Does the Number of sexual partners really matter (Page 5)

[jimmy2]

Wow good my take you said it very well. I bive 2 should start together with a clean slate. If you have to talk nimbers dobit brfore a clean slate. Clear communication is key and with that forgiveness will take both to death we part

[Barry88]

No, for me it doesn't matter. What matters is her present, not her past. In fact, experience can be a good thing. If I would be single again, I would prefer if my next partner would have experience and knows what she wants.

[jshm2]

Depends on lifestyle and aspirations of both. I suppose.

[2021biguy]

I think people with a high body count should get together with someone that has a high body count too. They should be honest with each other, no secret past.

[Shiningtempest]

@aerissa_jade In my opinion, her number of sexual partners really matters. Higher the number of sexual partners, there's an increased chance she'll get sexually transmitted diseases or commit affairs.

[Sparks32]

Sorry for this troll statement but I was the attitude back in the day.
A key that opens many locks is a master key and a lock that is opened by many keys is a shitty lock.

[zeitgeist057]

Objectification at its finest and most literal.

[Anonymous]

To me both men and women shouldn’t be sleeping around. Men are not the best example to follo anyway. Having men sleep around be the norm is stupid and doesn’t make it right.

[Anonymous]

it's your own fault for dick hopping so much and riding the cock carousel as much as you did and whining after how no guy wants you. you brought all that on yourself. nobody forced you to fuck all those guys before you got engaged and when you did get engaged to the first guy he had every right to feel the way he did. you fucked up bottom line

[Anonymous]

Yes, girls having lots of partners is pretty gross to me.
The problem with the idea of the double standard is the assumption that it should apply the same to everyone. That's obviously nonsense. People want different things and so trends in different people wanting different things emerge.

[Jay3344]

I’m down with low numbers for my partner. I’m picky as long as I’m not black out drunk. So my numbers are low.

[Anonymous]

A short answer, yes it does, a girl with a high body count isn't marriage material. And a guy that does, isn't either.

[all_hayl]

This is not an absolute. I know gals who had been promiscuous when they were younger, but they changed their lifestyle and values and had not been with anyone for quite a while.
So there’s that. Everyone has a story to tell.

[Opinion Owner]

@all_hayl You're right, it's not an absolute but personally I don't want a former prostitute or player, everyone is entitled to their own opinion and values. I think high body counts should be with other high body counts, or someone like you that doesn't mind that, but I do.

[AviatorTom]

Only when it's zero. Otherwise, the body count number often depends on the person's age and whether they've been married or single, and it's not that important.

[AviatorTom]

I'd be interested in why one person disagrees with my comment. Do they think that body count IS important, no matter what?

[Idioticsnowfairies]

Hmm... so this is the reason girls seem to be frigid and afraid to have sex with any guys?
Because they're scared of judgement? That's stupid, I jus thought girls didn't like sex much that's why they're usually not open... stop caring about judgement, their judgement doesn't matter... Thanks slut shamers for ruining all my chances 🙄👎

[Idioticsnowfairies]

By the way it's not a double standard, because if girls called guys sluts for fucking a lot we would still do it and wouldn't care... It's jus you girls seem to care about shit that doesn't matter

[ikEVERYTHING]

Yes, I would prefer someone who has had none. Or very limited and then regretful

[livingnightmare]

thats funny because i asked a question here whether they would date a promiscuous person and a lot of this girls here said no. so its just girls being hypocrites. this what feminism has turn girls into.

[Anonymous]

It is something to worry about if you don't want to drastically increase the chances of getting divorced. I prefer to cut my losses so I'm less likely to become another Divorce Statistic.

[nawtee_me]

Not to me. I have a past and would think other do too

[Anonymous]

I think it does matter because I'm really not trying to get STDs the first time I have sex, sooo.

[GreenLanternI0I]

It is not about fear of getting an S. T. D. The heavy problem lies with you getting desensitized from sleeping with so many guys or girls. Everyone reaches the point where they won't be able to stay with one girl or one guy anymore for a long period of time. That is the biggest problem with having way to many partners.

[Opinion Owner]

@GreenLanternI0I And STDs. I think that's the biggest issue. You don't know where this guy's been dipping his penis nor what a girl has had going up in her. You're dumb if you think that's more important than fuckin' STDs.

