@HippieVeganJewslim so then why canโt everyone be โhappyโ? If kidnapping brown people and ducking them even after they die makes someone happy then there mustnโt be anything wrong with that. As long as youโre content itโs okay. It didnโt happen if nobody cares
Not everyone knows how to be happy all the time. You need a reason to be sad. You donโt need a reason to be happy. If one eats the right food (whole fruits), thereโd be enough dopamine, but many donโt nosh the right food, partially causing depression.
My shit is for real. Because majority of celebrities are trannies who've brainwashed all of us very deeply. If not them, there would've been much less leftist conspiracy theories.
Hundreds of civilizations having nothing to do with one another recorded these beings call them "demi gods" with long skulls. Which are still preserved there is a lot more weird shit you'll find too crazy to talk about... just keep these skulls in mind and the idea that another race of special humans has at least at some point walked the earth won't be the dumbest ever.
@pers0n Practices undertaken for religious or reasons related to social and ruling status to artificially elongate skulls like that are known to historians and archeologists. Those are not another species.
@pers0n no dude. That doesn't debunk the debunkers at all. This is another one of those situations where the claim is so outrageous compared to the rational and proven explanation, that it is simply reductio ad absurdum.
@pers0n the man is clearly a crackpot. He has simply says things like "it's not cradle boarding", "this shape cannot be achieved by cradle boarding", "only part of the DNA was human" etc. But he has a rudimentary understanding of things like archeogenetics, ossification, osteogenesis and other disciplines involved which actual scientists have used to determine the cause of the skull shapes.
Such as these skulls have only one parietal bone... "The parietal bones are two bones in the skull which, when joined together at a fibrous joint, form the sides and roof of the cranium" -wikipedia (his reason it is not fully human) Cranial boarding doesn't increase size and volume, only the shape... And overall using common sense look at the bigger picture... the degree of elongation is not achievable.
@pers0n This is an example of a non expert trying to explain away expert findings and explanation with what is simply disinformation caused by an inchoate understanding. Dismissed.
Why are there less number of bones on these skulls even though they are twice the size of a human's skull? There is one plate taking place of several plates on a human skull...
@pers0n that's just what you have been told. There are not. The skulls have been artificially deformed and there have been various different techniques across many cultures throughout history to achieve slightly different results.
@pers0n Easy. The article says this: "Davila Riquelme said three anthropologists, from Spain and Russia, arrived at the museum last week to investigate the findings and agreed it was โnot a human beingโ and would conduct further studies."
No actual report from these scientists has been provided. This is hearsay and clickbait journalism. If you read on, the article actually explains how the skull is most likely the result of head binding.
No it does not explain why it was so huge and the other inconsistencies mentioned. So now we have agreed that huge skulls exist and binding doesn't increase size and volume.
@pers0n Yes it does explain that. Because of artificial deformation. There were no other inconsistencies other than shape and I explained to you that brain shape is also changed. We did not agree at all. You provided no reliable source for your claim of increased cranial capacity. You've shown me nothing but click bait and amateur hour disinformation.
Just think about it for a moment, because this is extremely simple.
Forget everything else.
How is it possible for the entire structure of a building to fail at the same time in a way which would allow the whole thing to collapse at free fall speeds neatly into its own footprint and doubly so when the damage is asymmetrical?
You do not need any kind of specialist knowledge to understand that this is simply not possible and that the only way this could happen is with a controlled demolition and controlled demolition means inside job.
But as I say, just keep it simple for a moment, only focus on the building collapse.
You should be capable even with only an observed understanding of physics from your own life experience to be able to identify that it is not possible for a building to collapse in that manner without it being a controlled demolition.
Even if you ignore the asymemtrical damage and pretend for a moment that you are a wizard and you can just delete 10 stories of the building (that is being generous also but it really doesn't matter) so that the top falls exactly straight down into the remaining structure and even if you say that the force is some how great enough to cause the rest of the tower's structure to fail symetrically, in order for it to fall at free fall speeds that structure has to offer essentially no resistance what so ever.
Hundreds of thousands of tonnes of steel reinforced concrete, no resistance.
Cannot happen.
Has never happened.
No steel reinforced concrete building has ever collapsed as a result of fire in entire history of man kind.
How about Adam Eisenberg who was one of the first people on the ground after the Pentagon was attacked on 9/11. Explaining details how he was shocked that they were NOT allowed to get properly armed, rather were sent to the site unarmed?
How about the previous damage to the buildings that led them to build steel that had to be molten in order for the building to collapse? ...
So what year was it? 2001 or why did we see lots of this shit:
@Guffrus the collapsed due to planes with large quantities of jet fuel crashing into them. Would that result in smoke and fire, yes, but the fire wasn't a factor in them falling.
