Do you believe that Women are more susceptible to cult involvement than men?

[Heartache0405]

https://youtu.be/mwyOSJw5hYU

Yes

No

[CallmeTheKnight]

I think it comes to the individuals that are naive, easily impressionable, and dependent on others as far as emotions.
To be fair, average men tend to be more gullible for anything that's promiscuous or supposed to enhance their current looks and status.

To add to that, very insecure women and women who have a history of making poor decisions constantly are just as gullible.

[anylolone]

"To be fair, average men tend to be more gullible for anything that's promiscuous or supposed to enhance their current looks and status."

Doesn't seem to be the case.

[CasaNorba]

obviously!

feminism speaks for itself, being around for more than half a century. that is of course because women are followers, it is in their nature to follow/join crowds even when it doesn't pertain to them in any way

[Bel88]

Yeah, that's a heap of manure.

[CasaNorba]

@Bel88 where is your proof that my statement is manure?

[Bel88]

You say that "it's in their nature to join crowds" when it could easily be argued that most people, regardless of whether they're male or female, have this tendency. Most of the attendees at the Nuremberg rallies were male.

[CasaNorba]

@bel88 yeah that was actually a military movement so wtf do you expect?

Especially in a country ran by a dictator that talked out his ass for a living and tricked people in his nation that everyone outside them was a threat and they must defend themselves at all cause. So of course is mostly men who will join such a movement.

But wtf can you compared that woth feminism? That’s been around for more than half a century. Even in today’s world where women have more right and privileges than men do in the west

[RolandCuthbert]

Really? Prove that women have more rights and privileges than men.

[CasaNorba]

@RolandCuthbert go marry a bimbo out there, get her pregnant and give her an excuse to file divorce on your ass (which won't be so difficult) and after that go fight for the child's custody and let me know which one of you won.

that is just one example

[RolandCuthbert]

Why would I be stupid enough to get a bimbo pregnant?

So if the issue is one of intelligence. . . then. . .

maybe it isn't about rights and privileges.

[CasaNorba]

@RolandCuthbert again like I said that was only one example. the fact that women will always win the child custody 84% of the time even if she is not fit to be a parent and you are just shows how privilege women are

[AtTheTop]

@Bel88

says the girl who believes in the core of the earth lol

atheist and their imaginary beliefs

[Bel88]

What I "expect" is for people, of both genders, to be able to resist the urge to join in the crowd and actually remain impartial and unaffected by the emotions of the moment. Like this guy.
external-content.duckduckgo.com/.../

[Bel88]

You made the generalisation that "women are followers". Really? Well, I'm not, and never have been. I've always been an independent thinker, so don't get your panties in a knot here! Men are just as susceptible to manipulation as any woman ever born, it's just that males such as yourself are in serious denial about this.

[Bel88]

@AtTheTop Ah, it's Mr. SnakeMan! You've finally decided to reveal who you are. Good, because that means I can finally block you.
But before I do, I'd like to show you something.
external-content.duckduckgo.com/.../

[Bel88]

@AtTheTop And this.
external-content.duckduckgo.com/.../
It's called knowledge. You may have heard of it.

[AtTheTop]

@Bel88

thats a picture not reality hun

this is reality

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmBYV4kxS4w

[wagsingle]

Feminism is around because we still have neanderthal like you.

[wagsingle]

You made the claim, so it's your job to prove it's true. Which you can't because it's sexist bullshit.

[AtTheTop]

@wagsingle

FEMINISM WAS CREATED BY SATANIST MEN

they paid women thousands of dollars to make up lies
its all over youtube

[anylolone]

@wagsingle So what do we have because we still have morons like her and other cultist women?

[RolandCuthbert]

How many women are deadbeat dads?

Maybe insisting on one way of looking at things isn't helpful.

[CasaNorba]

@RolandCuthbert

"How many women are deadbeat dads?"

what kind fucking question is this? are you saying that "deadbeat MOMS" can't exists? dont you dare say no to me mr because I personally a few deadbeat mothers myself.

[RolandCuthbert]

Haha! It like someone beat you with a stupid stick or something. You make a comparison claiming that women "always" win child custody. But when someone makes a comparison saying that most parents who abandon their kids are males, you lose your shit?

Get the fuck out of here with that nonsense.

In the U. S. women make up the vast majority of single parent homes. But consider this. 92% of prison convicts are fathers. So forget about child support. And of rest whom are fathers, the majority of those women do not receive the full amount of court ordered assistance.

So what was this noise about women having some built-in advantage?

You must be one of those "nice guys".

LOLx10!!!

[CasaNorba]

@RolandCuthbert yeah if I got hit with that stick then you must of gotten shot with a moron bullet cause you're putting all the fault on men like a true simped up feminized momma's boys. and no, very few men abandon their children because they felt like it. most of these men just get barred from spending time with their children because as I said later women win custody 84% of the time and almost 99% of the times they win they either file a restraining order to the father or move to far away places so the kids won't see there father.

and this is my OP so why dont you take your damn advice and "get the fuck out of here with that shit"

"In the U. S. women make up the vast majority of single parent homes"

no shit, as I said women win the custody of the child 84% of the time so its obvious that most single parents are women. I bet our courts were more fair with both party than I bet the single parents % would be around 50/50

"92% of prison convicts are fathers. So forget about child support. And of rest whom are fathers, the majority of those women do not receive the full amount of court ordered assistance."

no shit that's because men get convicted more than women do and they even get longer sentences, even for the same crime. and if they dont get child support then they got other options like food stamps, Welfare, etc. so no you're once again dead wrong. and maybe we the population of convicts would be a lot less than 92% if women learn how to pick their baby daddies, instead of falling for losers who will either abuse them or walk out of their lives.

