Historically, European queens waged more wars than kings. Let's also look at other prominent women leaders throughout history. Egypt's expansion under Cleopatra, Catherine the Great expanded the Russian Empire even further, and for a more contemporary example, Hillary Clinton convinced her husband to intervene in Yugoslavia threatened to go to war with Iran in 2008, pushed for bombing Libya when she was Secretary of State, and said she was willing to go to war in Syria during the 2016 election. It seems like men are more warmongering because they're in power more often, but per capita tells a different story.
There would be less war is women were the only soldiers allowed on the battlefield. As long as men are the majority of soldiers, there will be war. A society can not sustain losing too many women to war otherwise it won't be able to reproduce.
Women in leadership are just as violent as men.
You want to stop war? Ban men from joining the military, an have all female soldiers in every country.
We would have world peace overnight.
Men are more disposable than women. One man could theoretically impregnate an entire population of women. A women is limited by +/- 30 years divided by 9 months per baby.
Women are just as violent as men, if not more so. The reason we associate violence with men is that men are stronger, so when a man gets violent there is more likely to be greater injuries to either party.
Women are not more peaceful than men. Have you ever lived with a woman?
It would be different, that's for sure. Both men AND women can make good choices if they really tried. And they can also make BAD choices too. It just comes down to who we as a people put in charge. If we choose people who think towards the future and are smart, compassionate, driven, as well as many other qualities, then there would be more changes towards a better world for everyone. :)
I. Agree at the same time its all about Greed. And ego. look at trump. he to is only in it for himself and has manipulated the whole process democracy I wish at least one person wood stand up and do the right thing it's not for the world do it for your kids your children and other children all over the world I don't care if it's a man or a woman but we need somebody with a backbone I'm sure there are so many obstacles but we have to get out of the good old boy system all of our representative at least 85% but they all had their hand in the cookie jar to benefit themselves so that the man can step up to the plate and do the right thing I'll be the first one to go to woman in if I believe it she can do it I don't care what it is in this world you back your play with good people caring people you can do anything in the world
No. Throughout history there were plenty of powerful women that have ruled nations whether directly or from the shadows and for this particular example, I would like to use Catherine the Great. She was an exceptional empress, who created a dynasty for more than 300 years and she did this by conquest. The main point is that whether it's a woman or a man, human nature sometimes supersedes what's right and wrong, simply for the purpose of greed or lust for power.
All ladies here, but there's still war, probably because we made a pact with the usa, the country that tells us we need to support them in their wars.
But I think if it were ladies everywhere there won't be wars like we know them now, more like just killing the enemy instead of all those innocent people..
"just killing the enemy instead of all those innocent people.."
You are completely delusional about wars. Even if the females ruled countries their would still be casualties among the civilians unless those women are morons. Killing civilians and enemies is just much easier and effective than killing just enemies.
@TheGreatSodini wow. I'd rather put a sniper in front of the enemies room instead of bombing the whole place. Much easier , much effective? And you're calling me delusional, wow. You're talking about lives here man..
@didigo182 no they won't, come visit the Netherlands and see for yourself. 🤔 and many people here actually accept those people. They're not the enemy, terrorists are, and who brought them here? America. So in an indirect way America is the enemy 🙃🙃
@Pikachula You guys are being colonized from the inside out. Take a look how is France today. Let them enter or not, was YOUR country choice (or not maybe they ate UE toy...) Poland and Hungary closed the gates. They had ball to do that.
Oh okay "alway's America fault" lol :D you will say "i hate wite people" too? lol :P
But i honestly hope i culd be wrong. I don't want this happen never to a continent who brigs almost a utopia and now is falling to Feminist and Politically Correct.
@didigo182 you have no idea what you are talking about. Yes france has their troubles, but they always had them.
We don't have that much trouble here. I think it's good they let those people in , now they are safe. If they didn't start a war in Syria those people didn't even have to come to our countries in Europe.
And yes I do blame America (usa) and their hunger for war, let them stay in their own country , enough problems there as it seems..
