Are they right when they say too little food and no weight loss?

[jennifer_bloom]

I seem to lose more weight with moderate calories then with lower calories cause my weight loss method is chemical and not calorie based

[horsenrhinounicorn]

Each person's metabolism is different. For the majority there will be a temporary weigh loss after the first fifteen pounds, after that one has to attack it from many different angles. The body often reacts based on changes in feeding patterns. When one has too little food, the body may go into a mode that stores calories for later. When a person does not intake enough water, the body may have a greater desire for food that contains water or eat large quantities of foods that only contain a small amount of water. For a lot of people it's a matter of getting it down to the right nutrients, calorie count, fat, carbs, etc, and being consistent in not exceeding the numbers. The body tries to improvise. Also if the body is not kept warm enough it may try to use food to store fat or carbs for warmth.

Here is a list of some of the most challenging foods that slow down weight loss progress and are barriers to the breakdown and brain response to food: sugary drinks, chocolate and candies, ice cream and frozen desserts, French fries and burgers, pizzas and pasta, muffins, buns, bread, yeast, and cakes. Processed meats, sausage, hot dogs, salami, and deli meats.

The taste buds trigger activity in the brain like a reward system, each person has healthy foods that may be used instead to mitigate those triggers.

[MrReliable12]

The law of weight loss is constant. You need to be in a caloric deficit to lose weight. This being said, there are a multitude of factors that contribute or inhibit weight loss such as certain diseases and hormones etc. Have you looked into the quality of your food and exercise?