Search Results: losing her

I am 31 years old. I have held 25 jobs since the age of 15. I have been hospitalized in a psych hospital more than 20 times. In my late teens/early 20s, I became obsessed with finding another virgin to lose my virginity to. I lost my virginity at age 20 to a 16 year old young woman, and later I was arrested and convicted of stalking after trying to desperately and pathetically win her love. I ended up losing my EMT license after the entire ordeal. Then I went into software engineering and because I became desperate after trying to find a woman without a romantic past (after realizing being a woman's first love was more important than taking her virginity), I managed to get myself into an even more troublesome situation. I ended up getting kicked out of the software engineering community and being blacklisted all around town.

I finally managed to find the love of my life, and we are now married. We are each other's first real relationship. I regret all my stupidity from the past, but how as it stands, I am 31 years old and barely leave the house. Now I just collect disability.

Trump bought a Football team and it failed. Trump tried to run an airline and it failed. Trump had a real estate course and it failed. Trump had Casinos and failed. His Meme failed. If he just invested his inheritance in stocks , what would he be worth today? He has profited from being President , going from $2 to $3 Billion (estimated) to being worth $8 Billion now. I will give answer later.

Yep, I knew 4.4% was a big lie. I actually don't have my head up my butt. I can see what is happening. I don't wish numbers , I react to bad numbers. Inflation up as well. People losing jobs are not able to replace those jobs. Wait until next month when job numbers are split in half.

🥃 Charlie Kirk debated with Oxford Union on May 13th, 2025 where he argued that what he called a “hyper-feminine” or “hyper-feminized” society would be weak and unsustainable 🥃

May 13, 2025, within the storied chamber of the Oxford Union, a pointed exchange on culture, strength, and the future of Western society unfolded as Charlie Kirk presented his case against what he described as a “hyper-feminized” social order. Framed as a warning drawn from history rather than mere rhetoric, the argument contended that civilizations endure when resilience, duty, and balance between complementary virtues are preserved. Admirers saw a defense of tradition and stability; critics viewed it as an oversimplification of complex social change. Like many debates staged beneath Oxford’s vaulted ceilings, the moment became less about a single speaker and more about a widening divide over how modern societies define strength, responsibility, and the path forward.

Charlie Kirk proves a hyper feminine society is always a losing option at Oxford - https://youtu.be/U6IoyvIGU3Y?si=9Npk9UR0cdTlGkN3

Patriarchy News Facebook Page - www.facebook.com/.../?mibextid=wwXIfr