@Pikachula If they "are safe now" in your (occidental, cristian country) why 'muslin 1st world countryes' like Saudi Arabia and Quatar do NOT accept them? Hun? :)
"Yes france has their troubles" lol wait until the next terrorist attack... or you forgot the kids dead in middle of street by a truck? This isn't not a normal thin even in my own country ("a no mans land").
The point it's not the Nationality or peple (many of them are decent people) the proble its the religion and they having sons like rats! USA it's neither a saint r innocent. But one thing they know how to do very well: protect their own interest/culture/frontiers.
@didigo182 it's more safe now than ever, if you did some research on terrorism in Europe you would know.. I don't know why Saudi Arabia etcetera didn't accept them, I think it's inhuman. What if this happends to you , should we just leave you there to die? Oke.
I'd rather live here than a country like the US where there are shootings, just because.. a guy gets bullied kills 10 people, guy is bored and psycho kills many and so on. And they aren't even Muslims, none of them, so what are we even talking about.
People die every day in southern America in those ''drugwars'' too. Unless thats false information, Thats more than you'll see here.
@Pikachula "more safer than ever" okay.. if you say so.. lol
The issue it's who enter there. Why you guys not accept only woman and child? Accepted instead alone, single in 'militrary age' Man. And neither Middle East Country accepted these refugees. Weird hun? Maybe occasionally Turkey or another one but the biggest flow (90%) go to Europe, a totally different continent/culture.
... You are anti-guns too right? (I already imagined that) "a guy gets bullied kills 10 people, guy is bored" - a muslim got a truck and killed 10, 20, 50 because he was bored... What is the difference? 10 people are killed on a stupid way (okay im not agree either) but in USA have over 140 million guns! Shit happen.
Yes, people die in everyhere. But it's NOT accetable a country/continent who it's NOT in a War suffer with terrorist attacks.
"What if this happends to you, should we just leave you there to die? Oke" - If i had woman + kids, i would let them there and already be happy to them been safe.
@didigo182 those women and kids were brought here too, they're here too. We accept their whole family.
Other 'refugees' such as albanians were refused they didn't get into our country , only people from Syria and some Eritrea.
These terrorists are killing people because they are sick in the head and have this hatred formed about our western society, that's their reason. Same as anders breivik that killed people that cared for people with other nationalities and religions, did you even know about that terrorist attack? The guy that killed many children on an island with his gun in Scandinavia?
Interesting. At least you guys have a "filter" do not allow 100% enter there.
If Albanians bring problems there they have to be stopped too, not only Afghans, Iraqis or Syrians.
Yes i know about the guy of Scandinavia, he is sick and was a exception, he not killed by religion. He was not trying to impose their customs and rules on another's country. It was a sad event i knoww; But we are talking about totally different circumstances.
If possible research about what happening in Sweden, "No go" Zones in Sweden and Sharia. I know maybe im wasting my time in trying to show you this, but maybe i can fix you :) lol
@Pikachula If you only put snipers to kill the enemies your enemy will just bomb the shit out of you and you have lost. So yeah, you are delusional. You either kill civilians together with enemies or lose. War is war, and nobody thinks about human lives when they fight.
About Muslims and "come visit the Netherlands" - you are being delusional here again. Your country is full of Muslims and Rotterdam is even being ruled by a Muslim. Wait a little bit and all those Arabs will be able to rape blonde White girls like yourself without getting any punishment.
@TheGreatSodini 😂 I'm not saying there are no Muslims here.. And no they won't rape me. There's a bigger chance a dutch mental guy will rape me here than a muslim. Please..
And we were talking about wars in a world ruled by women , so it might not be that the enemy will do what you say. Putin kills his enemies too by poisoning them.. did anyone drop bombs on him? USA kills people by dropping bombs, but did they drop bombs in the usa to come kill them, I don't think so.
@TheGreatSodini I'm very curious as though you've even been here, my country full of Muslims, maybe in a few cities , but still many without 👀 and most of them are practically dutch now in their ways and habits. Don't judge if you haven't seen any of it. Mentioning Rotterdam is just stupid , almost everyone in Rotterdam is foreign that's why we chose abutaleb. He's not even pro extremist or Muslims at all. He even came in the news for that 😅 he told them to behave and otherwise get back to your own damn country, he's not much better than greet wilders
Women are far more deceitful, back stabbing, and hateful than most men.
