Kvynhanma No, me Jane, you dickhead.
@Rachelspiks burn 😂😂😂 Nailed it.
" I think 30 is around the time a lot of women stop being insecure and naive people-pleasers,"
obviously, since their looks deteriorate after 30 then they have no choice but to lower their ego and standards. no man is willing to chance any of you by this stage in life
@CasaNorba " I think 30 is around the time a lot of women stop being insecure and naive people-pleasers,"
obviously, since their looks deteriorate after 30 then they have no choice but to lower their ego and standards. no man is willing to chance any of you by this stage in life"
I'm genuinely starting to wonder if you have a mental impairment or intellectual disability. I'm suggesting literally the opposite. That as a woman matures she raises her standards, because unlike a naive and insecure young woman who will try to please everyone around her despite being treated like an afterthought, a mature woman won't accept that.
You know what's really pernicious about men like you? Your type is the kind who pay out women for having a "high body count" (even that phrase is so nauseating, just dripping with misogyny)... but you know who has a high body count in a way that doesn't serve them? Young, naieve, people pleasing women with low standards. Of course, not all young women are this way, and more power to those who know their value. However, the more mature a woman gets, the better she learns not to accept lowball offers, imagining and hoping the man will magically change. She learns to judge a man by his character and actions, rather than believing promises of hot air that turn out later to be false, as young women often do.
The fact that you even need to have this explained to you because your comprehension skills are so poor shows us just what kind of a man you are. Let's just say, not the sharpest tool in the shed.
not you just confirmed you're the one who's mentally ill or perhaps retarded. women dont raise their standard in their 30s. this is when they have no choice but to lower it because like I said their looks are deteriorating and no men of high quality pay mind to her. seriously women in their 30s who are single or haven't been married always tremble with fear because they think "they're gonna be alone forever"
"your type is the kind who pay out women for having a "high body count"
no shit buddy, would you want to be in a relationship with a man who's slept with 50+ women? do you not mind taking the risk of being a cuckqueen? or are you already one?
and no just because a women become less mature and give it up less easier as they age still does not mean they can automatically scape their pass. your pass will always determine your future whether you like it or not.
"The fact that you even need to have this explained to you because your comprehension skills are so poor shows us just what kind of a man you are. Let's just say, not the sharpest tool in the shed."
just because I dont bow down to all your horseshit believes does not mean my comprehension skills are poor miss English teacher
@CasaNorba
You said: "not you just confirmed you're the one who's mentally ill or perhaps retarded."
My response: How so? I just demonstrated you misunderstood an extraordinarily simple position statement. In fact, you misunderstood it so profoundly that you thought it meant literally the opposite of what it actually meant. If you think that accurately pointing out your lack of basic comprehension skills constitutes being "retarded", well then, you're in a worse position than I feared.
NEXT.
You said: "women dont raise their standard in their 30s. this is when they have no choice but to lower it because like I said their looks are deteriorating and no men of high quality pay mind to her. seriously women in their 30s who are single or haven't been married always tremble with fear because they think "they're gonna be alone forever"
My reponse: just because you assert this, doesn't prove jack shit. This is not my experience, nor the experience of almost every woman I've ever encountered. I accept that my anecdotal evidence is not the final say on this. But yours certainly isn't either. And if you're going to fling around absurd vitriol about women, you're going to need to have more up your sleeve that "it is that way because I say so". Furthermore, we've already demonstrated above that you have the comprehension capacity of a cane toad. So, while I don't think anybody's anecdotal evidence is sufficient to prove anything here, if I had to choose a perspective which is more likely to be clear and cogent, it wouldn't be the perspective of a man with the IQ of a cockroach.
NEXT:
You said: "your type is the kind who pay out women for having a "high body count"
no shit buddy, would you want to be in a relationship with a man who's slept with 50+ women? do you not mind taking the risk of being a cuckqueen? or are you already one?"
My response: I don't give a damn about how many women my man has slept with. What I care about is whether or not he is a man of character who is in integrity with himself. There are virgins and incels who have slept with no women at all - this is not a virtue. And there are men who have slept with many women because they are shallow and superficial - also not a virtue. There are other men who have slept with a large sum of women, who have acted in joy and integrity while doing so - I celebrate those men, and their healthy sexuality. I'm sure you can't relate at all, because your sexuality (as your intellect) is obviously warped and twisted beyond repair. I doubt very much that you've ever had a loving, healthy sexual encounter in your life, let alone a decent relationship.
