Would there be less war and more peace if women ruled the world? (Page 3)

[bobbywiz79]

Women are human with the same ability to make bad decisions, just like men. Good leaders aren't good leaders because of their gender. They're good leaders because of their character.

[JaySmi]

Honestly, it just needs to be run by the best. If it happens to be a woman so be it, if it's a man so be it.
Sex, just like race, has no room to even be a factor in who rules.

[didigo182]

No.
"To have peace be prepared for war".

Sweden a Feminist paradise got screwed by their politically correct. And they will be dominated by Muslins and Islam.

Thaks to SJW, Women and the good man let this happen.

[BankruptBoy]

No offense, hostilities would probably occur more often purely as a result of emotional reactions.

[ktdec]

The women who choose to be in power or who are elected in power wouldn’t be the emotional ones. Think about it. It’s the same as how the emotional men aren’t in power (except trump in America)

[BankruptBoy]

Those women would be harder to find, in my opinion. Trump isn't close to being emotional either, he's more of a troll in my opinion.

[BeHappy1985]

I'm gonna go with more war. All y'all would plot behind eachothers backs. Start getting jealous over who is prettiest of them all and bomb the hell out of eachother being forever unable of a single real and lifetime lasting alliance.

[chris1984]

humans find reasons to segregate and kill each other. that's certainly not restricted to men.

[Darkener]

Most wars were sociopolitically driven gender doesn't play into it

[samsax]

Quite difficult to answer as some time women's are unable to understand the situations and do wt they want

[Kranjec]

Ever seen girl groups? They get all sinister and vile with each other. It's even been proven that women in companies lower productivity.

[behnam1999]

Because the world is not in war because men are the leaders.

[TiredMonkey]

Yes definitely.

All Governments should be made from Women who have children in the front line military. Would one work if it was global.

[motownplayer2000]

Women can't get along... More emotional, and colder in heart than a man... And they are more vindictive... So as soon as there was a weakness there would be more war...

[chrisbigman]

It's hard to say because both men and women are human. And that fact alone doesn't really dictate which gender is better in power. Women can be just as adversarial as men, maybe even more so.

[chrisbigman]

The most civilized and sane people in power are the ones that would keep the world peaceful and war-less.

[SuccessfulHornDog]

Eventually some guy will get control and attack the other countries and then your house of cards falls apart overnight as aggression needs to be met ith aggression

[LegateLanius]

Honestly, I have no idea. People will still bicker and hate each other. Politics, many blood sucking creatures. History has proven that gender of a leader means nothing in terms of war.

[BoySittingOnTheMoon]

Have you not heard this Chinese female ruler? She was so savage and cruel.

[Chiral]

No, because they pretty much do already rule the world.

[GoodGuyBreakingBad]

Yes i believe so. I think Women are less likely to want war and
they tend to want more Peace.

[Gossamyr]

can't choose, because ruling the world is difficult to handle, even if you're a man or a woman. It always depends on the mindset of a ruler, how he/she controls the world's economy, military, laws and its own people.

[MecheD]

Women already rule the world from the background half the men in power move on strings

[Silent_Bob]

No. Humans are flawed creatures regardless of their sex.

[fsu19]

Countries would go to war over petty shit. We're good with the two genders in power, not just one

[SlothySlob]

No, I believe there wouldn't be much of a change... we are all very susceptible to corruption.

[dollydianne]

fuck nah lmao, power corrupts people no matter what gender. we’re never gonna get true peace 🤷🏻‍♀️

[abond008]

Because they are humans and human instinct is one. Women get jelous, envious, greedy, status junkies, they steal, they kill.

[Genbento]

LOL! That was a funny question! But seriously, no. No one can make the world. Life will always be balanced. There will be wars, break ups, sinners.

[raspberry0416]

I think there would be less violence overall. But of course women would still have to fight over resources.

[TuMeManques]

No because power know no gender.

[bibi3pu]

Yes, men only compete for women, women compete innately. A island of men will turn into a sleepover of preteens. A island of women would regress into a sleepover o preteen girls and thy are vicious

[Edanurus]

War would still happen but it would be done in a different way. I personally feel there would be more system of controls in place (authoritarian) and it would be more social war than outright combat.

[Guanfei]

Doesn't matter who rules, power corrupt everyone. And a leader is never the one going to war, he wouldn't mind sending people to die as long as it's in his interests.

[jmack1543344]

No I don't believe women would have a chance of less war. I say this not because of gender but by observation. There is just as many women hot heads as there are men. So it doesn't matter the gender just personality.

[Prof_Don]

To be honest not much would be different in terms of peace. Power corrupts all regardless of gender

[Cursewords]

There would be no one on the planet if women ruled the world 😂😂😂🤣🤣

[ninjakillerhd]

No because women already rule the world wether you believe it or not

[GetFragged]

Yes because most women aren't gunna want to fight In a war, just look at voluntary enlistment rates as is.