That is why when people split up, the guy just wants to be separated and have equal custody of his kids. While the woman wants to take his kids away, steal as much of his money and possessions as she can, then goes around spreading lies about him so people won't realize how terrible of a person she really is.
Still waiting for women to actually fight for men's rights in court. Especially in family law.
No, it would be a fucking disaster. They can´t even normally talk to each other in general without the influence of emotions and drama. I´d say, there must be a healthy balance.
But seriously, women are less aggressive by nature. I believe God made them that way, and yes there are exceptions (see Ronda Rousey), but GENERALLY women are less aggressive and thus less likely to start wars. They're also less likely to do daring things like discover new continents and charge into burning buildings to save people. Testosterone makes a difference.
This is just a loaded question assuming women are less violent than men. Women are no less full of malice, it’s simply a lower capacity for violence compared to men. Where a man would throw a punch a lot of women would instead start a rumor or gaslight.
No. Women still want power. As well, there are dominant women. I mean, look at Cleopatra or Joan of Arc. They weren't afraid of war and used war to gain for whatever reason they saw fit for their ideals/beliefs. The only thing, the wars would be because of different reasons perhaps.
"War is atrocity committed in the name of survival"
Humans fight wars when their survival is threatened. A scarcity of resources or threats to our safety are the 2 biggest reasons. Even the Crusades were fought for the safety of the Church.
If women ran the world, wars would still be fought because we haven't mastered how to balance our need for resources and safety so everyone has enough of both.
I would think so as naturally women are more nurturing and maternal.
I haven't even read down yet but I know there's going to be a lot of males saying basically women are in a way evil and unintelligent and shouldn't be doing anything important, to those people, shut up and grow up.
Same. And your own narrowly defined concept of what being female is is almost as insulting as your assumption of us being sexist.
I'd like to point out that women are way more ruthless than men. Men, we'll let our enemy see another day if they submit. But women? Fuck no, man. Only total ruin will do.
And that's just one thing.
Men are also more blatant and straightforward than women. We think in straight lines. Women think in curves and bends. They are far craftier and more subtle than men.
In other words, I honestly vastly prefer patriarchy or egalitarian society to a matriarchy.
@Bippwatt the worst thing is though, that she speaks out pubicly how she admittedly doesn't even care about checking but still seems to be knowing what "men are like" it's a leftist way of arguing and living. "As long as you're not on my knees you oppose me, and are the ennemy. Only speak when you say stuff that i want to hear and that i already understand"
@blondie Fair enough, you said "naturally" and "mostly" and "basically" so you're in a way much smarter than i initially thought. For most it's hard to see that. But you're young, and you have no choice but learn stuff in a long term. Nothing people teach you in youtube videos or college can be as valuable as real life. No offense
I think there might be less if both men and women ruled more equally. This is only because it would mean that the people in charge would be forced to see each other's opinions instead of being able to shrug them off and label people into groups like male and female for example. It may make for rulers that see all kinds of conflicting groups and opinions and come to a consensus instead of war
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
227Opinion
Historically, European queens waged more wars than kings. Let's also look at other prominent women leaders throughout history. Egypt's expansion under Cleopatra, Catherine the Great expanded the Russian Empire even further, and for a more contemporary example, Hillary Clinton convinced her husband to intervene in Yugoslavia threatened to go to war with Iran in 2008, pushed for bombing Libya when she was Secretary of State, and said she was willing to go to war in Syria during the 2016 election. It seems like men are more warmongering because they're in power more often, but per capita tells a different story.
There would be more war if we chose our leaders based on gender rather than their capability to run a country.
You are wise beyond your years.
There would be less war is women were the only soldiers allowed on the battlefield. As long as men are the majority of soldiers, there will be war. A society can not sustain losing too many women to war otherwise it won't be able to reproduce.
Women in leadership are just as violent as men.
You want to stop war? Ban men from joining the military, an have all female soldiers in every country.
We would have world peace overnight.
Men are more disposable than women. One man could theoretically impregnate an entire population of women. A women is limited by +/- 30 years divided by 9 months per baby.
Women are just as violent as men, if not more so. The reason we associate violence with men is that men are stronger, so when a man gets violent there is more likely to be greater injuries to either party.