[CasaNorba]

@RolandCuthbert "So what was this noise about women having some built-in advantage?"

that noise that your deaf ass apparently can't hear or even worst doesn't want to hear. that women win custody of children 92% of the times, they get shorted sentence for committing crimes, they get to legally steal all your hard earnings via divorce, and the list goes on.

till then no I'm not one of those nice guys at all. but I rather be that over a momma's boy like you

[anylolone]

@CasaNorba You gonna get blocked by the "influencer".

[RolandCuthbert]

Son, I get women. You sound like another pissed off incel whining over shit that will never happen to him.

Oh, a woman used me and now I got a kid.

Get the fuck out of here!!! Unless she sit down on one of your used sock from those porn sessions, you don't have any worries.

Haha!!!

[CasaNorba]

@anylolone there's a lot of influencer losers in this site, which one are you talking about?

[CasaNorba]

@RolandCuthbert "Son, I get women. You sound like another pissed off incel whining over shit that will never happen to him."

nice now you gotta turn this argument into " I got a girlfriend and you dont" type of argument like an old 50 year high school kid who recently lost his virginity.

"Oh, a woman used me and now I got a kid."

yeah no shit, you sound like the type of loser who will let any bitch use him just so he can get pussy and deny he's an incel. me in the other hand I never been used by a woman and the only woman I got serious with ironically got pregnant by different dudes except me. guess I'm that lucky ey? or maybe just smart.

"Get the fuck out of here!!! Unless she sit down on one of your used sock from those porn sessions, you don't have any worries."

never had to use a sock for that in my life. oh and at least I'm not the one with a kid at the moment, mr 50 year trying so hard to be a stud. lmao old fart please, your youth days are over; so why dont you get the fuck out of her and TAKE CARE OF YOUR FAMILY

[anylolone]

You know who, the one who's an unwilling father, like the guy who had the bad luck to cuck you.
Smart of you to use condoms, by the way, I commend you on that.

[CasaNorba]

@anylolone thanks though I'm still confuse cause nobody has ever cuck me in my life

[anylolone]

Sorry, I understood wrong, I thought you said you ex got pregnant by some other guy during the relationship.

[BipBipLeddus]

At the center of most cults is usually a charming man. And they typically target women for recruitment because 1) they can push "free love" as an ideal of their cult and 2) guys aren't typically interested in joining a sausagefest.

So, yes, but because they're the main choice for recruitment.

[anylolone]

Why not a charming woman pushing free love into men?

[supercutebutt]

I think so. Tons of women got sucked into QAnon cuz of the whole "save the children" bullshit.

Demoncraps drink the blood of babies in Satanic ceremonies... am I right? I mean, JFK Jr. told Trump that I think.

[wagsingle]

Read this whole comment before judging it!! The end is the most important part. Natural selection favors women that form strong social groups because their offspring have a better chance of survival. This results in that DNA spreading wider. Men, on the other hand can spread more DNA by being players. These are completely natural processes requiring no intelligence. DNA influences (not predetermines, but influences these behaviors. and those behaviors that increase the numbers of offspring that survive become the most prevalent. Women have a hard limit on offspring, so rate of survival wins. Men have no such limit, so shear volume of sexual encounters wins out. But it's a blind process. It doesn't know what sex is, sex just creates the advantage. The same core behavior is expressed in cults. It's also why men TEND to be more controlling and women TEND to be more passive and group focused. But since DNA INFLUENCES behavior, but doesn't determine it, society can and does counter such behavior as we learn better survival and flourishing strategies. Society inserts intelligence into the natural process.

[OpenClose]

I don't really think it's super gendered, to be honest.

Taking the stereotypical masculine man or feminine woman into account, even if their thoughts and motivations were different, it would be different motivations towards the same result.

People who tend to be more dominant/controlling might get involved as a means to establish their identity as something different than the mainstream. They might be especially prone to conspiracy theories, for instance.

Someone who is more submissive/pro-social might join by general agreeableness, get pulled in by their partner, or being born into it and generally going with the flow long enough to get trapped in the direct or indirect threats to leaving.

Both often get hooked in by either a sense of belonging, which we lack these days and crave wherever we can find it. Or they may be hooked by the premise of a "hidden truth" that they feel is only known by this cult or conspiracy. The idea of being involved in something bigger than yourself is quite enticing, and a common hook.

Do note my use of dominant/controlling and submissive/pro-social. I think we have a tendency to view "dominance" as superior in most cases due to how we view everything as dominance or submission. But controlling vs pro-social gives more of the other side of the coin. Someone who is dominant is willing to generate new conflict. Someone who is pro-social might not be "submissive", but just not judgmental enough to be willing to stir up drama.

[MrOracle]

Yes, but that doesn't mean there is a shortage of men who get involved as well. Take a look at scientology, for example - there are plenty of men involved in it.

Cults appeal to people who are emotionally dependent and who are desperate to be told that they are special - that, effectively, that they're "better" than other people and thus have earned god's favor. People who are willing to manipulate people in that way are able to start cults and gain incredible loyalty - but they also have to cut off all contact with the outside world, because they can't let their followers be around clear-thinking people. Logic is doom to cults, which is why cults appeal to emotion, and to human weakness, because these are very resistant to facts and logic.

And while women tend to be more emotional and more driven by their emotions in general, there's certainly a subset of men who are driven by their emotions just as much, and those men are vulnerable to the cults.

[ronaldo75]

Psychology has proven over and over that women have stronger drives for social acceptance and pack inclusion. It's the reason women follow any dumbass trend that gets popular overnight while men barely notice. Notice in this age of 99 cent feminism it was WOMEN who 7 years ago planned their valentines day around a film about rape and misogyny because the TV said it was a 'must see' ? Same shit goes for a cult. If a cult is presented to a lonely baseless woman as the bestest social group in the world - she's going to join.

