It's not racism, its science. you can check the research, do a google search for example, the highest I. Q. in the world on average are Chinese people. The lowest I. Q. in the world on average are Africans at just 60-something, but "African Americans" only have an average I. Q. of 85, in spite of generations worth of educational programs to attempt to correct the problem.
It is genetic.
Genes matter. Learn something about the livestock industry. They selectively breed livestock because genes matter.
This is NOT racism. It is scientifically validated fact to 5th sigma evidence. It is literally a Scientific Law at this point, not just a hypothesis or theory.
The science community is well known for being racist and machist. The lack of opportunities or even education can affect to the development of cognitive skills (Poor countries). So this means my friend, you are another racist covered up for slanted researches. Good afternoon.
@AbleLearner If IQ test where based on real life skills and experiences, you would get different results. IQ is relative to you daily lives, not some random questions on things that have no possible use to you.
Put a city dweller in the woods, and no matter how city smart they are and most of them would starve to death. Because they have no nature survival skills, put simple survival in nature questions to and urban dweller and they would score pretty low.
So putting questions to someone that lives in the forest or jungle about science and other things not related to surviving in the forest or jungle. Of course that person will score low on an IQ test, not related to their life experience.
IQ test as they are written today and how they are used, are just a way of trying to say one race is genetically superior to another and it does not stand up to real life. Take a new born baby from every race country and environment, raise them in the same environment same conditions and see if the IQ test supports the bs about one race being genetically superior to another.
LOL. I am not a racist. I am dating a woman from another race. How the hell could I be a racist?
I think the Declaration of Independence is mistaken when it states that "All Men are Created Equal". I'm 100% certain that good science shows all men (and women) are in fact not created equal.
I've never been one to claim that Peer Review was perfect, it's not, but this has been Peer Reviewed by thousands of Psychologists and Psychiatrists, and African Americans score 20-something points lower on I. Q. tests than the rest of the U. S. population, and native Africans score 40-something points lower.
That's not racism. That's a scientific fact, and stating scientific facts does not make one racist or prejudicial.
I could post links to the actual test results or a scientific paper about it, but if you just use Google for 2 minutes, you could find it yourself. So I'll spare the community.
You are wrong about education being the problem. There have been generations of attempts to correct the educational shortcoming among Africans both in Africa and the U. S. and it has never even remotely solved the problem for anybody. In fact, African Americans are doing worse in High School and College right now than ever before, even though we have more technology and educational programs than ever before.
I. Q. tests are designed to test General Intelligence, by asking abstract problem solving skills, such as pattern recognition and "Working Memory". The Vocabulary test is given in your own native language, and if you are bilingual you get to choose what language to take it in, so that isn't the problem either. They are not biased by your city experience or woodsmanship experience. They don't ask you stupid shit like how to skin a deer, or what toppings to put on a pizza.
The tests are Double Controlled to make sure they are not biased in any way. They have found that education provides a 1 point per decade upward bias towards highly educated populations, for example, but they are aware of it and adjust the score for that. Compared to someone like Einstein or Newton, this bias is so small that it does not matter, with this bias it would take 1000 years before the average educated person becomes as intelligent as Albert Einstein.
Sorry, "city vs country" has been Double Controlled for centuries, and has no appreciable, measurable impact on I. Q. scores.
I don't think you know how modern Science works. The Nazi's were racist, but modern scientists are not.
In order for an "Apparent Discovery" to be considered a Formal Discovery, one must rule out all bias and error with five Sigma certainty, which means there must be less than a 1 in one million chance that the data or conclusions happened by chance, fraud, bias, measurement or theory error, or any other wrong-doing or mis-perception.
Just recently, "Dark Energy" was discovered to have FAILED the Five Sigma requirement, and was reduced to a Three Sigma result... after the Nobel Prize was incorrectly awarded to this team. the Science community did the right thing, and down-graded it, and it will probably be ultimately shown to be faulty science.
If they thought that race didn't play a role in I. Q. tests, they wouldn't publish data on race, but the data on race is basically 9-sigma certain that BOTH Native Africans and African Americans severely under-perform the rest of the world population, and every manner of control mechanism to rule out error or bias has already been tried.
They only need FIVE Sigma for it to be considered a Formal Discovery, and they have a NINE Sigma result.
Some lower primates have I. Q. in the 40 to 50 range, which is as high as a retarded human. So the fact the African Average is 60 shows that they are literally evolving into a completely different, inferior species, and I do not say that with any hateful or racist intentions to them, it's just the Scientific Fact of the matter. How many Standard Deviations difference do we need in Intelligence before you are considered a different species?
And I am NOT racist, not even towards African Americans. I have two African American women in mind who I am pretty close to at the moment, not really "friends" but acquaintances, and if they weren't already dating somebody, I'd be willing to date them. A couple months ago, I gave my number to a different African American woman and told her to text me. She did, but it didn't work out, she's too young and uneducated for my liking, but I gave her a chance nonetheless.
Sorry, you are just mistaken about your accusation of Racism on my part.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
49Opinion
America had a black president and you still talk about nationality and intelligence
We all know Americans score a significant amount lower on the IQ test than many others
such as?
Europe Asia Australasia the rest im not so sure about
Here's the American olympic math team for 2019
And that one was the American olympic math team for 2018
They buy too much into stereotypes.
I actually think in a sense it does.
I don’t believe that.
Nope, it just depends if you are a dirty stank ho.
I don't believe in that at all.
Prejudice that's what it is.
This belief is proof of lack of intelligence.
Or failure to adapt to indoctrination, as much so as yourself.