Women are not more peaceful than men. Have you ever lived with a woman?
It would be different, that's for sure. Both men AND women can make good choices if they really tried. And they can also make BAD choices too. It just comes down to who we as a people put in charge. If we choose people who think towards the future and are smart, compassionate, driven, as well as many other qualities, then there would be more changes towards a better world for everyone. :)
Women's mindset would be like men today if we lived in a matriarchal world. Don't underestimate the power of mindset, upbringing and history.
So in the end there would just be as many wars tbh.
I. Agree at the same time its all about Greed. And ego. look at trump. he to is only in it for himself and has manipulated the whole process democracy I wish at least one person wood stand up and do the right thing it's not for the world do it for your kids your children and other children all over the world I don't care if it's a man or a woman but we need somebody with a backbone I'm sure there are so many obstacles but we have to get out of the good old boy system all of our representative at least 85% but they all had their hand in the cookie jar to benefit themselves so that the man can step up to the plate and do the right thing I'll be the first one to go to woman in if I believe it she can do it I don't care what it is in this world you back your play with good people caring people you can do anything in the world
No. Throughout history there were plenty of powerful women that have ruled nations whether directly or from the shadows and for this particular example, I would like to use Catherine the Great. She was an exceptional empress, who created a dynasty for more than 300 years and she did this by conquest. The main point is that whether it's a woman or a man, human nature sometimes supersedes what's right and wrong, simply for the purpose of greed or lust for power.
I doubt it. War is always based around the distribution of resources and economic power. Women being in power doesn't change or remove that incentive.
Things would go from a dick measuring contest to a tit measuring contest. Wouldn't change much.
All ladies here, but there's still war, probably because we made a pact with the usa, the country that tells us we need to support them in their wars.
But I think if it were ladies everywhere there won't be wars like we know them now, more like just killing the enemy instead of all those innocent people..
Now i can understand why Europe it's almost totally submitted to Islam. And their man are cucks and can't protect their own women.
"just killing the enemy instead of all those innocent people.."
You are completely delusional about wars. Even if the females ruled countries their would still be casualties among the civilians unless those women are morons. Killing civilians and enemies is just much easier and effective than killing just enemies.
@TheGreatSodini wow. I'd rather put a sniper in front of the enemies room instead of bombing the whole place. Much easier , much effective? And you're calling me delusional, wow. You're talking about lives here man..
@didigo182 we are not submitted to Islam at all. 😂😂
@Pikachula Less than Sweden.
Wait the 3rd born and your grandsons will wearing Hijab.
@didigo182 no they won't, come visit the Netherlands and see for yourself. 🤔 and many people here actually accept those people. They're not the enemy, terrorists are, and who brought them here? America. So in an indirect way America is the enemy 🙃🙃
@Pikachula You guys are being colonized from the inside out. Take a look how is France today. Let them enter or not, was YOUR country choice (or not maybe they ate UE toy...) Poland and Hungary closed the gates. They had ball to do that.
Oh okay "alway's America fault" lol :D you will say "i hate wite people" too? lol :P
But i honestly hope i culd be wrong. I don't want this happen never to a continent who brigs almost a utopia and now is falling to Feminist and Politically Correct.
@didigo182 you have no idea what you are talking about. Yes france has their troubles, but they always had them.
We don't have that much trouble here. I think it's good they let those people in , now they are safe. If they didn't start a war in Syria those people didn't even have to come to our countries in Europe.
And yes I do blame America (usa) and their hunger for war, let them stay in their own country , enough problems there as it seems..
@Pikachula If they "are safe now" in your (occidental, cristian country) why 'muslin 1st world countryes' like Saudi Arabia and Quatar do NOT accept them? Hun? :)
"Yes france has their troubles" lol wait until the next terrorist attack... or you forgot the kids dead in middle of street by a truck? This isn't not a normal thin even in my own country ("a no mans land").
The point it's not the Nationality or peple (many of them are decent people) the proble its the religion and they having sons like rats! USA it's neither a saint r innocent. But one thing they know how to do very well: protect their own interest/culture/frontiers.