[enousonca]

i haven't watched the video and i have no time for it but here is my take:

cults generally are known to use manipulation and manipulation need to be emotional to work.
i will be damn honest here and you can call me misogynist or incel or whatever.
women are more emotional and therefore easier to manipulate so yeah it is no surprise that cults target them. one can deny it as much as he want but it is true.

[FreyaRed]

Lot of girls are overprotected by their parents and siblings. This makes them very idealistic. Charlatans and mind manipulators know how to isolate them from their families and know how to use their idealism to ensnare their minds.

[Jackblue]

Every woman in an abusive relationship who stays not out of fear, but for the sake of the relationship has arguably become a cult follower. People both men and women need to stop putting institutions ahead of right and wrong.

[ManOnFire]

I thought this was a known fact. Look at the way cult leaders have been able to sway female members for years. Women have a herd mentality more than men.

[RolandCuthbert]

I mean, it sounds right. Women make those social connections that cults depend upon.

My ex was prone to joining cult like groups.

[PAcc92]

Feminism IS a cult, so yes.

It even has it's own doctrine of original sin.

[Diodoro]

On average yes. Girls on average seek leadership in a way men don't on average. A man is more likely to want Guidance or a "how to".

[Effably]

I imagine they are more likely to be invited too. Probably plays into it if it is true.
And well, I'd bravely guess there is some truth to it.

[anylolone]

If they are more likely to join, then it's obvious that they would be more likely to be invited.
It's obvious that predators would tend to favor easier prey.

[Effably]

Agreed. But it is still a point of figuring out whether A leads to B or B leads to A even if they share a mutual endpoiny.

[anylolone]

Which is why they did the research, to find stuff out.

Turn out they really are more likely to join.

[Effably]

Is the research alluded to somewhere inside that 18min video of some people talking? I only fastforwarded through it now and certainly did not see anything.

But if you claim it is there I am willing to believe it. Seems about a cointoss anyhow.

[Anonymous]

Isn't feminism just one huge cult?
I rest my case.

[Curmudgeon]

From the Manson Girls to Alison Mack, there does seem to be a pattern.

[DaveJord]

Studies have shown it... but men just as silly as anyone.

[zagor]

Men are more likely to be loners, women tend to be more social, so not surprising.

[VikingWarLord]

This includes effeminate thinking males.
They are more susceptible to being pulled into cults like CHRISTIANITY or any of the SKY-DADDY beLIEf systems.

[Curmudgeon]

At least those had history and tradition and institutions behind them. I have yet to see newer cults that built a hospital, unlike established Judeo Christian religions, where such abound.

[VikingWarLord]

@Curmudgeon The irony of "CHRISTIANS" building "Hospitals" LOL

[Curmudgeon]

OK smart guy, just take a look around your city and you will see "Mercy Hospital", "The Good Samaritan", "City of Hope", "Methodist Medical", "Alexian Brothers", "Saint Jude", "Cedars Sinai", or a whole host of other Catholic, Protestant and Jewish names for hospitals. That IS how they started, whether or not private companies or the government got involved with them decades later.

[VikingWarLord]

@Curmudgeon Typical, a 'CHRISTIAN' doesn't know what his own Buy-Bull says, so what I said flies right over his head. Sky-Daddy beLIEfs are for Low IQ idiots

[Curmudgeon]

@VikingWarLord I know what empirical history has wrought, which your dogma does not answer. I expected better from you based upon other posts of yours, but here sadly you are acting like a Leftist twat.

[VikingWarLord]

@Curmudgeon Leftist LOL You can't even properly assess your own damn book, so I guess I shouldn't be shocked you can't assess someone's political affiliation. Continue believing in your Sky-Wizard CULT nonsense if it helps you sleep better at night.

[Curmudgeon]

@VikingWarLord Where did I ever say I believed in it? What I *did* do was look at the empirical results, who started hospitals, and what happened. I don't care whether you believe or not! Those are just the empirical results.

And yes, the inability to look at empirical results and think along the lines of "this time the Venezuela Model WILL work because we will have the right people in charge," IS a hallmark of the Left. As are your dogmatic twatty replies. Come on, based upon many other posts of yours, you are better than that.

[VikingWarLord]

@Curmudgeon 'empirically' looking at their "UNHOLY BOOK" juxtaposed to how they conduct their "business" (building hospitals one of them), they might as well throw the book out, since they don't really believe in it anyways. Their master and his rag-tag group of 12 were supposedly out there clearing out hospitals with all the gawdam miracles they did, and their master said that all of his followers would be doing what he did and GREATER (John 14:12-14). I ain't even seen any of these mawphuckaz on Jesus's level let alone anything GREATER. That's why I said, the irony of them building SECULAR hospitals using SECULAR medicine is a fuuckin joke.

[anylolone]

@Curmudgeon Actually... Cults tend to make stuff like that in their own scale, any organized group, actually.

It's a good way to attract followers and dissuade suspicions.

May be a day care center, renovate a park, etc.
Not that it is why christianity built hospitals. In that case it's more like "everybody around is christian and people want a hospital so they use the organization structure of the local churches to build and man it."
Or "benefactor is a christian."
Also true for all other major religions.
Major religions basically function like a parallel state and less like a cult, even when they have cultish elements within then.

[Slartybartfast]

After cult 45s coup attempt I have to say it's men who are the core of cults.

[maverick2022]

Yes women are more gullible which is also why they are the main target of advertising. Many males actually join cults because of the females in them.

[Medicalbug]

If you tweak the cult just right, you can create a playpen for most people.

[shaysh87]

another question trying to start a gender war by a misogynist.

[anylolone]

It's not a gender war, it's just a question.
The answer is observably yes, no misogyny necessary, just the evidence.

[shaysh87]

@anylolone

There are plenty of questions on here , are women more likely to be desperate on Valentine’s Day? Who cheats more men or women? Why do women have higher standards than men?

