Let's also assume that he is all-powerful.
If that's the case, is he just sadistic?
If the world of man was full of sin, but animals are just animals, why didn't he just snap his fingers like Thanos and delete those he wanted to kill with the flood, rather than putting innocent animals through torture, suffering, and death?
If Pharaoh had to be convinced to let the slaves go, why didn't God go speak to him? After all, Ramses believed in other Gods and had no reason to believe in Yahweh. Wouldn't that make more sense than killing children? Why not kill Ramses instead of his son?
If God is all-power and all-knowing, why did he need to test Abraham? Surely he already knew how Abraham would behave.
Why did the tree of knowledge exist at all and why did God allow Satan to exist within Eden? Isn't that sort of like leaving two children in a sweet shop with a paedophile?
I'm sure some of you have seen my religious questions/viewpoints before and may believe that these are "troll" questions, but I'm genuinely curious about the answers to them.
#Cammysquestions #BakedHaggis #Religion
Most Helpful Opinions
3.3rd question, Jesus was tortured and died on the cross.
4. The Pharaoh didn't believe Yahweh was God. He would have just heard his own False God and not the God of Moses.
5. No^^^^ and it was the 1st born of Egypt including adults and animals. the Pharaohs own 1st born military died. The Pharaoh put the last plague upon himself.
6. Was Ramses not the one who was Pharaoh? Why didn't God Just kill all the evil in an instant. Why doesn't God just live your life for you? It's called freedom. Satan is the one who wants to give everything you want. What you want is for God to act like Satan, the great deceiver.
7. Abraham didn't know? Abraham was being tested. Its also an example to show future generations. What's the point if God knows, when no one else does?
8. They were told not to go to the tree of knowledge. They were being tested. this explains it...
Skeptics claim that God set up Adam and eve to fail by giving them a test that was either too difficult or deceptive. However, the Bible makes it clear that God gave Adam and Eve all they needed - with lots of different trees from which to eat fruit. It is clear that Eve knew she should not eat from the one tree in the middle of the garden that she was instructed to avoid. Instead of believing God and trusting Him, after all He had done for them, Eve chose to believe the lies of Satan (in snake form), and believed that God was lying to her. She ate the forbidden fruit and convinced her husband to do the same, resulting in their loss of innocence and a broken relationship with God and each other. Yes, they now had knowledge of good and evil, but it wasn't quite as originally advertised by the snake. We still have the same choice as Adam and Eve. We can gain the knowledge of evil by directly participating in it or we can believe God and avoid the things He has said are bad for us.
I think you misunderstood what I was asking... again
No sir I did not for it is you who are not understanding.
11 And he said unto them, Unto you it is given to know the mystery of the kingdom of God: but unto them that are without, all these things are done in parables:
12 That seeing they may see, and not perceive; and hearing they may hear, and not understand; lest at any time they should be converted, and their sins should be forgiven them.
13 And he said unto them, Know ye not this parable? and how then will ye know all parables?
14 The sower soweth the word.
15 And these are they by the way side, where the word is sown; but when they have heard, Satan cometh immediately, and taketh away the word that was sown in their hearts.
16 And these are they likewise which are sown on stony ground; who, when they have heard the word, immediately receive it with gladness;
Go read the Book of Steve. Thank me later!
If you didn't understand then why comment or why not ask for clarification?
You are in such a strong denial. No matter what anyone says, you just dont understand.
So provide evidence to refute my position. Saying im in denial isn't an argument.
I already have
Oh sorry, I thought this was on one of our other discussions! I thought this was the Hinduism one and you were saying I was in denial over that. My mistake!