[GreenLanternI0I]

So, what you are saying is if S. T. D. didn't exist at all, let's just take S. T. D. fully out of equation. Hell, let's even take getting accidently pregnant fully out of equation, you think it would be perfectly fine to sleep with as many partners as it is physically possible?

[Opinion Owner]

@GreenLanternI0I Well no, I don't think sleeping with a bunch of people is good at all lol.

[GreenLanternI0I]

So if it is not the fear of S. T. D. and pregnancy and if you don't like the idea of sleeping with an army of guys or guys sleeping with an army of girls and let's be realistic here, if a person slept with at least 3 partners he or she will not stop at that number. So, maybe I am right, that amount does matter GREATLY!! and not of fear of getting an STD, but of a problem of complete desensitization of seeing girls as girls and not fleshly masturbation objects and seeing guys as guys and not as a pleasure sticks. And if I'm wrong, please, elaborate your answer in a Respectful and Logical way. Thank You!

[acooke-13]

It doesn't matter aslong as you are careful and practice safe sex.

[VikingWarLord]

I've had over 500+ women

Whenever I've told a b! sh my count, I've never had her run off, so it must not matter

[Aerissa_Jade]

Curious, are you married?

[VikingWarLord]

What you think?

[marish01]

That is gross. A manwhore is a turn off.

[VikingWarLord]

@marish01 There's nothing fuuuckin wrong with sex.
Before the European Christians came to the Americas, virtually ALL Native American Tribes were polyamorous and the women were more sexually liberated than your modern feminist. Your mindset is what caused the Europeans to torture Natives Americans and burn them at the stake. STOP THE FUUCKIN SLLUT SHAMING AND NUDE SHAMING. sex is as natural and normal as drinking water. People like you need to go the way of the dinosaur, it's time for a new breed of people who aren't so obsessed with shaming people for sex and nudity.

[marish01]

You sound like an animal.
What does dinasuars have to do with my mindset?
People in the dinasaur era were not sexually moral like me. They were like you.
If you think sex is as normal as drinking water then you do it with your mom, sister and daughter.

[marish01]

By the way there is nothing wrong with being turned off by promiscuity. You can't force me to be atteacted to sluts. It's impossible.

[VikingWarLord]

@marish01 You sound like a RACIST.
Were those other cultures like the Native Americans or the Indians (from India) or Egyptians, etc.. acting like ANIMALS because they practiced and enjoyed open sexuality? People like you make me fuuuckin sick! You're the exact type of person who is probably OFFENDED when a mother breast-feeds in public. I'm glad people like you are starting to phase out though.

[VikingWarLord]

@marish01 P. S. I ain't forcing you to believe anything. You're the one trying to FORCE others to believe that sex and nudity are evil. You're not gonna change my mind on that. Thankfully many other cultures aren't as uptight as this one in America. Go over to Thailand, SouthEast Asia, Eastern Europe or other parts of the world and they see sex and nudity as no big deal. You're probably some hypocrite Christ-turd that doesn't even read the Bible but you wanna push your moral dogma bullsh! t onto everyone else. Go take your Screwed up beliefs elsewhere, they don't work on me.

[marish01]

So you didn't even denying that you believe it's okay to fuck your mother, daughter and sister as according to you sex is like drinking water.
This is beyong disgusting. I'm glad not many people think like you.
I am not forcing you to change. Your level of immorality will never change. You can't rise to my level.
As a man you're a turn off. A man who has been inside so many women has no standards and no values. Your dick is as disgusting as shit.
I hope you will never have a daughter. The poor girl will get to see you naked and think it's fine. Not to mention she will get banged by you when she is 18 and if you think she is hot.

[VikingWarLord]

@marish01 We know that fucking your family members produces children that have many fucked up problems (mental and physical). You're creating a strawman fallacy and attacking that, you're not attacking me or my arguments. You're a narrow-minded CUUNT and I'll be glad when you go the way of the dinosaur. Hopefully you got your DEATH VACCINE too. The less people we have of you on earth, the better.

[VikingWarLord]

@marish01 P. S. And you're showing your RACISM again. READ BELOW (were these Native American Tribes ANIMALS too you fuuckin racist POS?)

