A response to "Men expect too much from women. You wanna know why your expectations are ruining your chance of dating?"

[LogicBomber]

Since this user blocks anyone who disagrees with her and likes to hate on men....

here is a response to

Men expect too much from women. You wanna know why your expectations are ruining your chance of dating?

Women expect endless shit from men, men just want you to not be fat or crazy. NOTHING ELSE!

Women want men to be the "provider" but also want the "equality" bullshit that only benefits them.

You want a guy who will be subservient to your bullshit and you use sex as a reward or a prize for good behavior.

You even nailed it when you said men have to look good and have money... yet you likely wear a mask of makeup and I guarantee you will never work as hard or make as much money as most men you are with, since most women refuse to date down.

So you literally only provide sex? So, What else are you worth?

You call men trash and use MGTOW references to try and shame males for not wanting to deal with female games and bullshit shit tests... which gives a perfect example of the maturity level expected of a female like yourself.

If women don't want men putting them down for age and weight, then maybe, just maybe, women should stop waiting until they hit the wall and their looks go to shit before they decide they "want a real man".

Men die of a heart attack and stroke more than women because men do 99% of ALL hard jobs. Their lives are more stressful, and more is expected of them as providers and protectors. It's easy to be a condescending asshole when you live in a bubble of safety created by the men you are talking shit about.

If you don't want men judging you on weight (something you can change)... don't judge men on height (which they can't change), bank account, job, status, power, looks, longevity, etc.

Also let's remember that you are part of the group that gets endless societal help, funding, groups, etc. To help your already catered life be even easier.

So before you attack men for your false idea of what we "expect" from you... look in that mirror you keep talking about. Your high horse will wait.

[sageevalentine]

Sad to say that I disagree, I expect the same from a potential man than I do for myself:
education, ambition, good looks, takes care of their body, funny, adventurous, well cultured and travelled... etc.

I don't agree that all men pick women only on looks, if so, there would far more plastic surgery going on around the world. If you mean that men sometimes can be overlooked and not appreciated as they should be... I believe that. I've seen some fathers who work very hard for their family and get very little appreciation in return. Yet, as far as I've noticed, these families tend to be trash overall (rude but necessary).

My only problem in relation to men and looks, is that maybe they don't understand the effort put into it. I work pretty hard, going to the gym and eating well and looking after my hair. I get some ungrateful comments from men about how I'm superficial and too focused on my looks, where in actual fact, I'm one of the smartest in my class. But I think these are just assumptions from people I don't really know anyway so I don't care.

I do agree with her point no 3. Sometimes both genders have way too high expectations. In this world, we have leagues, it separates rich from poor and a 3 from a 7. In fact, if we presume that 90% of single people are looking for a date, then there's always a date out there for you, you expectations are probably just too high.

The ultimate truth is, shit people will marry shit people. A woman who didn't finish school, get's blackout drunk every weekend and is already looking frumpy at age 30 can't expect to marry a good looking, high earning man. The same way a grumpy, wrinkled poor man can't expect to marry a hot, smart girl.

Don't complain, such is life.

[No_Sugarcoat]

Those are some hilarious glasses you have on if you truly think we're not being judged based on and by these criteria.

I never even thought about what people worked as before i considered them close friends or relationship partners. We don't care, cause it's superficial materialistic stuff. It doesn't make u happy, but a partner you genuinely love can make u happy for the same reason friends can.

[LogicBomber]

Ok first of all, nowhere did I say ALL MEN... logically it is assumed that I am not making a universal statement unless I actually say ALL, therefore... the only real concern we have for our partner is that she not be a bog beast. This is of course not all.
Same applies to men being overlooked and underappreciated. It's generally, not universally.
Yes, there are some women who actually know the value of a male in her life, but current social ideas are that men are disposable and used as provides and protectors. Which is why we die first in most catastrophes. Society is gynocentric.

Men understand the effort it takes to look good, trust me. It takes a shit ton more work for a male to look good to a female than it does for a female to look good to a male. All you have to do to look go to a male is not be fat. All the other shit women do is completely nonsensical.

