
ALL OF THE ABOVE!!!

D: All of the above. I literally haven't even thought of Playboy since that show Amber Heard starred in on NBC, called The Playboy Club (oh my, the irony in that). As I said on YouTube, Playboy should've just gone the way of Brazzers, or maybe merged with them, some ten years ago, but Hefner was too behind-the-times and thought the internet was "just a fad." And now, woke feminists have taken a giant steaming sh*t on his legacy with this. Can't feel too sorry for him, now. Eh, I still feel a little sorry for him. No one deserves woke dipsh*ts destroy their entire life's work.
https://www.youtube.com/embed/qwqevlCcWG0 Here's that show that Amber Turd was in; the last time I thought about Playboy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-95qfa956A
Sickening, puke-inducing degeneracy.
Thanks for the MHO!
Opinion
72Opinion
This isn't about audience or sales. The people cheering for this don't buy Playboy, and the people canceling their subscriptions, who will never go back, have no desire for this. This alone could cost the magazine 20% of revenue, permanently. But THEY DON'T CARE.
This is about virtue-signaling. People in the woke elite crowd will call them "stunning and brave" and will give them awards for their "enlightenment", and they'll be able to feel superior for a while.
This is the same company that, shortly after Hef died, tried to take the naked women out of the magazine for the same reason (virtue signaling) - and lost half their readers and had a 22% approval rating - quickly forcing them to bring back the naked women.
The people in charge of Playboy today didn't have to do anything to build it, and they don't care about it's actual success - they care about their own personal status as "woke progressives" and if they take down an iconic magazine in the process, oh well. These are the same people who have decimated the comic book industry exactly the same way, the same people who are trying to destroy video games the same way, and the same people responsible for all of the woke Hollywood productions.
They're fully aware that their crap doesn't sell, but THEY DO NOT CARE. They just want the social points from the woke elite. That's all that matters to them.
Ok, are you ready to hear some shit that will just make you shake your head in disbelief? Hugh Hefner basically turned the reins of the Playboy publication to his daughter “Christie Hefner” and after putting her female touch on it… it began to lose interest in it’s main consumer… horny men who wanted nothing more than something to take to the bathroom and rub one out quickly.
Well, after running it into the ground she decided to jump ship and attempt to be a “philanthropist” inspired by Barrack Obama to give more time to charitable work. From there, their publications dropped to 11 a year, then to 10 a year and finally decided to no longer publish frontal nudity.
Now, I’m just taking an educated guess and say that they are now desperately attempting to cater to a more diverse market and it’s not one that is interested in women at all. You know what I figure out quite a while ago… Cosmopolitan became better than what Playboy started becoming earlier on! Seriously, they have better pictures and better stories!

Having never read a playboy magazine myself I'm not entirely sure what the content usually is inside.
I'm aware that yes they may have images of women in a similar fashion, ie only dressed from the rib cage down?
But are there articles and advice pages like the women's mags?
If the sole purpose of it is just a flip book of more provocative images then I can imagine the person on the cover would be more provocative inside.
If a person who usually buys the mag sees the cover and decides this particular print isn't for them then perhaps the sensible thing would be to avoid it.
I'm sorry to say this but sexual preference isn't something you can influence your born with it.
I truly believe that trying to convince people otherwise leads to more harm than good.
We are living in an age of choice, and that means whatever sexuality you reside with you are free to explore it.
And live it openly its 2021.
I'm not entirely sure why we can't have a company that caters to all, maybe with a main and additional prints.
That way they target all the market.
There used to be a Playgirl magazine that had nude guys and was targeted at women and gay dudes. Playboy was the flip side of that. Playgirl folded in 2016 and the next year the first male to female transgender (no penis) was in Playboy. So with that in mind... it's sort of like they combined Playgirl and Playboy. When I was a kid there were maybe 3 main nude mags and a bunch of lesser known ones. Playboy was considered the lamest out of them all BUT they also had a reputation for having good investigative journalism that had nothing to do with the sex stuff so that was probably the real reason they didn't go out of business 20 years ago.
Point is tho.. it's really nothing new. They're probably desperate for cash and think this will get them more customers.
