Hoggin. Is it a ethical?

[love_conquers_lust]

Hoggin: a guy who picks up a fat woman

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Hoggin%27

Given that women will support body positive women that are no longer a threat to them, isn’t it funny how guys can be strangely tolerant when they are shallow?

Updates

+1 y

This is satire for those unaware. It isn’t kind or caring to pump and dump a woman from any walk of life. Neither is it kind to “support” unhealthy women by not being truthful about their condition because of an ulterior motive. The point is illustrate how toxicity from both genders can “harmonize” into a harmful cycle.

[Anonymous]

Hoggin is really an excuse for guys who are into fat chicks or guys thar have trouble getting laid to get some action. They make it a joke so their buddies don't laugh. It's like my fat friend gets a lot more action than my friend who looks like a model, why? Because there are a lot of chubby chasers out there.

[IslaTheWitch]

I find wiki definition much more descriptive.

In general, for me, it looks like frustrated, not attractive men make a move on overweight or obese women not because they are attracted but because of the bet or, even worse, to humiliate these women.

Is it ethical? Hell no. But does it change a thing?

[MorningDew90]

I hope showing disagreement will change things. I didn't know such thing exists.

[Anonymous]

No. But it's not like a fat chick doesn't know she's fat. And if she accepts a date with a guy who's clearly out of her league she kind of deserves what she gets don't you think? I mean if Scarlet Johansson asked me out wouldn't that be a clear sign something was amiss?

[LazerBean]

Yes, leading people on for entertainment is unethical.

[love_conquers_lust]

But do you see my point? There are no hard feelings between guys and fat girls. They’re just trying to get their dick wet and give obese women some attention, doing what some guys do.

Catty women are deliberately trying to harm their well being. At least guys are doing what most women expect them to do. If we’re going to say women are in control and smarter than men, then who is the real evil culprit if we’re just dumb guys?

[LazerBean]

No, I actually don't understand what you are trying to say. I would say a fat girl who finds out that a guy only slept with her because him and his friends thought that she was so unattractive that it would make a funny bet would have extremely hard feelings between those guys. I guess are you saying that the body positivity movement is bad? I would agreed with that statement. But the way this post is worded, that is not what I got from it.

[love_conquers_lust]

Body “positivity” is in fact negative if it encourages unhealthy choices. I thought the update clarified that.

I’ll give you a little insight into this male’s psyche. When it comes to pussy, it’s all pink on the inside. This doesn’t necessarily DICKtate everything I do, but it’s always there. Nagging. Sometimes I’d submit to it out of weakness. Hence, masterbation, porn, maybe getting too “handsy” with my past SOs (although I found they were more on me than I them). It takes self control to govern that. Is it everything when it comes to judging a partner? No. I’m human as well as an animal. I have other preferences. I strive to be civil because I find it makes me happier when I can exhibit animalistic tendencies and still not “succumb” to them.

I also think it’s folly and disrespectful when some women try to control and manipulate me. When I feel them encroach on my independence and freedom of expression, I get irritated because I defend their rights to those same things..

So, what I’m implying is when some women do that, it can be a false flag operation when they don’t discourage them from eating.

That’s the satire. Saying women do this deliberately while guys just think with their dicks. Would you blame a dog for doing dog things, or are they just being themselves?<-That’s also satirical, calling men dogs.

[LazerBean]

I respect you more than most users on this site. But you telling me that men are naturally dogs is just as harmful, wrong, and offensive as telling a fat girl that being fat is natural. Even if you are right that y'all are dogs and just think with your dicks, then women thinking with their feelings and telling fat women that they look good because its truly what they want to believe is no different. Which makes the comparison pointless any, tbh, hypocritical. But as someone who has many good men in my life who would strongly disagree with you thinking men are naturally, and in a way, uncontrollably dickheads, it makes me question why you even chose your username. I agree that a lot of men are worthless dogs, but saying that the two things are synonymous is offensive.

[love_conquers_lust]

I said it was satire. It might be offensive to you, but it’s not as offensive to me because I don’t believe it to be the whole truth for myself.

I think my post history speaks for itself on my username.

I’m glad you have good men in your life, I hope they have good women in theirs. Hopefully these women can find the same for themselves.

Thank you for the compliment. I aim to entertain…at the risk of offending.

[LazerBean]

I think if you don't think that men are dogs who think with their dicks, you probably shouldn't say that men are dogs who think with their dicks and then try to pass it off as a joke.

[love_conquers_lust]

I’m not a dog. I hope my actions reflect as such.

[LazerBean]

I hope you aren't either. When I see a paragraph like that one it just makes me wary.

[MorningDew90]

It is the first time I read about it, but it sounds horrible and is not ethical.

[Anonymous]

Seeking advice and knowledge from Urban Dictionary now, are we?

How sad!

[love_conquers_lust]

I’m tolerant of other perspectives.