Search Results: new order

https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-paula-white-cain-faith-office-husband-b2738449.html

The leader of President Donald Trump’s White House Faith Office said Wednesday that she willingly “submits” to her husband, whom she dubbed the “head” of her household.

“God has an order,” Paula White-Cain told right-wing media outlet Real America’s Voice as she described her vision of the divinely dictated relationship between men and women.

“If there’s ever a time that a decision has to be made and we don’t agree on something, he’s the head,” she added, going on to say it’s “not hard to submit” to her husband.

yeahhhh... oh and apparently we now have a 'faith office' in the White House. so much for the separation between church and state huh?

https://www.fox61.com/article/news/nation-world/federal-police-misconduct-database-no-longer-active/

The database included information of current and former federal law enforcement officers with records relating to: criminal convictions, suspensions, terminations related to misconduct, civil judgements, resignations or retirements while under investigation for serious misconduct, sustained complaints or records of disciplinary actions, and commendation and awards.

The executive order also directed the U. S. Attorney General to publish a report with this collected data at least once a year.

The White House sent a statement to the Washington Post, defending the change and calling the database “full of woke, anti-police concepts that make communities less safe like a call for ‘equitable’ policing and addressing ‘systemic racism in our criminal justice system.’”

The now rescinded executive order banned chokeholds and carotid restraints, provided “clear guidance for use-of-force standards,” developed “anti-bias” training and guidance, restricted no-knock entries, supported “officer wellness,” strengthened recruitment and hiring, and shared federal best practices with other law enforcement agencies.

Donald Trump shut down the nation's first database tracking federal police officer misconduct, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics.

The National Law Enforcement Accountability Database was originally proposed by Trump in 2020 amid the killing of George Floyd, but didn’t actually launch until former President Joe Biden signed an executive order two years later, according to the Washington Post who first reported this story.

The EO aimed to “commit to new practices in law enforcement recruitment, hiring, promotion, and retention, as well as training, oversight, and accountability,” according to the DOJ Statistics.

The site now reads "EO #14074 was revoked by Trump. As a result, the National Law Enforcement Accountability Database is no longer active.”

Judge to launch proceedings to decide if Trump administration defied court order - www.washingtonpost.com/.../

If Judge Boasberg is trying to hold Trump in contempt for enforcing immigration law—even after the Supreme Court already ruled in Trump’s favor—then we’re entering dangerous territory. That’s not just judicial oversight. That’s judicial overreach.
It may not be called a “universal injunction,” but it functions like one: a single judge trying to override the executive branch nationwide. The Constitution doesn’t give any federal judge that kind of power. If the courts can ignore both law and precedent just to punish political opponents, we’ve already lost the balance of powers.
- Eva ❤️

I really miss my MGTOW days. it seems like we are no longer as cool as we used to be back in the 2010s. ever since they pull the plug on our subreddit back in 2021 we all been quiet.

oh well the battle might of been stolen from us but we still won the war for the fact that even though we are no longer trending we still left an impact behind...

• the vast majority of men are no longer simping
• marriage is crumbling
• most men know how apathetic relationships are today
• feminism doesn't have the credibility it used to
• authorities dont side with women like they did decades ago
• women are complaining nonstop about the above

and the list goes on. nevertheless feminism which has been around for over a century is still around whining about the same problems and creating new ones along the way. it seems like at first feminist wanted women to have the right to vote, then they wanted to have the right to work, then hate men and encourage women to reject being mothers and housewive, then #metoo came along the way and now all of the sudden 4B has arised.

it seems like feminists are forever changing their narratives and agendas in order to keep their existence going. but the more they keep going the more imaginary their problems turn out to be. so this makes me wonder is the fact that they keep changing their agendas and creating more variants of themselves a sign that they are desperate to admit they are fighting a losing battle?

A 'disaster': Gretchen Whitmer's talk on tariffs and meeting with Trump anger fellow Democrats - https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna200530

Whitmer met with Trump to discuss Michigan issues and stood by while he signed executive orders. Many Democrats are calling it a “disaster.” Does working with the other side automatically mean betrayal?

The Vances oppose abortion for religious reasons, but tends not to mix that subject with the birthrate conversation except to say that with all the new restrictions on reproductive choice, it would make sense to do more for young mothers financially.

Rather than religious belief, Musks supporters are motivated by a fear that humanity will not replace itself. They dismiss immigration as a remedy, arguing that it can weaken the culture of the receiving country.

This Musk aligned group, which embraces assisted reproduction, is most visibly identified with Malcolm & Simone Collins, a media-friendly couple with 4 children born through IVF. They favor using genetic selection to pick embryos with desirable characteristics, an approach that Christian groups typically oppose. The Collinses said they recently composed a suite of suggested executive orders and sent them to allies in the White House. They include deregulating child care businesses to bring down the cost, and loosening car seat laws, which can now require buying larger vehicles to accommodate more than two children. Another would create an award for women who have six or more children, versions of which exist in a handful of countries, including France.

An agenda that prioritizes large families makes plenty of people queasy. Groups like Population Connection worry that the tactics required to raise birthrates can verge on authoritarianism, and believe that the consequences of population loss aren’t as catastrophic as pronatalists make them out to be. And increasing numbers of young people do not want to burden the planet by having children of their own.

Nevertheless, pro-natalists want the administration to establish a commission to elevate and study the subject, as well as to infuse their priorities across the federal government. The Biden administration screened many policies and grant applications for their impact on climate change and racial equity, they point out; the same could be done for procreation.