Would there be less war and more peace if women ruled the world? (Page 2)

Question

Why/why not? #War #MenVsWomen #WomenWar

LogicBomber · Answer

Women are generally incapable of running societies.
There are only TWO societies in the world completely run by women and both those are still living in grass huts.
Men (as much as women like to deny it) are the reason society has advanced and survived to this point.
Yeah, there are dictators and megalomaniacs but that goes for both genders.

MayBlythe · Answer

Well seeing as there is no 'ruling' gender atm and there are already still wars I would think it would be worse cause girls just suck at that, it wouldn't be much better with men either

Amethyst5 · Answer

Nope. Women can be just as bad as men when it comes to things like this.

katthewolf · Answer

Females are still people and people will be foolish. E. g. politicians

ohshee · Answer

I Believe we are going to find that out maybe not in our time but we will start seeing more women play bigger roles in today's society. And i welcome it the good old boy system sucks. And we need change. So i welcome it

Stoner710 · Answer

Not is Hillary Clinton was a part of it. All joking aside. There would be less war but I don’t think there would be all together.

Ranjeetks96 · Answer

Women are best manager. In a family she manages each and everything so nicely. She acts as wife mother sister daughter at the same time. She deserves world's most respect. Similarly i think they would rule the world Peacefuly..

DaTruth01 · Answer

i dont think so, maybe women are more tolerant than men, however... men are decisive women are not, so while most men know what they want and go for it, women need a while to decide, so we will still have wars but different kind o wars

Sunburst223 · Answer

No. History has indicated that female leaders have been and are perfectly willing to go to war.

freakyzeaky · Answer

If all rulers were women, they would learn really fast after their nations were invaded and taken over that they will need to start protecting their interests, which naturally includes national defense and war.

Levin · Answer

Have you never been in an office? There would be about 1000 cold wars occurring simultaneously.

Minahh · Answer

Definitely, world needs more ladies in politics. Women wouldn't be like fighting between eacher, they would solve problems differently. However I think wars would be still there.

ImMackFreeze · Answer

Women usually make choices off of feelings more than men do, leading to a more sparactic irrational leader. When have you seen a man get jealous, falsely accuse, manipulate others as a woman has? I mean men do it, however women do it more.

MisterSage · Answer

Considering how feminists have been acting lately, I’d say you should keep nationwide authority AWAY from women who think they know what’s best nowadays.

azzntittiz · Answer

We'll see in a couple years, I plan to be one of the women leaders.

CandacePerry · Answer

I don't think is make a difference. I have bad experience with woman in the past. I only hang out with guy's and only on good woman.

willborp · Answer

Women would rather subdue a man than allow him another chance. A girl who rapes a man bears his child and she alone controls the baby who can do her bidding, which is to feed her more so that she may bear more children but ultimately her daughters would become just like her.

bbbbbbbb929 · Answer

Wars will end when people accept the fact that people all have different beliefs
My beliefs will be different to yours this doesn't make one supperior and the other inferior it makes us different, but thats what makes us unique

Wars will end when people stip trying to express their opinions and beliefs onto others without consent or respect the world will know peace when we elaccept each other for who we are

MlleCake · Answer

I really don't think we will have peace if one group is ruler. I think this world takes the hard work and dedication of everyone in it, and we all do better if we ALL do better.

Chaz269 · Answer

No way. Read a history book. Spain and England never missed an opportunity to invade someone with matriarchs at the helm. Egypt had plenty of conflict and human sacrifices with Queens and no kings. Greed is the root of all evil, and it is universal.

Tdieseler · Answer

Maybe not as long as men have it for... but once a month... some bitch or bitches is going to the other side.  And what makes you think women don't rule the world?

HateYourCellphone · Answer

War isn't about gender. It's about resources and land. Women are just as smart as men and just as ambitious. War and retaliation would still be a thing if not more so with women in power.

Soteris · Answer

Wars are a result of politics and geopolitics and has nothing really to do with gender. Countries would still have the same reasons to go to war with eachother.

disgustingweebtrash · Answer

Apparently throughout history from 1400 to 1900 Queens were more likely to engage in warfare compared to kings.

Robbey · Answer

Going by the example of Margaret Thatcher, Indira Ghandi, and a few other women. No, there would not be less war.

deseno · Answer

Leadership that is based on gender is bound to fail. We need to start electing leaders based on capability

Longlegs1979 · Answer

I think we have it better ones start wars are men the government ran mostly on man and ones sent people of to war are men. Cheney his company benefited from that war.

0112358 · Answer

No. Female leaders are just like male leaders. There are fewer women than men with the aggressive drive and desire to rule a country but picking from those women wouldn’t need make much difference.

