MTG/Wizards of the Coast. Why does the company print cards like this?

This card is just going to get banned in Standard and probably immediately on the "Game Changer" list in Commander, which means it'll be on the watch list for banning there too. This is better than Stroke of Genius. It's better than many Green X Creature cards. You know what? It's better than Stroke of Genius combined with an X elemental creature card, because it has flash and vigilance and flying, and because it's last ability locks entire deck archetypes out of using their best cards.
MTG/Wizards of the Coast. Why does the company print cards like this?

Statistically, if you bought Booster Packs until you pulled one of these cards, it would be worth about $10, but people have drove the price up to $65 on TCGPlayer already, even though I'm positive he will be banned by the 3 months from now when the next banned list is posted.

It makes no sense for the company to print cards that get banned 3 months later in the two leading formats, but I assure you this guy will be banned in Standard within the next 3 to 6 months, because blue drawing this many cards and strangling the other colors to death is completely unfair.

Anyway, until they do ban it, I'm obviously adding one copy of him to my Commander deck.

Updates
6 mo
This is one of the most powerful blue cards ever printed. It might even rival "Power Nine" cards in cost-effectiveness.
Updates
6 mo
Based on the "Rule of Four" method some pro gamers use for evaluating cards, this creature when cast for X=0 has a Cost of 6 (4 for the card and 2 for the mana) and a total value of 11 when cast with X=0.

When Cast with X=4, it has a cost of 10 and a value of 19.

This definitely means this card is similar to the Power Nine in Cost Effectiveness.
MTG/Wizards of the Coast. Why does the company print cards like this?
Post Opinion