Why was Epicurus so primitive and super dis-honest?

[strateguy632]

1, So a famous philosopher Epicurus came up with a challenge (around 200 b. c. before christ,) to a happy god, but he left out a possibility , that he should have known , even back then!

2, Modern atheists pathetically use a fancy "flow chart" to pretend they are logical or smart, but is actually the deception of "shaping" the readers thought, along " lines" like brainwash instead of actually thinking...

So look, by epicurus (who believed in some god, not atheist, as preserved in wikipedia and jewish religious law books, as a form of idol worship (...

As a Christian i choose A, god opposed evil. I reject "unable". If so, yes omnipotence... if so able, again A, and reject b "without desire" because god opposed evil and harm, and knows we suffer and even cares and love...

therefore if god WANTS to prevent harm, and can... why not prevent... there is a REASON to allow humans to CHOOSE, now this idea was around for hundreds of years, by then, since book deuteronomy was written around 700 b. c. (some say earlier) 500 years before him, so why was Epicurus so primitive and super dis-honest?

[Pohjolan]

Choice wouldn't explain for a example AEC disease.

Moreover you shouldn't judge atheists too much.

The difference between them and you is that you disbelieve just one god less.

[strateguy632]

wow! who told you to write such silliness? READ the question it is about EVIL. "Moreover " i did not ridicule atheists here... but look how judgmental athiests are! if judge is bad then atheists are hypcrits too.
your joke is silly because even the name is opposite "atheist" not just a small difference as you lie but a-theism.

[Pohjolan]

You wrote about harm.
Or tell me what's the benefit of humans choking on their own puke?
Or what the point of crippling pain?
Less would be enough.