A grumpy wrinkled man can marry a hot female (intelligence is an unnecessary trait), as long as he is not poor. Money is the defining factor in most females attractiveness to a male.
For males, women don't need to be smart, strong, brave, rich, etc. We are happy as long as you are not fat.

[sageevalentine]

Money is absolutely a factor, it's the only thing that transcends leagues, and I mentioned that many times. Well then perhaps you have too low standards on women. I know the men I've met want a girl who's classy, sexy, smart, pretty, skinny, ambitious, efficient, financially savvy. bonus points if she's rich.

[Oram52]

I agree with most of what you're saying. But he was responding to something specific. He was saying it in response to this;
Men expect too much from women. You wanna know why your expectations are ruining your chance of dating? ↗

You're Swiss we're talking about women in Anglosphere. It'll take a miracle for them to put effort in their appearance. Men do realize effort women put into their appearance. And men overall do care about appearance in LTR. Men don't care about how much a woman makes just that she is ambitious.

Women do have higher expectations than men. Point was women have all these expectations like she said she wants men to be providers, yet has a problem when it comes to putting effort in her appearance.

I agree with you on leagues (I don't know why people deny that) and that we should also be willing to offer same in return. But both genders don't look for the same thing, if it clarifies they don't look for same thing in same proportions. Majority of men do care about looks and do put higher emphasize on appearance. Women do as well but other factors can compensate especially money and status. Makeup is multi-billion dollar industry, fashion industry is worth billions. Which gender are they targeted at? Men are visual look at mens magazines, even women's magazines have women on them.

His point was women complain about having to put effort in appearance (which most don't) yet expect a lot more from men. She wanted a provider but what was she offering same in return? She wanted guy to be provider yet offer nothing in return.

@LogicBomber was making a point women are not discriminated or they don't get a raw deal. Men also have certain societal/dating expectations and men also do suffer. You may not realize it because Switzerland probably doesn't have men hating third wave feminism that we have in Anglosphere.

[sageevalentine]

@No_Sugarcoat Fine I suppose I agree that I do see more frumpy and overweight women in America and North England than I see in Switzerland. And while I am embarrassed and horrified at the laziness people have with their appearances... I generally stick to the idea of people getting what they deserve. In regards to all those frumpy, below average looking women, unless you're their equals, surely you have nothing to worry about? Maybe I don't really understand, I'm from London and Switzerland, but as far as I've noticed, the wealthier, good looking men always end up with pretty and smart girls.

[No_Sugarcoat]

@sageevalentine

Yea of course the rich guys always end up with top tier girls. Cause girls can do hypergamy if they have the looks for it.

A guy can't, unless he gets a sugermomma and there is a lot more sugardaddys than vice versa.

And i'm not even American, i'm Austrian (Hey neighbour) and if it wasn't for me being a very masculine dude by nature and tall i would have to pay attention to my looks a lot more if i wanted to date girls that are hot for me.

And i've been with girls that are cute and a little more chubby, girls are just in a position where they can always choose no matter the guy unless he is miles beyond her status.

[Devon18031]

i agree with you in most of what u said im exactly the same. I care about my self work out eat well and stuff some people have way too high expectation for other people and they never look at theirselves which is bad and they will probably never reach their expectancy.

[Uru_DS]

Hey man look, I agree with almost everything you've said, really. But as much as I'd like to say this isn't a society that oppresses women, it is.
It depends on only one thing, where you live. Now clearly you're either from the states or some developed country. But you can't speak for the majority of the world just because things in your country are different.
I didn't read the whole thing sorry for that but I see where you're coming from and I think it's laughable too, but only in a few countries. And the women in those countries are now acting crazy, hiding under feminism. And elsewhere where it actually is needed, they aren't able to do much.
Just wanted to point this out, and thank you for this much needed eye opener to the priveleged.

[LogicBomber]

Ok so let me rephrase it as to not confuse 1st world (EVERY western society) with shit 3rd world countries.
When myself (or almost anyone for that matter) says "society", it's generally assumed that no one is talking about garbage 3rd world where bronzed-aged nonsense is still believed.

Shit 3rd world countries are just that, shit. They don't represent actual society in any way.
Most of the world is developed and it's in all those places where women are the most priviledged and protected group of humans to ever exist.

