
True or False: Almost everyone can find a partner as long as they have reasonable expectations?


True.
But it’s more difficult for women to aim lower. Because we’re more likely to be affected for life, after a pregnancy. We could also die from a pregnancy. Postpartum Depression is absolutely mortifying.
Hair and Teeth could fall off from pregnancy. Complications could arise in any pregnancy. Our vagina could be loosened for life after pushing out a baby. There is wayy to much risk. For us to select undesirables. And mate with undesirables or men over the age of 40.
Too much risk. You would only understand if you felt a period cramp. Or felt childbirth. If you had uterus, and were at risk of pregnancy every second that a men inserted a penis, you’d understand.
Us women much rather risk all that trauma and stress from mating with a male of good genetics. Good genetics is seen in how easily you can make muscles. And also seen from the shape of your head and hairline. It’s easily seen on just the shape of your skull alone. It’s also noticeable on the depth of your voice. If you have a “deep thunderous voice”. It means you have higher testosterone than the average. Women are attracted to these traits. Aroused by these traits. And of course, youth. A man past the age of 35 is more likely to lose testosterone by the day.


Men are more likely to date down. And screw whatever, because nothing happens to them every time they release their nut into someone.
Not women. We’re the ones who suffer the consequences of sex. Even with birth control available everywhere, our brains are hardwired to reject everyone except for a Chad. In fact, it’s extremely difficult to reject the “one ☝️ Chad” you find. If you find one. It literally feels like finding gold, amongst dirt. No offense.
It’s nature, it’s biology, it’s genetics. If we are an ugly woman and we choose to reproduce with an ugly man. It’s a higher chance that we’ll create an ugly baby. It’s higher chance that child will be born with the BAD GENES of both parents. That is another factor women take into account. Even if we’re ugly or fat. WE ARE NOT REPRODUCING WITH UGLY OR FAT.
I don’t understand why I keep having to teach men this #blackpill
@coachtanthony
In fact if we are an ugly woman or bad genes. Or fat or obese or overweight.
We rather stay single, alone, and die alone without a partner.
50 years ago, there was more men with Chad traits and Chad genetics, as well as higher testosterone. That has changed. In the last 20 or 10 years. Most men have Incel, Low Testosterone traits. So women naturally are fighting over a 1% of men with Chad genetics.
@emyywolf Chads will bang anyone so when a woman of average looks and status gets to bang a Chad they somehow think they deserve a high status male to settle down with...(which we all know are two different things) so they choose to stay single in their delusion instead of giving really good guys of their own average looks a chance.
It’s biology. 🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️ I don’t know what to tell you.
A ”chance” at what? At cloning more bad genes?
A smart woman who’s average. If smart. She takes the seed of the warrior and makes the degenerate geek feed her offspring. It is, what it is. This is what they all should do.
It was better back in the day when no fool could test for paternity. Then women could really get away with it. Our ancestors weren’t the undesirables 😂. Women were having sneaky sex with the Warriors.
If I was ugly, I would keep the sperm of Chad someplace frozen. And then marry the ugly, and later inject myself with the Warrior seed.
@emyywolf That is true. Lorenzo Lamas was the warrior back in the 90's and he was married 5 times and had 6 kids. Women didn't care if he was married before or had children. They wanted the warrior seed like you said lol
@coachtanthony
Exactly….
I feel like the fix would be if the testosterone of young men today was somehow fixed or it increased. Look up “atrazine” it’s in the water of all USA 🇺🇸. It feminizes men.
This might seem degrading and it's not my intention but a romantic match is a lot like a shopping trip. If you choose something that matches your budget and your professional abilities to pay off the loan, you can get the product. But some products are useless and some products are fake and some products are toxic and lead to problems.
I’d say that it’s true, generally speaking.
For example, if one is a 10 themselves, it’s not unreasonable for them to find another 10 to pair with.
If someone is a 8, it will not be that difficult to pair with a fellow 8.
A man should not be upset that he cannot get a princess, if he is not a prince.
A woman should not be upset that she cannot get a prince, if she is not a princess.
The issue is that many people want the best, without doing the work it takes to deserve the best.
Do you want a completely emotionally stable person, with no mental health issues, who communicates very well, and knows how to resolve conflicts maturely?
That person is going to have standards and will want you to be able to reciprocate that.
One must meet the standards of those whom they are pursuing, otherwise they won’t find success.