I don't know lol. I didn't think people still read playboy magazines. I don't see an issue with it? So what a guy is on the cover of a sex magazine. What's it gonna do? Kill you?
Honestly I don't see the big deal. there's no need to be upset about it. Also he's gay, yes. What does that have to do with anything?
It might seem like im trying to defend playboy magazine, but trust me when I say I just dont give a fuhhhk lol.
Im very neutral when it comes to stuff like this.
If its not hurting me, or making my life hard... then I dont care. I choose not to complain over such silly things because this doesn't efffect anyones life in a negative way.
Why tf should I care?
But more imporantly, why do you care?
The short version is, it's stupid beyond belief and yes, it will kill the company and what little brand recognition they have left. It's like someone lighting themselves on fire, thinking it'll cure their cancer. Or hell; maybe going bankrupt is their plan all along.
On the larger scale, it's yet another vicious example of the far left being petty and sh*tting on things men love because they can. It's so childish and immature and it speaks more to how disgusting it is that they would rather "smash the patriarchy" and sh*t on things men like (as well as attractive women and their livelihood to earn a living) than to pay their own rent. It's a giant middle finger yet again to "straight white males" and it's beyond petty.
@MCheetah so all in all, you're homophobic. got it
@spookywashere What are you babbling about?
@billyballs Im "babbling" about how ridiculous it is to complain over something as stupid as this billy. Do you not have the ability to comprehend simple conversations?
What the absolute fuckery?
They could have created another magazine for that niche. I mean, Playgirl existed.
Playboy is for straight dudes into women. Or guys just in it for the articles.
Really? 🙄
Hilariously terrible business decision. They must be throwing everything at the wall hoping something sticks. Porn is literally free now and amateur is the best, not scripted or over done bullshit. Just natural and raw the way it should be. People with actual affection for one another. Scripted porn and magazines are trash
Becusse they want to program gen z and younger into aggots (F).
MILLINALS we're to be sluts. And aggot (F)
You gotta break down the psyche of the the kids young to indoctrinate them.
Is he gay or trans? If I'm not mistaken there is a Playgirl magazine so it wouldn't make sense for a gay guy to be on there.
I think they're trying to be "relevant" and got pressured similarly to how Victoria's secret did. Once a lawsuit was threatened they changed their minds about never allowing a tranny to model for VS.
@Григорий Well not quite. I don't keep up with the magazine but I'd expect the men to be sexualized in a masculine way as in shirtless but NOT wearing women's clothing.
If the LGBTQ+ whatever alphabet want their own Play magazine fine but don't pollute what's traditional!
Is it bretman rock? That’s so cool! I love him. Also I’m pretty sure playboys done a lot more controversial stuff? Like.. putting several underage girls in their magazine? (The youngest being 11)
“Brooke Shields”
If people are genusnly trying to cancel playboy cause this is what they consider the last straw for the company then I have no hope for this world
Omg he killling it in the magazine
Option C of course. They've basically destroyed their magazine. Who is going to buy it now? No one.
I never cared for Playboy, if I wanted a dirty magazine I went for explicit stuff. My guess here is a combination of being woke and trying to stay relevant. Either way I don't really care, hell didn't realize the magazine was still around (figure it would have gone digital by now or something).
Because despite what you’re low IQ is Playboy is about the erotic not the sex. If you want sex you buy hustler, if you want allure, sexy and class you buy playboy. Playboy realizes that appeal and eroticism comes in many forms and that it’s readers aren’t just slack jawed white males. It’s demographics have always been in large part women. Plus sexuality isn’t binary. A majority of men are bisexual and can appreciate the feminine aspect of the human form irrespective of ones genitalia.
Bottomline is that the world is changing its views on the to be more in line with the feelings and emotions that were already inside us.
Being woke just means we are acknowledging what has always been and pretending it doesn’t exist.
Duh
Troll alert!!!
Troll? Your questions seem to incite hate. All I do is tell the truth.
Hate?
HaHaaHaaaa!!!
HaHaaaHaaa!!!
LOL!!!
Companies trying to “do their part” to not catch flack from the PC crowd. There could have been a different magazine for this cover, I won’t hate too much. I actually love Bretman Rock. He’s overall a really chill guy, down to earth and funny as hell. 🤷🏽♀️
I totally committed to the Playboy lifestyle by getting the bunny logo tattooed on my arms. But today I still wear the logo, but what the brand stands for is changing underneath me. I don't want to be always embarrassed by my tattoos based upon who is on the cover that month.
Oops i clicked on the wrong answer when I tried to vote. But, i think they’re doing it to avoid the backlash that’s coming with all of these lawsuits.. like how x videos got sued for not having subtitles.. as ridiculous as that sounds, they’re more than likely avoiding that. Lol
Because old men hate young pretty boys that attract all the as*. Think about it Jason Statham got kicked out of a playboy mansion party because he rejected a girl who wanted to sleep with him. Why would you want to sleep with a beautiful girl who offers her goodies like they are raisins for old men to eat and feast their eyes upon.
. google. com/amp/s/amp. theguardian. com/commentisfree/2015/dec/09/handsome-hell-science-job-girl. I need level three so I took out the www. http/. It sucks handsome guys get a lot of hate they have people calling them gay take Prince and Romeo Santos and Justin Bieber for instance. lying to girls mostly but also anyone who it may concern about them old men criticizing them jealous guys jealous girls hating them for no reason. Gay guys trying get with them also people trying dig up dirt on them to blackmail them. Gorgeous girls have it hard too. If a really handsome guy goes around a guys girlfriend and that guy starts acting like the handsome guy is a problem to society. If a really handsome guy Gets around an old man's gold digging girlfriend he'll turn the FBI against him 😂 seriously. Look at wiz khalifa in this picture {https://} youtu. be/8kvZ1Y7DAsA Wiz khalifa More and more song. Do you understand what he's trying to tell you? This is honestly the same thing as me taking a picture of a lawyer making haughty eyes and putting the word snob under it. It's propaganda. Like all who wear suits are snobs basically that's the message that I'm trying to get across on the picture. This guy was just a tool to use for that. What if I take a picture of my angry teacher and put it on the cover of Newsweek magazine but had paragraphs speaking about Orphans in orphanage homes.
Handsome men aren’t allowed to attend festivals in Saudi Arabia. The world I full of this type of crap.
It's all over the world this persecution of really handsome men the exploitation of them. it's bullshit.
Brendan Fraser got sexually abused and just abused most of his acting career. Yeah the guy from George of the jungle. The mummy movies. Some jealous weirdo movie director tried violating him. Justin Bieber accused of sexually assaulting his ex's friend that's slander. Tupac accused of sexually assaulting a girl who gave him head. like what? and thrown into prison later to be set up and eliminated.
Isn't that what grandfather used as wank material back in ye olden dayes before the internet.
@purplepoppy exactly I thought this wank mag had died years ago.
Can you still buy wank mags? Think I'll do a question
@purplepoppy not sure, you usually see guys in the woods with an ipad cracking one off these days.
Women identity politics
See playboy has been providing nude women and porn for a long time now they are diversifying same politics as all female avengers team
Must admit I never knew they still sold porn magazines.
Definitely thought Playboy had finished years ago.
According to statistics, 93% of men and 87% of women in western cultures identify as mostly heterosexuals.
So maybe this is an experiment to see whether 7% of men 87% of women will spend more money buying their magazine than 93% of men 13% and of women?
Pardon, for men it is 93% completely heterosexual and 4% mostly heterosexual, while cor women it is 87% completely heterosexual and 10% as mostly heterosexual.
All options make sense in this context
that's just the time we live in. gay shit and gender cvonfusion is forced on the masses.
haha i saw this, idek what audience they're trying to latch onto here.
Trying to stay relevant and pretending to be woke
@karaspara 😂😂 I choked on my wine there, you being called Woke.
@ez-bri-z imagine calling Kara woke and not ducking
It's the LGBTQ lady boy agenda. Homosexuals are running the media and they want America to become like Thailand with a bunch of lady boys walking around.
Guys with guys and girls with girls.
Being gay isn't enough for homosexuals, they want you to be gay too.