@didigo182 it's more safe now than ever, if you did some research on terrorism in Europe you would know..
I don't know why Saudi Arabia etcetera didn't accept them, I think it's inhuman. What if this happends to you , should we just leave you there to die? Oke.
I'd rather live here than a country like the US where there are shootings, just because.. a guy gets bullied kills 10 people, guy is bored and psycho kills many and so on. And they aren't even Muslims, none of them, so what are we even talking about.
People die every day in southern America in those ''drugwars'' too. Unless thats false information, Thats more than you'll see here.
@Pikachula "more safer than ever" okay.. if you say so.. lol
The issue it's who enter there. Why you guys not accept only woman and child? Accepted instead alone, single in 'militrary age' Man. And neither Middle East Country accepted these refugees. Weird hun? Maybe occasionally Turkey or another one but the biggest flow (90%) go to Europe, a totally different continent/culture.
... You are anti-guns too right? (I already imagined that) "a guy gets bullied kills 10 people, guy is bored" - a muslim got a truck and killed 10, 20, 50 because he was bored... What is the difference? 10 people are killed on a stupid way (okay im not agree either) but in USA have over 140 million guns! Shit happen.
Yes, people die in everyhere. But it's NOT accetable a country/continent who it's NOT in a War suffer with terrorist attacks.
"What if this happends to you, should we just leave you there to die? Oke" - If i had woman + kids, i would let them there and already be happy to them been safe.
@didigo182 those women and kids were brought here too, they're here too. We accept their whole family.
Other 'refugees' such as albanians were refused they didn't get into our country , only people from Syria and some Eritrea.
These terrorists are killing people because they are sick in the head and have this hatred formed about our western society, that's their reason. Same as anders breivik that killed people that cared for people with other nationalities and religions, did you even know about that terrorist attack? The guy that killed many children on an island with his gun in Scandinavia?
Interesting. At least you guys have a "filter" do not allow 100% enter there.
If Albanians bring problems there they have to be stopped too, not only Afghans, Iraqis or Syrians.
Yes i know about the guy of Scandinavia, he is sick and was a exception, he not killed by religion. He was not trying to impose their customs and rules on another's country. It was a sad event i knoww; But we are talking about totally different circumstances.
If possible research about what happening in Sweden, "No go" Zones in Sweden and Sharia. I know maybe im wasting my time in trying to show you this, but maybe i can fix you :) lol
@didigo182 no I'm interested, I don't hear much about Sweden. They have actual no go zones? Haven't heard of that yet
@Pikachula I confess was waiting something like "haha don't waste your time" haha
I tried to send PM but not accepted, so i will send here: www.youtube.com/results
The mainstream media will deny and never will show this.
I know it's late there but when you have more time, take a look.
@Pikachula If you only put snipers to kill the enemies your enemy will just bomb the shit out of you and you have lost. So yeah, you are delusional. You either kill civilians together with enemies or lose. War is war, and nobody thinks about human lives when they fight.
About Muslims and "come visit the Netherlands" - you are being delusional here again. Your country is full of Muslims and Rotterdam is even being ruled by a Muslim. Wait a little bit and all those Arabs will be able to rape blonde White girls like yourself without getting any punishment.
@TheGreatSodini 😂 I'm not saying there are no Muslims here.. And no they won't rape me. There's a bigger chance a dutch mental guy will rape me here than a muslim. Please..
And we were talking about wars in a world ruled by women , so it might not be that the enemy will do what you say. Putin kills his enemies too by poisoning them.. did anyone drop bombs on him? USA kills people by dropping bombs, but did they drop bombs in the usa to come kill them, I don't think so.
@TheGreatSodini I'm very curious as though you've even been here, my country full of Muslims, maybe in a few cities , but still many without 👀 and most of them are practically dutch now in their ways and habits. Don't judge if you haven't seen any of it. Mentioning Rotterdam is just stupid , almost everyone in Rotterdam is foreign that's why we chose abutaleb. He's not even pro extremist or Muslims at all. He even came in the news for that 😅 he told them to behave and otherwise get back to your own damn country, he's not much better than greet wilders
@Pikachula Nice meme, those secretaries of Defence are babies
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CbRcvzcUUAAfMVC.jpg
Women are far more deceitful, back stabbing, and hateful than most men.