[ok604]

The rules of eat would be different, but as sensitive and emotional as women generally are, I think it NEEDS to be equal; checks and balances

[Kiran04]

There's not even less war in women's only social groups, what makes you think letting them run an entire country would work out well?

[Wolf113498]

No because there still would be the feuds between nation and also there would still be conflict in nations

[SleepingSnorlax]

Its human nature
doesn't matter if you have a dick or vagina
People will still cross each other and create conflict

[Jayson101]

Women have ruled whole countries and they didn't hold back on war. From Maria Theresa to Queen ELizabeth I to Catherine the Great.

[OpenWine]

the world will have wars, even if humans in general became smarter.. war is part of a highly profitable economy (at least for america etc.)

[Likes2drive]

There are some women presidents in other countries and doesn’t seem to run any different so it probably wouldn’t change if they did

[bi-mike-95]

Men always disagree with women. Men would start riots killings etc if they dont get there way :( why are guys like this I don't know

[AlexEfron]

Greed is bane. And the authoritative power leads to greed and corruption.
Can't say if it would be any better

[DanyelC]

Women are no different than men. It's just BS. They hate too. They are impulsive too, angry, violent etc.
The world today just like to play the VICTIM card.

[smølf]

See the female rules in history, just as bad as the men.

[Dzokson00]

Men rule it now, if it changed to women, we would be crawling in bunkers and nuclear shelters

[BrianMerritt]

Have you BEEN to middle school? Girls would cat-scratch the earth.

[ktdec]

I would hope middle schoolers wouldn’t be ruling anything lol

[Revanaintplayin]

Women aren't natural born leaders, its not really in their biological character

[ktdec]

On a larger scale, yeah i guess. But they are many women who are natural born leaders.. and those are the ones who would be in power 🤦‍♀️ cmon now, think. There’s only a limited amount of positions in power and there are more than enough women who have those leadership traits.

[USA1960]

If Killery had been elected, we would be at war right now.

[Fukaroo]

In my opinion it would be worse, but realistically it would probably be the same.

[HamAndCheese]

No because when the diplomatic options run out then you need some way of solving disputes.

[Whysosirius7]

Less war, more unhappiness as the countries would backstab each other because women are more emotional but less willing for physical violence

[8string]

you forget that it is human nature to slaughter each other and it has been happened since the beginning of time

[YHL6965]

Just look at feminists, their movement scream hate and war on men. I don't think this would change anything really.

[BlondieGirl_]

A feminist is someone who believes in treating woman as equals to men.

That does not include hating on men.

No ones against men. You're biologically stronger than women, and thus should be gentle with us women. Grow up.

[YHL6965]

@BlondieGirl_ Have you ever seen one of these feminist compilation videos? This is clear man hating and they are obviously not for gender equality. I'm totally for equality (well, equity to be more precise), but these psychos are not.

[PinkMichae]

Yes feminist have taken it into a man hating direction. Blaming men because they feel oppressed. The original feminist fought for equality. As a woman today I do not feel oppressed or unequal to men. But I understand each gender brings something to the table with most women doing some things better and mist men doing some things better. We are all made differently for a reason therefore will never be completely equal whether you're a man or woman.

[YHL6965]

@PinkMichae I definitely agree with you on that. We were made to complete each other, not to be equal.

[ktdec]

Many anti feminists confuse being equal in WORTH as human beings with being equal in abilities. There’s a huge DIFFERENCE.

Men and women are equal in worth but have different strengths and weaknesses. One is not inferior in worth as a human being as many anti feminists believe

[YHL6965]

@ktdec Worth is subjective, equaility should be defined with objective criterias, not subjective ones. For example, men are more worthy in physical duties than women. Worth depends on too many factors to be relevant.

[ktdec]

Nope, you are still equating worth to abilities. Worth, in this sense, just means how we are valued as human beings. 5 pennies and a nickel are worth the same amount but they are different

[YHL6965]

@ktdec I'm not sure men and women are equal in worth. In fact, most indiviaduals aren't even equal in worth. However, every individual should be given the same opportunities.

[hornymike6969]

no every guy would be in jail for some kind of sexual harassment. cause you were flirting or look at them wrong

[Pluto4prez]

No, because women with political power are just as capable of being corrupt/incompetent/idiots/assholes as their male counterparts.

[Uglyman1001]

Lol no can u imagine if one of these female leaders has her period or brakes a nail or can’t find shoes that matches her dress everyday would be a war.

[cybersamurai]

Yes. During evolution, men developed violent and competitive nature, which suited their task of hunting. While women developed coexistence, sharing and management as Gatherer.