What I see is a bunch of misogynists who look for excuses to hate on women

[anylolone]

How is this an excuse to hate on women?
It's just a verifiable fact, one that's very important when tackling cults.

[shaysh87]

@anylolone

Why don’t you mention other facts or ask other questions instead of constantly as “are women this or are women that or are women more likely than men to…?”

Go fuck yourself

[shaysh87]

@anylolone

I don’t believe women are more likely to join cults. But I do believe men are more likely to commit crime

[anylolone]

Women are more likely to join cults and men are more likely to commit crime.
Both are undeniable truths and are actually linked.

Women are also more likely to favor violent criminals and to fetishize about them, which is also linked to both.

[shaysh87]

@anylolone

[Women are also more likely to favor violent criminals and to fetishize about them, which is also linked to both.]

where are your statistics that most women are married to criminals?

[shaysh87]

@anylolone

Men are more violent, more likely to abandon their children, less likely to finish school and less likely to vote. Does that make women the superior gender?

buffalonews.com/.../...5493-b540-82882735a416.html

According to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, more than 99 percent of the Americans arrested for child porn crimes each year are men. Almost every serial killer or terrorist in the annals of American history has been a male. With a few rare exceptions, violent street gangs and organized crime gangs in Buffalo and other cities are headed by males.

When it comes to abandoning their own children, men can be awful. A Census Bureau study last year said 50 percent of black children, 25 percent of Hispanic children, 18 percent of white children and 10 percent of Asian children live in homes without a father.

Meanwhile, studies show that American women do better in school than men, earn more college degrees than men, contribute more often to charities than men, and are more likely to volunteer than men.

They vote more often, too.

[anylolone]

Women also more likely to abuse children.
They are majority of child traffickers, including sex traffickers.
Receive less punishment for the same crime with same antecedents.
More likely to alienate the other parent.
For one example, most of cases of statistic you cited are of kids who's father, if named, were named late in life for child support purposes.
Mother more likely to kill their kids than any other group.
Control 80% of leisure spending, contribute to 20% of the taxes.
They work less hours, in less dangerous jobs, in more popular fields.

And none of this is to disparage women, but it's useful information when it comes to solving problems.
Failing to pay child support is a crime that fills prisons, hasn't worked at all.
Like the war on drugs, it's failing to see a problem for what it's out of stubbornness.

And the reason is, you are doing what you project unto others, that's how your life works, how your mind works. And it makes you feel really self conscious and insecure.

[shaysh87]

@anylolone

[Women also more likely to abuse children.]

women are more likely to abuse kids because there are plenty more single moms than single dads. But if single dads were raising kids, I will be willing to bet single dads will abuse their kids even more
cuz men are usually the more violent gender.
[They are majority of child traffickers, including sex traffickers.]
Majority of rapists, child traffickers, sex offenders ARE MALE.
QUIT LYING

[Receive less punishment for the same crime with same antecedents.]

Women are less likely to commit crime. And when they do commit crime, it tends to be less violent or severe thats why women get less punishment. Women also are able to learn from their mistakes more than men. Overwhelming majority of career criminals ARE MEN, not women.

[More likely to alienate the other parent.]

There are plenty more single moms than single dads. Its the deadbeat dads that alienate their kids more
.
[For one example, most of cases of statistic you cited are of kids who's father, if named, were named late in life for child support purposes.]

Most mothers do not even receive the sufficient amount of child support from the fathers, leaving women in an incapable state to raise their children.

[Mother more likely to kill their kids than any other group.]

Men are responsible for most domestic violence cases and more likely to kill women than vice versea.

[Control 80% of leisure spending, contribute to 20% of the taxes.]

The only reason why men make more money and pay moer taxes is because women are the ones taking care of his children, doing all the cooking and cleaning for him. So thats why he has so much time to dedicate to his career. According to statistics, women are STILL the ones doing most of the child caring, housework, cooking, cleaning while JUGGLING FULL TIME JOBS.

[shaysh87]

[They work less hours, in less dangerous jobs, in more popular fields.]

Women also are the ones having to endure 9 months of difficult uncomfortable pregnancy, spend hours in a tortuous, painful labor birthing the baby. Then having to give up her career in order to care for the baby. Or having to do all the housework, cooking, cleaning just to care for the baby.
You wouldn't exist without the work of women.

Overwhelming of the teachers, nurses, mothers, daycares, social workers, therapists are predominantly female. Without women, there wouldn't be a next generation. If nobody cared you as a kid, you wouldn't be here today.

[shaysh87]

@anylolone

I think you're projecting. Because women are far suprieror to men. In so many ways.

Women raise the kids that fathers abandon, as single moms.
Women do not commit crime nearly as much as men.
Women are usually college educated and do better in school.
Women are generally more nurturing, polite, well-mannered and considerate.
Women care for more our children, unlike men.
Women are less shallow than men.
Women give birth.
Women are the same people who nurse you back to health when you need help the most.
Women are almost never sex offenders or rapists.
Women never commit serious crimes.
Women are more likely to care for their parents than men.
Women are less likely to cheat.
Who do you see when you need a therapist? A WOMAN.

[anylolone]

"I think you're projecting. Because women are far suprieror[sic] to men. In so many ways."

As I said, you are projecting.

It's problem solving, not a question of your ego, insecurity and desperation.
Women are superior to men on average, in agreeableness and neuroticism, which is why they are more vulnerable to cults as the researches made by women cited here showed.

Men are superior to women also in many ways, like extroversion and openness to experience, which is why they are more vulnerable to gangs.

But the truth is, we locked your favorite psychopaths for ages now, and you still all fuck the same psychopaths at even higher rates. It seems like we are rewarding your bad choices, and just like women in nazi germany being the biggest base for hitler, we need to start holding you responsible because you always will do anything to find the next monster to be your source of violence by proxy.