So if someone is just slightly above average, then they should only expect other people who are slightly above average to be interested in them.
For them to be a 6 and angry that they cannot attract a 10, they are being unreasonable, whether or not they are a man or a woman.
That's true for the most part. My friend says the reason I don't have a girlfriend is because my standards are "higher than a yeti on top of Mount Everest". Most of my standards have to do with their behavior and intelligence and aren't unreasonable. No current or former drug addicts, no psych meds, no women who don't have enough common sense to keep themselves safe and out of trouble or who are not street smart, no women that make poor life decisions, no women that have served time in jail or prison (unless it's for fighting, I can deal with that), no women who get drunk all the time, no vaxtards, no libtards, no religious lunatics, no racists, no materialistic women or status chasers, no women that hate doing outdoorsy stuff and scream like a child about bugs, no women who can't think for themselves and who blindly accept what the media tells them, no women who don't stand up for themselves, no women who don't like old cars, no vegans. I'm not so picky about looks. As long as she isn't fatter than me, doesn't have a face like a bulldog, and doesn't smell like a sack of onions.
Opinion
52Opinion
True to the question but I mainly came to laugh at the photo😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣
That phhooto is hilarious
True but I'd argue they don't even need to have reasonable expectations Tbh. They just need to be decent people to be around for the most part. I notice that extremely caring types of people can get in relationships even if they aren't the best looking.
Usually true, but some people really are totally undateable
MOSTLY TRUE. Some people are rather unpleasant looking so they may have to accept that and aim a little lower than they're willing.
I see this all the time on G@G where women complain that they can't get guys to approach them that they want. But all these butterfaced slack-jawed guys hit on them. And how do you tell these women that there's no Santa Claus?😆 You want prime rib you can't offer bologna. Most of these women will not accept they're punching far above thier weight.
And I'm not picking on women here. Because guys are generally 3 times worse.
I think so, but not only do people need to have realistic expectations, most people are going to need to put in some real work to both meet people and to vet people. Most people aren't going to have a "romantic comedy" experience - for most people, the process is going to be closer to being a hiring manager trying to fill a C-suite position - you are going to have to filter through many people to find the best candidates, and then vet the finalists thoroughly.
No or at least having "reasonable expectations" is not enough because you need a person interested in you. If you don´t manage to change that you can lower your expectations as much as you want.
Having a partner is a privilege in history not everybody had and not everybody will have since who wants to be in a relationship so he/she can say they are taken but they are actually not happy?
I always felt I may have had lower standards through the years (obviously my wife is the exception). The reason I say that is because the girls I dated never played hard to get or even showed signs of not being intetested in the beginning. I was interested and they were all over me. That had me thinking I might be able to do better if I work at it. I don't know but yes, I totally agree with your statement.
@VIVANT No, it's simply that they showed interest, so I did but they weren't necessarily what I was looking for. Not that they weren't great girls! I loved them all but I was always wondering if I lost out. Fortunately, I found my true love and yes, it didn't come easy. I had to grow a pair of balls and ask her out and let her know I was interested. Not that she played hard to get but she also didn't throw herself at me. It's my story and my thoughts.
It's definitely true.. Also if people don't write somebody off just because they do one thing you don't like.. People have this illusion of choice, when in reality you'll just end up alone going on a thousand dates
No. Love is not guaranteed in life. If you're suffering from autism where you can't communicate or understand communication like a normal person or you don't have enough money as a man your chances are very low most likely impossible.
As a woman you will be fine though.
It is very easy to find a partner if you have the motivation and the right attitude.
And like the happy couple in the photo, 👍🏻👀 are okay 😁👍🏻 as realistic 🤩
I liked the couple, personally 👍🏻 also
"Reasonable" must mean " very low" expectations.
Reasonable expectations should be a partner without a past of promiscuity, drugs, and that is fair and contributes close to the same to the relationship, and doesn't expect to gain an unfair legal advantage (marriage without a prenuptial agreement), but that is nearly impossible to find.
No, some people are just not datable. Sad but true
This is why I said Almost not everyone.
Probably except that mist women don't have reasonable expectations because they all think they are 10's.
Many think they can get with a 10 because maybe they got smashed by one at one time in their life.
I suppose so but personally I think it is better to stay alone..