That is why when people split up, the guy just wants to be separated and have equal custody of his kids.
While the woman wants to take his kids away, steal as much of his money and possessions as she can, then goes around spreading lies about him so people won't realize how terrible of a person she really is.
Still waiting for women to actually fight for men's rights in court. Especially in family law.
No, it would be a fucking disaster. They can´t even normally talk to each other in general without the influence of emotions and drama.
I´d say, there must be a healthy balance.
Do you think that makes it good that Trump won? (I know basically nothing about politics by the way, so don't get into too much detail.)
Trump is better than Clinton. Even though he is an asshole. Bernie should have won
Yeah, for 25 days out of the month anyway...
But seriously, women are less aggressive by nature.
I believe God made them that way, and yes there are exceptions (see Ronda Rousey), but GENERALLY women are less aggressive and thus less likely to start wars. They're also less likely to do daring things like discover new continents and charge into burning buildings to save people. Testosterone makes a difference.
This is just a loaded question assuming women are less violent than men. Women are no less full of malice, it’s simply a lower capacity for violence compared to men. Where a man would throw a punch a lot of women would instead start a rumor or gaslight.
No. Women still want power. As well, there are dominant women. I mean, look at Cleopatra or Joan of Arc. They weren't afraid of war and used war to gain for whatever reason they saw fit for their ideals/beliefs. The only thing, the wars would be because of different reasons perhaps.
LOL no. Imagine Killary Clinton ruling the world... =))
(and no, I am not a Trump groupie, I just hate that woman!)
😂😂😂 killary.. if Trump read this he'd rtfol
Would still prefer her to run it than Trump. Just saying.
So actually it's not men or women creating wars, just the USA.
@Bippwatt Trump does not run it either, make no mistake
@Pikachula true =))
@Pikachula That's... disturbingly accurate, actually.
@damnwinter Oh, no doubt. Nobody actually runs the world. I'm just spitballing here.
@Bippwatt :D I think both our accuracy awards go to @Pikachula here!
To quote my favorite game series:
"War is atrocity committed in the name of survival"
Humans fight wars when their survival is threatened. A scarcity of resources or threats to our safety are the 2 biggest reasons. Even the Crusades were fought for the safety of the Church.
If women ran the world, wars would still be fought because we haven't mastered how to balance our need for resources and safety so everyone has enough of both.
I would think so as naturally women are more nurturing and maternal.
I haven't even read down yet but I know there's going to be a lot of males saying basically women are in a way evil and unintelligent and shouldn't be doing anything important, to those people, shut up and grow up.
Please don't assume my sexism
Same. And your own narrowly defined concept of what being female is is almost as insulting as your assumption of us being sexist.
I'd like to point out that women are way more ruthless than men. Men, we'll let our enemy see another day if they submit. But women? Fuck no, man. Only total ruin will do.
And that's just one thing.
Men are also more blatant and straightforward than women. We think in straight lines. Women think in curves and bends. They are far craftier and more subtle than men.
In other words, I honestly vastly prefer patriarchy or egalitarian society to a matriarchy.
@Bippwatt
the worst thing is though, that she speaks out pubicly how she admittedly doesn't even care about checking but still seems to be knowing what "men are like" it's a leftist way of arguing and living. "As long as you're not on my knees you oppose me, and are the ennemy. Only speak when you say stuff that i want to hear and that i already understand"
@blondie
Fair enough, you said "naturally" and "mostly" and "basically" so you're in a way much smarter than i initially thought. For most it's hard to see that. But you're young, and you have no choice but learn stuff in a long term. Nothing people teach you in youtube videos or college can be as valuable as real life. No offense
I think there might be less if both men and women ruled more equally. This is only because it would mean that the people in charge would be forced to see each other's opinions instead of being able to shrug them off and label people into groups like male and female for example. It may make for rulers that see all kinds of conflicting groups and opinions and come to a consensus instead of war
I doubt it, because the women who got into the position of power had to fight hard for it, and they rarely resemble Mother Teresa.
Women would allow their emotions to influence their decisions, and cause a lot of problems. I don’t think this is the smartest idea😂