I sorry to be the bearer of bad news here but my original statement is entirely accurate you are profoundly ignorant and unbelievably arrogant.
You presume to mock and by saying that the dumbest conspiracy theory you know of is 911, you are mocking something about which you literally know nothing.
3 towers fell that day and only 2 were hit by planes.
You keep telling me that no one thinks that fire was a factor even after I have attempted to educate you about the fact that the official fucking narrative is that they collapsed as a result of a fire which cannot burn hot enough to melt steel.
You were about 10 years old when this happened and it is quite obvious that your understanding is that of what a 10 year old boy remembers his television telling him.
If you haven't noticed by now, you are embarrassing yourself, I'm embarrassed for you.
Now you have 2 choices at this point, you can continue to be a profoundly ignorant cunt or you can accept the obvious truth that you have been lied to your whole life and start to learn something about the real world.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
57Opinion
Literally most stuff coming out of the mouths of entitled conservative politicians especially when it comes to the working class citizens
The dumbest one is "Girls wear leggings or short shorts for comfort"
That the US government colluding for 9/11 for an excuse to invade the middle east.
I never got one shot and I'm fine
What does this even mean ๐
That covid must nit be a big thing
Ooo ๐ lol I don't know why it took me so long to get that
There is always a doubting Thomas.
Birds are fake has to be the dumbest on yet.
Flat Earthers.
That Jesus "died for your sins".
Rigged 2020 U. S. election.
Being gay is not wrong or weird
Is that just stating a fact of you find it a conspiracy?
@MAC1983 It is a fact, not about me, and Iโm just saying itโs dumb and icky
Happiness and homosexuality ainโt dumb or icky. The latter is in genetics.
@HippieVeganJewslim so then why canโt everyone be โhappyโ? If kidnapping brown people and ducking them even after they die makes someone happy then there mustnโt be anything wrong with that. As long as youโre content itโs okay. It didnโt happen if nobody cares
Not everyone knows how to be happy all the time. You need a reason to be sad. You donโt need a reason to be happy. If one eats the right food (whole fruits), thereโd be enough dopamine, but many donโt nosh the right food, partially causing depression.
@HippieVeganJewslim every time you lose, you have to open a pack
That men can menstruate and give birth
My shit is for real. Because majority of celebrities are trannies who've brainwashed all of us very deeply. If not them, there would've been much less leftist conspiracy theories.
Our balls give birth to countless sperm cells.
@Luopio27 We are talking about babies, not sperm. And production is not the same as birth.
JFK Jr is still alive and faked his death
The first moon landing was fake.
Trump won the election.
That the royals are lizard people.
We don't see any scales so it's dumb. But there is truth to their special bloodlines being different from ours.
@pers0n They are inbred if that's what you mean. That's the only "special" thing about their bloodline.
Fuck my reply vanished as I was typing...
Hundreds of civilizations having nothing to do with one another recorded these beings call them "demi gods" with long skulls. Which are still preserved there is a lot more weird shit you'll find too crazy to talk about... just keep these skulls in mind and the idea that another race of special humans has at least at some point walked the earth won't be the dumbest ever.
@pers0n Practices undertaken for religious or reasons related to social and ruling status to artificially elongate skulls like that are known to historians and archeologists. Those are not another species.
Debunkers are to be expected, straight off the bat https://youtu.be/xC4kjhE1O-U
Debunking the debunkers
@pers0n no dude. That doesn't debunk the debunkers at all. This is another one of those situations where the claim is so outrageous compared to the rational and proven explanation, that it is simply reductio ad absurdum.
Did you even listen to what he said?
@pers0n the man is clearly a crackpot. He has simply says things like "it's not cradle boarding", "this shape cannot be achieved by cradle boarding", "only part of the DNA was human" etc. But he has a rudimentary understanding of things like archeogenetics, ossification, osteogenesis and other disciplines involved which actual scientists have used to determine the cause of the skull shapes.
Those were the first 5 seconds only...
@pers0n That's all it took to see the guy has no idea. If you had the level of scientific knowledge I do, you would understand.
Such as these skulls have only one parietal bone...
"The parietal bones are two bones in the skull which, when joined together at a fibrous joint, form the sides and roof of the cranium" -wikipedia (his reason it is not fully human)
Cranial boarding doesn't increase size and volume, only the shape...
And overall using common sense look at the bigger picture... the degree of elongation is not achievable.
@pers0n This is an example of a non expert trying to explain away expert findings and explanation with what is simply disinformation caused by an inchoate understanding. Dismissed.
Why are there less number of bones on these skulls even though they are twice the size of a human's skull? There is one plate taking place of several plates on a human skull...
