If you could take a test that would identify your soulmate despite being in a relationship with someone else would you take it?

[Simslover92]

Yes I would

No I would not

A total of 48 votes were cast: 16 girls and 32 guys. See detailed results

[Abbycado]

Nope. I’ve very happy with the person I’m with and don’t believe there is a better match out there.

[Simslover92]

That's good. I don't think I would either. I think I found my person.

[Abbycado]

Yeah, I agree. If something or someone pointed to a guy and said he has everything you want, I’d say already have that. Why have to retrain? XD

[Simslover92]

Right. Very true. XD

[Abbycado]

Ty for mho!

[Simslover92]

You're welcome!

[7Phoenix7]

Id take the test 👀lol… my curiosity would kill me otherwise

[Simslover92]

Lol understandable. I'd be tempted too but I think if I already had my person I wouldn't want to do that to them.

[7Phoenix7]

And that makes total sense…

I wouldn’t take it either especially if I already found my person… but you know my situation 😭

[7Phoenix7]

I’d probably have him take the test too…

And have his soulmate come and pick him up 😂🤣

[Simslover92]

Lol.

[AI Opinion]

I’m here on GAG to decode love, crushes, and all the messy in‑betweens for you ❤️

I wouldn’t take it. That “soulmate test” would become a permanent red flag in my head and sabotage my current relationship. Real love is built, not magically assigned. If I’m committed, I’d rather pour energy into my partner than daydream about some hypothetical upgrade.

[ohsheeT]

No I dont think I would that wouldn't be fair to the person that I was with at that moment

And in a way it would be telling me that i'm not all the way into that relationship , and it's telling me that I would be thinking. The grass might be greener on the other side. Yeah, I don't think I would do it. If it was meant to be is meant to be what happened, but I'm not going to be selfish and just because of something I want Or think I should have

Because the person that I would be within that moment would be the person that I would think that I was supposed to be with, because\nI'm i'm with her

And i would be setting myself up for failure

[AviatorTom]

No, because there is no such thing as a soulmate. There are many individuals that one can have a happy life with, not just that one soulmate that some wait for.

[MontBlanc]

No, I wouldn’t.

Being in a relationship is about commitment, trust, and presence.

Taking a test like that would only create doubt and distraction.

True connection is built through effort, understanding, and mutual growth not a hypothetical result.

[madhatters4]

i would not. i think the knowledge that someone who is your "soulmate" is out there would be hard to ignore, especially whenever you had issues or tough times with your partner. in the back of your mind you'd sort of be thinking 'why am i dealing with x, y, z with a person who isn't even my soulmate'

relationships are tough, tough enough without sort of having a clearer picture of wear the grass may be greener

[realbiggrin]

Because if there was such a thing as a soul mate what could be better than to have that kind of natural love for someone and to recieve that from someone. Undyeing loyalty and connection is worth checking out, because if your curious, you're obviously not there with who you're with now.

[ElenaSeluna]

If I’m in a relationship, I wouldn’t take it because it wouldn’t be fair to my partner. I’m with the person I love and want, and that’s enough for me. And if I’m single, I probably wouldn’t take it either, unless I didn’t know I was taking it, because I’d end up overthinking and biasing myself. 😄

[spartan55]

You should really try to get this soulmate myth out of your head.

[Simslover92]

I don't believe in soulmates

[spartan55]

Really? My bad, I thought you were a believer.

[Simslover92]

No I did before my breakup then I realized fate, soulmates, twin flames is all bs.

[spartan55]

Twin flames? Should I even ask?

[Simslover92]

It's like soulmates but a bit different. Still bs though

[Iyaelsorai]

It might cause havoc, but I would definitely do it. That's something divine, and I'd be curious about exploring that aspect of me/the cosmos/God, whether or not I'd actually end up dumping the girlfriend I'd be with for her.

[CupcakeTheDestroyer]

I’d take it for the hell of it, not really expecting anything. I wouldn’t want a romantic soulmate and I would hope that the results come back saying I don’t have one like that

[BadApple69]

No I wouldn’t. I don’t care. We can learn to love almost anyone (within reason). Don’t need a “soulmate” don’t even believe in them.

[Tarifa]

I have both, a partner I've been with for 20+ years, and a soulmate who understands me perfectly. So I don't think I need any test.

[LC75LC71]

I wouldn't take the test regardless. Mrs. non guy mho voter!

[Simslover92]

They had the best answers. I didn't choose them because they are females.

[LC75LC71]

Most of them aren't :P

[NathanDavis]

you know I don't like spoilers... lol

[Nikki1989]

Nah, I have my soulmate and many other friends. I don't need any more in my life.

[MrChinaski]

The world is awash with potential soulmates.

[dudeinohio]

No. This could cause emotional stress. It's best not to know.

[Anonymous]

Relationship is about chosing someone. It’s a discipline from your side

[AgentG111]

Test? Based on what information or algorithm?

[Beckybooboo]

I wouldn't take it.

[DonaldDarko]

I don't want a soul mate.

[MrChinaski]

Really? Like, no dating, no courting, no dressing fancy or practicing interesting topics to discuss, zero effort... literally someone knocks on your door and says 'Hi, I'm your soulmate' and you're a hard pass?

[DonaldDarko]

@MrChinaski Yeah because of how it all actually works. I've got Schopenhauer's views on women and dating. There have always been monks and such people who want to know if something more is out there.

[Likes2drive]

Sure, I would be curious

[Paige2006]

I would investigate

[fish5505_87]

I need to see her results as well.