Search Results: what's his deal

IT'S BEST TO READ EACH PAGE FROM THE BOTTOM UP AS THEY WERE EMAILS

Page One

Gmax [gmax1@ellmax. com]

4/2/2011 7:09:39 PM

I have been thinking about that...

Original Message From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail. com>

Sent: Sat Apr 02 14:25:45 2011

I want you to realize that that dog that hasn't barked is trump.. REDACTED VICTIM spent hours at my house with him,, he has never once been mentioned. police chief. etc. im 75% there

Page two:

From: J [jeevacation@gmail. com]

1/31/2019 10:47:52 PM

To: Michael Wolff

REDACTED VICTIM mara lago trump said he asked me to resign, never a member ever.. of course he knew about the girls as he asked ghislaine to stop

Page Three:

From: Michael Wolff

12/16/2015 4:26:32 PM

To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail. com]

Re: Heads up [Importance High]

I think you should let him hang himself. If he says he hasn't been on the plane or to the house, then that gives you a valuable PR and political currency. You can hang him in a way that potentially generates a positive benefit for you, or, if it really looks like he could win, you could save him, generating a debt. Of course, it is possible that, when asked, he'll say Jeffrey is a great guy and has gotten a raw deal and is a victim of political correctness, which is to be outlawed in a Trump regime.

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:52 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail. com> wrote:

if we were able to craft an answer for him, what do you think it should be?

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 8:00 PM, Michael Wolff > wrote:

I hear CNN planning to ask Trump tonight about his relationship with you--either on air or in scrum afterwards.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/05/us/politics/supreme-court-trump-tariffs.html?unlocked_article_code=1.y08.Dy9M.ZdMazry8agHP&smid=nytcore-android-share

The key question for the justices on Wednesday was whether the president exceeded his authority when he used the 1977 emergency statute. Past presidents have relied on the law to impose sanctions or embargoes on other countries, but Mr. Trump is the first to use it to impose tariffs.

The conservative majority speakers suggested the administration’s position could represent an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power to the executive branch that would be difficult for Congress to reclaim. Justice Gorsuch warned of “a one-way ratchet toward the gradual but continual accretion of power in the executive branch and away from the people’s elected representatives” in Congress.

The justices grappled with a doctrine favored by the conservative legal movement. The Supreme Court’s conservative majority repeatedly relied on the “major questions doctrine” to invalidate many of President Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s key initiatives, including his student loan forgiveness program. The doctrine says presidential initiatives with “vast economic or political significance” must be clearly authorized by Congress.

The Trump administration has proposed or issued tariffs that cover roughly a third of U. S. imports under a nonemergency provision related to national security.

If the justices were to rule against Mr. Trump, the administration says it would be forced to unwind trade deals with other countries. The government might also have to pay billions in refunds to importers.The result could lead to economic ruin akin to the Great Depression. "It’s simply implausible” that Congress had “handed the president the power to overhaul the entire tariff system and the American economy in the process, allowing him to set and reset tariffs on any and every product from any and every country, at any and all times.”