@mattdzz like I said, lack of intelligence; it's always the stupid who imagine themselves superior to others based on supposed/imaginary attributes.
Intelligence is a mix of education, values and iq
no wonder all 'muricans are stupid
Because they're not very intelligent.
Exactly. I condemn that belief as xenophobic, fundamentally flawed, and disrespectful.
I think it has more to do with the language spoken
In a word, Racism.
Yeah. To ethnicity
Racism
It's not racism, its science. you can check the research, do a google search for example, the highest I. Q. in the world on average are Chinese people. The lowest I. Q. in the world on average are Africans at just 60-something, but "African Americans" only have an average I. Q. of 85, in spite of generations worth of educational programs to attempt to correct the problem.
It is genetic.
Genes matter. Learn something about the livestock industry. They selectively breed livestock because genes matter.
This is NOT racism. It is scientifically validated fact to 5th sigma evidence. It is literally a Scientific Law at this point, not just a hypothesis or theory.
The science community is well known for being racist and machist. The lack of opportunities or even education can affect to the development of cognitive skills (Poor countries). So this means my friend, you are another racist covered up for slanted researches. Good afternoon.
@AbleLearner If IQ test where based on real life skills and experiences, you would get different results. IQ is relative to you daily lives, not some random questions on things that have no possible use to you.
Put a city dweller in the woods, and no matter how city smart they are and most of them would starve to death. Because they have no nature survival skills, put simple survival in nature questions to and urban dweller and they would score pretty low.
So putting questions to someone that lives in the forest or jungle about science and other things not related to surviving in the forest or jungle. Of course that person will score low on an IQ test, not related to their life experience.
IQ test as they are written today and how they are used, are just a way of trying to say one race is genetically superior to another and it does not stand up to real life. Take a new born baby from every race country and environment, raise them in the same environment same conditions and see if the IQ test supports the bs about one race being genetically superior to another.
Another white supremacist 😩😩😩
LOL. I am not a racist. I am dating a woman from another race. How the hell could I be a racist?
I think the Declaration of Independence is mistaken when it states that "All Men are Created Equal". I'm 100% certain that good science shows all men (and women) are in fact not created equal.
I've never been one to claim that Peer Review was perfect, it's not, but this has been Peer Reviewed by thousands of Psychologists and Psychiatrists, and African Americans score 20-something points lower on I. Q. tests than the rest of the U. S. population, and native Africans score 40-something points lower.
That's not racism. That's a scientific fact, and stating scientific facts does not make one racist or prejudicial.
I could post links to the actual test results or a scientific paper about it, but if you just use Google for 2 minutes, you could find it yourself. So I'll spare the community.
You are wrong about education being the problem. There have been generations of attempts to correct the educational shortcoming among Africans both in Africa and the U. S. and it has never even remotely solved the problem for anybody. In fact, African Americans are doing worse in High School and College right now than ever before, even though we have more technology and educational programs than ever before.
@Hal2002
I. Q. tests are designed to test General Intelligence, by asking abstract problem solving skills, such as pattern recognition and "Working Memory". The Vocabulary test is given in your own native language, and if you are bilingual you get to choose what language to take it in, so that isn't the problem either. They are not biased by your city experience or woodsmanship experience. They don't ask you stupid shit like how to skin a deer, or what toppings to put on a pizza.
The tests are Double Controlled to make sure they are not biased in any way. They have found that education provides a 1 point per decade upward bias towards highly educated populations, for example, but they are aware of it and adjust the score for that. Compared to someone like Einstein or Newton, this bias is so small that it does not matter, with this bias it would take 1000 years before the average educated person becomes as intelligent as Albert Einstein.
Sorry, "city vs country" has been Double Controlled for centuries, and has no appreciable, measurable impact on I. Q. scores.
Next objection:?
I don't think you know how modern Science works. The Nazi's were racist, but modern scientists are not.
In order for an "Apparent Discovery" to be considered a Formal Discovery, one must rule out all bias and error with five Sigma certainty, which means there must be less than a 1 in one million chance that the data or conclusions happened by chance, fraud, bias, measurement or theory error, or any other wrong-doing or mis-perception.
Just recently, "Dark Energy" was discovered to have FAILED the Five Sigma requirement, and was reduced to a Three Sigma result... after the Nobel Prize was incorrectly awarded to this team. the Science community did the right thing, and down-graded it, and it will probably be ultimately shown to be faulty science.
If they thought that race didn't play a role in I. Q. tests, they wouldn't publish data on race, but the data on race is basically 9-sigma certain that BOTH Native Africans and African Americans severely under-perform the rest of the world population, and every manner of control mechanism to rule out error or bias has already been tried.
They only need FIVE Sigma for it to be considered a Formal Discovery, and they have a NINE Sigma result.
You don't understand how bad a 60 i. q. is.
Some lower primates have I. Q. in the 40 to 50 range, which is as high as a retarded human. So the fact the African Average is 60 shows that they are literally evolving into a completely different, inferior species, and I do not say that with any hateful or racist intentions to them, it's just the Scientific Fact of the matter. How many Standard Deviations difference do we need in Intelligence before you are considered a different species?
And I am NOT racist, not even towards African Americans. I have two African American women in mind who I am pretty close to at the moment, not really "friends" but acquaintances, and if they weren't already dating somebody, I'd be willing to date them. A couple months ago, I gave my number to a different African American woman and told her to text me. She did, but it didn't work out, she's too young and uneducated for my liking, but I gave her a chance nonetheless.
Sorry, you are just mistaken about your accusation of Racism on my part.
wowww man you are racist with Africans but not with Chinese girls uh? ;)
that's stupid af
Racism