Lightspeed-Lemon · Answer

There'd be less organized warfare but more catfights. Instead of dropping bombs on an enemy, they would drop harmful rumours, false accusations, and gossip.

shadow1332 · Answer

By speculation there would be a lot more peace. But that can't really be defined as an achievement as there has not been a year going by in about 10000 years where war was not a possibility and men were the dominant rulers during that time period.
We can talk on of a hypothetical possibility but the best way to actually see is to put women in the ruling spots

readywriter · Answer

Our world problems are not borne out of gender fears or management.. Besides if you ever meet my four sisters you would live in fear of one of those fiery women to be in-charge. Plus think of all the grudges that would be held.

SnowHearth · Answer

Nope, there would be still war, but for different reasons than the ones that exist now...

MLGbreezy · Answer

No offense to y'all females bht y'all be trippin some be going off for no reason and you females hold grugdes a lot longer then us males do seen someone walking slow in school one time and oh boy there was a girl next to me we mad i contact and she was like if this bitch dont hurry the fuck up i moved cause i didn't wann a get caught in the crossfire

FakeName123 · Answer

Ever seen girls bitch at each other? Like hell would there be no war. Anyone who says that has lived in a bubble away from any normal female behaviour.

LittleSally · Answer

I'm fairly certain the answer is 'yes'... I can't say how - because I don't see it ever happening... call me grim... but yeah...

D_Bone_Steak · Answer

"We came, we saw, he died!" - Hillary Clinton Women are no different... a war pig is still just a war pig despite their gender.

MackLoan · Answer

If women will ruin the world there wouldn't me war anymore. Just some countries not talking with each other.

Lumirayz · Answer

If women ruled the world we'd be living as slaves. Not to mention the monthly bloodbath we would have to go trough. Almost like the movie "Purge"

Bippwatt · Answer

No, it would just make the wars quieter and more savage. And surrender probably wouldn't be very prudent. No offense, ladies.

bitterguard · Answer

There will be more fights BUT these fights Would BN be more in the form of speech debates, discussions, etc The use of power in the war Would be less

WalterRadio · Answer

Nearly every advancement of civilization has been a result of the efforts of men. I don't see that changing.

Knkutz · Answer

People talk about men and women as if they're two different species, but that can't be farther from the truth. The fact is, humans will always be at war with one another

oni11 · Answer

Because at the lowest levels we are still animals and fight for territory and food and family but since we are more advanced its on a bigger scale and hide behind religion and politics

fpmsn · Answer

Tell me any powerful civilization ruled in a matriarchal convention. the answer will tell you everything

SimplyFail · Answer

I'd say no, there would be the same amount of war, just the reason behind them would be different. Maybe even the extent of how vicious the wars are, would be different too.

heavygear40k · Answer

In my opinion no. Humans gravitate to violence. Doesn't matter male or female. We're a totally fucked species. Our intelligence will one day be our downfall. There will always be hate for things that are different.

baegirlbae18 · Answer

Women or men, it doesn't matter. It depends on the person who is ruling the world

lilmissumshine · Answer

It would be more war. girls are very catty that's why I only have male friends literally

gobsmacked3 · Answer

i have no doubt America would be at War if Hilary goes in. Which debunks this to a degree.

The point is War to a large degree driven by $$$$$$$$. People in power profit through suffering. As well as using it as a means to divert from real issues. This would be the same for both men/women. For it is an inherent flaw in the human race

JudgmentDay · Answer

There would be no wars PERIOD if humans NEVER came into existence to this world! @Unit1 ?

Metaanio · Answer

When England had Queen it still was in many wars, also Russia, Netherlands, Spain etc. So yeah, there would still be as many wars.

Margillard · Answer

Women are just as greedy and power hungry as men are.

JDavid25 · Answer

Probably less war in my opinion... But peace.. Hell naw.. LOL.. They would be a women's equivalent to war..

slatyb · Answer

Probably. I'm not sure but we should find out. Angela Merkel seems to be doing a good job as the leader of the free world.

chadi3269 · Answer

There will be no wars Only a bunch of countries that dont talk to each others 😂😂 And makeups will be sold only in the black market 😂

labruja · Answer

Just ask yourself, which gender is the cause for wars? Which gender goes out to battles to fight? Just saying... not pointing any fingers 💅🏼 lol

lime_rampljuset · Answer

Would be the same or worse. Imagine reading in the history books: "Panties War", "He cheated on Me War", "Battle for the Last Make Up" Siege of (insert clothing store name here)" Lol.

worldscolide · Answer

Considering there was more war and death in the middle ages when a female monarch was in control vs a male monarch in Britain is say it's the opposite.

Rangers · Answer

No, the reason men are dominant within armies is because they're undeniably more suitable than women for war, if no men existed, women would fight instead.

maestrodematimaticas · Answer

If you look through history 99.999999% of the World's atrocities have been committed by men. Personally, i think testosterone and a world leader aren't necessarily the best mix.

Would there be less war and more peace if women ruled the world? (Page 2)

What Girls & Guys Said

We're glad to see you liked this post.