Turns out that mob heads are the goons of women. No big deal, no hurt feelings, it's just human nature.
So this call for completely and utterly parity under the law, this will solve the issue.

I know you hate the idea of not being treated like a useless damsel in distress when your choices crash on you, but trust me, you can handle being treated like a responsible adult.
You can flip enough burgers to pay for that gender studies degree, it was just a bad choice in your youth. (that's an exaggeration, but you get the point)

[shaysh87]

@anylolone

Even if women did join cults, women would be a far superior gender. We don't comit crimes, we care for our children, we are more educated, we are more family oriented, we are more considerate, we vote more than men, we do better in school than men, we take care of our parents, we birth children.

The world needs women more than it need men. Without women, you wouldn't exist today. Women are worth more than men. You can have 1 man impregnate a million women. But the world can't survive with just 1 woman and a million men. Men can't procreate.

[shaysh87]

@anylolone

women definitely aren't damsels in distress nowadays. In fact today, women can buy houses and cars. There are more women in college than men. Men don't go to college because they tend to misbehave in school or commit crimes.

[anylolone]

Women do commit crimes, as shown, stop being such an insecure child.
It's not about superiority, as I said, and you show again how much you projecting here.
Neither is superior, they are complementary.

Women raise men to commit crimes, they send their boys as cannon fodder, which is why one is better off being raised by a single father than a single mother.
And it makes sense, given human history and evolution.

Women nowdays aren't allowed to own cars and have jobs, they are forced to take care of themselves, as more and more mild mannered men refuse to be what women want them to be, the monster women want them to protect women from.

You want men to be your monsters, to oppress others for your selfish goals.
And no matter what you say, you'll still pursue those men, while, when men eschew women, they actually turn celibate and disengage.

[shaysh87]

@anylolone

[Women do commit crimes, as shown, stop being such an insecure child.]

Females commit minimal crime. Men commit the vast majority of crimes. Men are also the ones who start wars and cause all the destruction to humanity. Men are the reason why there is so much violence, deaths in the world. Just take a look at every other country in the world, its always men bullying women. Women have always been second class citizens in US history, africa, middle east, china, parts of Europe.

[It's not about superiority, as I said, and you show again how much you projecting here.
Neither is superior, they are complementary.]

how do you say that when women give the society far more benefits than men? you don't see women destroying society. women are the ones building society and humanity while men are the ones destroying it.

[Women raise men to commit crimes, they send their boys as cannon fodder, which is why one is better off being raised by a single father than a single mother.
And it makes sense, given human history and evolution.]

Problem is NO MAN WANTS TO BE A SINGLE FATHER. Most men ABANDON their children. They force women to be single mothers. Only a sexist woman hater like you would say its ok for fathers to abandon their kids, then blame single mothers for raising criminals. how sexist is that?

[Women nowdays aren't allowed to own cars and have jobs, they are forced to take care of themselves, as more and more mild mannered men refuse to be what women want them to be, the monster women want them to protect women from.]

Women can survive without men. Men can't survive or reproduce without women. I can have kids at a sperm bank, I don't need a husband. Sperm isn't expensive or hard to get. Why would I have kids with a man, if he is just gonna abandon me and the kids?

[shaysh87]

[You want men to be your monsters, to oppress others for your selfish goals.
And no matter what you say, you'll still pursue those men, while, when men eschew women, they actually turn celibate and disengage.]

Women will never be celibate because men are always desperate for women / sex. Men can't survive without sex. You're clearly delusional because men have bigger sex drives than women. Women can survive without men. Men can't survive without women. YET, its the women that you bully all the time.

When a woman rejects you, she has the RIGHT to reject you. Don't come on GAG to complain how all women owe you something.

[anylolone]

Actually, men aren't the ones who made several political organizations to force others not to reject them.

You do not believe men have right to withhold consent, I ran into plenty of women like you, I know the type.

Men start wars, like the Nazis, because women want it. And then, like in WWII, western women think fighting Hitler is bad.

Suffragettes went from giving white feathers to injured veterans in WWI to being suddenly pacifists in WWII.

The crimes women commit are "minimal" because they are naturally cowardly and can get guys to do it for them. Not much different from gang bosses.

[shaysh87]

@anylolone

[Actually, men aren't the ones who made several political organizations to force others not to reject them.

Men are also the same ones who made a culture where women were second class citizens. Not only are they the one who oppress women, but men are also the ones who start wars and kill people.

[You do not believe men have right to withhold consent, I ran into plenty of women like you, I know the type.]

You're the type of guy who blames a female rape victim for getting raped by a man. I have seen your types too. You're the same type of guy who bitches about women rejecting you, but then reject any woman over 30. You're the same guy who praises fathers who abandon their children but ridicule single mothers. what do you call this? a fucking sexist.

[Men start wars, like the Nazis, because women want it. And then, like in WWII, western women think fighting Hitler is bad.]

You're just lying. There are no women that are in favor of violence. Who started WWII? MEN. Who started the nazis? MEN. Who killed the jews? MEN. Who bombed the world trade center? MEN. Who are the vast majority of serial killers? MEN. Who are the vast majority of rapists? MEN. Who are the vast majority who abandon their children? MEN. Who are the vast majority who beat their spouses? MEN.

[Suffragettes went from giving white feathers to injured veterans in WWI to being suddenly pacifists in WWII.]

If men didn't oppress women, there would be no such thing as "suffragettes". why would a woman starve herself just so that she can vote? are men really that evil? to not even let women vote?

[The crimes women commit are "minimal" because they are naturally cowardly and can get guys to do it for them. Not much different from gang bosses.]

I don't think women are more cowardly. I think its just that MEN ARE MORE EVIL. this is the truth you refuse to accept.

[anylolone]

Second class don't get catered for with only legislation biased in their favor.

Also, culturally wise, women always dominated because of their free access to kids and no pressure to earn out of the household.

