Is it true most women would rather share a winner vs having a loser to themselves?

[Vegasrunner]

[Chazmatazz269]

I highly doubt it. As a matter of evolutionary biology women are hardwired to demand all of a man’s resources for herself and her progeny. Sharing is not in their nature. I suppose the premise is that half of something is better than all of nothing. But that’s why women are naturally hypergamous. They’re always on the lookout for the BBD.

[Vegasrunner]

@Chazmatazz269 If what you're saying is true, then that means the more resources a man has the more women that will demand them. Seeing how only a small percentage of men make enough resources to support multiple women, that means women are forced to make a choice between sharing the type of man that can provide or having the type that can't all to themselves. Once a man builds himself up, it's he thet decides whether or not to keep the woman.

[Chazmatazz269]

It’s not quite so black and white. It’s actually not that expensive to provide the bare necessities for a small family. Some women want more than that but don’t want to do the work themselves for the luxuries they demand. So, yes, they will almost certainly have to choose between a man who has options and a man who offers less but will likely be more committed from the start. If men generally had higher standards and stricter boundaries, this wouldn’t be the case so often, i think.

[Vegasrunner]

@Chazmatazz269 As a man that has slept w/ over 400 women I can tell you that women, especially young attractive ones don't want "the bare necessities" from a guy. Most woman want more however only a slim percentage can demand that and only for a short window. This is why the more money and status a guy has tbe easier it is to replace the woman. You see this a lot w/ celebrities and athletes who routinely replace women or keep a good roster. I'm not as wealthy as them, but I have enough to know that I can easily keep a roster of 3-5 woman at a time.

[Chazmatazz269]

Ell oh ell! Whatever created that hole in your soul, it isn’t going to be filled by women if you haven’t found it after 400. You may need professional help, or to go live with the monks for a while.

[Vegasrunner]

@Chazmatazz269 That's so odd that you believe that people have sex to fill a hole in their soul. So you're saying that woman who allow men to insert them are soulless? What is it that u believe I'm "looking" for

[Chazmatazz269]

That’s not that unusual of a perception. Psychologists and therapists make a good living helping people figure out why enough is never enough. I don’t know you. So i don’t know what you’re searching for. But i know that behavior. Chances are pretty good you’re an addict though.

[Vegasrunner]

@Chazmatazz269 Enough sex how would that even work? Have sex once and stop? Those professions make a good living listening to people, but the enough is enough part is false. There's a bigger much bigger industry centered around teaching guys how to get sex so by that logic you need professional help?

[Chazmatazz269]

We both know you’re damaged goods, friend. You wouldn’t have gotten so butthurt about a simple observation if i was so completely off base. Get help or don’t. I couldn’t care less.

[Vegasrunner]

@Chazmatazz269 TY you so much for sharing that info. So you're that any woman that continues a conversation on GAG is doing that because they are "Butthurt"?

[MrOracle]

I'm not sure "most" is correct, but "some" is provably true.

[avery58]

I never share. Neverrr

[laraWM]

Some people think it's better

[itsclearlynicholas]

I think I'm an exception 😋😋😋🥳

[pethouse]

I’d sure hope not. And define looser vs winner

[Anonymous]

Whoever pays them more

[Opinion Owner]

Isn't it so easy to get money in your purse by being a whore to a filthy rich dude?

[May_Summers]

True