[Uru_DS]

31 countries are developed. There are 195 in the world. 80% of the world population lives on a wage less than 10$ a day and half of them under 2.5$ a day. Main distinguisher of developed is GDP and infrastructure, more than 70% of the world is either in developing countries or in underdeveloped countries.

[Uru_DS]

I can't believe how ironic your name is to your crap talk. Wow, how arrogant and ignorant people are these days. I mean you don't even know anything about the world, the harsh reality of poverty is maddening.
And although people may assume they're not talking about 'garbage', they shouldn't.
And just for your information, you're the priveleged one. Your country is developed because of your ancestors. You probably haven't contributed to that at all, and neither have I to mine as much as I'd want to. So get off your high horse cause there's a tunnel ahead and your face is gonna go *splat* on the wall of reality.

[Uru_DS]

And you're right, women are the most priveleged and protected group of humans to ever exist in those countries, but seeing how you perceive the world, you're no less.

[LogicBomber]

You sound like you got your stats from a social justice class.

You are talking about economies. Which is totally different.
Women are protected in MOST areas of the world.



World map representing Human Development Index categories (based on 2017 data, published in 2018)
[Dark Blue] 0.800–1.000 (very high)
[Less dark] 0.700–0.799 (high)
[Blue] 0.555–0.699 (medium)
[Light Blue] 0.350–0.554 (low)

The ONLY place I am talking about being underdeveloped is light blue.
Which is NOT 80% of the planet. Just the shit middle east countries.

But you like to throw in personal attacks as a response which shows the mentality of your character and I won't argue with someone who uses schoolyard shaming tactics.
I provide links to back up all my statements which you can go look at. That is called LOGIC... schoolyard nonsense is not logic, it's emotional thinking.

Once again... I was not talking about poverty... at NO POINT! NONE.

So in the future, before you go on a triggered emotional snowflake rant... pay attention to what you are reading.

[Uru_DS]

You know what the social justice class I never took taught me? Never to say a fact if you can't prove it.
But I want you to search on Google - "How many countries are developed in the world" then look for the UN website that says 'Country classifications - UN'.
Every single word is true in that first reply I sent and I could send you links if I knew how, but you can check them for yourself.
I don't care about what you think about me because frankly your thoughts aren't the truth.
I did not throw in personal attacks, I used what you told me to be used against you.
I'm not thinking 'emotionally', you need to get your LOGIC in check because what I sent are facts.
Economies? You used the word 'world' so I gave you facts using population. Now who's contradicting themselves here?
I honestly think you're the one who didn't read properly because in the last reply I agreed with something you said. You tell me if that shows you the mentality of a person.
I'm open to being corrected but I hate it when SOMEONE THINKS ONLY THEY KNOW FACTS. Dude you're making me mad which is bad for me so I'll just say this for my own sake.
You used the word 'developed' and I used 'developing' and 'underdeveloped' when I stated the facts I did. So I proposed an argument, instead of checking with my facts you just put in whatever you think is true.
So, if you wanna believe only 10% of the world is in underdeveloped countries, go ahead.
I honestly don't care about what you have to say now.
So you want me to say you're right? (Which I did if you didn't notice and settled the original argument)
I'll say it again I have no problem, your facts are correct sir. The world is an amazing place with only middle Eastern garbage that is undeveloped but the rest of the countries, not economies (lol), are developed and/or about to develop.

[Uru_DS]

What a time to be alive and yes women are 'protected' in most parts of the world. So I guess rape and sexual assault must be part of this 'protection'. Facts? You're the master so why don't you see how many women are 'protected' each day all over the world.
I did pay attention to what I was reading and I mentioned the poverty fact to tell you that how can someone be priveleged and protected and poor at the same time. But I guess you didn't understand that because you didn't care about what I was trying to explain.
Great, good. You're an excellent arguer and a wise man. Keep it up.
And do me a favour, block me and never contact me again because you never know when I might be triggered and go into an 'emotional snowflake rant' again.
Thanks.

