Why Sydney's Jean ad is causing uproar

One of my favorite movies is Idiocracy. And its laden with "eugenics". It portrays IQ as genetic. Which is wrong. But at least its a parody.

The best studies that IQ (not a real metric for intelligence) is genetically attained shows children less so and teens more so. Why? Because PARENTING. Reading to children, having sit down dinners, involved in schooling increases likelihood of IQ being higher. Which parents do that? Smart ones.

https://tinyurl.com/3m4djtpm

The latest controversy is Sydneys jeans ad. I dont really care about adverts for jeans. But the constant mistake of eugenics never dies.

While hair color and weight, and some other traits have genetic influence, it pales in comparison to UPBRINGING and teaching health to kids. So much so upbringing can counteract genetics. Sydney isn't even blond, by the way. And prob with cosmetic surgery. Al celebs do.

Genotypes can pass on traits similar to other families. Recent studies show more connection of uncles and aunts rather than parents.

https://tinyurl.com/39htz86w

Alleles are Heterozygous genes that have a probability of passing on certain traits. But as far as we know, its still a crap shoot. There are NO good genes.

That's why eugenics is bunk and "good genes" are inherently horrific. Its like my dollar is better than your dollar to buy a soda. Whether that soda is flat or carbonated and cold is probability.

Thats the uproar. And that people can't seem to understand this. And so much violence is still based on these beliefs.

Why Sydney's Jean ad is causing uproar
Post Opinion