*BEFORE THE EUROPEANS CAME TO THE AMERICAS, VIRTUALLY ALL NATIVE TRIBES WERE POLYAMOROUS*

*1. SENECA NATIVE American TRIBE ON SEX AND MARRIAGE*

The Seneca tribe of the Iroquois Nation is one of the many indigenous societies to practice polygamy and polyandry as the standard for human relationships. It was normal for men and women to have more than one life partner, creating a family structure that wasn’t simply dependent upon two-parent child-rearing or relationships, but rather a network of support between all partners. Having more than one husband or wife wasn’t simply about sexual relations, as many contemporary critics of polygamy and polyandry tend to assume. But rather it was about love, partnership, and sex being experiences that didn’t have to remain restricted between two individuals. And yes, women valued these experiences too. For more on the Iroquois, read Barbara Mann’s book entitled, “Iroquoian Women.”

[VikingWarLord]

@marish01 *2. COMANCHE NATIVE American TRIBE*

Weyodi O’Clerc Stern says this about her own Comanche Tribe :
“My tribe, the Comanches, for instance were traditionally polyamorous, with both women and men free to take more than one spouse. As it was explained to me by my elders when a woman married a man she also married his brothers.

Instead of the hokey “blood brother” (which is actually a European tradition) nonsense, a Comanche man would be considered the brother of any man who had had sexual relations with his wife. Women also made men brothers without their consent. Even when approaching the other man for redress of wrongs in such a case, the first husband had to address his wife’s paramour as “brother”.

The deed was done, the men would be brothers for the rest of their lives. On the other side women were sisters who had sexual relations with the same man and when a man married a woman he also married her sisters. When speaking to my husband my grandmother consistently referred to my sisters as “your other wives” and to my sisters and me she would indiscriminately refer to any one of her grandson-in-laws as “your husband”. I always had to ask her ‘Which one?’”

---

*3. NAVAJO NATIVE American TRIBE*

Former Navajo tribal chairman Peter MacDonald explains Navajo polygyny this way: “A man would marry a woman, then work hard for his family. If she had a sister who was not married, and if the man proved to be caring, a good provider, and a good husband, he would be gifted with his wife’s sister, marrying her as well.”

[VikingWarLord]

@marish01 *4. PAWNEE NATIVE American TRIBE*

Polyandry (the marriage of one woman to more than one man at the same time) was found among many of the tribes. This practice was often not recognized by Europeans, including many ethnographers, as it seemed so alien to them. The Pawnee, for example, practiced a form of temporary polyandry. When a boy reached puberty, his mother’s brother’s wife would take charge of him and initiate him into sex. He would continue having sex with her until he married. For a period of four or five years, the young man, and perhaps his brothers as well, would be a junior husband for this woman, creating a temporary state of polyandry. Polyandry also occurred as a form of an anticipatory levirate.

In Native American cultures, marriage was neither religious nor civil. There was usually no religious ceremony involved, only a public recognition of the fact of marriage. In most cases there was no formal ceremony. The couple simply started living together. In most Native American cultures, nearly all adults were married, yet marriage was not seen as permanent. It was recognized that people would be together in a married state for a while and then separate. Divorce was accomplished easily since the couple did not own property in common. Each partner simply picked up his or her personal property and left.

Divorce was neither a civil nor a religious concern-this was a private matter among the people involved. While some American commentators bemoan the negative impact of divorce upon children, in Native cultures, each child had many fathers, many mothers, and many siblings. A child was not property but a member of a large family and thus had rights. Since divorce was accepted and the raising of the child was the responsibility of many relatives, not just the biological mother and father, divorce does not appear to have had negative impact on the children.

[VikingWarLord]

@marish01
*5. HAWAI'I / INUIT / YANOMAMO NATIVE TRIBES*

Informal polyandry is a feature of some hunter-gatherer societies, such as the Inuit of northern North America, or the Yanomamo of the Orinoco river basin in South America. The concepts of premarital and extramarital sexual activities were absent, and it was probably true of Hawai‘i, as it was said to have been true of much of Polynesia, that “there are no people in the world who indulge themselves more in their sensual appetites than these”
(Ellis, 1782, Vol. 2, p. 153).