What Playboy and magazines are stull a thing. Thought the internet killed both off a long time ago.
Playboy went off the rails when Heff's daughter took over. Now it's finally jumped the shark.
Obviously some people are pushing an agenda and don’t care about making money
Why did America put a gay, biracial guy in the White House in 2008 ?
Because they already chased away their intended audience.
Playboy lost its way when Hugh Hefner died.. Yeah its woke. And guess what, it's going broke, just like everything else that went woke. It's stupidity, no more no less.
Because Hugh Hefner died and now they are going to run the mag out of bussiness
Because these businesses aren't capitalistic businesses anymore, but propagada machines. It's not about selling stuff anymore. It's about putting out as much propaganda as possible.
They've gone woke. Removed naked women, and now putting dude on cover. They'll fuck up themselves and it won't be too soon.
They have run out of sane options, I guess - - - - -
They've been flirting with wokeness for a few years.
And they say there isn't a gay agenda going on. Its all over the place now including targeting children.
What is wrong with you having straight people could seen as targeting children and I'm a straight guy nothing wrong about being gay
@mattissebfan5: Once you start promoting gay marriage in front of kids eyes in cartoons you definitely have crossed a line.
But you can say promoting straight anyway people are born gay so it's promoting diversity and inclusion no person should have to fear because they love same gender as a straight person can't turn gay a gay person can't turn straight
Because homosexuality wasn't popular before, but it is now. Not popular per se, just more acceptable.
I think people start to become more diverse nowaday
Could be true
They should be burned to the ground. They are trying to appeal to anyone since they became irrelevant. Transvestities and queers. They no longer have an audience and are desperate cunts
Weird. I thought it would go the way of the dodo as there's porn sites all over the place.
Teens today don't need fap material in print form, since kappa-bytes of sexual content is free available in internet.
Playboy is irrelevant and they try to gain some attention with wokism.
they are in need of readers and they understand that today we live in a far different world than years ago.
Maybe gay men also want to read playboy magazine (?). This is why they do it? I dont how it works
They could make a Magazine for gay men instead of doing something like this.
I did not know it. Interesting
@Григорий They actually went bankrupt in 2016:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Playgirl
It's a publicity stunt that will fail and likely backfire.
Playboy became irrelevant with the rise of the internet, so who cares anyways.
Because Hugh died and can't argue what the woke people in charge now chose to do with PB.
Does anybody look at Playboy anymore? I think it kind of peaked 50+ years ago. With the internet, what is the point?
I remember seeing them at my great-uncle's house when I was very young.
They are trying to destroy a brand that stands for heteronormative values.
I would go with all of the above, they are just that dumb.
Maybe they are confused and didn’t realize that it goes on playgirl? Hugh Hefner would be pissed seeing that if he was alive
They probably have been losing subscribers for years with all the access to porn online. They need the attention.
To make sales. With the prevalence of free, online porn, the only way Playboy can continue to exist is to innovate. It is a business, after all.
I'm fine with it, if you don't like it, don't buy it. 🤷♂️
Shit makes as much sense as Vegan Cat Food.
Trans woman without the peen in my opinion would be ok but not this
Maybe!!!
It sure struck a nerve with you. Stopped to really wonder why?
You don't think it's a little bizarre that a dying magazine company would alienate their few remaining supporters by literally doing the opposite of what would get them good business and save their careers? No one is "nerve-struck." Just dumbfounded by the sheer aburdity of it all. Of course, this is obviously just another feminist goal to destroy all things men love, like the woke does with everything.
@MCheetah Get a grip. All of you.
Because why not? Because they can. Because he looks awesome.
Preach
Awesome?
Seriously?
It's quite common, and Culturally acceptable for Men to be Gay these days. Playboy most likely caught on with it.
Meanwhile in China…
playboy has been complete shit ever since hugh died. he must be rolling over in his grave
all they did was ruin another piece of American history and culture and destroyed their company. it was getting bad before but this just puts the final nail in the coffin for this company
nothing against bretman rock, but if he wanted to be on the cover of a magazine so badly he should of done it for playgirl since a lot of women and gay men read playgirl
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions