Search Results: people lie

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-sc-crowd-50-000-230550142.html
Trump in SC: Tens of thousands pack Pickens. More than 50 treated for heat-related illness

Former President Donald Trump didn't have to do much convincing to impress a hometown crowd of mostly Trump supporters in Pickens Saturday.

Nearly 75 percent of Pickens County voters selected Trump over current President Joe Biden in 2020.

"I love it," Kenny Stoll, a self-described blue-collar iron worker from Summerville, S. C., said of Trump's remarks. "I don't think he lies to the people. He's true to his word and he don't back down. He fights for what's right."

Trump headlined the Pickens Independence Day Spectacular, and supporters came as early as Friday to Pickens in hopes of being among the first on Saturday to see the former president, who is leading in the polls among GOP presidential candidates.

Supporters traveled from as far away as Texas, Oklahoma, Nebraska, Indiana and Florida to attend the rally.

Trump spoke for nearly an hour and a half, and people began leaving before he finished due to the extreme heat.

More than 50 people treated for heat-related illness

Whenever the subject of climate change arises, invariable young people will say that scientists must be trusted. Unfortunately, scientists sometimes lie. Maybe they are lazy and simply fabricate research "results;" maybe they have some unspoken pressures to produce certain results; or maybe they simply have a personal bias that they want to support with "research" results.

Research studies are published in journals that are read by other researchers in the field, and others rely on the published research when they design and analyze their own research. Errors or lies in one study can be perpetuated and infect subsequent research, so the validity of data should always be open to scrutiny instead of the question being shouted down.

Here's a current example of apparently completely fabricated research. . . AT HARVARD UNVERSITY!

https://www.foxnews.com/media/leading-scholar-harvard-accused-fabricating-findings-famous-study-honesty-report

So, do you think research should be blindly accepted or should it be carefully scrutinized and examined for bias or intentional error?

From movies and tv shows all saying that men are trash, that only care about sex, buffoons that need a woman's intuition to guide them to outright sexist laws that punish men. A good example of misandry in society is Amber Heard and Johnny Depp scenario. Amber heard just had to say Depp abused her and inflict a minor bruise to her face in order for people to believe her. Society then turned on Depp and he got cancelled just from word of mouth. It took video/audio evidence + women coming forward to defend him to sway public opinion.

In other instances of harm against women (e. g. rape) even if the guy is proven innocent later, people don't care and will continue to view said male as a rapist. Example, Columbian student, Emma Sulkowicz, accused her friends with benefits of raping her. He was quickly deemed a rapist by his university and kicked out, just base on her word alone. After being found innocent, he received no compensation and was just told to move on with his life; while still being viewed as a rapist by those unaware of the final outcome of the case. Ugly to average men also have their rights infringe upon by just EXISTING. Benjamin Reeves, former CEO of peak industry was accused by a model, Simone Holtznagel of stalking her. He was dragged to court and they needed video evidence to show that everything Simone said was a blatant lie and did not happen.

We also often feminist show blatant misandry both online and in person. Feminist will rejoice and gain pleasure in seeing men suffer, discriminated against or even rejoice at hearing about men dying. There was even a peak point in society, where feminist were actively posting themselves with mugs, that read "male tears" when it comes to male suicides. And no one called them out on it, and it was allowed to trend.