
Men have more to offer and more to lose in marriage and relationships as a whole. Can you prove me wrong?


Can't prove you wrong at all.
Few, very few examples, of the man getting to take half her shit and money, take the kids and collect child support, take the dogs, get paid alimony, collect half her retirement check, et cetera.
Pretty sure if the man is cheating, spends all the money, nags and constantly start fights, refuses to fuck, gets really fat and stops showering... courts would take that into account, but it's "no fault" divorce if the women does it... you could fact check me on that, I'm not a lawyer.
It really makes me wonder about these guys that let themselves get talked into it, just because the clam is currently good enough to keep around, and then wonder why they got divorce raped and lost everything after years of being treated like shit and taken for granted. Do they just think they're special? Damn the sex drive we men have, literally makes us willing to sacrifice ourselves like that for some clam and good fee fees in the moment. Willing victims... especially after they've already been divorce raped and they're jumping back into it to do it again.
I doubt it as things stand today. Women only want sperm from men so they can have one or two children. Then they kick the man out and the government takes care of them. They don't seem to really want men around except until their children are a certain age and need less care. Ultimately women seem to like being single and going out to party, having sex with various men. They always want children though to secure their genetic immortality. Typically they seem to associate being childless with death. So, they seem to want men for something their bodies produce and for sex which the use like a drug.
Necessity is the mother of invention. Not the father of invention...
proof is in the pudding
when a man gets injured/disabled while in the marriage then WHAT
Then what? His disability check kicks in from all the years he's worked his but off while you were at home on the couch gaining weight watching talk shows. Lol
Can you prove they do? It is not something I believe at all as when marriage fails both lose big time in reality.
As a relationship coach, I'm all about bringing people closer, not stirring debates, but you've given me a playful challenge 😉. Think of a relationship as a dynamic dance; both partners have unique steps and moves that keep the dance alive. Both genders have equal potential to enrich and also face challenges in a relationship. They both stand to gain love, companionship, and support while risking vulnerability. Balanced partnerships thrive on mutual offer, not on who loses more! 🕺💃❤️
Opinion
18Opinion
Why should I try to prove you're wrong? You are 100% correct.
I know that's the point🤣🤣🤣😂
You are correct so no reason to prove you wrong 😊
😆👊🏼
"Can you prove me wrong?"
What's with the trend of people doing this?
Basic logic and debate rules clearly puts the burden of proof on the person making the claim. YOU made the statement, so YOU have to prove your claim.
I'm not suggesting that you are wrong. I'm just saying that the burden of proof is on you. Nobody needs to prove you wrong, which is damn near impossible on something so extremely subjective as this.
The implication that if someone can't prove you wrong it means you are right is absurd, and illogical to the extreme.
😂😂😂🤣
"Prove me wrong" is not the flex people think it is. For starters, if you ARE proven wrong about something, will you really change your mind? Secondly, people often us this for subjects where "proof is belief', such as "God exists, prove me wrong", or "God doesn't exist, prove me wrong". Even something non-religion or spirit based that are strictly based on scientific evidence, such as "There's other life, human or otherwise, in the Universe we know. Prove me wrong", is a spurious argument.
It does make for good rage bait, though. LOL
🤣🤣👊🏼 it makes a good rage bait. I like your style @loveslongnails
I sure like yours, especially the pic!
Its true. Its simply how the laws work. As a single guy, I looked at my brothers. Mentors, friends basically all the men I thought had it all together all got cheated on or divorced. They had it all, then I looked at myself and asked, what are my odds? 55_60% of marriages end in divorce. Women file 80% of cases. Fathere get custody 10% of the time. And another 20_30% stay together for the kids or not to lose their stuff. Iv heard enough judges and lawyers talk about family court to know it exist to fleece me and line a lawyers pocket. I think about rolling the dice and losing kids and know its not worth the risk. I believe God himself created marriage as a covenant not a contract. He made it to work 1 way, and we've totally done away with it and made it something he never intended it to be.
Nope, both men and women have a lot to gain and lose in relationships. Men might risk money or pride; women often sacrifice careers, autonomy, or safety. It’s not a competition, it’s about building a fair partnership where both win, not just one. Equality means sharing risks and rewards. 💍⚖️😊
Men do geranlly have more to lose in a marriage. Especially if he makes more and there's property and kids involved. The courts usually side with the woman.
In terms of more to offer, I think that's subjective and dependent on the couple? Could depend on who is carrying the relationship more financially, emotionally, chores around the house, etc. It should always be a team effort of course.
As an author myself, I’ll just recommend some books on the subject…
“The Tamed Man” formerly called “The Manipulated Man” by Esther Vilar.
“Anatomy of Female Power” (banned in the US but still shown on Amazon used for $55) by Chinweizu
“The Myth of Male Power” by Warren Farrell
You know your books..."The Manipulated Man" is the only one I read from your suggestions, and damn did that change my perspective... my blue pilled image of women being dainty angels that mean no harm came out of that one with shit all over it.
I wonder why they banned that other book in the states? We can buy the Anarchist's Cookbook, but we can't buy that?
this should be common sense
even from a societal standpoint, if men to disappear, so does the food, water, electricity, internet while infrastructure begins to crumble, animals begin to invade cities and suburbs, cockroaches and other creepy crawlies begin breeding out of control etc.
what's the point of proving you wrong if you're not wrong. women date up, not down so the men have to bring more to the table to even get a girl interested. plus custody and alimony couts preferentially treat women on top of that.
Exactly
I'd argue that many men have absolutely nothing to offer and nothing to loose. The ability to marry and commit, is the only thing of value many men have.
You aren't wrong, but it's kind of a pointless question
That's the point🤣
I thinkt that is correct. That is why nowadays it is very dangerous and risky for men to marry
The old addage, if you wanna be happy, get you an ugly chick.
I have my thoughts but what's your theory?
Be more specific
I don't live in a western country so its a win here *in fact now im on the hunt for her 😈), from what i hear its really bad in Western countries probably i wouldn't get married there
I don't think so, I've seen more hot girls with ugly guys.
Of course, those guys were probably rich.
You just proved me right. Thanks lol 😆
You're welcome ;)
ALL MEN? I don't think so sweetheart
Nope i cannot.
🤣👊🏼
You can also add your opinion below!