I need more than just a physically good looking guy to intrigue me. I'm also not really into that *type* in all honesty. I'm more into guys with longer hair and a tall & skinny build instead of muscular.
So you like the tall part, what about the dark part? Both/either dark hair/eyes and mysterious personality. Do you like masculine handsome guys, or more feminine pretty boys. What kind of skinny too? Can you post a pic? I'm thinking this kind of skinny: www.marwankillufitness.com/.../...uy-768x10241.jpg vs this kind of fit/toned: www.google.com.au/search
@Asker
I don't have a specific hair color preference but I do tend to prefer brown or dark hair. So that would be hot for me. Yeah that skinny is what I have in mind too when I say skinny
Really? Most women I know want a strong man's body, not a weak boy's.
@Asker
Implying that someone who is naturally on the skinny side is a "boy" and not a man is quite offensive. That's like saying I'm a girl and not a woman because I maybe don't have huge boobs or ass. I like what I like and that's just how it is. My current guy is naturally tall and on the thin side and I love his body. He's very much manly to me. Being a man isn't just defined by how you look on the outside.
Then you're offended by male biology. When boys go through puberty, the process that changes them from boys into men, they get surged with testosterone which increases muscle mass. The extent of the testosterone surges differs greatly, meaning some don't have as much testosterone and aren't as muscular, like your boyfriend.
But the hormonal change is enough to have maturity and physique subconsciously and instinctually correlated in our brains.
I'm not saying skinny men are boys, I'm referring to subconscious hard-wiring, which has a correlation between skinniness and boyishness. Most women naturally prefer fully matured males, it doesn't matter that they're 18+, it's the traits that indicate.
@Asker
So what you're saying is that guys who aren't tall are also "boys" and not men simply because they never grew much taller during puberty? Sorry but that's bullshit. If you've gone through puberty you're a man whether you are short or skinny or not. Just like I'm a woman too even though through puberty I might not have grown the largest pair of tits. You're obviously the one getting offended for me saying I like less buff guys and can't handle the fact that actually many women might not necessarily like a buff physique.
No, I'm just trying to get more insight. If you're trying to put that on me I've emotionally charged you more than I thought. I'm talking about biological inclinations, of course there will be statistical deviants like you.
Seems you're either skimming or having trouble understanding the concepts I've explained. Being short doesn't make a man a boy, but shortness is a feminine trait and tallness is a masculine one. A man will subconsciously be seen as less mature for a shorter height and be taken less seriously, you can look up forums of short men complaining about that one all over the place. Even scientific studies to back the height/maturity correlation.
@Asker
" Being short doesn't make a man a boy, but shortness is a feminine trait and tallness is a masculine one."
So you just changed you story. You went from saying that guys who don't get muscular and grow a certain way during puberty aren't men and now you say they actually are but are just perceived as feminine. Pick a stance please and stick to it. Changing your argument after I replied just tells me you realize you have no grounds to base your original argument on. Just face the facts that just because someone is less muscular doesn't mean they aren't manly. I just told you I find my guy very manly and handsome. That's just how it is whether you like it or not.
Damn you're pissed, must be why your reading comprehension has gone out the window haha. My argument is consistent. Look at my comment before the one you quoted:
'I'm not saying skinny men are boys, I'm referring to subconscious hard-wiring, which has a correlation between skinniness and boyishness. Most women naturally prefer fully matured males, it doesn't matter that they're 18+, it's the traits that indicate.'
Height is exactly the same. Because boys pre-puberty are more androgynous, thus more feminine than the more masculine fully matured males. Which has the same subconscious maturity correlation.
@Asker
I'm not "pissed". It's cute if you think this matters to me enough to get me angry but it actually doesn't bring me any emotion other than sheer amusement when I see the kinds of arguments guys come up with when females express their preferences. Guys like you just can't accept that not everybody can find them sexy and need to bring other males down in the process to feel more important and wanted. It's all about the ego I suppose. Wanting to bring other guys down and belittle others is pretty much the number 1 sign of insecurity for many women and I can see that in you needing to make it out like less muscular guys are somehow underdeveloped and not matured. Maybe just accept that not all women like the same things and will not be attracted to you always just because you have a certain body build.
Interesting assumptions, but completely incorrect. I made a politically incorrect comment regarding evolutionary psychology, you took offence and attempted to argue against the merit of my comment which I argued in defense of.
If you'd actually been reading what I've been writing you'd already understand the flaws in your assumptions. Like I've already said, I'm only talking about biological inclination.
It's obvious you have strong ego investment in this subject however, you've even provided strong evidence for that yourself. For evo psyche to be equated to insecurity projection and ad hominem attacks, you're only highlighting your ignorance of the subject. Ignorance fueled by ego investment. How intellectually void.
@Asker
I don't find any flaws in my assumptions whatsoever. You're the one who made a very idiotic statement and I just questioned it. This is a discussion website. Me asking you about your opinion does not = me taking offense. You're the one who couldn't really provide me with much of a justification for your bizarre claim that less muscular guys are "weak boys". Saying that it's justified because some people might perceive a less tall or less muscular guy as feminine is actually a very weak argument because you're assuming you can decide on someone's femininity based on one or two things when in reality it's a lot more complex and there are other factors involved. I've never called someone out on being feminine over just their height or body build. I know very manly guys who are maybe not very tall but still come across as "men" and not boys. Same goes for guys who are more skinny. You forget that there's a face attached to the body and it's about the greater scheme of things.
@Asker
The only time me and most other women will consider a guy as "feminine" is when he might dress femininely or speak a certain way or have certain likes/dislikes we may associate with being a female. However saying height and body build alone dictates how we view a male as feminine or not just tells me your lack of understanding of female preferences in men.
I have no idea why woman like mysterious men. I have no interest in mysterious men. Give me a man I can understand and read like a book and trust and I will be happy.
Interesting, most girls I know think that's boring.
Well nah, sure it'd be flattering if anyone was interested, but I'd do nothing more because I already really like someone
It's a hypothetical question, your crush can be left out.
Still, flattering but wouldn't pursue a relationship
I don't like the dark part...
O. o
Never understood does that pertain to hair color or race.
Some think dark hair/eyes, some think dark mysterious personality. I made it both. It can be a darker skinned race, but not necessarily, if you google tall dark and handsome it's mostly tanned Caucasians.
When you say dark, do you mean dark skinned? Or a dark personality?
It's in the description, 'dark hair and eyes and a mysteroious (mysterious*) personality'. Those are the main ones people think of with T, D and H. It can mean darker skinned too, but it doesn't have to be. Google images mostly gives tanned Caucasians when you search it.
Are you being intentionally obtuse?
Uh huh, whatever you say, troll.
Drugs or boredom?
You should mix that with drugs, should be interesting and I get to watch from a distance.
Not gonna lie, I laughed a lot.
Opinion
1Opinion
Just want to talk to him and maybe flirt.
What about the 'type' do you like?
That be sounds reserved.
He***
I reckon option D might win this
Looks like B is for now...
That doesn't matter if we don't have chemistry
Not at all? So if I made it a short, pale, ugly guy you wouldn't mind at all? As long as there is chemistry?
A. Always A.
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions