Polls

What kind of food is too repulsive for you?

I'm very surprised, as all predictions I saw had concluded that it was a coin flip, with a slight edge to Harris. I've always viewed Harris as possibly the least electable candidate in a long time. She laughs at criticism, she doesn't have her own policies, she's immature, and she's a massive liar.

In the debate against Trump, her weakness was very apparent to anyone who pays attention to body language. Her only chance was retaining a little bit of the incumbent advantage, since she was part of the current administration.

Michigan, I was sure Trump had no chance, since Whitmer is so well liked there. Wisconsin was unlikely, but Pennsylvania was a possibility, since the governor split from the Democratic party over the Israel-Palestine conflict, by choosing Israel.

I figured Arizona and Georgia would learn from their mistakes, and go back to being red, so I wasn't surprised there. And Texas, my home state, one has to be delusional, or on serious drugs to think they'd vote blue, so no surprise there, either.

I was shocked that Trump nearly took Virginia, and he took every swing state, including Nevada. The prediction I would've made, if I'd been told 4 years ago came true. Kamala Harris is just about the worst possible candidate in American history, and Trump would crush her easily. And that's exactly how it played out, he even took the popular vote. I'm very happy with the results, and I'm hopeful for the future of America with Trump as our president once again.

Were you surprised?

I quite like the shape

I believe it really started to go downhill for late-Millenials and GenZers for sure. There was such a strong emphasis on standardized testing and strict curriculums, so much that soft skills, socioemotional developmental skills, and interpersonal skills were severely neglected.

Employers often complain GenZ lacks professionalism and other soft skills. This is why. We were raised to sit at desks, do independant schoolwork, and have a 30-minute lunch break. Recess ended in the 5th grade, so that was one less opportunity to freely socialize with peers.

In addition, we have seen a rise in Autistic Spectrum Disorders and psychological disorders over the many years.

I most certainly agree with eliminating the US Dept of Education. I am onboard. They were a huge reason for the decline of the education system. To me, this was too much federal overreach into state affairs.

RFK Jr has stated repeatedly he's not taking away anyone's vaccines, yet people everywhere are fear mongering that he is.

Bucks County commissioners vote to count illegal ballots in Pennsylvania recount - www.msn.com/.../ar-AA1u6J0s?ocid=sapphireappshare

DEMOCRAT PA COMMISSIONERS JUST VOTED TO COUNT ILLEGAL BALLOTS!
They PROUDLY violated the PA Supreme Court's decision, saying:
"Precedent by a court doesn't matter... People violate laws anytime they want." - x.com/boloudon/status/1857149363140600133?s=46

I regret not waiting till marriage to do this. I’ve been with a few girls and I realise why religion teaches this.

Otherwise you’re too focused on very superficial/hedonistic things and losing sight on what’s important and valuable. It’s why love doesn’t even feel real and authentic.

They say you need to test drive it before you buy it, it doesn’t matter if you’re only going to be with one partner and not comparing with x many.

There is talk of adding Rosanne Bar to the panel on The View. Tv show. What do you think?

With social media like instagram. You’re never going to feel rich, pretty, handsome, tall enough. There’s always just too many people with more. It’s quite overwhelming how our society has become so depressing.

People are conscious to it but subconsciously they believe it all, like women expect all these unrealistic things. You see from what they like. I think it also makes a lot of men out there want to give up on playing a game you can’t win.

People want the rare thing, rare for a woman used to be like 1in20 guys, now it’s like 1in2000 guys because of all this abundance of people. 2/3 men are single 18-30.

On one hand it has helped motivate me a lot to keep moving forward.

I got into a debate with another Gagger on this matter earlier today. So MY argument for why I think it's "Guilty unless proven innocent" is...

This was the other person's argument...

Yeah, that's how our legal system works, but what's the actual logic behind it? What specifically is it that makes "Innocent until proven guilty" correct?

I stand by my argument, and one of my professors in college made the same argument. "Innocent until proven guilty" just doesn't make any sense. And is it, really? Take that guy who stabbed those people in Idaho. He didn't even have a trial and the police and media were already saying the guy did it. So how is that "Innocent until proven guilty"?

It's Guilty unless proven Innocent. If you believe it's "Innocent unless proven guilty" prove me wrong.

Also, just because someone is found "innocent" doesn't mean they didn't do it. It just means they had a good lawyer.

Likewise, how many people were found guilty who were actually innocent?

And I'm only talking about the US here. I'm not talking about corrupt countries where police will lock up a random person just so they don't look bad.