Search Results: controlling men

Hear me out.

We should have one ruling body at the Federal Level, and it should be the Senate. There should be no President and no Supreme Court. The body which writes the law should interpret and enforce the law. duh. they are the ones who know what it means, since they wrote it.

Every 4 years, we waste billions and billions of dollars on campaign spending for President, and we have stupid Supreme Court rulings such as the courts saying the Senate couldn't ban abortion by Constitutional Amendment with the Roe vs Wade ruling, which was itself Unconstitutional.

I'm 42 years old, and ever president in my lifetime has been an unqualified LOSER. It's time we completely abolish the office of President.

Some laws which should be fundamental in a proposed new constitution:

1) All provably false religions are banned. You can be a Deist, but you cannot be a Polytheist nor worship a man-god.

2) Abolish the Double Jeopardy clause from the constitution. If new evidence or a later admission shows you committed a crime after you were falsely aquitted, you should go back on trial and go to prison or be executed as your crime deserves. (O. J. Simpson et al).

3) A federal law requiring both State, Local, and Federal budgets to be balanced regardless of circumstances. If they fail to balance the budget they must immediately raise taxes to balance the budget.

4) A federal law limiting military spending to 2 percent of GDP unless engaged in a fully declared war.

4b) A Federal law making it illegal to declare an offensive war without some benchmark of a degree of risk, such as having already been attacked on homeland, but limiting counter attacks to those nations and terrorist organizations directly responsible. This would have prevented the Iraq and Afghan wars, and would pretty much require that we declare war on Saudi Arabia and Pakistan instead, if any war should have happened at all.

5) A Federal Law giving control of Energy Infrastructure to Congress.

I’m not a simp. I was a genuine “nice guy” to women when I was younger but I got brutalized for it one too many times. I grew much more callous over the years and developed a radar for bs.

I also had a few controlling women feel confident that I would their “whipped” man. However to their surprise I proved them wrong pretty quickly and got out it fast.

Anyway if I determine if a woman has no respect for me I will cut off all association with them and never turn back. I might cut her some slack in the beginning and take a while to get to that decision. But once I make my decision I will stick with it. I will never understand women like a Don Juan but I can figure it out quickly nowadays if they respect me or not. I rather be a loner than a chump. I rather be by myself and still have self respect.

But I have a deep devil’s advocate question here. I have a few friends and family members who tolerate more abuse from their wives than they should. But they still have their marriages, companionship and sex.

Can it be worth it for some guys to be trapped in this situation given they still have a woman? I expect a resounding no response (and that’s my response as well). But it could it be the lesser of two evils?