[LogicBomber]

" Never to say a fact if you can't prove it."
I can prove every thing I say... I don't speak unless I have researched something to the nth degree. The map image shows DEVELOPED countries. NOT economies.

I never stated you took a social justice class, I said you sound like you got your facts from a social justice class. You seem to have a habit of assuming things and then answering them as if they were stated.

The things you said in your first response may all be true, (and I didn't say they weren't) but they were misguided as I pointed out. I never said anything about a countries financial stability, YOU chose to assume that and went on answering it as you seem to do.

You don't have to agree with my statements, frankly facts don't care if you agree with them or not.

"I used what you told me to be used against you. " ... No, again you went on a different tangent about economy when I was speaking about development of the country as a whole. Saying the word world does not equal economy.

Personal attack/shaming tactics (these are used by weak debates to belittle the opponent)
1. "I can't believe how ironic your name is to your crap talk."
2. "Wow, how arrogant and ignorant people are these days. I mean you don't even know anything about the world"

If at any point you mention ME instead of the actual topic... it's a personal attack, since the individual is irrelevant to the facts of the argument.

I also never said anywhere that only I know the facts of anything. Your facts were correct, but irrelevant to the statement since I wasn't at any point speaking about economy.

If you are getting emotional over something on the internet, You should probably stop going onto sites like this trying to be argumentative.

But back to your economics vs development of a country...
Economics can be a part of the developed country but a developed country is a sovereign state that has advanced technological infrastructure relative to other less industrialized nations.

[LogicBomber]

I also saw that you agreed with me in part of the first comment.
That doesn't mean I can't disagree with our other statements.

You also said you didn't read the whole thing, so stop suggesting I am the one incapable of reading.

Now on to your sarcastic take on the original topic...
Rape and sexual assual are not "part of this protection" but luckily this protection helps keep it from happening.

Yes rape happens, to BOTH males and females by both males and females.
But here's a FACT for you... It's around 1 in 1000 (including estimated 90% that "don't come forward" and not excluding the 40% that are deemed false) This is as per the Bureau of Justice Statistics. The most reliable and accurate crime statistics database.

https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv17.pdf

* No this doesn't mean the numbers can't be different in other countries.
But the US is stated to have an 8 times higher rape rate than Spain. SO you do the math.

www.nationmaster.com/.../Crime

When you want to speak of protection... don't pigeon hole the entire topic into one crime.
Women are protected financially with programs from the governement and campaigns
They are protected by the law and courts. They get less punishment for the same crimes.
They are protected by police more so than men.
They are protected by family court and get custody the majority of the time.

The list graphic above gives you a broader picture, but as you said you didn't read the post.
You simply came here to be argumentitive.

You can be poor and still be protected. A welfare mother still gets more protection from
government programs than a welfare father. Which is why the majority of homeless are men.

As for your last statement.
You proved that point without me needing to provide facts.

[Uru_DS]

First and foremost I'm not here to be argumentative. I hate typing long paragraphs and I didn't read the whole thing because I didn't find it interesting. I only read a few things and I disagreed with most so I just pointed it out.
Secondly I apologise for the things I said as a personal attack and quite frankly I'm not proud of that. I made a mistake and seeing your wiser than I previously thought it's only fair to say that that is not how I usually am. Been a little pissed lately so I guess that would explain uncharacteristic behavior.

Now to the 'debate', if you may.
I don't think you see things as I intended them to be seen. I used some examples to say the main distinguisher of a developed economy according to what I've learnt in class is GDP and yes infrastructure. And dude, your definition of developed country is straight out of Wikipedia, just like other information you presented. I took economics in school and was awarded for my understanding of the subject. And that is not how you define a developed country. It is a part of it, but an equally important part of it given by the Cambridge Dictionary is people's income. So I hope you now see where I came from.
Just so you know, I don't consider information from sites such as Wikipedia as facts.
And stop saying irrelevant because frankly it is not.
And no the protection doesn't keep it from happening. And honestly I'm amazed at the number of people who see the fact that women are protected by institutions and laws.
As far as rape is concerned, 91% of rape victims are women in the United States.
Now again, you're clearly from the US so talking to you is like talking to someone who's unaware of how the rest of the world really is.
Now just try and understand what I mean by this -