[VikingWarLord]

@marish01 *6. AMAZONIAN NATIVE TRIBES*

Few cultures are as sexually liberated as those of the ancient Amazon rainforest. Nearly 70 percent of the tribes practiced multiple paternity, in which all of a woman’s sexual partners were fathers to her children. It was commonplace for people to be open about having multiple sexual partners in the ancient Amazon. Open sexual arrangements were socially accepted, even expected, according to anthropologist Robert Walker. And these multiple attachments were anything but casual. Men acted as father figures to the children of any and all of their partners. A woman could marry one man, making him the primary father to her children, but all the other men in her life would be considered vital secondary fathers.

[VikingWarLord]

As Walker explains, this was partly because of the ancient Amazonians’ rather unique take on genetics:

*“In these cultures, if the mother had sexual relations with multiple men, people believed that each of the men was, in part, the child’s biological father. It was socially acceptable for children to have multiple fathers, and secondary fathers often contributed to their children’s upbringing. In some Amazonian cultures, it was bad manners for a husband to be jealous of his wife’s extramarital partner. It was also considered strange if you did not have multiple sexual partners. Cousins were often preferred partners, so it was especially rude to shun their advances.”* (end quote)

For children, having as many fathers as possible had its advantages. More dads meant more gifts and support for the child, which is known to increase a youngster’s odds of reaching adulthood. Besides, it was a rather pragmatic solution to a basic fact of life in a culture where warfare was all too common and brutal. If a child’s primary father died, he or she would have other males around to step in and act as father figures, easing the newly widowed mother’s burden.

Men also benefited from this system. Sharing paternity brought men together, cementing bonds and friendships (basically, just like Three Men and a Baby, just with less Steve Guttenberg). Indeed, one of the best ways for two men to cement an alliance was to share wives, often in a family – brothers were some of the most frequent wife-sharers According to Walker’s new research, of 128 indigenous groups in lowland South America, 53 are known to practice multiple paternity, while only 23 are known to practice single paternity. The remaining 52 don’t have clear conception beliefs, making it difficult to know whether they once possessed this custom. That means at least 40% and perhaps as much as 70% of these groups once practiced multiple paternity, which definitely means it was a common feature of Amazonian civilization.

[VikingWarLord]

@marish01 *7. MOCHE, MEHINKU AND GUAJIRO NATIVE TRIBES*

The Moche Tribe existed along north coast of Peru from 200 AD to 850 AD. It was a complex, state level society that covered a large geographical area. Their cities, temples, and agriculture dotted the northern Peruvian coastline in what are considered two factions of the Moche: the Northern and Southern. The Moche are probably best known and recognized for their complex pottery styles.

The Moche erotic pottery is characterized by the various sexual acts depicted, which include acts of oral, vaginal, and anal sex as well as masturbation. These acts are most commonly shown between a man and a woman, although male on male homosexual acts are present, too. Although heterosexual sexual relations are the most common it is interesting to note that vaginal sexual acts are the most rarely depicted. Common sexual acts demonstrated in Moche erotic pottery are (in order of most common to least common) heterosexual anal sex, acts of masturbation, and heterosexual oral sex. There are also several vases that portray males with their erect penises. These pieces are known as phallic libations. These are functional ceramics used as pouring vessels, with the erect penis being used as the spout.

There are some other oddities in Latin America when it comes to mating. A small village in Brazil called Mehinaku is a place where size really does matter. This refers not to the size of your package, but rather the size of your catch. There, men compete for partners and sex by presenting women with fish. The man with the largest fish wins the girl. Among those in the Guajiro tribe of Colombia, much like singles in the US, this indigenous group scores on the dance floor. The Guajiro ladies catch a fella by tripping him during their ceremonial dances. If she trips him, they must have sex.

[marish01]

I am not going to read your advertisement of polygamy.
You are a turn off yourself so reading your opinion on sex might decrease my libido.
I am sure you turn on women with low self worth and mebtal issues like yours.
And please understand what racism is before accusing me of racism.
I hate polyamory, promiscuity, cheating, group sex, etc. I don't hate races.

[marish01]

Not all sexual acts result in pregnancy.
So the only bad thing about incest is pregnancy? 🤦🏻‍♀️🤦🏻‍♀️😉

[marish01]

The last emoji was a typo

[VikingWarLord]

@marish01 I'm showing you RACES of people such as the Native American Indian Tribes (most of them) who were POLYAMOROUS and engaged in lots of sex. You think it's GROSS and that it's acting like an ANIMAL. That's pretty dammn racist !

