Hear me out. I know it's the reverse in terms of economics and wealth, but in terms of body and dating, they're like- too bad nice guy. The wealth of sex is not distributed.
I don't know why people don't see this connection. Many guys want sexual socialism or welfare- and when I say sexual, I mean romantic and intimate primarily. The idea one guy gets five girls and 4 guys get zero is ridiculous to them because the guys are the more socialist or at least feel they deserve subsidy or support, a level playing field.
Women are the ones that are totally fine with the unequal distribution. Women are more capitalist and want to be free of government or social interference. Her body her choice. They think such things would be wrong and repressive.
So why the f does everything flip flop when we talk about wealth and income and jobs and so on? Is love life any less important of an issue? I bet people start imagining starving children emaciated on the streets and death death death and poverty but that's more just something that happens between the brain synapses.
Both women and men in general know what it's like to be capitalist and socialist just in different key areas. Me, I'm like most people, wanting a balance to achieve good end results. Of course everyone's selfish, and they should be, because it's how we stay grounded, but let's not question each others' morality in the process of arguing. It's not a moral argument. Women are business like. Women are more business like, where relationships are concerned. They are more shark like than men in the bedroom, if men are in the board room. They are ruthless capitalists, and that's fine. So I am just against trying to one sidedly fuck with the system through politics. There is so much politicians and their voters should just stay the fuck out of. I want people to think about that- that women are ruthless capitalists and men are generally the complainers about inequality- but only as far as the bedroom is concerned.