[Uru_DS]

Everything you said about protection mostly only applies to women in the US.
No, women in most countries of Asia don't have financial aid from the government or from campaigns. And neither do men. It's all a sham and countries with high corruption make sure of that. Being a US citizen you are literally unaware of the blatant corruption that is consuming countries in Asia and how powerful politicians are. The only reason I say this is because people connected to politicians are more likely to commit violent crimes against women than those who aren't. Asia is the largest continent is terms of population and combine that with Africa, that's almost 6 billion people. Things are different here, the government is a loose character here and the laws are different here. Where I'm from, women are oppressed in households.
And I support the decision about giving custody to a woman because what has a man does to contribute to a baby compared to what a woman does is not even a comparison.
Less punishment, yes I agree that's unfair.
Protected by the police? Are you for real? Do you seriously think women need equal protection as men given the amount of stalkers, creeps, rapists, etc roaming around? When was the last time a girl stalked a man so much that he committed suicide? It could have happened, but a majority and I mean more than 90% of women are in constant threat if the police don't favour women. After all the domestic violence cases I highly doubt a police men will show at a house and not automatically assume it's the husband's fault after seeing the wife beaten.

[Uru_DS]

I did not assume anything, some things are implied and although I have misunderstood somethings about you and the things you said, I don't really see if you've put in an effort to see past the little shananigans I threw in and see how different America and the rest of the world is.
I rest my case and I do not wish to continue further because I'm tired of reading and writing so much. If you were to be on a phone call or in person I would love to have more of a healthy debate but texting is beyond my capacity and I suck at it.
But I would read what you have to say next but that's it.
Thank you so much for your patience and politeness (mostly) and the will to stand up for what you believe in.
I respect that fact that you agreed with things I had to say but I don't know if you see the fact that the country where you're from hinders your judgement a bit.
That being said, thanks for sharing. I hope I was helpful.

[Uru_DS]

Just saw you selected this as most helpful, thanks.

[Uru_DS]

One point I forgot to mention - I'm not a misandrist and neither am I a feminist.
I just simply believe that life is unfair to both genders in different ways.

[selfesteemguy]

Women has no right to bitch around since all the heavy things are done by men. This is why they can't want "equality" either. It always be like that. Men will always do the hardest things and women will always claim that they deserve best of everything. They simply can f*ck off.

[Uru_DS]

Giving birth is hardest thing anyone can ever do. Raising a child and maintaining a household is the second toughest according to me.
That's physical and mental, so no men do not do the hardest things, women do.
Men do a majority of hard work, yes agreed. Women can't ask for equality there cause it's not meant for them, but saying they can fuck off is just plain and simple dumb, arrogant and shows low self esteem by the way.
Do this, go say this to your mom. Let's see how heavy you can really handle.

[LogicBomber]

@Uru_DS Giving birth is difficult for sure, but in today's age with all the medical advancements and medicine... it is FAR from the hardest thing someone can do. Most women have c-sections now as well and don't even have to give birth vaginally.
Men raise children too. Maintaining a household is NOT a difficult job. Anything you can do in your pajama's is NOT a hard job.
Men work backbreaking and dangerous jobs and then come home and help with household duties (or else be shamed and attacked for being a "lazy asshole").
You insult the 99% of men who work the oil rigs, waste management, construction, mining, etc... and make life cushy for your soyness and the women you want so desperately to please.
They don't have to fuck off, but they shouldn't be given open mic to claim they are somehow underprivileged.

My mother didn't raise me. Like most women I have seen, she has "mental issues" and therefore my father had to work endlessly to provide, then came home to cook, clean, shopped for food, and assist with all other family duties, while my mother sat on the computer, napped, and bitched and moaned about nonsense.
My father died (like most men) much younger than he should have... because his life was compounded by the actual stress of providing, protecting, nurturing, and everything else.