[VikingWarLord]

@marish01 And the Ancient Egyptians would indeed have sex with family members. It was typically BROTHER AND SISTER having sex. Whether you want to go that far with it is subjective to the reader, the point I'm making is that two consenting adults should feel free to have as much SEX as they want without feeling shamed for it by narrow-minded rettards like you! And there's nothing wrong with NUDITY either. You're probably one of those KARENS who sneers at women who breast-feed their baby in public aren't ya?

[marish01]

Go to those ancient times. You don't sound like civilized person.
You just approved of incest and your justication for it is how people engaged in it in ancient times

[VikingWarLord]

@marish01 RACISM just flowing our of your mouth more and more. And it's not just in ancient times, I've done my entire thesis on this and turned it into a Mini-Book. There are still cultures who practice polygamy, incest, etc.. all over the world. Go open a book and study other cultures, your brain is too small to even debate with. You're just a brainless twit who can't think for yourself.

[marish01]

I think for myself and that is why I don't share views of many people.
I don't hate any race. I hate IMMORAL ACTS OF ANY RACE.
WHOEVER DOES THAT.
DOESN'T MATTER THE RACE.
I am not a twit because unlike you I don't justify incest.
You have such a beta essence that makes me think you're a cuck. Although I'm sure you are since you love shared paternity.

[VikingWarLord]

@marish01 You just called ENTIRE RACES nothing more than wild ANIMALS who engage in evil sexuality. Your opinion doesn't matter, you're some overweight American idiot who gorges on McDonalds everyday. I'm very sure of that.

[marish01]

I think for myself and that is why I don't share views of many people.
I don't hate any race. I hate IMMORAL ACTS OF ANY RACE.
WHOEVER DOES THAT.
DOESN'T MATTER THE RACE.
I am not a twit because unlike you I don't justify incest.
You have such a beta essence that makes me think you're a cuck. Although I'm sure you are since you love shared paternity.
Grow some balls.
All you have in your head is instinct and nothing else.
Such a boring person.

[VikingWarLord]

@marish01 by the way cuckolds are those who share their wife or girlfriend. That's their prerogative to do so, I don't settle for any one female, and have lots of b! she's ready to let me blow their back out tonight if I wanted to go screw them. I'm not an alpha either though, I'm a Zeta, I live by my own rules! I don't provide for any one woman and I don't take care of anyone's snot nosed rug-rats. I screw as many women as I like and move onto the next. And there's NOTHING wrong wit that sh! t either

[VikingWarLord]

@marish01 Watch this and open your mind. I'm so glad I'm not an American, most of you are brainwashed idiots and will never come out of it.

https://youtu.be/88WojS-T6-g

[marish01]

I'm not going to watch disgusting things.
Incest is disgusting. It only appeals disgusting people.
Only sluts might be attracted to you. And you can't date because you're not interesting enough to build a relationship.
Anyone can fuck. But building a relationship requires lots of GOOD QUALITIES WHICH YOU LACK.

[VikingWarLord]

@marish01 I ain't a relationship type, I never claimed to be. What's gross are your faat rolls from eating too much McDonalds, that's much of a bigger issue than anything else we've talked about here. And you're not fit to be in a relationship when you can't even take care of your health and keep your weight down! Go work out and walk around some to get that faat off and get off the internet eating your twinkies and donuts.

[marish01]

I didn't say you claimed to be monogamous. I said you are not interesting enough to be able to build a relationship.
Slut want your dick because that is what you're all about.
I weigh 48 kg.
And I don't like Mc donalds. I only like their ice creams.

[VikingWarLord]

@marish01 Not interesting enough yet you just followed me. You don't even know me yet you judge what my personality is.
And there's no gawdam way you're only 50kg. PROVE THAT SH! T, you look like you have chubby cheeks there.

[marish01]

I followed accidentally. Why did you follow me?
Accidentally?
I doubt it

[VikingWarLord]

@marish01 How did I guess? You're the type to shame women for publicly breast-feeding their kid. LOL
So easy to spot people like you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGskWVk6ls8