Should men protect their wife while no fault divorce is a thing?

[Mark_Est]

Rather simple concept.

If men have to be ready to die for the wife, why should the wife opt out of the marriage for no good reason?

One can argue that wives have childbirth risks, but then again, they are legally free to kill their child, no matter what the man wants. So they never have to have the childbirth.

So should the men be free to choose their own life also and opt out of protection duty?

[DragonDan444]

Good men and good women should pick good partners. Honestly, at the end of the day. It’s better for a wife to leave her husband. Then make him miserable staying because there’s incentives or consequences. Trust me. These women deal with it later down the road.

[Mark_Est]

Nobody marries somebody they think is shit.

But marriage outcomes and who file them show a clear pattern

[LazerBean]

A good man will protect his wife, and good woman will not divorce her husband without good reason.

Men are not legally obligated to protect their wife, and women are not the only ones legally allowed to divorce.

So your comparison doesn't work.

[Mark_Est]

Not talking about legally. Socially and social pressure.

Then why is there a push and need for no fault divorce. While women do expect the duty of protection from men.

Men didn't push for it

[Mark_Est]

And why would a man risk his life for a woman who might just leave him one day? A man can't take his sacrifice back. When no fault divorce is a thing no good man should die for his wife.

[midnightmoon05]

It can be vs. At the end… the children are the victims. Adults? Need to grow up… socially or legally…
Raise the kids responsibly.

[Mark_Est]

So if children are the victims and the ultimate goal is the wellbeing of kids, then it reasons that divorce/seperation should be illegal until thr youngest child turns 18.

[midnightmoon05]

I don’t make the rules.
I am a victim of a no fault divorce. I have learned from it and our kids are doing very well because I don’t buy into the nonsense. Kids first.

[LazerBean]

Social pressure is just someone's opinion, therefore it's irrelevant to legal matters. A man can no fault divorce too, like I said, therefore the comparison doesn't work.

[TonyMetal___1986]

After reading some comments, i just wanna say what i believe in...

Divorce is a sin!
You can only divorce if there's a cheating...

Now if there's physical or emotional abuse which cannot be treated or the person who's doing it doesn't wanna change or receice help than a divorce can happen...

Other stuff, nope!

Marriage is a sacred bond to me, when you're married, you're married forever!

Today's most marriages are just a silly game where you can hit the reset button anytime 😏

[NathanDavis]

if you see marriage and relationships as divorce...

then you're inadequate for both... to be with a woman, and in a marriage

[Mark_Est]

That is some room temp IQ response dude. Some beta wishful thinking vs what is reality and how men should look at modern marriage and stats around it.

[NathanDavis]

okay Andrew Tate...

[midnightmoon05]

You already have your own answers.

no kids… don’t care.
kids? You know my answer

[Mark_Est]

So if the woman has no kids with the man but leaves the marriage in no fault divorce the woman should face the same social stigma as a man who lets the woman die?

As it is his social duty, currently.

[slatyb]

If she wants to leave the marriage, there's a good reason. It doesn't have to be a crime.

[Mark_Est]

You really dont get what a no fault divorce is

[slatyb]

Yes, I do. You really don't get that women are people too, not things you can own.

[Mark_Est]

You said there was a good reason, no fault literaly means for no good reason.

And you want women to have no duties. Fine. So men should have no duties to women either. Yet societally it is always expected from men.