Guess what most people want to do the most? Stay at home with their family.
It's not an accident that women get the role which most people want.

[shaysh87]

@anylolone

[Second class don't get catered for with only legislation biased in their favor.]

Women deserve extra favors because women tend to make less money than men and women also tend to be single moms. When you have a woman raising your kids without you doing any work, SHE DESERVES MORE. You get to come home to sleep every night, do not need to change your kids diapers, teach your kids and yet you want to get more? I don't think so.

[Also, culturally wise, women always dominated because of their free access to kids and no pressure to earn out of the household.]

Women dominate free access to kids because men abandon their children and don't like to do housework. Women do have pressure earning outside the household but women simply do not have the time to dedicate themselves to full time jobs because men won't do the childcare. Often times, women have to GIVE UP THEIR CAREERS to raise children. In our society, men are irresponsible and do not care about their kids.

[Guess what most people want to do the most? Stay at home with their family.
It's not an accident that women get the role which most people want.]

guess what a lot of women want to do the most? most people nowadays don't have the luxury of staying home with family. Nowadays BOTH MEN AND WOMEN WORK FULL TIME JOBS to support their families. ONLY DIFFERENCE IS: WOMEN HAVE TO DO BOTH WORK FULL TIME AND CARE FOR THE KIDS. MEN JUST NEED TO WORK FULL TIME JOBS.

Women are the pillars of society. We work full time , and care for the kids full time. Women are the ones who bear the biggest burden. Men have the luxury of achieving great heights in their careers and also have kids. Women don't have the same luxury. Women raise future generations. And YET, you're acting as if women are shit. You wouldn't be here without the work of women, sexist piece of shit.

[anylolone]

Women tend to work less than men, and women already get extra favours as control of 80% of leisure spending.
Wanna know what that means? Is that women are the ones that don't value the product of other women's labor as much as men.
You don't, and you show it with your purchases.

[shaysh87]

@anylolone

[Women tend to work less than men, and women already get extra favours as control of 80% of leisure spending.]

women work less than men. because women need to work for their children at home. this is why women make less money and get promoted less than men.

[Wanna know what that means? Is that women are the ones that don't value the product of other women's labor as much as men.]

why would it mean that women don't value product of women's labor? there are plenty of women who have to GIVE UP THEIR CAREERS to care for their children. do you not understand this?

[You don't, and you show it with your purchases.]

women purchase more than men because there are higher standards for looks and physical attractiveness for women than men in society. Makeup, hair care products, fashion, shoes are not things that are expected of men. Women's value is completely based on how she looks because we live in a patriarchal society where a woman's worth is completely based on men's opinion of her.

[anylolone]

"need to" no, want to. Also men work in the home as well, maintaining it.

"Had to leave their work" weird how it doesn't work that way with single dad's.

"Higher standards for women" 80/20.

And yeah, women's expenditure of men's money show how they value women's labor less.

[shaysh87]

@anylolone

["need to" no, want to. Also men work in the home as well, maintaining it.]

men don't do vast majority of housework. women do. women need to both work full time and also maintain the house. how about that?

["Had to leave their work" weird how it doesn't work that way with single dad's.]

It doesn't work that way with single moms either. Vast majority of single moms work.

[And yeah, women's expenditure of men's money show how they value women's labor less.]

when you expect your wife to look hot otherwise you will ditch her for a woman who is 20 years younger, then yes, you will need to pay for her makeup, skincare, fashion and cosmetic surgeries.

[anylolone]

Actually, accounting to value, men do the majority of house work.
Which is how a plumber out earns ever doctors.

Not to mention, most of that "work" done by women is watching kids play, and somehow feminists don't want to count men actually playing with the kids in order to teach them.

Be honest, you think you are inferior to men and it makes you desperate.
Way more desperate to be held to the same standards, like I do to you.

[shaysh87]

@anylolone

[Actually, accounting to value, men do the majority of house work.
Which is how a plumber out earns ever doctors.]

men do not do majority of the housework. It is women who are the pillars of society, working full time jobs and also doing vast majority of the housework and child care.

[Be honest, you think you are inferior to men and it makes you desperate.
Way more desperate to be held to the same standards, like I do to you.]

why would i be inferior to men? I think women are suprieror to men. why?
Women can have kids on their own, women can support their own kids, women can buy houses /cars / go on vacations on their own.

Men can't have kids without finding love. There are things women can do that men can't do.

[anylolone]

Women are less likely to do full time jobs. But I don't disagree, women are the pillars of society, more precisely, women are the moral compass of society, men naturally defer to women in such things.

You think you are inferior, that's why you are desperate. You think you are inferior because you really, really like dick and how strong and powerful men are. Unable to understand people value different thing and have their right to value it, and scared of men because you know what you'd do with such power. And also because you are a weak monster atracted to strong monsters, men need to be monsters otherwise they aren't men for you.

No, men can have kids without finding love, just adopt one of the millions of kids women abandoned and had not the good will to leave those kids to their loving biofathers and other relatives.
But why would anyone want a kid without a loving partner?

[shaysh87]

[Women are less likely to do full time jobs. But I don't disagree, women are the pillars of society, more precisely, women are the moral compass of society, men naturally defer to women in such things.]

Women are less likely to do full time jobs because women want to take care of their children. Men defer their parental responsibilities to women. Women both work full time jobs and raise the next generation. This is why women are pillars of society. Women do EVERYTHING.

[You think you are inferior, that's why you are desperate. You think you are inferior because you really, really like dick and how strong and powerful men are. Unable to understand people value different thing and have their right to value it, and scared of men because you know what you'd do with such power. And also because you are a weak monster atracted to strong monsters, men need to be monsters otherwise they aren't men for you.]