NEXT:
You said: "and no just because a women become less mature and give it up less easier as they age still does not mean they can automatically scape their pass. your pass will always determine your future whether you like it or not."
My response: This sentence is literally incoherent and completely undermines your previous position. Earlier you claim that women of your age bracket DON'T in fact make the choice to raise their standards and "give it up less easily" - but now you admit they do (as I said originally, and you stupidly disputed). But at the same time, now you are saying it is "less mature" of a woman to "give it up less easily". Riiight.
As mentioned, I have no problem with people having sexual experience - male or female. In fact, I think it is healthy. Why are you so repressed and judgmental about sexuality? Is it because you can't get none? I suspect so.
NEXT:
I said: "The fact that you even need to have this explained to you because your comprehension skills are so poor shows us just what kind of a man you are. Let's just say, not the sharpest tool in the shed."
You said: "just because I dont bow down to all your horseshit believes does not mean my comprehension skills are poor miss English teacher"
My response: I didn't assert your comprehension skills are poor because you are "not bowing down". I asserted - correctly - that they are poor because you miscomprehended an extremely basic position statement. And you miscomprehended it so poorly, you actually thought it meant literally the opposite of what it in fact meant. Also, as anyone who has had the misfortune of encountering your uncouth babbling here will already know - your comprehension and literacy skills are astoundingly sub-par for someone with such temerity. In fact, you yourself even admit to your own illiteracy and arrogance elsewhere here, in a conversation we had a couple of hours ago. So, yeah - I assert that your comprehension skills are poor, because your comprehension skills are demonstrably, and unequivocally, poor.
It's a societal trend that women should be young and beautiful, so the younger the better. Women, especially in fields such as entertainment after a certain age no longer hold value. This ass backwards philosophy leaks into everyday life.
How the hell is it backwards?
I personally think that type of thinking is childish. I feel like you shouldn't be worried about the opinion or someone who thinks like that. He's probably realizing he's getting old and projecting. And that's putting it nicely.
exactly. Men talk as if they don't age too. Its hilarious really.
@aliali8 totally.
Anyone who thinks so isn't worth your time or energy. Seriously isn't that some creepy shit anyway? EVERYONE will be over 30 unless they die. So what happens to the guy who is married then his wife turns 30? Yeah, he's just a piece of shit human now.
Well I don't think a women being over 30 should be degraded they are still fairly young and sexy in my opnion. Some women feel they are part there prime when they reach there 30's and there looks mind of fade away a little and maybe had some kids and feel what guy would want that. I think women are too hard on themselves as they get older if you asked me they are more attractive as they get older because they more mature and experienced.
In real life, no. Only by online trolls. I found women in their 30s more attractive even when I was a young adult
Clueless, but speaking for myself I find 30 year old or older much sexier than 20 something year olds.
Something about the maturity level.
Plus I actually will have something in common with them.
Age means nothing. Women over 30 can be attractive af. I'm thinking that the only guys who don't think so are young and still attracted to high school and college-age girls.
I think there may be a few of those. But actually I think the ones who spout this are mainly incels. It gives their egos comfort to believe a narrative that suggests that at some point women will feel rejection - since underneath all their vitriol, they just feel rejected themselves. It's like a twisted way of extracting a sense of justice from the Universe in their minds.
Good point, Nicolette.
There may also be idiots who think she must "used goods." I have a super low opinion of guys who think women who have had prior relationships are "used". Like women are only supposed to have sex with one man in their entire life. Ghaaah!
It's actually ridiculous. Like men, women flourish with good sex, and plenty of it. It's like watering a garden. There is nothing virtuous about being sex-starved.
No one ever said it better, Nicolette. I couldn't agree more with everything you have said. And I love that watering the garden analogy. 😂
It's not, I've seen atttractive 45 year old women before. seen unattractive ones too mind you, but the age itself typically is not the issue, as many women in their 30s and 40s look just as hot as when they were in their 20s.
I don't know why but this is an explanation: it's not that 30 was an age just picked for people to start disliking women, it's that women tend to start losing youthful features around that age. It's probably a general rule, but some people revere it as if it always holds true, which it doesn't (of course this matter is subjective but I'm not going to go into details).
The only thing significant about the age 30 in this case is that it tends to correspond to loss of youthful features.