@pers0n that's just what you have been told. There are not. The skulls have been artificially deformed and there have been various different techniques across many cultures throughout history to achieve slightly different results.
" the average modern day human brain mass is between 1130โ1450 cubic centimeters, drawing upon 2 sources. "
This is from another completely unrelated analyst...
The binding does not increase brain mass...
What is your reasoning? What do the debunkers respond with, if any?
@pers0n you've provided no source. Yet more apocryphal disinformation. Look ar yourself. You're choosing to believe absurdity over reliable evidence.
I would appreciate it if you dissect the truth from disinformation here www.dailymail.co.uk/.../...ity-Andahuaylillas.html
@pers0n Easy. The article says this: "Davila Riquelme said three anthropologists, from Spain and Russia, arrived at the museum last week to investigate the findings and agreed it was โnot a human beingโ and would conduct further studies."
No actual report from these scientists has been provided. This is hearsay and clickbait journalism. If you read on, the article actually explains how the skull is most likely the result of head binding.
No it does not explain why it was so huge and the other inconsistencies mentioned. So now we have agreed that huge skulls exist and binding doesn't increase size and volume.
@pers0n Yes it does explain that. Because of artificial deformation. There were no other inconsistencies other than shape and I explained to you that brain shape is also changed. We did not agree at all. You provided no reliable source for your claim of increased cranial capacity. You've shown me nothing but click bait and amateur hour disinformation.
That earth is flat
9-11 was an inside job.
So, you think that buildings fall down at free fall speed neatly into their own footprints?
lol
I'm sorry but you are really fucking dumb.
@Guffrus I higly doubt that it was planned by our government and covered up and bamed on someone who admitted to have planned it.
Sorry I should have said as a result of asymmetrical damage.
Just think about it for a moment, because this is extremely simple.
Forget everything else.
How is it possible for the entire structure of a building to fail at the same time in a way which would allow the whole thing to collapse at free fall speeds neatly into its own footprint and doubly so when the damage is asymmetrical?
You do not need any kind of specialist knowledge to understand that this is simply not possible and that the only way this could happen is with a controlled demolition and controlled demolition means inside job.
@Guffrus and the reason they had planes crash into them, and killed the numerous people in the airplanes and buildings was...
So you can blame someone else.
But as I say, just keep it simple for a moment, only focus on the building collapse.
You should be capable even with only an observed understanding of physics from your own life experience to be able to identify that it is not possible for a building to collapse in that manner without it being a controlled demolition.
Even if you ignore the asymemtrical damage and pretend for a moment that you are a wizard and you can just delete 10 stories of the building (that is being generous also but it really doesn't matter) so that the top falls exactly straight down into the remaining structure and even if you say that the force is some how great enough to cause the rest of the tower's structure to fail symetrically, in order for it to fall at free fall speeds that structure has to offer essentially no resistance what so ever.
Hundreds of thousands of tonnes of steel reinforced concrete, no resistance.
Cannot happen.
Has never happened.
No steel reinforced concrete building has ever collapsed as a result of fire in entire history of man kind.
@Guffrus No one was claiming it was a fire.
How about Adam Eisenberg who was one of the first people on the ground after the Pentagon was attacked on 9/11. Explaining details how he was shocked that they were NOT allowed to get properly armed, rather were sent to the site unarmed?
How about the previous damage to the buildings that led them to build steel that had to be molten in order for the building to collapse?
...
So what year was it? 2001 or why did we see lots of this shit:
@Twalli Wtf are you talking about?
The official story states that the building collapsed as a result of fire.
@Guffrus the collapsed due to planes with large quantities of jet fuel crashing into them. Would that result in smoke and fire, yes, but the fire wasn't a factor in them falling.
I sorry to be the bearer of bad news here but my original statement is entirely accurate you are profoundly ignorant and unbelievably arrogant.
You presume to mock and by saying that the dumbest conspiracy theory you know of is 911, you are mocking something about which you literally know nothing.
3 towers fell that day and only 2 were hit by planes.
You keep telling me that no one thinks that fire was a factor even after I have attempted to educate you about the fact that the official fucking narrative is that they collapsed as a result of a fire which cannot burn hot enough to melt steel.
You were about 10 years old when this happened and it is quite obvious that your understanding is that of what a 10 year old boy remembers his television telling him.
If you haven't noticed by now, you are embarrassing yourself, I'm embarrassed for you.
Now you have 2 choices at this point, you can continue to be a profoundly ignorant cunt or you can accept the obvious truth that you have been lied to your whole life and start to learn something about the real world.
Red pill or blue pill?
Who do you want to be?
flat Earth for the win...
Flat earth or birds aren't real. It's a toss up.
The election was stolen. Covid is fake.
time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/