I think you're jealous that women are the better gender. This explains why you go around GAG shitting on women. If you didn't have anything against women, you wouldn't write shit about women all day long on GAG. You hate women because women aren't weak and helpless anymore like it was during the 1950s. You hate the fact that women can have careers, buy homes, go to college and that women can afford to divorce their husbands whenever he doesn't satisfy her. why would a woman need a man if she can survive just as well on her own?

[shaysh87]

[No, men can have kids without finding love, just adopt one of the millions of kids women abandoned and had not the good will to leave those kids to their loving biofathers and other relatives.]

no man wants to adopt. every man wants to have their own real kid. Ask any guy on the street on whether he prefers to adopt or have his own kids. 95% of them will tell you they prefer to have their own kids. But men can't have kids without romance. Men die alone if they can't find romance. Women don't have to die alone. Women is guaranteed children if she wants them.

[But why would anyone want a kid without a loving partner?]

because who would want to stay married to someone like you? starting gender wars online, shitting women online 24/7. Staying married to a man who doesn't want to do housework and treats me like a maid?

If I'm 35 and still single, I'm just gonna have kids. Its something women can do, which men can't.
Without pleasing a woman, you will never be able to have kids.

[anylolone]

Plenty of guys adopt, and paternity is always uncertain without a paternity test.
So essentially, for centuries, men were all effectively adopting.

Well, I've been in a committed relationship for a very long time, kid.
All that aside, why would you want to bring a kid into a world without a loving partner?
That shows a shit ton of selfishness and how the kid is nothing but a prop.
It's better to have your line die off.

[shaysh87]

"Our report with the University of Sheffield debunks myths about single parent households and significantly, it shows that children are not negatively impacted if raised by a lone parent. What is most important to a child's well-being is the presence of positive relationships."

The team behind the report also wants to bring to light how changeable and diverse families can be. As many as one in three families will be headed by a single parent at some point during a six-year period, the research shows.

www.sciencealert.com/here-s-more-evidence-that-children-aren-t-any-worse-off-in-single-parent-households

[shaysh87]

Children in single-mother-by-choice families do just as well as those in two-parent families

www.sciencedaily.com/.../170705095332.htm

[shaysh87]

Children in Single-Mom-by-Choice Families Do Just as Well as Those in Two-Parent Families
A new study has found no difference in the well-being of kids raised by two parents and those raised by a mother who has chosen to be a single parent.

www.parents.com/.../

[shaysh87]

Children raised by same-sex couples do better in school, new study finds

www.washingtonpost.com/.../

[shaysh87]

All these studies come to show how useless men are. Don't you agree?

[anylolone]

First study "children perception and satisfaction" "not necessarily", yeah, weazle words.

subsequent links are collapsed and doesn't let me click on it for some reason.
Next time make a single post, probably it has something to do with that.

But all seem to follow the same bullshit.
We want to know criminal behavior, cognitive function and health.

"Positive family relations" oh, what really matters is positive family relations, no shit, that's the unlikely thing while raising a kid without a loving partner.
And impossible given you see your kid as a prop.

[shaysh87]

@anylolone

[Positive family relations" oh, what really matters is positive family relations, no shit, that's the unlikely thing while raising a kid without a loving partner.]

I was raised by two loving partners but I was abused. How would you explain that?

I had a terrible father who was an excellent lover. Just because you are a good partner , doesn’t mean you are a good father

A single mom may not be partnered but she may be an amazing mother

[shaysh87]

Men are useless. Even as the study says , kids without fathers can do just as well as kids with fathers

LESBIAN couples raise kids who do better in school than heterosexual couples. How do you explain that?

[anylolone]

"Can do just as well" considering it's the best kids without fathers against the worst kids with fathers.
Then yes.

It's like with trans women athletes humiliating the competition while being way down the totem poles as males.

I'm not hating women with this, by the way. Because single fathers aren't motivated by evil because single fathers motivated by evil aren't allowed, then they are better.

[shaysh87]

@anylolone

There’s no evidence at all that the “best “ kids of lesbian parents were included in the study
You just made that shit up.

According to the study , on average , kids from lesbian parents tend to do better in school than kids from heterosexual couples

Quit making shit up

[anylolone]

That's literally what it says. That they "can".
Also, it shows gay men as better parents.
And compares all to foster kids.
(of fucking course, what else is close to kin?)

[shaysh87]

@anylolone

There is no evidence in the article that says they only studied one subset of the kids of lesbian couples. You’re just making shit up.

The fact that lesbian couples can raise kids who succeed more in school than kids of heterosexual couples shows that fathers are not necessary

[shaysh87]

@anylolone

There’s even research that indicates that a child with a good relationship with their single mother can be just as happy and raised just as well as kids from heterosexual couples

[shaysh87]

@anylolone

And honestly i would very much agree with the research. Because growing up with an abusive dad , I rather be raised by a good single mom. I wished I never had a father

[anylolone]

There's, read the article.
I've grew up with an abusive mom, sister and grandma.
I didn't became a woman hater.

I've suffer DV, quite a few times, sexual assault, and all kinds of abuse.
Your excuses bring me no sympathy.

No, the research indicates that a child in a good relationship with an extended family can have just a good perception of family as a child with a two parent household.
A child in a single parent household is drastically less likely to have a good relationship with the extended family.
That's what it indicates.

[shaysh87]

@anylolone

[A child in a single parent household is drastically less likely to have a good relationship with the extended family.
That's what it indicates.]

You’re so full of shit because I grew up in a two parent household and I had a terrible relationship with my relatives. I grew up with minimal contact with my relatives. I literally saw my grandma 5 times in my life

I’d rather rather be raised by an amazing single mom with no relatives than a mother and a shitty father Ans wonderful relatives. Relatives do not matter. As long as I have someone I love to come home to daily, I’ll be happy

[shaysh87]

@anylolone

Your shit that all single moms must be incompetent , bad mothers is just a stereotype used to slander all single moms

I’d rather come home to a good single mom than a mom and a shitty dad.