Imagine being single beats being in a relationship with gold diggers, single mothers, drug junkies, welfare collectors (while unemployed or not disabled), abusers, social media addicts, cheaters, bemyhole models and so on.
True. there's 8.1 billion people in the world currently. Odds are in our favorite to find at least one person out of that lol
absolutely false
people are relying on faulty mathematics, outliers, anomalies and exceptions as if they are the norm
those are NOT the norm
some women are marrying their dogs too. that in itself isn't reasonable at all
For women true.
For men false.
There will always be the bottom of the barrel men that no woman wants. Hence incels.
There are bottom of the barrel women. But even those women don't want the men who are incels.
I think it is female nature to reject the bottom of the male population and that will never change.
I agree. It ticks them off, but when guys tell me they are InCels I ask if they'd get turned down by a meth addict (yes, I know it is extreme). To a man they say they would never. To that I say, "So you are not really an InCel, you just have too high a set of standards." Not that they should date meth addicts, but the reality is that these guys won't consider normal, average girls.
Yes. And goals. Couple goals 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻😋 really, I really appreciate that example.
Sure is a valuable insightful point question. Mmm. Then again, should I settle for less than I think I should? 😬😬😬👀👀👀😄
True, you can always marry a crack addict whore.
But I guess it’s more aligning your wants with reality. Demi Moore or the girls from Friends go through hours of makeup and skin tanning. That’s not real. Magazine covers of perfect men/women aren’t real. I’ve been hired to photoshop them.
False.
Just as some people cannot (and should not) be employed, as they pose a danger to themselves and others, so it is with dating.
Some people just cannot be allowed near other people.
I mean honey booboo's mom had a man... so yeah pretty sure almost anyone can find someone
That's generally true, I think. It depends how practical you are in nature. You can find a decent, intelligent person to spend your life with if you really want to. If you're hanging out for a true romance or that "spark" though, it can be much harder to find (especially as you get older). It really comes down to the individual and what is most important to them in life. Many people will stay in relationships that aren't great, because they fear being alone..
This stretches the meaning of "almost". For about 10% of men it is extremely tough to get a woman and aome may never succeed regardless of expectations.
I agree…
I'm not so sure! I believe I have reasonable expectations, but I seem unable to find a partner in crime!
Yes. You've also got to value yourself but also be realistic.
Totally agree.
Unfortunately, that's not how the world works.
Absolutely true
there nothing wrong with average
I think people would have to get past the initial appearance thing and actually seek out someone that is truly meant for them.
I concur! Mutual respect and compromise go along way in a new and nurturing relationship. Afterall you wouldn't want to date yourself now would you?
No, I don't think so. I think it is equally tough even if the expectations are reasonable.
False. You also have to be enjoyable to be around. There's too many people who refuse to work on themselves.
No.
My expectations are pretty low and i haven't found anyone.
I mean the last 2 years i haven't even bothered to meet anyone so there's that.
But even before that i had no chance.
I'd say true.
"Reasonable expectations" or not, anyone can really find a partner.
True but doesn't mean you can stay whom you are or want to stay as you are.
For me personally, 'reasonable expectations' is begging them to let me kiss their ass... lol
False, no matter how long you can look, people can find even the smallest things to hate you for
True I just did not know the cost and take 8 years to find her
Depends how flexible you are with the term 'almost'. I've not really had any opportunities to hold someone up against a set of standards.
Yes/ A guy on here wants a young girl who hasn't had any previous relationships and who is a virgin. He's approaching 30 and is not a virgin.
yea it might be true, today people expect too much. the women think instagram is real and the men don't want fat women but they're all getting fat
Yes I believe there is someone for everyone
I don't think that's true. there are people who have low expectation but then they can't find anyone either.
That is why I didn't say "ALL"
Maybe they need higher expectations?
Absolutely. People just need to be realistic and self-aware.
False. Besides death and taxes, there are no guarantees in life. You're not guaranteed love or relationships. Some people win and others lose
With my own experiences, I can't say I do agree with this.
Statistically false. There are more single guys on the dating market than single women.
False. A lot of people are simply undesirable by the opposite or even their own sex.
these days Women: men ratio getting more than 1...
so couple of women for men living currently so for me slightly difficult
almost true but not all.
Yes true, I have seen all types of couples.
True.
I agree completely, coach!
Very true
True
Yes, that's true.
and if they lower their standards, sure
You can also add your opinion below!