Search Results: sexual positions

I think he's a bitch for not standing for trial. If you stand up to support the US constitution you should have the balls to face trial. He also shouldn't have released technical documents that aided the enemy. If he would have simply said I personally know these people are violating the US constitution with illegal surveillance he would have been cleared of any charges by a court of law. By just releasing aid to the enemy he in no way supported his country or the US constitution. This manner of hiding while you throw shit is why no one seems to honor the oath they took. In the US military it is not only acceptable but required by oath to deny an order from a superior officer who is using his position to sexually assault women in uniform. This unclear understanding of the oath they took is why sexual assault is so rampant in the military. The oath I took when I was 12 I still live by today. On my honor, I will do my best to do my duty to God and my country, to help other people at all times, and to keep myself physically strong, mentally awake, and morally straight. I think I forgot a part in the middle. Comment below if you remember yours.

One of the most amazing things about the recent conflict concerning Brett Kavanaugh is that those opposed to him act as if his supporters have a conscious desire to support sexual predators. Is the opposition really blinded to the possibility that his supporters believe in his innocence. Did they, as a matter of strategy, decide to accuse supporters of being sexual assault fans because they thought they could "shame" supporters into backing away from their positions. It was so ridiculously over the top!

I heard one recording in which a group of women were chanting "Listen to me, listen to me." Perhaps that holds a clue to the venomous attacks that were launched against supporters. Is it possible that Kavanaugh opponents were primarily sexual assault victims and they were using this experiencing to relive what had earlier happened to them? Of course, if a woman has a history of having been sexually assaulted, that does not mean that every allegation she hears about someone else should be believed. . . but that is a logical analysis; what I observed was not a logical response.

If the rationale is "this happened to me, so I am entitled to respond in the strongest, most emotional, most illogical manner," I can live with that. . . but I will learn to stop listening to any protest from victims' groups.

What a sad occasion for this great nation!