Positive relationships always outweigh toxic parents

[shaysh87]

@anylolone

What the article said was it’s better for a child to be raised by a good relative / single mom than to be raised by a toxic heterosexual couple. It’s the quality relationships that matter , not whether or not the parents are female or male.

[anylolone]

I grew up with a terrible relationship with my relatives while not being a cunt and being nice to them, by the way.
And in a two parent household.
But that's a statistical thing, I was more than smart enough to notice a patern.

I'm not slandering single moms the way you are slandering men. As I said, it's a product of how they are formed. IE, women like you are rewarded to do shit like that, men like you are punished and at least disallowed.

Yes, but a single parent almost guarantees a more toxic environment.
I don't want a boss that had several associates and broke up business partnerships all the times in bad terms.

[shaysh87]

@anylolone

Relatives do not matter because you don't see them on a daily basis. If you're seeing them once every 2-5 months, why would that cause so much harm?

I'd rather have a good relationship with my single mom and a bad relationship with relatives than to come home to a mom and a shitty dad with nice relatives.

Even studies have concluded single moms , lebsian couples can raise kids that can do just as well or even better than kids of heterosexual couples.

[anylolone]

Of course they matter, and ideally the extended family is supposed to have access to the kid on at least a weekly basis. Gosh, I grew up with way more than that.

If you don't have a relationship with both your dad and your mom, and their relatives, you are way more likely to have a shitty mom, your perception is irrelevant.
"I rather have a good relationship with charles manson than my family" said the women who killed on manson's stead.

Gosh, to top it off, you need a good relationship with the community as well.

[Anonymous]

Women are targeted more. And I won't say why but if there are stats that show women are more susceptible it is because they are targeted more; at least in my experience.

[In_Trance]

Who studies this shit and even more important who pays for these useless studies?

[SaoirseS]

I often wonder the same myself.

[anylolone]

@SaoirseS People who study cults in order to counter them.
Which is usually people who have been victimized by cults, interestingly enough, mostly women.

[genericname85]

yeah. simply cause women are more agreeable and menn are more likely to dominate and be the cult leader xD

[rabbitzzz]

Then men will join too seeing those beautiful cult recruits it's a vicious circle.

[Heartache0405]

Not if they're smart.

[rabbitzzz]

No they become cult leaders.

[Heartache0405]

😂 sure

[anylolone]

Seems to be the case.

The reasons are still obscure, but certainly female tendency for neuroticism and agreeableness seems to play a part in it.

[DWornock]

Watch the screaming fans at a basketball game or notice how men join in mob rule. Therefore, I doubt there is much difference.

[anylolone]

There's a difference between a cult and a club.

[kellytheman]

I feel women can be or manipulative or naive than men. It might sounds sexiest but I feel why when get caught up in cults like Charles Manson.

[Better_off_here]

i think anyone that wants to believe in someone and something would fall for it. any race any gender and it comes down to someone hoping to try to belong somewhere and with someone.

[Evan64]

Seems like it based off of the documentaries on cults that I've seen

[007kingifrit]

yes. women depend on social acceptance more than men and thus can be led astray by the group easier

[clampfan101]

Would you consider feminism a cult? lol
Otherwise, I don’t think so.

[Joshua0213]

Yes because girls want to be accepted by society so sometimes dont use their brain

[Anonymous]

Yes, they are often traps created by dudes to trick women into having sex with them.

[Anonymous]

If you're a cult leader who do you want as members? Women, so you can start your own personal harem. You only let in guys to keep up appearances.

[anylolone]

Why don't women start free love cults, though?

[Opinion Owner]

They don't need to start a cult to get free sex.

[anylolone]

But certainly helps in keeping a harem.

[JAWBR8KRZ]

who cares? we should be making studies on shit that actually matters 💀

[IMuser]

Just wondering, what do you think are the topics which should be researched the most? The priority topics

[JAWBR8KRZ]

health, science, technology... y'know. stuff that's actually beneficial to society.

[IMuser]

There is a shit tons of research on it and even as we speak right now, at some place in the world, the research is continuing

Research in psychology is a double edged sword: it helps us understand better but this leads to marketting tactics or other tactics which aim to control our behaviour

[Anonymous]

Because women are followers and easier to manipulate.

[Jintendo18]

Yes, they’re more susceptible to herd mentality.

[Soremain]

I think it's obvious they are.

[Kiran_Yagami]

Seems truthful to me.

[wEiRdG]

So stupid, stop feeding off of your delusions

[Anonymous]

anyone who is an atheist is in a cult

[wagsingle]

Oh, so Not believing in shit without evidence is a cult. Thinking for yourself is a sure sign of being under someone else's control.

[Opinion Owner]

@wagsingle

nigga you believe in the core of the earth AND YOU HAVE NEVER SEEN IT
so shut the fuck up and learn your place bitch

you and your imaginary fairy tales
im not stupid like you

FOR MY GOD ABOVE THE DOME NEVER LIES

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyyrhUKgSso&t=209s

NOW GET YOUR FAIRY TALE OUT OF HERE WORTHLESS ATHEIST

[wagsingle]

Does your god tell you to hate people the way you do? Or are you just a hypocrite?

[Opinion Owner]

@wagsingle

shut the fuck up you worthless sack of shit
you idiots had your chance with me

either turn to Christ
or kill yourself and get off my GODS earth

your feelings and false beliefs do not mean jack shit to me
GET THE FUCK OUT

[wagsingle]

The other reason people post anonymously is so they can be trolls who mock Christians, by pretending to be an extremely ignorant and hateful Christian. Unfortunately Poe's law tells us that it is often impossible to tell the difference.

[Abby005]

Yes we have cookies.

[007kingifrit]

the posesssion of baked goods makes me more vulnerable to a cult?

[Abby005]

Yes..