Do you believe one woman’s trash is another woman’s treasure?

[Anonymous]

Aka womens ex’s

Yes (put why)

No (put why)

[NZGirl07]

Yes but it depends on the reasons for the breakup. If a man was a cheater, manipulative, or an abuser etc of course not he is just always trash. But if two people were just incompatible, not ready for a relationship or met at the wrong time then yes of course he can be another woman's treasure.

[LazerBean]

Only to a very small degree. Just because a man is not compatible with a woman does not make him trash. To her or anyone else.

In a more literal sense. I believe trash is trash. Just because some people happen to want trash doesn't make that person any less trash.

[Asker]

I agree whole heartedly!

[Vegasrunner]

@LazerBean I disagree, bevause you could consider a guy trash but a hotter woman considers him valuable, therefore his value would increase in the eyes of others.

[LazerBean]

This literally what I said.

[Vegasrunner]

@LazerBean I'm referring to the part where you claim "just bevause some people happen to want trash doesn't make that person less valuable" It would raise their value no?

[LazerBean]

No, it would not. If one person in the world decided they wanted used and empty candy wrappers, would the value of a candy wrapper raise above $0.00? No.

[Vegasrunner]

@LazerBean You do realize this has actually happened in the world b4. Go research Tulip mania. Economics is based on supply and demand. If one person decides they want used and empty candy wrappers, and I have empty candy wrappers, I would first make sure I limited his ability to get empty candy wrappers and then sell him the empty candy wrappers for a price determined by me. This is literally Economics 101. This is also o e of the reasons women spend so much time attempting to shame men who have a lot of women. Most women inherently understand that they are the demand, and if they limit the customers (men) access to other women then their value goes up because he has fewer options. If you don't know these things you shouldn't spend your time dialouging w/ me you should go educate yourself. This is why we have bosses and workers. Gl to you.

[LazerBean]

actually if one person decided they wanted empty candy wrappers, you would never be able to determine a price for them because they would never go to you for the first place. They would get one out of the trash. Literally logic 101.

As for Economics 101, there's Inherent value vs artificial value. Even in your own example, the candy wrapper itself still has no value. It is the desire of a large amount of people that has value, not the candy wrapper itself. Which is why a good man will always be valuable, while a rich but otherwise detestable man is only valuable for as long as he is rich. Since you don't know those things, you should probably stop talking to me and go educate yourself instead. That'll take you a long time at the rate of your comprehensive abilities, so have a good day 😉

[Vegasrunner]

@LazerBean Yes for a micro thinker that is exactly right. That's because you're focused on the result of one hypothetical situation. Poor people do this all the time. Macro thinkers recognize that their is a demand for a product and attempt to figure out why. Rich people do this all the time. For instance why would someone need a candy wrapper?

[LazerBean]

I see you still haven't gotten a grasp on inherent value vs artificial value. Do you happen to be the same guy I was arguing with a while back who thinks that a man that rapes his infant child is as valuable as every other man? It's the same concept. Just because there might be a woman out there who will have him doesn't make him any less of a piece of shit who deserves to die in the most horrendous way possible and who is worthless aside from possibly organ harvesting. But I know you with that.

[Vegasrunner]

@LazerBean TY for sharing but I can't speak to a conversation I'm not involved in and I don't see an answer to my question in there. The fact that you can't answer shows that you're simply arguing for the sake of arguing as it doesn't look like you have any points rooted in fact.

[MCheetah]

"Only to a very small degree." - LazerBean
(Don't assume anything. Just laugh.)

"I'd say garbage is a more accurate term, as trash is man-made, while garbage is more organic waste. 'One woman’s garbage is another woman’s fertilizer." - Mcheetah

[inhua]

if he was good enough for one woman, he should be good enough for another woman of similar level.

if he wasn't good enough for any one woman of any level, he won't be good enough for any other woman of any other level. basically he remains trash.

[BlueScorpio]

Yes, what one person doesn't like someone else will.

[Smoothing]

Absolutely and it happens all the time. Some women feel so entitled and when they are with a man, they don't treat them well, where ax another woman who can see the value of that man will treat that man very well and bring out the best in him and in turn the man will appreciate her and never leave her because he would feel how well the woman is treating compared to his ex.

[Fireguy17]

yes, some people are just not suited to be with each other, so just because it didn't work out between those two, that doesn't mean that it wouldn't work out between someone else and him.
plus, she may have been the reason it didn't work out, or a big part of it.

[melanieeeB]

It could be, sometimes one person might be awful to one partner but a totally different person so another parent and sometimes they stay awful lol

[Sour-rose]

In a way... what @LazerBean said. Because there are not many things that a woman doesn't want that another woman has had.

What a man throws away however... well they throw away some good shi.

[petitedollbabee]

I guess so? Just because one woman was not compatible with said man, doesn’t mean the next woman won’t be compatible with him. We’re all trash in our exes eyes lol. Doesn’t stop us from finding the right lover in the future.

[rosek]

Are you assuming no one has exes? To answer "no" it means you assume everyone finds their soul mate on the first try. That's simply not true.

[Asker]

I never said that

[CallmeTheKnight]

Depends. If she has poor taste, she just picks trash.
If the man was a good man, then she was never the woman for him.

[Jersey2]

Yes, of course. Some people are shallow so they only see part of a person. Some are not big thinkers and really can’t think about the future and who is best suited for a life long relationship.

[fonduegirl]

Depends on why the guy got dumped. If she left because he's a cheater... Well, not much of a treasure now is he?

[fembotnpc777]

Sometimes yes, but I put no, because usually trash is just trash.

[YourFavoriteFriend]

Simply. If that woman is trash, then yes. If she's not trash, then no.

[JHNS98]

You can't change anyone but yourself, so it's a no from me.

[FilmGuy93]

Considering the shit women are happy to throw away? Unquestionably.

[AdithyaR]

I've only ever been someone's trash so i don't think so 🤣

[PinkRose24]

Start calling yourself recyclables 😂 lol jk

[Aakash_Hangargi]

Good one 😂

[AdithyaR]

@PinkRose24 pretty sure I'm a perishable 🤣, not recycle friendly

[Anonymous]

I like to think so considering I've been ghosted and most likely cheated on. Oh and she found a rich man in a bigger city where she spent her vacation at, so she simply became a gold digger.

[Anonymous]

Lol no! If he's garbage then he's garbage. If she considered him to have a trash personality than he's garbage.

[Vivaldi]

I was going say yes but I choosed no by mistake.

[Anonymous]

Most of the time women are the cause of their own issues in relationships.

[Anonymous]

One's a trash a always a trash 🗑️.

by the way also applies to women as well as men.

[Nomina]

I won't put why 😏

[Jamie05rhs]

Two words: Pete. Davidson.

[bamesjond0069]

No because y'all don't want virgins. Lol