[Uru_DS]

Well unless science can come up with a substitute for 9 months of pregnancy I will still consider it the hardest thing to do.
As far as rest of your text is concerned, I'm through with you. Clearly you don't read well, if you do then you don't understand well.
I'm sorry you had a difficult childhood, I had the perfect childhood so I will never be able to change your opinion about stuff.
Side not - I never say stuff to try and 'please' anyone. For all we know, no one will read this but you.
Second, I never said men don't do hard jobs. Again if you had comprehended better you would notice what I really mean.
Since you think you're right and wanna act ignorantly about it, there's no point in arguing with that closed mindedness. So I'm sorry, I don't wanna waste more time on you.

[LogicBomber]

@Uru_DS They have. It's called the artificial womb. They also have found ways to turn sperm into eggs using stem cells.

I read fine bud. Your writing could use some work though.

I know what you really mean. You are putting women on a pedestal for doing what their body does naturally.
I don't need you to waste your time. Facts don't need your approval.

[Uru_DS]

EXACTFUCKINGLY!
Thanks for saying this - "what their body does naturally".
Now if you don't see the irony of that statement and what you said about men before,
I don't know what to tell you. My English and my writing skills are completely adequate to me thank you for your criticism, not needed.
The irony, just so you know, was that men are naturally physically strong because the right hormones allow us to be, so you are the one putting us on a pedestal.
P. S. - I knew you wouldn't get it, because your IQ is lower than you think.
And I'm not reading anything you send now so sorry again.

[selfesteemguy]

@Uru_DS Keep being a feminist, you bastard.

[selfesteemguy]

@Uru_DS Indeed, he is putting women on a pedestal.

[Uru_DS]

I'm not a feminist. I believe in true equality.
And I quite frankly don't wanna bother explaining you the difference.
Go carefully read and understand everything I said and if you still think I'm a feminist, you're dumber than you realise.
I stated mostly facts, didn't take a side.

[LogicBomber]

@Uru_DS
I know many women who have had 3 or 4 children without c-section and have said it wasn't as bad as other women make it out to be. We live in a world of advanced medicine
the only reason carrying a child for 9 months is considered the "hardest thing to do" is because women tell you it is. Women play victim all the time. Let's stop bowing down to women because they have a monopoly on what only they can claim is "hard"... working a oil rig is hard and it lasts longer than 9 months.

A person who believes in "true equality" would hold women to the SAME standards as men, not put them on a pedestal for something many of them won't even do, and those who choose to do it will have advanced medical assistance, a society to aid and support them with it, and generally males who will die trying to support them.

Your repeated attempts at school yard name calling don't make your statements look any more valid, you simply sound like a child.

[bamesjond0069]

Yes but its mens fault. We all know most women are too emotional to primarily act in a logical fashion. So therefore its mens job to enforce logical action. STOP FUCKING WITH AND BEING NICE TO DUMB FAT OLD HOS. For real. I will proudly say to a woman she's too old and she should have came correct when she was younger. Im not afraid to say fat girls are ugly and they should go to the gym. And i have self control and dont fuck hos and give them attention. Now if y'all men did this too and werent too scared to shame hos and left them to only fat ugly wimpy men, then girls would straighten the fuck up fast.

[Kiran_Yagami]

Men should expect more from women. A woman should enhance a man's life and make it more bearable and more pleasurable. If she can't do that, then she has no value. If you want to be valuable to a man, learn some domestic skills, be a good mother, be a good homemaker. If you aren't willing to do that, then you'd better be willing to bring in enough bacon yourself to pay for the hired help, because expecting him to do it while you kick back and relax is asinine. That's gunning for the top 1% of men, which ALL WOMEN ARE GUNNING FOR. If you aren't a perfect 10, you don't stand a chance. Don't want to be valued for just your looks? Get some value outside of your looks. Fucking duh. And "personality" ain't it.

[Oram52]

"Since this user blocks anyone who disagrees with her and likes to hate on men..."

Blocked me as well. Guess she's tough talk but can't handle it in return xD

[LogicBomber]

Like most idiotic misandrist children.
Spew a shit lot of talk and then run away with her fingers in her ears before she hears the truth.

[Thatsamazing]

Ehh... you have some good points in here, for sure. There's also some crap-- none of those figures you used, for example, have any citation of data or evidence to back them up.

Yeah chicks shouldn't be fat, but guys shouldn't be fat either.

