I need to know why, because they aren't experiencing the terrible pain of childbirth, so why some insist on their wife?
Besides, it’s a little risky to give birth to a child in this insecure world, isn't it?
I need to know why, because they aren't experiencing the terrible pain of childbirth, so why some insist on their wife?
Besides, it’s a little risky to give birth to a child in this insecure world, isn't it?
Asker wants to hear from Guys only. Login to share your opinion.
Well the fact that men not experiencing childbirth pain is one of the reasons that men does not afraid to have children, on the other hand most women have a maternal instinct, while men don't. Not wanting children is immature, like sex is seen as a rite-of-passage, children are even more so, though the separation between sex and children is artificial mostly, as the main purpose of sex is to have children.
There is an achievement for a man to make a woman give birth to his child, the fact that it not something easy only makes it more of a achievement, woman also proves the man her love by giving birth to his child, kiss < sex < child, woman saying to a man "I don't want a child from you" is an insult, not an compliment. Children are also important for the survival of the country or on smaller scale the survival of the family.
https://allthetropes.org/wiki/Sex_as_Rite-of-Passage
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/06/03/japan-low-births-population-decline-2021/
Not wanting children is NOT immature ! I can't have children, I have PCOS, my body is NOT made for birth! Why people can't understand this? I can only adopt a child! This thing makes me so angry!!
Certain folk are busybodies, At3mis24
It's the only thing we tend to be noble at doing besides securing things for ourselves and having sex with as many women as possible. To be a noble man means to stop exploiting women, to protect them, to stay behind with one, get married, raise a family.
When I read "with as many women as possible" I'm almost getting sick... What a world. I'm not made for relationships, I'm sure about it.
What type of image do you conceive of an ideal man if I may ask? You see a loving father and devoted husband playing with his kids in the park and kissing his wife and say and willing to die on their account to protect them, that it's not the right way? You have a different picture in mind? Is there a better man of a sort I'm missing that isn't like this at all?
Not a father (I don't want biological kids), just a men who have sex only with me and who had only 3 or 4 female conquests (not a bunch of them) and who will support all my decisions with respect, never being violent (I read a lot of things about an increase in domestic violence)
It's cool if you don't want any kids but what about the generalized one? If there are no kids, no future. Economy collapses. You grow old with only old people, and no one to run clean water, sanitation, hospitals, electricity, agriculture and food, grocery stores, etc. etc. etc. You know, we're doomed. Our lives even in near-future years is gonna be like Mad Max without any young people to repopulate, to teach, to love.
No kids and it's gonna be like:
Give us all your women, food, gas. Surrender now and it will all be over. Except everyone's gonna be like 60+ years old. Whole economy and everything you depend on now is going to be gone. No kids, no future. And it's gonna probably be ugly as hell for women.
It's not a problem, because some women have 3 or 5 kids, that's enough. I'm worrying more about wars...
It's an unfortunate tendency we have but we seem to be growing away from it. What you usually find is that developed nations never go to war with other developed nations these days since it's too disastrous and trading is so beneficial. It's usually a developed nation picking on a lesser developed nation that seems to be the problem. If we can all develop, maybe we can really have world peace of some sort on the global scale.
But you know, I'm down for women who don't want to have kids here and there and men too, but if all of us were like that, that will probably doom us faster than any hypothetical WW3 or AI SkyNet. We have to hold some value collectively in the father and mother if we want our societies to survive.
People who don't want kids are not so many. If I don't want it it's ok. And I haven't choice: If I get pregnant, I will die, I'm sure. Anyway I can’t stand the screams of babies.
That's cool. I was worried it's a growing thing. Like lots of people think about this. That's the impression I got from your Q is like you see something wrong with a man who wants to be a father.
Yes I see something wrong with it, because I only want to adopt, and it's definitive. I'm very angry today because of someone who judging me "immature" just because I don't want kids! I blocked this jerk.
If you are willing to adopt, that's actually ideal in my opinion. I think one problem is that we're growing into this horrible society that wants to conflate "normative" with "right" and shun the rest. If anything, we especially shouldn't do that today.
I'm in a weird camp that doesn't see anything wrong with a "heteronormative" society. I would be worried if anything else was normative. But I do see things deeply wrong if embracing what's most normal, ordinary, common, means shunning what isn't, like shunning homosexual or bisexual people. That's just judgmental, ignorant, creating conflict where no conflict is necessary.
So I don't like when people want to make these things the norm and basically render the norm non-existent, but I also don't like people who shame those who deviate from the norm. There's a middle ground to all of this.
If I use slim-normativity as another example, obviously a healthy body isn't going to have 30% body fat. We don't need to normalize obesity. But we also don't need to shame obese people. I feel like I'm working with two types of extremely dumb people at the end of the day if I'm dealing mostly with people who want to normalize it by putting obese women on fashion magazines on one hand and people who want to shame obese women on the other hand. Both hands are stupid.
I want children because I love to have a bigger family and I want someone to pass on the family legacy to. And I think God ordained us to have children to fill the Earth.
Please you don't need to give up because AI is still available and people as old as 58-60 can have children that way:).
So, please don't give up. In any case I love someone who can't have children of her own but I know she is very close to God compared to someone like me. She is my mom non Biological 😁. She is half blind but a very good person. It doesn't matter if she didn't have children because of her diabetes but I know I am her son and always going to be that way to her. Maybe God and Jesus help her and I be able to help her through her entire life.
by the way, she is your age too 😃.
It's only natural to want a family to carry on there bloodline.
It may seem one sided but seeing as us guys can't carry the baby then that becomes a task for the woman.
We are all individuals as far as wanting to have a family men or women can want or not want kids. This can also extend to how you want to have kids eg naturally or adoption.
Needless to say this is something to discuss early on in a relationship.
Oh not too early: it will crush my relationship if I had one
And I don't want to have a family, just want to stay alone and free, with a good job, a lot of friends, Lego and other leisures
I don't want any kids.
I prefer pets. 🐍🐈⬛🦔🦂🕷️🐢🦎🐦⬛🐀🦜🦋🐛🐝🐠
I don't want any, never have
The bad grammar here never ceases to amaze this ol' boy.
I'm sorry top be French but today I don't use a translator because I'm really angry!
I getcha, At3mis24 .
Public education at work, folks.
Because children are our legacy.
That's not a good reason
Why not?
We are overpopulated on Earth, consciences should wake up and people should consider adoptions instead giving birth
Explain how we're overpopulated.
When we see the wrong direction in today’s world, bringing a child into this world, who has to endure all of this shit that we endure, is far more cruel in my opinion.
We are 8 billion on Earth and there will soon be no resources for all. One of the consequences of global overpopulation would be to aggravate inequalities between developed countries and countries like India, already very densely populated.
To feed the world’s population, it would be necessary to develop increasingly intensive and industrial agriculture. As a result, the release of harmful compounds (CO2, methane, nitrates) for the environment and for humans.
www.nationalgeographic.com/.../the-world-now-has-8-billion-people
Not me! Lol
Instincts
You can also add your opinion below!