A lot of the female privilege in that graphic is true and a lot of it isn't-- chicks are not automatically given preference in domestic court. That's a common misconception.

[LogicBomber]

Not a misconception in the least...

www.sciencedaily.com/.../180403085049.htm

www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/127983NCJRS.pdf

mesacanada.com/.../

[TheUniqueOne96]

Nice response.

I answered here take and broke down every single point and I look back earlier and my opinion is gone, lol - I literally didn't even get a response or anything, like trying to justify your opinion should be the bare minimum.

[TheUniqueOne96]

I just asked her about it on another one of her questions and she blocked me, lol.

[TheUniqueOne96]

I made a mistake in saying it was a MyTake, when it was actually a question (although I am sure I saw it in the MyTake section) but that's not the point. The point is, she pussied and I replied to her on another question asking about it and this is what I got. '@theuniqueone96 you need to get a life and some friends. no normal individual with a normal life and friends ponders over nonsense like this. get a life freak and that's not a mytake stupid weirdo. Now you're blocked.' I can't respond back now, because it's her question. Not the first man hating feminazi to block me on here.

[TheUniqueOne96]

Do you think men are the cause of the changes experienced in this generation of women? ↗ She deleted my replies too, even though all I did was ask her about why she deleted it. Typical angry feminazi.

[Edanurus]

As far as objectification goes I've always thought everyone does it just depends on how.

Women are objectified as ornaments pretty to look at not much use but high worth.

Men are objectified as tools, take a lot of battering and only have value as long as they have use, replaceable.

[Uru_DS]

You get it man. Prefect description of objectification.

[Boppy]

I'm starting to think objectification comes from selfishness and a lack of empathy in general.

[mistixs]

"Men die of a heart attack and stroke more than women because men do 99% of ALL hard jobs." No it's because of hormones. Women become as likely as men too die of heart attacks after they pass menopause.

[mistixs]

To* die

[LogicBomber]

NO, it's because of a large number of variables, which include things like testosterone.
Women have more funding for health, more societal protection, less stressful and less dangerous jobs, women take more time off work, take more holidays, women have shelters and groups, and they have a society that cares about their mental health.

These are not fabrications, they are easily obtainable data.

[sadassad]

I don’t see any women working on any construction sites. The building you are now comfortably sitting in right now was made by men risking their lives. Men do work all the hardest jobs you can look it up. Statistically men suffer from heart disease a lot more than women go ahead and guess why

[mistixs]

@sadassad most men don't work in construction either

[sadassad]

Yeah but men are the ones who work at constructions.

[NineBreaker]

I generally agree with you.

Also,

https://youtu.be/XlR6CdJtRWM

[Someguynamedbob]

THIS!!! men are held too a way way way way way higher standard especially in dating, we gotta be perfect in every single way just to be considered an OPTION

[morrowlow]

@brittslitt you're an entitled little ass. men don't have to go MGTOW to think women like YOU are trash. you're just sore that guys don't want you so you blame them for having standards

[JoseftheMan]

Being a human comes with challenges and hardships, and when those hardships are our own problem, we must face them. Men and women face problems for their gender, so is the problem really male or female privilege? I always say that rather than preaching feminism, we preach equality. Many women bash on men because of unfair stereotypes, and it's considered "feminism". Equality is what we strive for, and feminism does not represent that.

[Rangers]

Her and her misandrist friends will probably do everything they can to get this taken down, lmao. Great take

[Passinggas]

The best part is LB that I fall into the 10% they pursue, but I still reject women for their privileged derived man-hate. So, I just use them up, and toss them.

[Iloveapplepies34]

The untrue and lying that women are payed less than men , if they have same job there payed same even more in some private jobs

[themomo84]

I don't know the history of this question, so thanks for the post

[Chthou95]

Yeah but still you'll get women who disagree with you when you listed statistical facts 🙄

[HereIbe]

All I want, in the end, is the same putting up with my bullshit from her as she expects for me putting up with her bullshit.

[NerdInDenial]

That Tweet is hilarious

[No_Sugarcoat]

That was entertaining and comforting to read.

[Secretgardenblood]

Good take
...